Discussion:
Ideas of Karl Marx Discussion
(too old to reply)
John McAdams
2020-08-18 12:33:28 UTC
Permalink
The entire discussion of the ideas of Karl Marx has long gotten
disconnected from Lee Harvey Oswald.

So as of 9:00 a.m. (Central) tomorrow (Wednesday, Aug. 19) I'm going
to start rejecting posts on Marxism, unless they explicitly talk about
Lee Oswald's thinking.

And a mere pro forma mention of Oswald won't be enough to save a post.

So any forum member has a bit over 24 hours to get in their last
arguments.

Lately, it seems we are talking about things *other than* the JFK
assassination.

.John
-----------------------
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm
Anthony Marsh
2020-08-18 23:37:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by John McAdams
The entire discussion of the ideas of Karl Marx has long gotten
disconnected from Lee Harvey Oswald.
Well, that's the whole point of this newsgroup. To not talk about the
JFK assassination, but rehash politics.
Post by John McAdams
So as of 9:00 a.m. (Central) tomorrow (Wednesday, Aug. 19) I'm going
to start rejecting posts on Marxism, unless they explicitly talk about
Lee Oswald's thinking.
And a mere pro forma mention of Oswald won't be enough to save a post.
So any forum member has a bit over 24 hours to get in their last
arguments.
Lately, it seems we are talking about things *other than* the JFK
assassination.
.John
-----------------------
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm
ajohnstone
2020-08-19 18:06:39 UTC
Permalink
I have no issue with your decision.

I merely responded to criticisms.

When they cease, i will return to the reason i first joined this list - as
a rich treasure trove of evidence to rebut CTers.
John McAdams
2020-08-19 18:09:51 UTC
Permalink
Post by ajohnstone
I have no issue with your decision.
I merely responded to criticisms.
When they cease, i will return to the reason i first joined this list - as
a rich treasure trove of evidence to rebut CTers.
I just passed two posts (one from Hank, and one from Corbett) that
came a little late.

So in fairness, if you want to reply to either or both of those posts,
I'll pass your reply.

Otherwise, this discussion is closed.

.John
-----------------------
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm
John Corbett
2020-08-19 22:40:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by John McAdams
Post by ajohnstone
I have no issue with your decision.
I merely responded to criticisms.
When they cease, i will return to the reason i first joined this list - as
a rich treasure trove of evidence to rebut CTers.
I just passed two posts (one from Hank, and one from Corbett) that
came a little late.
So in fairness, if you want to reply to either or both of those posts,
I'll pass your reply.
Otherwise, this discussion is closed.
Seems fair to me. I'll let him have the last word.
Anthony Marsh
2020-08-20 19:40:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by John McAdams
The entire discussion of the ideas of Karl Marx has long gotten
disconnected from Lee Harvey Oswald.
So as of 9:00 a.m. (Central) tomorrow (Wednesday, Aug. 19) I'm going
to start rejecting posts on Marxism, unless they explicitly talk about
Lee Oswald's thinking.
And a mere pro forma mention of Oswald won't be enough to save a post.
So any forum member has a bit over 24 hours to get in their last
arguments.
Lately, it seems we are talking about things *other than* the JFK
assassination.
Ah, I said that already. The Nazis here are using it as a meme to
discredit all leftists.
How about Harpo Marx?
Post by John McAdams
.John
-----------------------
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm
Loading...