Anti-CT Film

[Mark]

Not sure if this has been discussed on here or not. Anyone own a copy?
Any good?

https://www.amazon.com/Conspiracy-Theorists-Lie-James-Lambert/dp/B0149B3XKE/ref=sr_1_21?dchild=1&keywords=john+f+kennedy&qid=1607683094&sr=8-21

[John Corbett]

Not sure if this has been discussed on here or not. Anyone own a copy?
Any good?
https://www.amazon.com/Conspiracy-Theorists-Lie-James-Lambert/dp/B0149B3XKE/ref=sr_1_21?dchild=1&keywords=john+f+kennedy&qid=1607683094&sr=8-21

Lambert did a review on his own movie and he pointed out something I
noticed even before I read his words:

"Ok, so I'm biased, since I made this film, but I have noticed a clear
pattern here that I thought I should point out. Most viewers give this doc
5 Stars or 1 Star; they love it or they hate it. That tells me that I must
have done something right, because those who can accept history praise it
and those who refuse to accept history attack it."

[Mark]

Post by John Corbett

Not sure if this has been discussed on here or not. Anyone own a copy?
Any good?
https://www.amazon.com/Conspiracy-Theorists-Lie-James-Lambert/dp/B0149B3XKE/ref=sr_1_21?dchild=1&keywords=john+f+kennedy&qid=1607683094&sr=8-21

Lambert did a review on his own movie and he pointed out something I
"Ok, so I'm biased, since I made this film, but I have noticed a clear
pattern here that I thought I should point out. Most viewers give this doc
5 Stars or 1 Star; they love it or they hate it. That tells me that I must
have done something right, because those who can accept history praise it
and those who refuse to accept history attack it."

Yeah, I read that. What he says about Amazon reviews of his film holds
true for reviews of LN books. Lots of 1 Stars from obvious CTs, and you
have to wonder if they even read the book. Mark

[John Corbett]

Not sure if this has been discussed on here or not. Anyone own a copy?
Any good?
https://www.amazon.com/Conspiracy-Theorists-Lie-James-Lambert/dp/B0149B3XKE/ref=sr_1_21?dchild=1&keywords=john+f+kennedy&qid=1607683094&sr=8-21

Compare Lambert's self review to this one from a CT:

"This Lambert and everyone interested in the real truth of the murder and
coverup should read and study the US Government's final findings by the
AARB. This was ordered by Clinton. The year 1992. A wealth of facts
including names in Government high positions that were involved. I find
this insulting to the life's work on many intelligent and educated men and
women who have risked their lives to expose this truth. Many in fact have
been silenced by odd and convenient deaths. Research yourselves, study all
the facts, not hearsay."

First of all, Clinton did not become president until 1993. He had nothing
to do with the creation of the ARRB. Second, the ARRB did not issue
findings. Their job was not to reinvestigate the crime. Their purpose was
to supervise the release of records that were still classified. Not
surprising this guy would have such a poor command of basic facts. The
ultimate irony was his last statement, "...study all the facts, not
hearsay.". The case for conspiracy is based largely on hearsay and very
little on the facts.

[Mark]

Post by John Corbett

Not sure if this has been discussed on here or not. Anyone own a copy?
Any good?
https://www.amazon.com/Conspiracy-Theorists-Lie-James-Lambert/dp/B0149B3XKE/ref=sr_1_21?dchild=1&keywords=john+f+kennedy&qid=1607683094&sr=8-21

"This Lambert and everyone interested in the real truth of the murder and
coverup should read and study the US Government's final findings by the
AARB. This was ordered by Clinton. The year 1992. A wealth of facts
including names in Government high positions that were involved. I find
this insulting to the life's work on many intelligent and educated men and
women who have risked their lives to expose this truth. Many in fact have
been silenced by odd and convenient deaths. Research yourselves, study all
the facts, not hearsay."
First of all, Clinton did not become president until 1993. He had nothing
to do with the creation of the ARRB. Second, the ARRB did not issue
findings. Their job was not to reinvestigate the crime. Their purpose was
to supervise the release of records that were still classified. Not
surprising this guy would have such a poor command of basic facts. The
ultimate irony was his last statement, "...study all the facts, not
hearsay.". The case for conspiracy is based largely on hearsay and very
little on the facts.

He pretty much screwed up everything he touched on, didn't he? Some CTs
have a way of doing that. Note how he still believes in the death squads.
Mark

[David Von Pein]

http://jfk-archives.blogspot.com/2014/11/conspiracy-theorists-lie.html

"I applaud James Lambert's efforts to spread the anti-conspiracy word to
the masses. His documentary provides one more much-needed source with
which to combat the constant flow of rumors, speculation, and half-truths
that continue to be endorsed by the conspiracy theorists of the world.
James' interviews with the people in Dealey Plaza also clearly illustrate
that President John F. Kennedy was oh so right when he said [in
1961]....."Reason does not always appeal to unreasonable men"." -- DVP;
Nov. 18, 2014