Discussion:
Interesting photo
(too old to reply)
John Corbett
2020-12-01 16:43:09 UTC
Permalink
https://allthatsinteresting.com/kennedy-assassination#26

Hadn't seen this one before. It is looking west on Elm St. toward the TSBD
and the caption indicates it shows the 1213 bus that Oswald had boarded.
It seems to show the traffic backed up with Elm St. blocked off in front
of the TSBD.
Steve Schmidt
2020-12-02 03:49:58 UTC
Permalink
Indeed, very interesting photo.

The caption on that website said that LHO was aboard, but if the bus had
passed Market Street, then Oswald had already disembarked.

Loading Image...

Anybody got a better scan of that photo?
Post by John Corbett
https://allthatsinteresting.com/kennedy-assassination#26
Hadn't seen this one before. It is looking west on Elm St. toward the TSBD
and the caption indicates it shows the 1213 bus that Oswald had boarded.
It seems to show the traffic backed up with Elm St. blocked off in front
of the TSBD.
donald willis
2020-12-02 15:24:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by Steve Schmidt
Indeed, very interesting photo.
The caption on that website said that LHO was aboard, but if the bus had
passed Market Street, then Oswald had already disembarked.
According to the debunked Revised-McWatters/Roy Milton Jones story, which
has been debunked. By yours truly....
Post by Steve Schmidt
https://www.gutenberg.org/files/58031/58031-h/images/i_p158.jpg
Anybody got a better scan of that photo?
Post by John Corbett
https://allthatsinteresting.com/kennedy-assassination#26
Hadn't seen this one before. It is looking west on Elm St. toward the TSBD
and the caption indicates it shows the 1213 bus that Oswald had boarded.
It seems to show the traffic backed up with Elm St. blocked off in front
of the TSBD.
John Corbett
2020-12-02 23:17:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by donald willis
Post by Steve Schmidt
Indeed, very interesting photo.
The caption on that website said that LHO was aboard, but if the bus had
passed Market Street, then Oswald had already disembarked.
According to the debunked Revised-McWatters/Roy Milton Jones story, which
has been debunked. By yours truly....
Like you debunked Oswald firing from the 6th floor.

<chuckle>
donald willis
2020-12-03 20:48:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by John Corbett
Post by donald willis
Post by Steve Schmidt
Indeed, very interesting photo.
The caption on that website said that LHO was aboard, but if the bus had
passed Market Street, then Oswald had already disembarked.
According to the debunked Revised-McWatters/Roy Milton Jones story, which
has been debunked. By yours truly....
Like you debunked Oswald firing from the 6th floor.
<chuckle>
You certainly helped my debunking there by flubbing Bob Jackson's
testimony re the far-west 6th-floor window. How many "explanations" did
you offer in hopes of making it go away?

dcw
John Corbett
2020-12-04 01:54:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by donald willis
Post by John Corbett
Post by donald willis
Post by Steve Schmidt
Indeed, very interesting photo.
The caption on that website said that LHO was aboard, but if the bus had
passed Market Street, then Oswald had already disembarked.
According to the debunked Revised-McWatters/Roy Milton Jones story, which
has been debunked. By yours truly....
Like you debunked Oswald firing from the 6th floor.
<chuckle>
You certainly helped my debunking there by flubbing Bob Jackson's
testimony re the far-west 6th-floor window. How many "explanations" did
you offer in hopes of making it go away?
I don't have to make anything go away. I just need to be able to weigh the
probative value of any evidence and understand that when a witness tells
us something, that witness is not necessarily right. Very often witnesses
are wrong. The way we figure out if any witness got it right is to weigh
their account against the entire body of evidence. In this case, ALL the
physical evidence tells use the shots were fired from the corner window on
the sixth floor. That outweighs anything any witness tells us.
donald willis
2020-12-04 20:49:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by John Corbett
Post by donald willis
Post by John Corbett
Post by donald willis
Post by Steve Schmidt
Indeed, very interesting photo.
The caption on that website said that LHO was aboard, but if the bus had
passed Market Street, then Oswald had already disembarked.
According to the debunked Revised-McWatters/Roy Milton Jones story, which
has been debunked. By yours truly....
Like you debunked Oswald firing from the 6th floor.
<chuckle>
You certainly helped my debunking there by flubbing Bob Jackson's
testimony re the far-west 6th-floor window. How many "explanations" did
you offer in hopes of making it go away?
I don't have to make anything go away. I just need to be able to weigh the
probative value of any evidence and understand that when a witness tells
us something, that witness is not necessarily right. Very often witnesses
are wrong. The way we figure out if any witness got it right is to weigh
their account against the entire body of evidence. In this case, ALL the
physical evidence tells use the shots were fired from the corner window on
the sixth floor. That outweighs anything any witness tells us.
All beside the particular point, which was that you "misread",
accidentally I'm sure, Jackson's testimony....
John Corbett
2020-12-05 01:41:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by donald willis
Post by John Corbett
Post by donald willis
Post by John Corbett
Post by donald willis
Post by Steve Schmidt
Indeed, very interesting photo.
The caption on that website said that LHO was aboard, but if the bus had
passed Market Street, then Oswald had already disembarked.
According to the debunked Revised-McWatters/Roy Milton Jones story, which
has been debunked. By yours truly....
Like you debunked Oswald firing from the 6th floor.
<chuckle>
You certainly helped my debunking there by flubbing Bob Jackson's
testimony re the far-west 6th-floor window. How many "explanations" did
you offer in hopes of making it go away?
I don't have to make anything go away. I just need to be able to weigh the
probative value of any evidence and understand that when a witness tells
us something, that witness is not necessarily right. Very often witnesses
are wrong. The way we figure out if any witness got it right is to weigh
their account against the entire body of evidence. In this case, ALL the
physical evidence tells use the shots were fired from the corner window on
the sixth floor. That outweighs anything any witness tells us.
All beside the particular point, which was that you "misread",
accidentally I'm sure, Jackson's testimony....
What if I did. It changes nothing. It doesn't make eyewitnesses more
reliable or physical evidence less reliable. Your position relies on
specific witnesses being correct about specific details and wrong about
everything else they told us. Anything a witness tells us needs to be
weighed against the body of evidence to determine the probative value of
their account. Unfortunately for you, your hand picked witnesses fail that
test.
donald willis
2020-12-05 19:32:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by John Corbett
Post by donald willis
Post by John Corbett
Post by donald willis
Post by John Corbett
Post by donald willis
Post by Steve Schmidt
Indeed, very interesting photo.
The caption on that website said that LHO was aboard, but if the bus had
passed Market Street, then Oswald had already disembarked.
According to the debunked Revised-McWatters/Roy Milton Jones story, which
has been debunked. By yours truly....
Like you debunked Oswald firing from the 6th floor.
<chuckle>
You certainly helped my debunking there by flubbing Bob Jackson's
testimony re the far-west 6th-floor window. How many "explanations" did
you offer in hopes of making it go away?
I don't have to make anything go away. I just need to be able to weigh the
probative value of any evidence and understand that when a witness tells
us something, that witness is not necessarily right. Very often witnesses
are wrong. The way we figure out if any witness got it right is to weigh
their account against the entire body of evidence. In this case, ALL the
physical evidence tells use the shots were fired from the corner window on
the sixth floor. That outweighs anything any witness tells us.
All beside the particular point, which was that you "misread",
accidentally I'm sure, Jackson's testimony....
What if I did. It changes nothing. It doesn't make eyewitnesses more
reliable or physical evidence less reliable.
The point was not whether these witnesses were "reliable". It was simply
that they all (Brennan, Fischer, Edwards, and Jackson) testified or
indicated (on photos) that the shooter's window was open all the way.
They are thus not part of your "entire body of evidence"; at best, they're
self-contradictory. That is, for you, they get the floor number right and
the state of the window wrong, although Fischer & Edwards originally
seemed to say "fifth floor", which would make them consistent, and not
part of your "body" at all....

dcw
John Corbett
2020-12-06 00:53:34 UTC
Permalink
Post by John Corbett
Post by donald willis
Post by John Corbett
Post by donald willis
Post by John Corbett
Post by donald willis
Post by Steve Schmidt
Indeed, very interesting photo.
The caption on that website said that LHO was aboard, but if the bus had
passed Market Street, then Oswald had already disembarked.
According to the debunked Revised-McWatters/Roy Milton Jones story, which
has been debunked. By yours truly....
Like you debunked Oswald firing from the 6th floor.
<chuckle>
You certainly helped my debunking there by flubbing Bob Jackson's
testimony re the far-west 6th-floor window. How many "explanations" did
you offer in hopes of making it go away?
I don't have to make anything go away. I just need to be able to weigh the
probative value of any evidence and understand that when a witness tells
us something, that witness is not necessarily right. Very often witnesses
are wrong. The way we figure out if any witness got it right is to weigh
their account against the entire body of evidence. In this case, ALL the
physical evidence tells use the shots were fired from the corner window on
the sixth floor. That outweighs anything any witness tells us.
All beside the particular point, which was that you "misread",
accidentally I'm sure, Jackson's testimony....
What if I did. It changes nothing. It doesn't make eyewitnesses more
reliable or physical evidence less reliable.
The point was not whether these witnesses were "reliable". It was simply
that they all (Brennan, Fischer, Edwards, and Jackson) testified or
indicated (on photos) that the shooter's window was open all the way.
Which if they are not reliable means nothing.
They are thus not part of your "entire body of evidence"; at best, they're
self-contradictory. That is, for you, they get the floor number right and
the state of the window wrong, although Fischer & Edwards originally
seemed to say "fifth floor", which would make them consistent, and not
part of your "body" at all....
ALL the physical evidence was found on the 6th floor which confirms the
witnesses who placed the shooter there and refutes the witnesses who said
the window was wide open. The only thing that doesn't fit with everything
else is the observation that the window was wide open. That should tell
you something.
donald willis
2020-12-06 17:46:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by John Corbett
Post by John Corbett
Post by donald willis
Post by John Corbett
Post by donald willis
Post by John Corbett
Post by donald willis
Post by Steve Schmidt
Indeed, very interesting photo.
The caption on that website said that LHO was aboard, but if the bus had
passed Market Street, then Oswald had already disembarked.
According to the debunked Revised-McWatters/Roy Milton Jones story, which
has been debunked. By yours truly....
Like you debunked Oswald firing from the 6th floor.
<chuckle>
You certainly helped my debunking there by flubbing Bob Jackson's
testimony re the far-west 6th-floor window. How many "explanations" did
you offer in hopes of making it go away?
I don't have to make anything go away. I just need to be able to weigh the
probative value of any evidence and understand that when a witness tells
us something, that witness is not necessarily right. Very often witnesses
are wrong. The way we figure out if any witness got it right is to weigh
their account against the entire body of evidence. In this case, ALL the
physical evidence tells use the shots were fired from the corner window on
the sixth floor. That outweighs anything any witness tells us.
All beside the particular point, which was that you "misread",
accidentally I'm sure, Jackson's testimony....
What if I did. It changes nothing. It doesn't make eyewitnesses more
reliable or physical evidence less reliable.
The point was not whether these witnesses were "reliable". It was simply
that they all (Brennan, Fischer, Edwards, and Jackson) testified or
indicated (on photos) that the shooter's window was open all the way.
Which if they are not reliable means nothing.
That does not, however, mean that you can alter their testimony, as you
did, in the case of Jackson. Perhaps unwittingly.
Post by John Corbett
They are thus not part of your "entire body of evidence"; at best, they're
self-contradictory. That is, for you, they get the floor number right and
the state of the window wrong, although Fischer & Edwards originally
seemed to say "fifth floor", which would make them consistent, and not
part of your "body" at all....
ALL the physical evidence was found on the 6th floor
Some of it may have "traveled" there *after* 12:30....

which confirms the
Post by John Corbett
witnesses who placed the shooter there and refutes the witnesses who said
the window was wide open.
They said that "a" window was wide open, not necessarily the "nest"
window.

The only thing that doesn't fit with everything
Post by John Corbett
else is the observation that the window was wide open.
Oddly, however, it was nearly unanimous that the window was open almost
all the way. Nearly unanimous "misremembering"!

dcw
John Corbett
2020-12-07 13:49:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by donald willis
Post by John Corbett
Post by John Corbett
Post by donald willis
Post by John Corbett
Post by donald willis
Post by John Corbett
Post by donald willis
Post by Steve Schmidt
Indeed, very interesting photo.
The caption on that website said that LHO was aboard, but if the bus had
passed Market Street, then Oswald had already disembarked.
According to the debunked Revised-McWatters/Roy Milton Jones story, which
has been debunked. By yours truly....
Like you debunked Oswald firing from the 6th floor.
<chuckle>
You certainly helped my debunking there by flubbing Bob Jackson's
testimony re the far-west 6th-floor window. How many "explanations" did
you offer in hopes of making it go away?
I don't have to make anything go away. I just need to be able to weigh the
probative value of any evidence and understand that when a witness tells
us something, that witness is not necessarily right. Very often witnesses
are wrong. The way we figure out if any witness got it right is to weigh
their account against the entire body of evidence. In this case, ALL the
physical evidence tells use the shots were fired from the corner window on
the sixth floor. That outweighs anything any witness tells us.
All beside the particular point, which was that you "misread",
accidentally I'm sure, Jackson's testimony....
What if I did. It changes nothing. It doesn't make eyewitnesses more
reliable or physical evidence less reliable.
The point was not whether these witnesses were "reliable". It was simply
that they all (Brennan, Fischer, Edwards, and Jackson) testified or
indicated (on photos) that the shooter's window was open all the way.
Which if they are not reliable means nothing.
That does not, however, mean that you can alter their testimony, as you
did, in the case of Jackson. Perhaps unwittingly.
I made an honest mistake. If you want to believe that there was more to it than
that, then you are being consistent with the way CTs have looked at the case
for decades. There are no honest mistakes. Every anomaly is evidence of
something sinister.
Post by donald willis
Post by John Corbett
They are thus not part of your "entire body of evidence"; at best,
they're self-contradictory. That is, for you, they get the floor
number right and the state of the window wrong, although Fischer &
Edwards originally seemed to say "fifth floor", which would make
them consistent, and not part of your "body" at all....
ALL the physical evidence was found on the 6th floor
Some of it may have "traveled" there *after* 12:30....
which confirms the
Nobody cares about the nonsense you imagine. There is no evidence any of
that happened. That is just something you dreamed up out of thin air to
explain away something that doesn't fit with what you want to believe.
Post by donald willis
Post by John Corbett
witnesses who placed the shooter there and refutes the witnesses who said
the window was wide open.
They said that "a" window was wide open, not necessarily the "nest"
window.
Stop it. You are embarrassing yourself.
Post by donald willis
The only thing that doesn't fit with everything
Post by John Corbett
else is the observation that the window was wide open.
Oddly, however, it was nearly unanimous that the window was open almost
all the way. Nearly unanimous "misremembering"!
As I was saying...
Mark
2020-12-02 23:17:12 UTC
Permalink
Post by donald willis
Post by Steve Schmidt
Indeed, very interesting photo.
The caption on that website said that LHO was aboard, but if the bus had
passed Market Street, then Oswald had already disembarked.
According to the debunked Revised-McWatters/Roy Milton Jones story, which
has been debunked. By yours truly....
I'm not certain what you think you debunked, but bus driver McWatters clearly admitted he made a mistake when viewing the lineup on the 22nd. He mixed up Oswald and Jones in his mind. From McWatters' WC testimony:

Mr. BALL - In this affidavit, it says, it mentions the fact that when you went to Marsalis and picked up a woman.
Mr. McWATTERS - Yes.
Mr. BALL - You asked her if she knew the President had been shot, you told us about that a few moments ago.
Mr. McWATTERS - Yes.
Mr. BALL - She thought you were kidding, and you told her, "I told her if she didn't believe me to ask the man behind her, that he had told me the President was shot in the temple."
Mr. McWATTERS - Yes.
Mr. BALL - Was the man, was that the teenager?
Mr. McWATTERS - That is right, sir, that was the teenage boy. In other words, he was, I would say, around 17 or 18 years old.
Mr. BALL - You said here, "The man didn't say anything but he was grinning."
Mr. McWATTERS - Yes.
Mr. BALL - Do you think that happened?
Mr. McWATTERS - Well, when the lady asked him, he just kind of grinned, in other words, and she said, "This is not a grinning or laughing matter," or something to that effect I don't remember just exactly what she did say.
Mr. BALL - Now you told them at that time you didn't know where you let this man off.
Mr. McWATTERS - That is right, I didn't at that time, I didn't know where he got off.
Mr. BALL - You told us a few moments ago you thought he got off another place.
Mr. McWATTERS - That is right, sir.
Mr. BALL - What was that place?
Mr. McWATTERS - He got off at Brownley, because the man rode with me the next day.
Mr. BALL - You went out there the next day, did you?
Mr. McWATTERS - Yes, sir.
Mr. BALL - With an FBI man or a Dallas policeman?
Mr. McWATTERS - No, I mean--
Mr. BALL - The same teenager?
Mr. McWATTERS - The same teenager rode with me the next day.
Mr. BALL - And you noticed he got off there?
Mr. McWATTERS - Yes, and I noticed, and I asked him, like I told him, I said that I was--I thought that, you know, that he was, when he first got on down there, I says, "From all indications, we had you kind of pinpointed as the man who might have been mixed up in the assassination and everything." And--
Mr. BALL - Do I understand the day after you made the affidavit, this would be the 23d of November?
Mr. McWATTERS - Yes.
Mr. BALL - That this same teenager got on your bus again?
Mr. McWATTERS - Yes, he got on.
Mr. BALL - And you noticed where you let him off?
Mr. McWATTERS - I noticed where I let him off, yes, sir.
Mr. BALL - Is that the reason that today you remember he got off?
Mr. McWATTERS - That is it today I remember, just like I say, I remember I talked to him the next day, and he told me where he got on, and he told me where he got on, and where he got off and where he lived, and, you know that--
Mr. BALL - Has he been on your bus since?
Mr. McWATTERS - Yes.
Mr. BALL - He has?
Mr. McWATTERS - He has rode with me since.
Mr. BALL - Yes. I see. Did you give him a transfer that day?
Mr. McWATTERS - No, because he gets on and he lives within about two blocks of the busline, in other words, where he gets off.
Mr. BALL - Do you know this boy's name?
Mr. McWATTERS - I believe his name is Milton Jones.
Mr. BALL - Milton Jones?
Mr. McWATTERS - Milton Jones. I don't believe I know where he lives, but I pass where he lives. But he told me his name was Milton Jones and he told me he was 17.
Mr. BALL - Did he ever tell you where he works?
Mr. McWATTERS - He told me that, I believe, he goes to school half a day, I believe he said and I believe he goes home and he has a part-time job, but he never did state where he works.
Mr. BALL - Did he tell you where he went to school?
Mr. McWATTERS - No, sir; he never did tell me where he went to school.
Mr. BALL - Or where he worked?
Mr. McWATTERS - Where he worked, either one.
Mr. BALL - You notice in the affidavit there it says, "This man"--referring to the man who was grinning--
Mr. McWATTERS - Yes.
Mr. BALL - "This man looks like the No. 1 man I saw in the lineup today."
Mr. McWATTERS - Yes.
Mr. BALL - Who was the No. 2 man you saw in the lineup on November 22, 1963?
Mr. McWATTERS - Well, just like I say, he was the shortest man in the lineup, in other words, when they brought these men out there, in other words, he was about the shortest, and the lightest weight one, I guess, was the reason I say that he looked like the man, because the rest of them were larger men than--
Mr. BALL - Well, now, at that time, when you saw the lineup--
Mr. McWATTERS - Yes.
Mr. BALL - Were you under the impression that this man that you saw in the lineup and whom you pointed out to the police, was the teenage boy who had been grinning?
Mr. McWATTERS - I was, yes, sir; I was under the impression--
Mr. BALL - That was the fellow?
Mr. McWATTERS - That was the fellow.
Mr. BALL - You were not under the impression then that night when you saw the lineup that the No. 2 man in the lineup was the man who got off the bus, to whom you had given a transfer?
Mr. McWATTERS - That is what I say. In other words, when I told them, I said, the only way is the man, that he is smaller, in other words, he kind of had a thin like face and he weighs less than any one of them. The only one I could identify at all would be the smaller man on account he was the only one who could come near fitting the description.
Mr. BALL - Let me ask you this, though. Did you tell them the man, the smaller man, you saw in the lineup, did you tell them that you thought he was the man who got off your bus and got the transfer or the man who was on the bus who was the teenager who was grinning?
Mr. McWATTERS - Well, I really thought he was the man who was on the bus.
Mr. BALL - That stayed on the bus?
Mr. McWATTERS - That stayed on the bus.
Mr. BALL - And you didn't think he was the man who got off the bus and to whom you gave a transfer?
Mr. McWATTERS - No, sir.
Mr. BALL - At that time you didn't?
Mr. McWATTERS - That is why I say I pinpointed that transfer on that boy as far as that is concerned. But at first, just like I say, I really thought from the height and weight of the two men, 1 mean was just like I say, was both of them were small. In the lineup they had, in other words, bigger men, in other words, he was the smallest man at the lineup-

http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/russ/testimony/mcwatters.htm

Mark
donald willis
2020-12-03 20:48:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by donald willis
Post by Steve Schmidt
Indeed, very interesting photo.
The caption on that website said that LHO was aboard, but if the bus had
passed Market Street, then Oswald had already disembarked.
According to the debunked Revised-McWatters/Roy Milton Jones story, which
has been debunked. By yours truly....
According to bus driver Cecil McWatters' same-day affidavit, at about
12:45, a man on his bus who resembled Oswald said that the "president was
shot in the temple". McWatters later recanted and named one Roy Milton
Jones as the man. However, Jones told the FBI that he was on a bus which
was boarded by police and held up for an hour--it was not McWatters' 12:45
bus, then, which he was on. In fact, Jones told the FBI that no one on
his bus said anything about anyone being "shot in the temple", while the
phrase was spoken at least twice on McWatters' bus, first by Oswald, then
by McWatters himself. Goodbye, Jones; hello, again, Oswald.

dcw
19efppp
2020-12-05 14:16:48 UTC
Permalink
Post by donald willis
Post by donald willis
Post by Steve Schmidt
Indeed, very interesting photo.
The caption on that website said that LHO was aboard, but if the bus had
passed Market Street, then Oswald had already disembarked.
According to the debunked Revised-McWatters/Roy Milton Jones story, which
has been debunked. By yours truly....
According to bus driver Cecil McWatters' same-day affidavit, at about
12:45, a man on his bus who resembled Oswald said that the "president was
shot in the temple". McWatters later recanted and named one Roy Milton
Jones as the man. However, Jones told the FBI that he was on a bus which
was boarded by police and held up for an hour--it was not McWatters' 12:45
bus, then, which he was on. In fact, Jones told the FBI that no one on
his bus said anything about anyone being "shot in the temple", while the
phrase was spoken at least twice on McWatters' bus, first by Oswald, then
by McWatters himself. Goodbye, Jones; hello, again, Oswald.
dcw
Roy Milton Bradley still seems to be around. Maybe you could interview him
and break the case wide open. "I ain't never been on a bus in my whole
friggin life!"
donald willis
2020-12-06 00:53:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by 19efppp
Post by donald willis
Post by donald willis
Post by Steve Schmidt
Indeed, very interesting photo.
The caption on that website said that LHO was aboard, but if the bus had
passed Market Street, then Oswald had already disembarked.
According to the debunked Revised-McWatters/Roy Milton Jones story, which
has been debunked. By yours truly....
According to bus driver Cecil McWatters' same-day affidavit, at about
12:45, a man on his bus who resembled Oswald said that the "president was
shot in the temple". McWatters later recanted and named one Roy Milton
Jones as the man. However, Jones told the FBI that he was on a bus which
was boarded by police and held up for an hour--it was not McWatters' 12:45
bus, then, which he was on. In fact, Jones told the FBI that no one on
his bus said anything about anyone being "shot in the temple", while the
phrase was spoken at least twice on McWatters' bus, first by Oswald, then
by McWatters himself. Goodbye, Jones; hello, again, Oswald.
dcw
Roy Milton Bradley still seems to be around. Maybe you could interview him
and break the case wide open. "I ain't never been on a bus in my whole
friggin life!"
Roy Milton Bradley may still "be around", but so what? Never heard of
him. Do you mean Milton Bradley, the company which I believe owned the
Monopoly game? Or do you... well, I know you do....

And I did break the case with my puncturing of the Jones-McWatters
fiction. Now, don't you go saying something like Case Wide Shut....
19efppp
2020-12-06 17:46:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by 19efppp
Post by donald willis
Post by donald willis
Post by Steve Schmidt
Indeed, very interesting photo.
The caption on that website said that LHO was aboard, but if the bus had
passed Market Street, then Oswald had already disembarked.
According to the debunked Revised-McWatters/Roy Milton Jones story, which
has been debunked. By yours truly....
According to bus driver Cecil McWatters' same-day affidavit, at about
12:45, a man on his bus who resembled Oswald said that the "president was
shot in the temple". McWatters later recanted and named one Roy Milton
Jones as the man. However, Jones told the FBI that he was on a bus which
was boarded by police and held up for an hour--it was not McWatters' 12:45
bus, then, which he was on. In fact, Jones told the FBI that no one on
his bus said anything about anyone being "shot in the temple", while the
phrase was spoken at least twice on McWatters' bus, first by Oswald, then
by McWatters himself. Goodbye, Jones; hello, again, Oswald.
dcw
Roy Milton Bradley still seems to be around. Maybe you could interview him
and break the case wide open. "I ain't never been on a bus in my whole
friggin life!"
Roy Milton Bradley may still "be around", but so what? Never heard of
him. Do you mean Milton Bradley, the company which I believe owned the
Monopoly game? Or do you... well, I know you do....
And I did break the case with my puncturing of the Jones-McWatters
fiction. Now, don't you go saying something like Case Wide Shut....
No. I mean that Milton Jones still lives and could be questioned about his
bus ride. Nobody ever did. Well, no honest person ever questioned him,
just the FBI. He might not want to talk to internet kooks. He might not
remember anything. But he's still out there, waiting for you to amaze the
world with his story. That's all I meant to say. And while you're down
Texas way, look up Leroy Watson McClain and ask him about the Michael Dale
Bridwell murder. But be careful. He's the one that murdered Bridwell.
donald willis
2020-12-07 02:52:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by 19efppp
Post by 19efppp
Post by donald willis
Post by donald willis
Post by Steve Schmidt
Indeed, very interesting photo.
The caption on that website said that LHO was aboard, but if the bus had
passed Market Street, then Oswald had already disembarked.
According to the debunked Revised-McWatters/Roy Milton Jones story, which
has been debunked. By yours truly....
According to bus driver Cecil McWatters' same-day affidavit, at about
12:45, a man on his bus who resembled Oswald said that the "president was
shot in the temple". McWatters later recanted and named one Roy Milton
Jones as the man. However, Jones told the FBI that he was on a bus which
was boarded by police and held up for an hour--it was not McWatters' 12:45
bus, then, which he was on. In fact, Jones told the FBI that no one on
his bus said anything about anyone being "shot in the temple", while the
phrase was spoken at least twice on McWatters' bus, first by Oswald, then
by McWatters himself. Goodbye, Jones; hello, again, Oswald.
dcw
Roy Milton Bradley still seems to be around. Maybe you could interview him
and break the case wide open. "I ain't never been on a bus in my whole
friggin life!"
Roy Milton Bradley may still "be around", but so what? Never heard of
him. Do you mean Milton Bradley, the company which I believe owned the
Monopoly game? Or do you... well, I know you do....
And I did break the case with my puncturing of the Jones-McWatters
fiction. Now, don't you go saying something like Case Wide Shut....
No. I mean that Milton Jones still lives and could be questioned about his
bus ride. Nobody ever did. Well, no honest person ever questioned him,
just the FBI. He might not want to talk to internet kooks. He might not
remember anything. But he's still out there, waiting for you to amaze the
world with his story.
He has already amazed me. All I need is his FBI description of his 11/22
bus ride, which has little or nothing to to with Oswald's.
Post by 19efppp
That's all I meant to say. And while you're down
Texas way, look up Leroy Watson McClain and ask him about the Michael Dale
Bridwell murder. But be careful. He's the one that murdered Bridwell.
19efppp
2020-12-07 13:49:52 UTC
Permalink
Post by 19efppp
Post by 19efppp
Post by donald willis
Post by donald willis
Post by Steve Schmidt
Indeed, very interesting photo.
The caption on that website said that LHO was aboard, but if the bus had
passed Market Street, then Oswald had already disembarked.
According to the debunked Revised-McWatters/Roy Milton Jones story, which
has been debunked. By yours truly....
According to bus driver Cecil McWatters' same-day affidavit, at about
12:45, a man on his bus who resembled Oswald said that the "president was
shot in the temple". McWatters later recanted and named one Roy Milton
Jones as the man. However, Jones told the FBI that he was on a bus which
was boarded by police and held up for an hour--it was not McWatters' 12:45
bus, then, which he was on. In fact, Jones told the FBI that no one on
his bus said anything about anyone being "shot in the temple", while the
phrase was spoken at least twice on McWatters' bus, first by Oswald, then
by McWatters himself. Goodbye, Jones; hello, again, Oswald.
dcw
Roy Milton Bradley still seems to be around. Maybe you could interview him
and break the case wide open. "I ain't never been on a bus in my whole
friggin life!"
Roy Milton Bradley may still "be around", but so what? Never heard of
him. Do you mean Milton Bradley, the company which I believe owned the
Monopoly game? Or do you... well, I know you do....
And I did break the case with my puncturing of the Jones-McWatters
fiction. Now, don't you go saying something like Case Wide Shut....
No. I mean that Milton Jones still lives and could be questioned about his
bus ride. Nobody ever did. Well, no honest person ever questioned him,
just the FBI. He might not want to talk to internet kooks. He might not
remember anything. But he's still out there, waiting for you to amaze the
world with his story.
He has already amazed me. All I need is his FBI description of his 11/22
bus ride, which has little or nothing to to with Oswald's.
Post by 19efppp
That's all I meant to say. And while you're down
Texas way, look up Leroy Watson McClain and ask him about the Michael Dale
Bridwell murder. But be careful. He's the one that murdered Bridwell.
Milton may have already amazed you, but his statement as it stands just
makes a mess with the McWatters accounts, which make their own mess. In
other words, you have a living witness who might be able to clarify
things...unless you're afraid of what Miltie might say. Or maybe you're
afraid he might be wearing a dress. Milties are known to do that. In other
words, Uncle Cecil is even further off than Texas now, beyond your
questioning. In other words, Miltie might be your last chance. Of course,
it would be easier to rest upon your imaginary laurels than to go to
Texas. In other words, never mind.

19efppp
2020-12-02 15:24:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by Steve Schmidt
Indeed, very interesting photo.
The caption on that website said that LHO was aboard, but if the bus had
passed Market Street, then Oswald had already disembarked.
https://www.gutenberg.org/files/58031/58031-h/images/i_p158.jpg
Anybody got a better scan of that photo?
Post by John Corbett
https://allthatsinteresting.com/kennedy-assassination#26
Hadn't seen this one before. It is looking west on Elm St. toward the TSBD
and the caption indicates it shows the 1213 bus that Oswald had boarded.
It seems to show the traffic backed up with Elm St. blocked off in front
of the TSBD.
That's from the Stuart Reed photos. I think that version originates with
John Armstrong ("Harvey and Lee"), the best version I've seen. Reed's
Texas Theatre photos are better known. Yes, Mr. Reed was magically
everywhere, and then he dropped his film in the mail and went back to
Panama.

https://postimg.cc/8sVJcHtf
19efppp
2020-12-02 23:16:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by 19efppp
Post by Steve Schmidt
Indeed, very interesting photo.
The caption on that website said that LHO was aboard, but if the bus had
passed Market Street, then Oswald had already disembarked.
https://www.gutenberg.org/files/58031/58031-h/images/i_p158.jpg
Anybody got a better scan of that photo?
Post by John Corbett
https://allthatsinteresting.com/kennedy-assassination#26
Hadn't seen this one before. It is looking west on Elm St. toward the TSBD
and the caption indicates it shows the 1213 bus that Oswald had boarded.
It seems to show the traffic backed up with Elm St. blocked off in front
of the TSBD.
That's from the Stuart Reed photos. I think that version originates with
John Armstrong ("Harvey and Lee"), the best version I've seen. Reed's
Texas Theatre photos are better known. Yes, Mr. Reed was magically
everywhere, and then he dropped his film in the mail and went back to
Panama.
https://postimg.cc/8sVJcHtf
I don't know why good versions of the Reed photos aren't easily had. The
best Texas Theatre shots of his seem to be in The Lost Tapes, I think it's
called. Here's one of them I captured. These photos are key to identifying
the motorcycle officer near Oswald as being out of uniform. He isn't even
wearing a gun. Why is an out-of-uniform motorcycle cop arresting Oswald?
Plenty of in-uniform cops were available at the theater.

Loading Image...
Anthony Marsh
2020-12-03 04:26:05 UTC
Permalink
Post by Steve Schmidt
Indeed, very interesting photo.
The caption on that website said that LHO was aboard, but if the bus had
passed Market Street, then Oswald had already disembarked.
https://www.gutenberg.org/files/58031/58031-h/images/i_p158.jpg
Anybody got a better scan of that photo?
Post by John Corbett
https://allthatsinteresting.com/kennedy-assassination#26
Hadn't seen this one before. It is looking west on Elm St. toward the TSBD
and the caption indicates it shows the 1213 bus that Oswald had boarded.
It seems to show the traffic backed up with Elm St. blocked off in front
of the TSBD.
This was taken several minututes after tthe motorcade had left Dealey
Plaza. Not good enough resolution to SEE Oswald on that bus.
Loading...