Discussion:
DOW
(too old to reply)
Anthony Marsh
2020-12-26 03:55:58 UTC
Permalink
When Obama left office the DOW was at 19,732
When Trump left it was 18,917. So all you Trump supporters think that
this proves that Whites are smarter than Blacks.
John Corbett
2020-12-26 15:58:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by Anthony Marsh
When Obama left office the DOW was at 19,732
When Trump left it was 18,917. So all you Trump supporters think that
this proves that Whites are smarter than Blacks.
HUH???!!!

Trump hasn't left office. The Dow is currently hovering around 30K. That's
more than a 50% increase during his administration. Not all his doing but
the market did take off following his tax cut and even after giving back
all if its gains in the early days of the pandemic, it has rebounded back
to a new high. It's still possible it could tank before he leaves office,
but I wouldn't be on it.

As for whites being smarter than blacks, where do you dream this stuff up?
Anthony Marsh
2021-01-01 00:56:13 UTC
Permalink
Post by John Corbett
Post by Anthony Marsh
When Obama left office the DOW was at 19,732
When Trump left it was 18,917. So all you Trump supporters think that
this proves that Whites are smarter than Blacks.
HUH???!!!
Trump hasn't left office. The Dow is currently hovering around 30K. That's
more than a 50% increase during his administration. Not all his doing but
the market did take off following his tax cut and even after giving back
all if its gains in the early days of the pandemic, it has rebounded back
to a new high. It's still possible it could tank before he leaves office,
but I wouldn't be on it.
As for whites being smarter than blacks, where do you dream this stuff up?
YES. A COUPLE of people are making a lot of money.
I quoted the statistics for you.
I never said that whites are smarter than blacks. That is what Trump
and his supporters say.
John Corbett
2021-01-01 18:57:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by John Corbett
Post by Anthony Marsh
When Obama left office the DOW was at 19,732
When Trump left it was 18,917. So all you Trump supporters think that
this proves that Whites are smarter than Blacks.
HUH???!!!
Trump hasn't left office. The Dow is currently hovering around 30K. That's
more than a 50% increase during his administration. Not all his doing but
the market did take off following his tax cut and even after giving back
all if its gains in the early days of the pandemic, it has rebounded back
to a new high. It's still possible it could tank before he leaves office,
but I wouldn't be on it.
As for whites being smarter than blacks, where do you dream this stuff up?
YES. A COUPLE of people are making a lot of money.
I quoted the statistics for you.
And you got them all wrong.
Post by Anthony Marsh
I never said that whites are smarter than blacks. That is what Trump
and his supporters say.
Quotes?

That'll be the day.
Jason Burke
2021-01-01 05:30:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by Anthony Marsh
When Obama left office the DOW was at 19,732
When Trump left it was 18,917. So all you Trump supporters think that
this proves that Whites are smarter than Blacks.
Are you *honestly* this freaking clueless, Tony?
Hank Sienzant (AKA Joe Zircon)
2021-01-02 01:09:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by Anthony Marsh
When Obama left office the DOW was at 19,732
When Trump left it was 18,917.
As of the close of the stock market on 12/31/2020, the Dow Industrial
Average was: 30,606.48 You can see that here:
https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/index/djia

Your claim is nonsense on two counts;
(1) You misstate the Dow's current average by nearly 40% too low.
(2) You misstate that Trump already left office. He hasn't.

And I left out your bizarre other claim because that is so off-the-wall I
cannot believe you seriously meant it.

Hank
John Corbett
2021-01-02 05:34:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by Hank Sienzant (AKA Joe Zircon)
Post by Anthony Marsh
When Obama left office the DOW was at 19,732
When Trump left it was 18,917.
As of the close of the stock market on 12/31/2020, the Dow Industrial
https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/index/djia
Your claim is nonsense on two counts;
(1) You misstate the Dow's current average by nearly 40% too low.
(2) You misstate that Trump already left office. He hasn't.
And I left out your bizarre other claim because that is so off-the-wall I
cannot believe you seriously meant it.
Rossley lives.
19efppp
2021-01-02 20:41:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by Hank Sienzant (AKA Joe Zircon)
Post by Anthony Marsh
When Obama left office the DOW was at 19,732
When Trump left it was 18,917.
As of the close of the stock market on 12/31/2020, the Dow Industrial
https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/index/djia
Your claim is nonsense on two counts;
(1) You misstate the Dow's current average by nearly 40% too low.
(2) You misstate that Trump already left office. He hasn't.
And I left out your bizarre other claim because that is so off-the-wall I
cannot believe you seriously meant it.
Hank
It took you a week to notice this and to pile on unnecessarily? Too busy
snuggling over there with Ben Holmes, it seems. Asserted but not proven.
Hank Sienzant (AKA Joe Zircon)
2021-01-03 02:51:52 UTC
Permalink
Post by 19efppp
Post by Hank Sienzant (AKA Joe Zircon)
Post by Anthony Marsh
When Obama left office the DOW was at 19,732
When Trump left it was 18,917.
As of the close of the stock market on 12/31/2020, the Dow Industrial
https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/index/djia
Your claim is nonsense on two counts;
(1) You misstate the Dow's current average by nearly 40% too low.
(2) You misstate that Trump already left office. He hasn't.
And I left out your bizarre other claim because that is so off-the-wall I
cannot believe you seriously meant it.
Hank
It took you a week to notice this and to pile on unnecessarily? Too busy
snuggling over there with Ben Holmes, it seems. Asserted but not proven.
It took me a week to bother to read this thread. I established my claim
with a link to the Dow's current closing price. Your "asserted but not
proven" is an appeal to ridicule. We saw you use that approach elsewhere,
while ignoring all my points. Another logical fallacy by you. Yes, I have
been posting at alt.conspiracy.jfk a bit, it is by no means the only place
I post, or the only thing I'm involved it. Some other things take up as
much or more of my time - like caring for my 97-year-old father in law.

Hank
19efppp
2021-01-03 23:05:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by Hank Sienzant (AKA Joe Zircon)
Post by 19efppp
Post by Hank Sienzant (AKA Joe Zircon)
Post by Anthony Marsh
When Obama left office the DOW was at 19,732
When Trump left it was 18,917.
As of the close of the stock market on 12/31/2020, the Dow Industrial
https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/index/djia
Your claim is nonsense on two counts;
(1) You misstate the Dow's current average by nearly 40% too low.
(2) You misstate that Trump already left office. He hasn't.
And I left out your bizarre other claim because that is so off-the-wall I
cannot believe you seriously meant it.
Hank
It took you a week to notice this and to pile on unnecessarily? Too busy
snuggling over there with Ben Holmes, it seems. Asserted but not proven.
It took me a week to bother to read this thread. I established my claim
with a link to the Dow's current closing price. Your "asserted but not
proven" is an appeal to ridicule. We saw you use that approach elsewhere,
while ignoring all my points. Another logical fallacy by you. Yes, I have
been posting at alt.conspiracy.jfk a bit, it is by no means the only place
I post, or the only thing I'm involved it. Some other things take up as
much or more of my time - like caring for my 97-year-old father in law.
Hank
You established your claim that the market was not in free fall with a
link to the DJA? My! You are a gem!
Anthony Marsh
2021-01-03 17:51:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by Hank Sienzant (AKA Joe Zircon)
Post by Anthony Marsh
When Obama left office the DOW was at 19,732
When Trump left it was 18,917.
As of the close of the stock market on 12/31/2020, the Dow Industrial
https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/index/djia
Your claim is nonsense on two counts;
(1) You misstate the Dow's current average by nearly 40% too low.
(2) You misstate that Trump already left office. He hasn't.
I quooted them directly from Google.
Post by Hank Sienzant (AKA Joe Zircon)
And I left out your bizarre other claim because that is so off-the-wall I
cannot believe you seriously meant it.
Of course you are not brave enough to debate it.
Post by Hank Sienzant (AKA Joe Zircon)
Hank
John Corbett
2021-01-04 01:05:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by Hank Sienzant (AKA Joe Zircon)
Post by Anthony Marsh
When Obama left office the DOW was at 19,732
When Trump left it was 18,917.
As of the close of the stock market on 12/31/2020, the Dow Industrial
https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/index/djia
Your claim is nonsense on two counts;
(1) You misstate the Dow's current average by nearly 40% too low.
(2) You misstate that Trump already left office. He hasn't.
I quooted them directly from Google.
You need to learn to Google. The numbers you posted aren't even close to
correct. Trump won't leave office for another 17 days.
Anthony Marsh
2021-01-05 01:03:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by John Corbett
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by Hank Sienzant (AKA Joe Zircon)
Post by Anthony Marsh
When Obama left office the DOW was at 19,732
When Trump left it was 18,917.
As of the close of the stock market on 12/31/2020, the Dow Industrial
https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/index/djia
Your claim is nonsense on two counts;
(1) You misstate the Dow's current average by nearly 40% too low.
(2) You misstate that Trump already left office. He hasn't.
I quooted them directly from Google.
You need to learn to Google. The numbers you posted aren't even close to
correct. Trump won't leave office for another 17 days.
I quoted them directly from Google. Stop always covering up.
Bud
2021-01-02 20:41:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by Anthony Marsh
When Obama left office the DOW was at 19,732
When Trump left it was 18,917. So all you Trump supporters think that
this proves that Whites are smarter than Blacks.
Obama only got elected because racists voted for him because he was
black.
Anthony Marsh
2021-01-04 01:04:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bud
Post by Anthony Marsh
When Obama left office the DOW was at 19,732
When Trump left it was 18,917. So all you Trump supporters think that
this proves that Whites are smarter than Blacks.
Obama only got elected because racists voted for him because he was
black.
Excuse me? You are calling black voters racists? Don't be a McAdadams.
Whites are racists, not blacks.
John McAdams
2021-01-04 01:09:26 UTC
Permalink
On 4 Jan 2021 01:04:58 -0000, Anthony Marsh
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by Bud
Post by Anthony Marsh
When Obama left office the DOW was at 19,732
When Trump left it was 18,917. So all you Trump supporters think that
this proves that Whites are smarter than Blacks.
Obama only got elected because racists voted for him because he was
black.
Excuse me? You are calling black voters racists? Don't be a McAdadams.
Whites are racists, not blacks.
What you just said it racist, Tony.

It has a different standard for blacks and whites.

Further, it's demeaning to black people to say they can't attain the
same standards of tolerance that you expect of whites.

.John
-----------------------
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm
Jason Burke
2021-01-04 03:37:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by John McAdams
On 4 Jan 2021 01:04:58 -0000, Anthony Marsh
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by Bud
Post by Anthony Marsh
When Obama left office the DOW was at 19,732
When Trump left it was 18,917. So all you Trump supporters think that
this proves that Whites are smarter than Blacks.
Obama only got elected because racists voted for him because he was
black.
Excuse me? You are calling black voters racists? Don't be a McAdadams.
Whites are racists, not blacks.
What you just said it racist, Tony.
It has a different standard for blacks and whites.
Further, it's demeaning to black people to say they can't attain the
same standards of tolerance that you expect of whites.
.John
-----------------------
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm
I can't believe anyone, even Tony, is this clueless about ANYTHING
approaching reality.
John Corbett
2021-01-05 04:58:32 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jason Burke
Post by John McAdams
On 4 Jan 2021 01:04:58 -0000, Anthony Marsh
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by Bud
Post by Anthony Marsh
When Obama left office the DOW was at 19,732
When Trump left it was 18,917. So all you Trump supporters think that
this proves that Whites are smarter than Blacks.
Obama only got elected because racists voted for him because he was
black.
Excuse me? You are calling black voters racists? Don't be a McAdadams.
Whites are racists, not blacks.
What you just said it racist, Tony.
It has a different standard for blacks and whites.
Further, it's demeaning to black people to say they can't attain the
same standards of tolerance that you expect of whites.
.John
-----------------------
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm
I can't believe anyone, even Tony, is this clueless about ANYTHING
approaching reality.
I would bet that Tony looked at a website that reported how low the DOW
dipped when the market crashed early on during the COVID pandemic and
because he usually just skims written material as opposed to reading it,
he thought that low water mark is where the DOW is now. Where he got the
idea that Trump had already left office I'll never know.
Anthony Marsh
2021-01-07 01:53:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by John Corbett
Post by Jason Burke
Post by John McAdams
On 4 Jan 2021 01:04:58 -0000, Anthony Marsh
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by Bud
Post by Anthony Marsh
When Obama left office the DOW was at 19,732
When Trump left it was 18,917. So all you Trump supporters think that
this proves that Whites are smarter than Blacks.
Obama only got elected because racists voted for him because he was
black.
Excuse me? You are calling black voters racists? Don't be a McAdadams.
Whites are racists, not blacks.
What you just said it racist, Tony.
It has a different standard for blacks and whites.
Further, it's demeaning to black people to say they can't attain the
same standards of tolerance that you expect of whites.
.John
-----------------------
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm
I can't believe anyone, even Tony, is this clueless about ANYTHING
approaching reality.
I would bet that Tony looked at a website that reported how low the DOW
dipped when the market crashed early on during the COVID pandemic and
because he usually just skims written material as opposed to reading it,
he thought that low water mark is where the DOW is now. Where he got the
idea that Trump had already left office I'll never know.
No, I asked Google to show me the Dow for the day that Obama left office
and the day I wrote the message. I can't post the Dow for every day. My
point was to compare the Dow from Then to Now.
Anthony Marsh
2021-01-05 01:03:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by John McAdams
On 4 Jan 2021 01:04:58 -0000, Anthony Marsh
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by Bud
Post by Anthony Marsh
When Obama left office the DOW was at 19,732
When Trump left it was 18,917. So all you Trump supporters think that
this proves that Whites are smarter than Blacks.
Obama only got elected because racists voted for him because he was
black.
Excuse me? You are calling black voters racists? Don't be a McAdadams.
Whites are racists, not blacks.
What you just said it racist, Tony.
FALSE. Pointing out racism is not racist.
Post by John McAdams
It has a different standard for blacks and whites.
No.
Post by John McAdams
Further, it's demeaning to black people to say they can't attain the
same standards of tolerance that you expect of whites.
What?
What does tolerance have to do with it? You can hate dogs without bring
racist. You can hate Hitler without being racist.
Post by John McAdams
.John
-----------------------
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm
John McAdams
2021-01-05 01:08:17 UTC
Permalink
On 5 Jan 2021 01:03:33 -0000, Anthony Marsh
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by John McAdams
On 4 Jan 2021 01:04:58 -0000, Anthony Marsh
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by Bud
Post by Anthony Marsh
When Obama left office the DOW was at 19,732
When Trump left it was 18,917. So all you Trump supporters think that
this proves that Whites are smarter than Blacks.
Obama only got elected because racists voted for him because he was
black.
Excuse me? You are calling black voters racists? Don't be a McAdadams.
Whites are racists, not blacks.
What you just said it racist, Tony.
FALSE. Pointing out racism is not racist.
Pointing out your racism is what I've been doing, Tony.
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by John McAdams
It has a different standard for blacks and whites.
No.
So if whites hate blacks, that's racism.

But if blacks hate writes, that's not racism.

You think that's a single standard.
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by John McAdams
Further, it's demeaning to black people to say they can't attain the
same standards of tolerance that you expect of whites.
What?
What does tolerance have to do with it? You can hate dogs without bring
racist. You can hate Hitler without being racist.
But hating people because of the color of their skin is racist.

.John
-----------------------
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm
Anthony Marsh
2021-01-07 01:53:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by John McAdams
On 5 Jan 2021 01:03:33 -0000, Anthony Marsh
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by John McAdams
On 4 Jan 2021 01:04:58 -0000, Anthony Marsh
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by Bud
Post by Anthony Marsh
When Obama left office the DOW was at 19,732
When Trump left it was 18,917. So all you Trump supporters think that
this proves that Whites are smarter than Blacks.
Obama only got elected because racists voted for him because he was
black.
Excuse me? You are calling black voters racists? Don't be a McAdadams.
Whites are racists, not blacks.
What you just said it racist, Tony.
FALSE. Pointing out racism is not racist.
Pointing out your racism is what I've been doing, Tony.
False. All you have been doing is spalying Pee-Wee Herman. "I know you
are, but what am I." It is a common Trick to deny racism by claiming that
the person making rhe charge is racist. Just like the racist who use the
charge of reverse racism.
Post by John McAdams
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by John McAdams
It has a different standard for blacks and whites.
No.
So if whites hate blacks, that's racism.
But if blacks hate writes, that's not racism.
Silly.Blacks do not hate whites bceause of the color of their skin.
oppressed people of any skin color hote those who oppress them, whatever
skin color. Again, did you see that Star Trek episode? Ask Mr. Spcock.
Post by John McAdams
You think that's a single standard.
You have no right to tell me what I think.
Post by John McAdams
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by John McAdams
Further, it's demeaning to black people to say they can't attain the
same standards of tolerance that you expect of whites.
What?
What does tolerance have to do with it? You can hate dogs without bring
racist. You can hate Hitler without being racist.
But hating people because of the color of their skin is racist.
That is what white people do.
That is not what black people do.
Post by John McAdams
.John
-----------------------
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm
John McAdams
2021-01-07 02:02:58 UTC
Permalink
On 7 Jan 2021 01:53:21 -0000, Anthony Marsh
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by John McAdams
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by John McAdams
Post by Anthony Marsh
Excuse me? You are calling black voters racists? Don't be a McAdadams.
Whites are racists, not blacks.
What you just said it racist, Tony.
FALSE. Pointing out racism is not racist.
Pointing out your racism is what I've been doing, Tony.
False. All you have been doing is spalying Pee-Wee Herman. "I know you
are, but what am I." It is a common Trick to deny racism by claiming that
the person making rhe charge is racist. Just like the racist who use the
charge of reverse racism.
You have consistently condoned blacks being racist toward whites.

That's racist.
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by John McAdams
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by John McAdams
It has a different standard for blacks and whites.
No.
So if whites hate blacks, that's racism.
But if blacks hate writes, that's not racism.
Silly.Blacks do not hate whites bceause of the color of their skin.
oppressed people of any skin color hote those who oppress them, whatever
skin color. Again, did you see that Star Trek episode? Ask Mr. Spcock.
The slave owners are long dead, Tony. And almost everybody who
imposed Jim Crow is dead.

Hating white people because *other* white people oppressed *other*
black people is racist.
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by John McAdams
You think that's a single standard.
You have no right to tell me what I think.
Yes I do. What you think is racist. It's racist to say that blacks
cannot be racist toward whites, and indeed it demeans blacks, by
implying that they can't live up to the moral standards you expect of
whites.

Martin Luther King did not espouse hatred of whites.
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by John McAdams
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by John McAdams
Further, it's demeaning to black people to say they can't attain the
same standards of tolerance that you expect of whites.
What?
What does tolerance have to do with it? You can hate dogs without bring
racist. You can hate Hitler without being racist.
But hating people because of the color of their skin is racist.
That is what white people do.
That is not what black people do.
Nonsense.

And racist nonsense.

.John
-----------------------
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm
Anthony Marsh
2021-01-07 21:07:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by John McAdams
On 7 Jan 2021 01:53:21 -0000, Anthony Marsh
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by John McAdams
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by John McAdams
Post by Anthony Marsh
Excuse me? You are calling black voters racists? Don't be a McAdadams.
Whites are racists, not blacks.
What you just said it racist, Tony.
FALSE. Pointing out racism is not racist.
Pointing out your racism is what I've been doing, Tony.
False. All you have been doing is spalying Pee-Wee Herman. "I know you
are, but what am I." It is a common Trick to deny racism by claiming that
the person making rhe charge is racist. Just like the racist who use the
charge of reverse racism.
You have consistently condoned blacks being racist toward whites.
That's racist.
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by John McAdams
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by John McAdams
It has a different standard for blacks and whites.
No.
So if whites hate blacks, that's racism.
But if blacks hate writes, that's not racism.
Silly.Blacks do not hate whites bceause of the color of their skin.
oppressed people of any skin color hote those who oppress them, whatever
skin color. Again, did you see that Star Trek episode? Ask Mr. Spcock.
The slave owners are long dead, Tony. And almost everybody who
imposed Jim Crow is dead.
But racism is not dead.
Post by John McAdams
Hating white people because *other* white people oppressed *other*
black people is racist.
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by John McAdams
You think that's a single standard.
You have no right to tell me what I think.
Yes I do. What you think is racist. It's racist to say that blacks
cannot be racist toward whites, and indeed it demeans blacks, by
I didn't say that.
Post by John McAdams
implying that they can't live up to the moral standards you expect of
whites.
I've learned to not expect much from whites. I forgive a lot.
Post by John McAdams
Martin Luther King did not espouse hatred of whites.
Which is one reason why he was so great.
Love thine enemy. Pray for his soul.
Post by John McAdams
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by John McAdams
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by John McAdams
Further, it's demeaning to black people to say they can't attain the
same standards of tolerance that you expect of whites.
What?
What does tolerance have to do with it? You can hate dogs without bring
racist. You can hate Hitler without being racist.
But hating people because of the color of their skin is racist.
That is what white people do.
That is not what black people do.
Nonsense.
And racist nonsense.
Your reverse racism is so silly.
Post by John McAdams
.John
-----------------------
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm
Bud
2021-01-09 01:18:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by John McAdams
On 7 Jan 2021 01:53:21 -0000, Anthony Marsh
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by John McAdams
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by John McAdams
Post by Anthony Marsh
Excuse me? You are calling black voters racists? Don't be a McAdadams.
Whites are racists, not blacks.
What you just said it racist, Tony.
FALSE. Pointing out racism is not racist.
Pointing out your racism is what I've been doing, Tony.
False. All you have been doing is spalying Pee-Wee Herman. "I know you
are, but what am I." It is a common Trick to deny racism by claiming that
the person making rhe charge is racist. Just like the racist who use the
charge of reverse racism.
You have consistently condoned blacks being racist toward whites.
That's racist.
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by John McAdams
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by John McAdams
It has a different standard for blacks and whites.
No.
So if whites hate blacks, that's racism.
But if blacks hate writes, that's not racism.
Silly.Blacks do not hate whites bceause of the color of their skin.
oppressed people of any skin color hote those who oppress them, whatever
skin color. Again, did you see that Star Trek episode? Ask Mr. Spcock.
The slave owners are long dead, Tony. And almost everybody who
imposed Jim Crow is dead.
But racism is not dead.
The term "racism" is merely a tool the left uses to gain political
leverage.
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by John McAdams
Hating white people because *other* white people oppressed *other*
black people is racist.
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by John McAdams
You think that's a single standard.
You have no right to tell me what I think.
Yes I do. What you think is racist. It's racist to say that blacks
cannot be racist toward whites, and indeed it demeans blacks, by
I didn't say that.
Post by John McAdams
implying that they can't live up to the moral standards you expect of
whites.
I've learned to not expect much from whites. I forgive a lot.
Post by John McAdams
Martin Luther King did not espouse hatred of whites.
Which is one reason why he was so great.
Love thine enemy. Pray for his soul.
Post by John McAdams
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by John McAdams
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by John McAdams
Further, it's demeaning to black people to say they can't attain the
same standards of tolerance that you expect of whites.
What?
What does tolerance have to do with it? You can hate dogs without bring
racist. You can hate Hitler without being racist.
But hating people because of the color of their skin is racist.
That is what white people do.
That is not what black people do.
Nonsense.
And racist nonsense.
Your reverse racism is so silly.
Post by John McAdams
.John
-----------------------
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm
John Corbett
2021-01-09 18:12:11 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bud
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by John McAdams
On 7 Jan 2021 01:53:21 -0000, Anthony Marsh
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by John McAdams
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by John McAdams
Post by Anthony Marsh
Excuse me? You are calling black voters racists? Don't be a McAdadams.
Whites are racists, not blacks.
What you just said it racist, Tony.
FALSE. Pointing out racism is not racist.
Pointing out your racism is what I've been doing, Tony.
False. All you have been doing is spalying Pee-Wee Herman. "I know you
are, but what am I." It is a common Trick to deny racism by claiming that
the person making rhe charge is racist. Just like the racist who use the
charge of reverse racism.
You have consistently condoned blacks being racist toward whites.
That's racist.
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by John McAdams
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by John McAdams
It has a different standard for blacks and whites.
No.
So if whites hate blacks, that's racism.
But if blacks hate writes, that's not racism.
Silly.Blacks do not hate whites bceause of the color of their skin.
oppressed people of any skin color hote those who oppress them, whatever
skin color. Again, did you see that Star Trek episode? Ask Mr. Spcock.
The slave owners are long dead, Tony. And almost everybody who
imposed Jim Crow is dead.
But racism is not dead.
The term "racism" is merely a tool the left uses to gain political
leverage.
In addition to xenophobia and homophobia.
Bud
2021-01-04 03:37:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by Bud
Post by Anthony Marsh
When Obama left office the DOW was at 19,732
When Trump left it was 18,917. So all you Trump supporters think that
this proves that Whites are smarter than Blacks.
Obama only got elected because racists voted for him because he was
black.
Excuse me? You are calling black voters racists?
I`m saying the people who voted for Obama because of the color of his
skin were racist. To say he should get the job because he was black is no
different from a white employee not giving a job to a black person because
they are black.
Post by Anthony Marsh
Don't be a McAdadams.
Whites are racists, not blacks.
Anyone can be racist.
Anthony Marsh
2021-01-05 01:03:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bud
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by Bud
Post by Anthony Marsh
When Obama left office the DOW was at 19,732
When Trump left it was 18,917. So all you Trump supporters think that
this proves that Whites are smarter than Blacks.
Obama only got elected because racists voted for him because he was
black.
Excuse me? You are calling black voters racists?
I`m saying the people who voted for Obama because of the color of his
You are trying to redifine words to support your version of reverse
racism. You are trying to say the liking blacks is racism. Then you'll
say that you are not racist because you don't like blacks.
Post by Bud
skin were racist. To say he should get the job because he was black is no
different from a white employee not giving a job to a black person because
they are black.
WELL. I DIDN'T SAY THAT
a RACIST SAID TTHAT.
Post by Bud
Post by Anthony Marsh
Don't be a McAdadams.
Whites are racists, not blacks.
Anyone can be racist.
John McAdams
2021-01-05 01:11:06 UTC
Permalink
On 5 Jan 2021 01:03:39 -0000, Anthony Marsh
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by Bud
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by Bud
Obama only got elected because racists voted for him because he was
black.
Excuse me? You are calling black voters racists?
I`m saying the people who voted for Obama because of the color of his
You are trying to redifine words to support your version of reverse
racism. You are trying to say the liking blacks is racism.
No, he's saying that discriminating against whites is racist.
Post by Anthony Marsh
Then you'll
say that you are not racist because you don't like blacks.
Post by Bud
skin were racist. To say he should get the job because he was black is no
different from a white employee not giving a job to a black person because
they are black.
WELL. I DIDN'T SAY THAT
a RACIST SAID TTHAT.
So you *don't* think people should have voted for him because he was
black?

.John
-----------------------
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm
davide...@gmail.com
2021-01-10 22:02:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bud
Post by Anthony Marsh
When Obama left office the DOW was at 19,732
When Trump left it was 18,917. So all you Trump supporters think that
this proves that Whites are smarter than Blacks.
Obama only got elected because racists voted for him because he was
black.
Question: Is Obama more black or white?

When you say "racists voted for him", are you saying that the Whites who
voted for him were racists or that that the Blacks who voted for him were
racists? Or, maybe you're saying that EVERYBODY who voted for him was a
racist which, to me, seems like a racist statement in itself.

David Emerling
Memphis, TN
John McAdams
2021-01-10 22:09:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by ***@gmail.com
Post by Bud
Post by Anthony Marsh
When Obama left office the DOW was at 19,732
When Trump left it was 18,917. So all you Trump supporters think that
this proves that Whites are smarter than Blacks.
Obama only got elected because racists voted for him because he was
black.
Question: Is Obama more black or white?
Biracial, but everybody was saying he was "black."
Post by ***@gmail.com
When you say "racists voted for him", are you saying that the Whites who
voted for him were racists or that that the Blacks who voted for him were
racists? Or, maybe you're saying that EVERYBODY who voted for him was a
racist which, to me, seems like a racist statement in itself.
He can speak for himself, but I think he's saying that people who
voted for Obama simply *because* he was black are as racist as people
who would vote against him because he was black.

The political divide in the US today is not mostly between anti-black
racists and non-racists. It's between pro-black politically correct
racists and non-racists. The anti-black racists are a tiny
marginalized group.

But like McCarthy and communists, they are a handy bogey man.

.John
-----------------------
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm
davide...@gmail.com
2021-01-13 03:43:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by John McAdams
Post by ***@gmail.com
Post by Bud
Post by Anthony Marsh
When Obama left office the DOW was at 19,732
When Trump left it was 18,917. So all you Trump supporters think that
this proves that Whites are smarter than Blacks.
Obama only got elected because racists voted for him because he was
black.
Question: Is Obama more black or white?
Biracial, but everybody was saying he was "black."
Exactly! Obama was no more black than he was white. But WHY do people
consider him black? Three reasons: 1) He married a black woman, 2) He
looks more black than white and 3) He seems to identify more with being
black than white. I know some of these are silly reasons, but that's how
most people determine somebody whose racial identity is somewhat
ambiguous.

It's like asking: Is Derek Jeter white or black?

Most people say that he is BOTH. Like Obama, Jeter's father was black but
his mother was white. When asked this question, almost EVERYBODY would
instantly remind the questioner that Derek Jeter is half white and half
black. Why? 1) He married a white woman. 2) He doesn't look very black and
3) He doesn't identify strongly with ANY race.
Post by John McAdams
Post by ***@gmail.com
When you say "racists voted for him", are you saying that the Whites who
voted for him were racists or that that the Blacks who voted for him were
racists? Or, maybe you're saying that EVERYBODY who voted for him was a
racist which, to me, seems like a racist statement in itself.
He can speak for himself, but I think he's saying that people who
voted for Obama simply *because* he was black are as racist as people
who would vote against him because he was black.
I get the point - that it is considered racist if the REASON you voted (or
didn't vote) for somebody was SPECIFICALLY because of their race. My point
is that Obama was an enigma in that he was not fully white nor fully
black; although, I imagine there is a significant number of people who
don't know that.
Post by John McAdams
The political divide in the US today is not mostly between anti-black
racists and non-racists. It's between pro-black politically correct
racists and non-racists. The anti-black racists are a tiny
marginalized group.
I would say the biggest political divide is between "city folk" and
"country folk." There are two Americas, urban-America and rural-America. A
color-coded electoral map makes that perfectly clear. Even an state
electoral map makes that clear. All the cities are in blue and everything
else is in red.

As far as racism is concerned, I would say the more racist elements of
America are in the rural areas. The Venn diagram of "racists" and "country
folk" wouldn't coincide exactly, but they would largely cover the same
area.

David Emerling
Memphis, TN
John McAdams
2021-01-13 15:15:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by ***@gmail.com
Post by John McAdams
Post by ***@gmail.com
Post by Bud
Post by Anthony Marsh
When Obama left office the DOW was at 19,732
When Trump left it was 18,917. So all you Trump supporters think that
this proves that Whites are smarter than Blacks.
Obama only got elected because racists voted for him because he was
black.
Question: Is Obama more black or white?
Biracial, but everybody was saying he was "black."
Exactly! Obama was no more black than he was white. But WHY do people
consider him black? Three reasons: 1) He married a black woman, 2) He
looks more black than white and 3) He seems to identify more with being
black than white. I know some of these are silly reasons, but that's how
most people determine somebody whose racial identity is somewhat
ambiguous.
It's like asking: Is Derek Jeter white or black?
Most people say that he is BOTH. Like Obama, Jeter's father was black but
his mother was white. When asked this question, almost EVERYBODY would
instantly remind the questioner that Derek Jeter is half white and half
black. Why? 1) He married a white woman. 2) He doesn't look very black and
3) He doesn't identify strongly with ANY race.
Post by John McAdams
Post by ***@gmail.com
When you say "racists voted for him", are you saying that the Whites who
voted for him were racists or that that the Blacks who voted for him were
racists? Or, maybe you're saying that EVERYBODY who voted for him was a
racist which, to me, seems like a racist statement in itself.
He can speak for himself, but I think he's saying that people who
voted for Obama simply *because* he was black are as racist as people
who would vote against him because he was black.
I get the point - that it is considered racist if the REASON you voted (or
didn't vote) for somebody was SPECIFICALLY because of their race. My point
is that Obama was an enigma in that he was not fully white nor fully
black; although, I imagine there is a significant number of people who
don't know that.
Post by John McAdams
The political divide in the US today is not mostly between anti-black
racists and non-racists. It's between pro-black politically correct
racists and non-racists. The anti-black racists are a tiny
marginalized group.
I would say the biggest political divide is between "city folk" and
"country folk." There are two Americas, urban-America and rural-America. A
color-coded electoral map makes that perfectly clear. Even an state
electoral map makes that clear. All the cities are in blue and everything
else is in red.
Not so simple. Working class neighborhoods in cities tended to vote
for Trump.

Further out suburbs voted for Trump, and those are not "country
people."

A lot of close in suburbs voted for Hillary (now then Biden).
Sometimes they have a substantial black population, and/or are a
spillover from urban yuppydom.
Post by ***@gmail.com
As far as racism is concerned, I would say the more racist elements of
America are in the rural areas. The Venn diagram of "racists" and "country
folk" wouldn't coincide exactly, but they would largely cover the same
area.
Calling people who don't agree with your leftist political views
"racist" is nasty and intolerant.

There is very little anti-black racism in the US these days. The
racists are usually politically correct and think it's OK to
discriminate against whites.

https://news.yahoo.com/oregon-sets-coronavirus-relief-fund-022145281.html

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/09/us/coronavirus-vaccine.html

.John
-----------------------
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm
Bud
2021-01-13 15:19:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by ***@gmail.com
Post by John McAdams
Post by ***@gmail.com
Post by Bud
Post by Anthony Marsh
When Obama left office the DOW was at 19,732
When Trump left it was 18,917. So all you Trump supporters think that
this proves that Whites are smarter than Blacks.
Obama only got elected because racists voted for him because he was
black.
Question: Is Obama more black or white?
Biracial, but everybody was saying he was "black."
Exactly! Obama was no more black than he was white. But WHY do people
consider him black? Three reasons: 1) He married a black woman, 2) He
looks more black than white and 3) He seems to identify more with being
black than white. I know some of these are silly reasons, but that's how
most people determine somebody whose racial identity is somewhat
ambiguous.
Tiger Woods is no more black than he is Asian. Why do people consider
him black?

1) He married a white woman.

2) Other than skin tone, his featutres are very Asian.

Loading Image...

3) He never seemed to get caught up in the race trap.
Post by ***@gmail.com
It's like asking: Is Derek Jeter white or black?
Most people say that he is BOTH. Like Obama, Jeter's father was black
but his mother was white. When asked this question, almost EVERYBODY
would instantly remind the questioner that Derek Jeter is half white and
half black. Why? 1) He married a white woman. 2) He doesn't look very
black and 3) He doesn't identify strongly with ANY race.
Post by John McAdams
Post by ***@gmail.com
When you say "racists voted for him", are you saying that the Whites who
voted for him were racists or that that the Blacks who voted for him were
racists? Or, maybe you're saying that EVERYBODY who voted for him was a
racist which, to me, seems like a racist statement in itself.
He can speak for himself, but I think he's saying that people who
voted for Obama simply *because* he was black are as racist as people
who would vote against him because he was black.
I get the point - that it is considered racist if the REASON you voted (or
didn't vote) for somebody was SPECIFICALLY because of their race. My point
is that Obama was an enigma in that he was not fully white nor fully
black; although, I imagine there is a significant number of people who
don't know that.
Post by John McAdams
The political divide in the US today is not mostly between anti-black
racists and non-racists. It's between pro-black politically correct
racists and non-racists. The anti-black racists are a tiny
marginalized group.
I would say the biggest political divide is between "city folk" and
"country folk." There are two Americas, urban-America and rural-America. A
color-coded electoral map makes that perfectly clear. Even an state
electoral map makes that clear. All the cities are in blue and everything
else is in red.
As far as racism is concerned, I would say the more racist elements of
America are in the rural areas. The Venn diagram of "racists" and "country
folk" wouldn't coincide exactly, but they would largely cover the same
area.
What is the litmus test for being deemed a racist?

Would you consider yourself to be racist?
Post by ***@gmail.com
David Emerling
Memphis, TN
John Corbett
2021-01-13 21:47:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bud
Post by ***@gmail.com
Post by John McAdams
Post by ***@gmail.com
Post by Bud
Post by Anthony Marsh
When Obama left office the DOW was at 19,732
When Trump left it was 18,917. So all you Trump supporters think that
this proves that Whites are smarter than Blacks.
Obama only got elected because racists voted for him because he was
black.
Question: Is Obama more black or white?
Biracial, but everybody was saying he was "black."
Exactly! Obama was no more black than he was white. But WHY do people
consider him black? Three reasons: 1) He married a black woman, 2) He
looks more black than white and 3) He seems to identify more with being
black than white. I know some of these are silly reasons, but that's how
most people determine somebody whose racial identity is somewhat
ambiguous.
Tiger Woods is no more black than he is Asian. Why do people consider
him black?
1) He married a white woman.
2) Other than skin tone, his featutres are very Asian.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/3e/Tiger_Woods_in_May_2019.jpg/800px-Tiger_Woods_in_May_2019.jpg
3) He never seemed to get caught up in the race trap.
Post by ***@gmail.com
It's like asking: Is Derek Jeter white or black?
Most people say that he is BOTH. Like Obama, Jeter's father was black
but his mother was white. When asked this question, almost EVERYBODY
would instantly remind the questioner that Derek Jeter is half white and
half black. Why? 1) He married a white woman. 2) He doesn't look very
black and 3) He doesn't identify strongly with ANY race.
Post by John McAdams
Post by ***@gmail.com
When you say "racists voted for him", are you saying that the Whites who
voted for him were racists or that that the Blacks who voted for him were
racists? Or, maybe you're saying that EVERYBODY who voted for him was a
racist which, to me, seems like a racist statement in itself.
He can speak for himself, but I think he's saying that people who
voted for Obama simply *because* he was black are as racist as people
who would vote against him because he was black.
I get the point - that it is considered racist if the REASON you voted (or
didn't vote) for somebody was SPECIFICALLY because of their race. My point
is that Obama was an enigma in that he was not fully white nor fully
black; although, I imagine there is a significant number of people who
don't know that.
Post by John McAdams
The political divide in the US today is not mostly between anti-black
racists and non-racists. It's between pro-black politically correct
racists and non-racists. The anti-black racists are a tiny
marginalized group.
I would say the biggest political divide is between "city folk" and
"country folk." There are two Americas, urban-America and rural-America. A
color-coded electoral map makes that perfectly clear. Even an state
electoral map makes that clear. All the cities are in blue and everything
else is in red.
As far as racism is concerned, I would say the more racist elements of
America are in the rural areas. The Venn diagram of "racists" and "country
folk" wouldn't coincide exactly, but they would largely cover the same
area.
What is the litmus test for being deemed a racist?
Would you consider yourself to be racist?
A lot of people don't know this but Rickie Fowler like Tiger Woods has a
mother of Asian decent. I was surprised to learn this too because his
facial features don't look Asian to me. Just as Tiger is considered to be
a black guy, people think of Fowler as a white guy but the reality is he
is a mixed race person. What does it take to be a member of a particular
race. In the case of Elizabeth Warren all it takes is to be 1/1024 to make
you a Native American. Apparently many moons ago, Hiawatha sowed some wild
seeds with one of her ancestors.
John Corbett
2021-01-13 21:47:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by ***@gmail.com
Post by John McAdams
Post by ***@gmail.com
Question: Is Obama more black or white?
Biracial, but everybody was saying he was "black."
Exactly! Obama was no more black than he was white. But WHY do people
consider him black? Three reasons: 1) He married a black woman, 2) He
looks more black than white and 3) He seems to identify more with being
black than white. I know some of these are silly reasons, but that's how
most people determine somebody whose racial identity is somewhat
ambiguous.
It's like asking: Is Derek Jeter white or black?
Most people say that he is BOTH. Like Obama, Jeter's father was black but
his mother was white. When asked this question, almost EVERYBODY would
instantly remind the questioner that Derek Jeter is half white and half
black. Why? 1) He married a white woman. 2) He doesn't look very black and
3) He doesn't identify strongly with ANY race.
We are seeing many more prominent mixed race people and the stigma has
largely vanished. Jeter, Tiger Woods, Patrick Mahomes just to name a few
from the world of sports. I've notice recently there have been a lot of
commercials recently featuring mixed race couples. Such a thing would have
been unthinkable as little as 20 years ago. Advertisers would have shied
away from such a thing because it would have been controversial. Now it is
widely accepted.
John McAdams
2021-01-14 01:40:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by John Corbett
Post by ***@gmail.com
Question: Is Obama more black or white?
recently there have been a lot of
commercials recently featuring mixed race couples. Such a thing would have
been unthinkable as little as 20 years ago. Advertisers would have shied
away from such a thing because it would have been controversial. Now it is
widely accepted.
I've noticed that, and while I'm fine with interracial marriage, I
don't like being *propagandized* about interracial marriage.

It's just cheap virtue signaling by huge corporations. Sometimes, the
same corporations that use slave labor in China.

.John
-----------------------
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm
Bud
2021-01-14 18:27:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by John McAdams
Post by John Corbett
Post by ***@gmail.com
Question: Is Obama more black or white?
recently there have been a lot of
commercials recently featuring mixed race couples. Such a thing would have
been unthinkable as little as 20 years ago. Advertisers would have shied
away from such a thing because it would have been controversial. Now it is
widely accepted.
I've noticed that, and while I'm fine with interracial marriage, I
don't like being *propagandized* about interracial marriage.
It's just cheap virtue signaling by huge corporations. Sometimes, the
same corporations that use slave labor in China.
The new Cadbury commercial has a couple of (presumably) gay guys sharing
a Cadbury egg.



I think they did a good job of slipping it in with the others as just
another thing, not a "look at how virtuous we are" like that cringy
Gillette commercial.
Post by John McAdams
.John
-----------------------
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm
John Corbett
2021-01-14 23:21:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bud
Post by John McAdams
Post by John Corbett
Post by ***@gmail.com
Question: Is Obama more black or white?
recently there have been a lot of
commercials recently featuring mixed race couples. Such a thing would have
been unthinkable as little as 20 years ago. Advertisers would have shied
away from such a thing because it would have been controversial. Now it is
widely accepted.
I've noticed that, and while I'm fine with interracial marriage, I
don't like being *propagandized* about interracial marriage.
It's just cheap virtue signaling by huge corporations. Sometimes, the
same corporations that use slave labor in China.
The new Cadbury commercial has a couple of (presumably) gay guys sharing
a Cadbury egg.
http://youtu.be/t6fdOwluWPI
I think they did a good job of slipping it in with the others as just
another thing, not a "look at how virtuous we are" like that cringy
Gillette commercial.
If I were an advertiser, I'd want my commercials to sell my product, not
push a social agenda. I think I might have seen the Gillette commercial
that you speak of but I can't remember the specifics. Is that really the
way to sell your product to the widest possible customer base when your
slogan is "Gillette, the best a man can get"?

I'm digressing now but I haven't used Gillette products for years. For
about the last three or four years I have been shaving with the old
fashion double edge razor blades. A pack of five costs me about $3.75 and
I get about a week's worth of shaves from one. Even more now that I am
cooped up and not shaving every day. I laugh at those Dollar Shave Club
commercials because i spend a little more than a dime a shave. I've even
reverted to the old fashioned shaving mug instead of aerosol shave cream.
One little bar of shaving soap lasts for months.

I started shaving regularly about the time Gillette was deemphasizing the
double edge safety razor in favor of the Trac II cartridges with a double
blade. Shortly after that SNL did a spoof commercial with a three blade
cartridge with the tag line "Because you'll believe anything". Now they
are up to five blade cartridges for real. I guarantee you my old fashioned
double edge razor shaves me as close and comfortable as those expensive
cartridges. If I wanted to I could shave with a new blade every day and it
would still be cheaper than those cartridges.
Bud
2021-01-15 06:37:20 UTC
Permalink
Post by John Corbett
Post by Bud
Post by John McAdams
Post by John Corbett
Post by ***@gmail.com
Question: Is Obama more black or white?
recently there have been a lot of
commercials recently featuring mixed race couples. Such a thing would have
been unthinkable as little as 20 years ago. Advertisers would have shied
away from such a thing because it would have been controversial. Now it is
widely accepted.
I've noticed that, and while I'm fine with interracial marriage, I
don't like being *propagandized* about interracial marriage.
It's just cheap virtue signaling by huge corporations. Sometimes, the
same corporations that use slave labor in China.
The new Cadbury commercial has a couple of (presumably) gay guys sharing
a Cadbury egg.
http://youtu.be/t6fdOwluWPI
I think they did a good job of slipping it in with the others as just
another thing, not a "look at how virtuous we are" like that cringy
Gillette commercial.
If I were an advertiser, I'd want my commercials to sell my product, not
push a social agenda.
I told my brother about the gay guys both biting into the same Cadbury
egg and he said "Now I know what they put inside those eggs".
Post by John Corbett
I think I might have seen the Gillette commercial
that you speak of but I can't remember the specifics. Is that really the
way to sell your product to the widest possible customer base when your
slogan is "Gillette, the best a man can get"?
One of my favorite videos is this parody of the Gillette commercial,
mostly a voiceover of the actual commercial...



Gillette doubled down with a trans commercial, so they parodied that
too...



They even did a Covington Gillette parody...



I`m glad this was brought up, I hadn`t watched them in a while, they
still crack me up.
Post by John Corbett
I'm digressing now but I haven't used Gillette products for years. For
about the last three or four years I have been shaving with the old
fashion double edge razor blades. A pack of five costs me about $3.75 and
I get about a week's worth of shaves from one. Even more now that I am
cooped up and not shaving every day. I laugh at those Dollar Shave Club
commercials because i spend a little more than a dime a shave. I've even
reverted to the old fashioned shaving mug instead of aerosol shave cream.
One little bar of shaving soap lasts for months.
I`ve only ever used just regular soap to shave. I tried aerosol shaving
cream one time, and it seemed I could cover my whole body with the
smallest amount I could get to come out.

And because of my extreme couponing days I haven`t paid for a shaver in
years and likely never will, I have bags and bags of them. I`ve given many
packs away and still have plenty. I like the Schick Titanium, they never
seem to get dull, I throw them away when I think I`ve gotten enough use
out of them.
Post by John Corbett
I started shaving regularly about the time Gillette was deemphasizing the
double edge safety razor in favor of the Trac II cartridges with a double
blade. Shortly after that SNL did a spoof commercial with a three blade
cartridge with the tag line "Because you'll believe anything". Now they
are up to five blade cartridges for real. I guarantee you my old fashioned
double edge razor shaves me as close and comfortable as those expensive
cartridges. If I wanted to I could shave with a new blade every day and it
would still be cheaper than those cartridges.
Bud
2021-01-10 23:35:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by ***@gmail.com
Post by Bud
Post by Anthony Marsh
When Obama left office the DOW was at 19,732
When Trump left it was 18,917. So all you Trump supporters think that
this proves that Whites are smarter than Blacks.
Obama only got elected because racists voted for him because he was
black.
Question: Is Obama more black or white?
When you say "racists voted for him", are you saying that the Whites who
voted for him were racists or that that the Blacks who voted for him were
racists?
Both.
Post by ***@gmail.com
Or, maybe you're saying that EVERYBODY who voted for him was a
racist which, to me, seems like a racist statement in itself.
No, I wouldn`t say everyone that voted for him was racist. Some might
have thought him the makings of a good President. I don`t follow politics
that closely but I never heard of him before he ran for President. I think
clearly a big selling point for him was his race. Many of the whites who
voted for him saw him as an articulate, non-threatening black man. Like
buying an electric car or giving money to a bum, it allows the person to
feel warm and fuzzy about themselves, even if it really does nothing.
Blacks embraced him as a fellow black. Race weighed heavily as a
motivating force to vote for him in both groups.

I sort of elaborated in a rely to Tony, you may have missed it...

"To say he should get the job because he was black is no different than
a white employer not giving a job to a black person because they are
black."
Post by ***@gmail.com
David Emerling
Memphis, TN
Loading...