Discussion:
Private Property Rights Protect The Assassins
(too old to reply)
19efppp
2020-10-08 02:37:47 UTC
Permalink
Why isn't this stuff publicly available?

DPD Channel 2 recordings after 12:48 PM. I know of two "researchers" who
say they have such recordings, but they want to keep them to themselves.

The Arch Kimbrough photos. Harold Weisberg said that Kimbrough took
"dozens" of photos, but the only one I've ever seen is a low quality crop
of Kimbrough 8.

The other Willis photos. Willis published 12, and they can be found
online. But Weisberg said he had 6 more, all in color. I've seen 1 of
those 6 in color, and another 1 in B&W that I'd like to see in color. With
all of the JFK fanatics out there, like DVP and Robin Unger and Prayer
Man, you'd think these things would be available. They are far more
relevant than many of they photos they do have posted. And I'm not opposed
to irrelevant photos. Those are cool, too. But why not the more important
stuff?

Release the documents!
Jason Burke
2020-10-08 16:53:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by 19efppp
Why isn't this stuff publicly available?
DPD Channel 2 recordings after 12:48 PM. I know of two "researchers" who
say they have such recordings, but they want to keep them to themselves.
Would that be Tony and the mouse in his pocket?
Post by 19efppp
The Arch Kimbrough photos. Harold Weisberg said that Kimbrough took
"dozens" of photos, but the only one I've ever seen is a low quality crop
of Kimbrough 8.
The other Willis photos. Willis published 12, and they can be found
online. But Weisberg said he had 6 more, all in color. I've seen 1 of
those 6 in color, and another 1 in B&W that I'd like to see in color. With
all of the JFK fanatics out there, like DVP and Robin Unger and Prayer
Man, you'd think these things would be available. They are far more
relevant than many of they photos they do have posted. And I'm not opposed
to irrelevant photos. Those are cool, too. But why not the more important
stuff?
Release the documents!
19efppp
2020-10-09 00:08:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jason Burke
Post by 19efppp
Why isn't this stuff publicly available?
DPD Channel 2 recordings after 12:48 PM. I know of two "researchers" who
say they have such recordings, but they want to keep them to themselves.
Would that be Tony and the mouse in his pocket?
Post by 19efppp
The Arch Kimbrough photos. Harold Weisberg said that Kimbrough took
"dozens" of photos, but the only one I've ever seen is a low quality crop
of Kimbrough 8.
The other Willis photos. Willis published 12, and they can be found
online. But Weisberg said he had 6 more, all in color. I've seen 1 of
those 6 in color, and another 1 in B&W that I'd like to see in color. With
all of the JFK fanatics out there, like DVP and Robin Unger and Prayer
Man, you'd think these things would be available. They are far more
relevant than many of they photos they do have posted. And I'm not opposed
to irrelevant photos. Those are cool, too. But why not the more important
stuff?
Release the documents!
No. Steve Barber and Odellm have said they have the recording, but
apparently they'd rather not make it public. Marsh seems to be happy to
share what he has.
John Corbett
2020-10-09 22:29:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by 19efppp
Post by Jason Burke
Post by 19efppp
Why isn't this stuff publicly available?
DPD Channel 2 recordings after 12:48 PM. I know of two "researchers" who
say they have such recordings, but they want to keep them to themselves.
Would that be Tony and the mouse in his pocket?
Post by 19efppp
The Arch Kimbrough photos. Harold Weisberg said that Kimbrough took
"dozens" of photos, but the only one I've ever seen is a low quality crop
of Kimbrough 8.
The other Willis photos. Willis published 12, and they can be found
online. But Weisberg said he had 6 more, all in color. I've seen 1 of
those 6 in color, and another 1 in B&W that I'd like to see in color. With
all of the JFK fanatics out there, like DVP and Robin Unger and Prayer
Man, you'd think these things would be available. They are far more
relevant than many of they photos they do have posted. And I'm not opposed
to irrelevant photos. Those are cool, too. But why not the more important
stuff?
Release the documents!
No. Steve Barber and Odellm have said they have the recording, but
apparently they'd rather not make it public. Marsh seems to be happy to
share what he has.
Whatever they have is a copy, not the original. The copy is theirs to do
with as they please, assuming it was legally obtained. They figured out a
way to get a copy. Why can't you?
odellm
2020-10-11 00:25:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by 19efppp
Post by Jason Burke
Post by 19efppp
Why isn't this stuff publicly available?
DPD Channel 2 recordings after 12:48 PM. I know of two "researchers" who
say they have such recordings, but they want to keep them to themselves.
Would that be Tony and the mouse in his pocket?
Post by 19efppp
The Arch Kimbrough photos. Harold Weisberg said that Kimbrough took
"dozens" of photos, but the only one I've ever seen is a low quality crop
of Kimbrough 8.
The other Willis photos. Willis published 12, and they can be found
online. But Weisberg said he had 6 more, all in color. I've seen 1 of
those 6 in color, and another 1 in B&W that I'd like to see in color. With
all of the JFK fanatics out there, like DVP and Robin Unger and Prayer
Man, you'd think these things would be available. They are far more
relevant than many of they photos they do have posted. And I'm not opposed
to irrelevant photos. Those are cool, too. But why not the more important
stuff?
Release the documents!
No. Steve Barber and Odellm have said they have the recording, but
apparently they'd rather not make it public. Marsh seems to be happy to
share what he has.
This person is being absurd, and not telling the truth. When I posted the
channel 2 video he immediately attacked me for withholding channel 2
recordings. The fact that I'd just posted one seemed to have gone over
his head.

I also never said I'd rather not make it public (like I just had). In
fact I said it was my intent to eventually post all of the recordings.
And he has no idea what I have or what Steve has.

But they are my copies, and it's my labor, and there are other things
going on. So it will be when I'm ready. Most people could understand
that. Some people just rant angrily for no good reason. There's probably
a good word for people like that.

Michael
odellm
2020-10-13 02:34:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by 19efppp
Post by Jason Burke
Post by 19efppp
Why isn't this stuff publicly available?
DPD Channel 2 recordings after 12:48 PM. I know of two "researchers" who
say they have such recordings, but they want to keep them to themselves.
Would that be Tony and the mouse in his pocket?
Post by 19efppp
The Arch Kimbrough photos. Harold Weisberg said that Kimbrough took
"dozens" of photos, but the only one I've ever seen is a low quality crop
of Kimbrough 8.
The other Willis photos. Willis published 12, and they can be found
online. But Weisberg said he had 6 more, all in color. I've seen 1 of
those 6 in color, and another 1 in B&W that I'd like to see in color. With
all of the JFK fanatics out there, like DVP and Robin Unger and Prayer
Man, you'd think these things would be available. They are far more
relevant than many of they photos they do have posted. And I'm not opposed
to irrelevant photos. Those are cool, too. But why not the more important
stuff?
Release the documents!
No. Steve Barber and Odellm have said they have the recording, but
apparently they'd rather not make it public. Marsh seems to be happy to
share what he has.
This person is being absurd, and not telling the truth. When I posted the
channel 2 video he immediately attacked me for withholding channel 2
recordings. The fact that I'd just posted one seemed to have gone over
his head.
I also never said I'd rather not make it public (like I just had). In
fact I said it was my intent to eventually post all of the recordings.
And he has no idea what I have or what Steve has.
But they are my copies, and it's my labor, and there are other things
going on. So it will be when I'm ready. Most people could understand
that. Some people just rant angrily for no good reason. There's probably
a good word for people like that.
Michael
You misrepresent our conflab. Perhaps it is brainflab. But it probably is
something else. May the sweat of of your brow eventually grow some fruit
on your barren YouTube channel.
No I didn't. You started off not making sense.

Michael
19efppp
2020-10-13 11:08:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by odellm
Post by 19efppp
Post by Jason Burke
Post by 19efppp
Why isn't this stuff publicly available?
DPD Channel 2 recordings after 12:48 PM. I know of two "researchers" who
say they have such recordings, but they want to keep them to themselves.
Would that be Tony and the mouse in his pocket?
Post by 19efppp
The Arch Kimbrough photos. Harold Weisberg said that Kimbrough took
"dozens" of photos, but the only one I've ever seen is a low quality crop
of Kimbrough 8.
The other Willis photos. Willis published 12, and they can be found
online. But Weisberg said he had 6 more, all in color. I've seen 1 of
those 6 in color, and another 1 in B&W that I'd like to see in color. With
all of the JFK fanatics out there, like DVP and Robin Unger and Prayer
Man, you'd think these things would be available. They are far more
relevant than many of they photos they do have posted. And I'm not opposed
to irrelevant photos. Those are cool, too. But why not the more important
stuff?
Release the documents!
No. Steve Barber and Odellm have said they have the recording, but
apparently they'd rather not make it public. Marsh seems to be happy to
share what he has.
This person is being absurd, and not telling the truth. When I posted the
channel 2 video he immediately attacked me for withholding channel 2
recordings. The fact that I'd just posted one seemed to have gone over
his head.
I also never said I'd rather not make it public (like I just had). In
fact I said it was my intent to eventually post all of the recordings.
And he has no idea what I have or what Steve has.
But they are my copies, and it's my labor, and there are other things
going on. So it will be when I'm ready. Most people could understand
that. Some people just rant angrily for no good reason. There's probably
a good word for people like that.
Michael
You misrepresent our conflab. Perhaps it is brainflab. But it probably is
something else. May the sweat of of your brow eventually grow some fruit
on your barren YouTube channel.
No I didn't. You started off not making sense.
Michael
Fine. You have the right as a free capitalist to keep your recording to
yourself. Only a commie would want to publish such a thing, anyway, and
you're no Oswald. You are Michael. I hear you roar!
odellm
2020-10-13 23:17:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by 19efppp
Post by 19efppp
Post by Jason Burke
Post by 19efppp
Why isn't this stuff publicly available?
DPD Channel 2 recordings after 12:48 PM. I know of two "researchers" who
say they have such recordings, but they want to keep them to themselves.
Would that be Tony and the mouse in his pocket?
Post by 19efppp
The Arch Kimbrough photos. Harold Weisberg said that Kimbrough took
"dozens" of photos, but the only one I've ever seen is a low quality crop
of Kimbrough 8.
The other Willis photos. Willis published 12, and they can be found
online. But Weisberg said he had 6 more, all in color. I've seen 1 of
those 6 in color, and another 1 in B&W that I'd like to see in color. With
all of the JFK fanatics out there, like DVP and Robin Unger and Prayer
Man, you'd think these things would be available. They are far more
relevant than many of they photos they do have posted. And I'm not opposed
to irrelevant photos. Those are cool, too. But why not the more important
stuff?
Release the documents!
No. Steve Barber and Odellm have said they have the recording, but
apparently they'd rather not make it public. Marsh seems to be happy to
share what he has.
This person is being absurd, and not telling the truth. When I posted the
channel 2 video he immediately attacked me for withholding channel 2
recordings. The fact that I'd just posted one seemed to have gone over
his head.
I also never said I'd rather not make it public (like I just had). In
fact I said it was my intent to eventually post all of the recordings.
And he has no idea what I have or what Steve has.
But they are my copies, and it's my labor, and there are other things
going on. So it will be when I'm ready. Most people could understand
that. Some people just rant angrily for no good reason. There's probably
a good word for people like that.
Michael
You misrepresent our conflab. Perhaps it is brainflab. But it probably is
something else. May the sweat of of your brow eventually grow some fruit
on your barren YouTube channel.
No I didn't. You started off not making sense.
Michael
Fine. You have the right as a free capitalist to keep your recording to
yourself. Only a commie would want to publish such a thing, anyway, and
you're no Oswald. You are Michael. I hear you roar!
And you continue to not make sense. I've clearly said it is my intent to
publish them. You're only angry that I didn't comply with your wish in
advance. You were immediately angry that I hadn't already published them,
even before you expressed any desire to have them. Not very sensible.

Michael
19efppp
2020-10-14 18:23:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by odellm
Post by 19efppp
Post by 19efppp
Post by Jason Burke
Post by 19efppp
Why isn't this stuff publicly available?
DPD Channel 2 recordings after 12:48 PM. I know of two "researchers" who
say they have such recordings, but they want to keep them to themselves.
Would that be Tony and the mouse in his pocket?
Post by 19efppp
The Arch Kimbrough photos. Harold Weisberg said that Kimbrough took
"dozens" of photos, but the only one I've ever seen is a low quality crop
of Kimbrough 8.
The other Willis photos. Willis published 12, and they can be found
online. But Weisberg said he had 6 more, all in color. I've seen 1 of
those 6 in color, and another 1 in B&W that I'd like to see in color. With
all of the JFK fanatics out there, like DVP and Robin Unger and Prayer
Man, you'd think these things would be available. They are far more
relevant than many of they photos they do have posted. And I'm not opposed
to irrelevant photos. Those are cool, too. But why not the more important
stuff?
Release the documents!
No. Steve Barber and Odellm have said they have the recording, but
apparently they'd rather not make it public. Marsh seems to be happy to
share what he has.
This person is being absurd, and not telling the truth. When I posted the
channel 2 video he immediately attacked me for withholding channel 2
recordings. The fact that I'd just posted one seemed to have gone over
his head.
I also never said I'd rather not make it public (like I just had). In
fact I said it was my intent to eventually post all of the recordings.
And he has no idea what I have or what Steve has.
But they are my copies, and it's my labor, and there are other things
going on. So it will be when I'm ready. Most people could understand
that. Some people just rant angrily for no good reason. There's probably
a good word for people like that.
Michael
You misrepresent our conflab. Perhaps it is brainflab. But it probably is
something else. May the sweat of of your brow eventually grow some fruit
on your barren YouTube channel.
No I didn't. You started off not making sense.
Michael
Fine. You have the right as a free capitalist to keep your recording to
yourself. Only a commie would want to publish such a thing, anyway, and
you're no Oswald. You are Michael. I hear you roar!
And you continue to not make sense. I've clearly said it is my intent to
publish them. You're only angry that I didn't comply with your wish in
advance. You were immediately angry that I hadn't already published them,
even before you expressed any desire to have them. Not very sensible.
Michael
I was never angry at you. That's all in your own head. I am amused at you.
With a tinge of disgust. But mostly I laugh.
x
2020-10-15 22:48:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by 19efppp
Post by odellm
Post by 19efppp
Post by 19efppp
Post by Jason Burke
Post by 19efppp
Why isn't this stuff publicly available?
DPD Channel 2 recordings after 12:48 PM. I know of two "researchers" who
say they have such recordings, but they want to keep them to themselves.
Would that be Tony and the mouse in his pocket?
Post by 19efppp
The Arch Kimbrough photos. Harold Weisberg said that Kimbrough took
"dozens" of photos, but the only one I've ever seen is a low quality crop
of Kimbrough 8.
The other Willis photos. Willis published 12, and they can be found
online. But Weisberg said he had 6 more, all in color. I've seen 1 of
those 6 in color, and another 1 in B&W that I'd like to see in color. With
all of the JFK fanatics out there, like DVP and Robin Unger and Prayer
Man, you'd think these things would be available. They are far more
relevant than many of they photos they do have posted. And I'm not opposed
to irrelevant photos. Those are cool, too. But why not the more important
stuff?
Release the documents!
No. Steve Barber and Odellm have said they have the recording, but
apparently they'd rather not make it public. Marsh seems to be happy to
share what he has.
This person is being absurd, and not telling the truth. When I posted the
channel 2 video he immediately attacked me for withholding channel 2
recordings. The fact that I'd just posted one seemed to have gone over
his head.
I also never said I'd rather not make it public (like I just had). In
fact I said it was my intent to eventually post all of the recordings.
And he has no idea what I have or what Steve has.
But they are my copies, and it's my labor, and there are other things
going on. So it will be when I'm ready. Most people could understand
that. Some people just rant angrily for no good reason. There's probably
a good word for people like that.
Michael
You misrepresent our conflab. Perhaps it is brainflab. But it probably is
something else. May the sweat of of your brow eventually grow some fruit
on your barren YouTube channel.
No I didn't. You started off not making sense.
Michael
Fine. You have the right as a free capitalist to keep your recording to
yourself. Only a commie would want to publish such a thing, anyway, and
you're no Oswald. You are Michael. I hear you roar!
And you continue to not make sense. I've clearly said it is my intent to
publish them. You're only angry that I didn't comply with your wish in
advance. You were immediately angry that I hadn't already published them,
even before you expressed any desire to have them. Not very sensible.
Michael
I was never angry at you. That's all in your own head. I am amused at you.
With a tinge of disgust. But mostly I laugh.
And through all of that, you still make no sense.
19efppp
2020-10-17 04:06:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by x
Post by 19efppp
Post by odellm
Post by 19efppp
Post by 19efppp
Post by Jason Burke
Post by 19efppp
Why isn't this stuff publicly available?
DPD Channel 2 recordings after 12:48 PM. I know of two "researchers" who
say they have such recordings, but they want to keep them to themselves.
Would that be Tony and the mouse in his pocket?
Post by 19efppp
The Arch Kimbrough photos. Harold Weisberg said that Kimbrough took
"dozens" of photos, but the only one I've ever seen is a low quality crop
of Kimbrough 8.
The other Willis photos. Willis published 12, and they can be found
online. But Weisberg said he had 6 more, all in color. I've seen 1 of
those 6 in color, and another 1 in B&W that I'd like to see in color. With
all of the JFK fanatics out there, like DVP and Robin Unger and Prayer
Man, you'd think these things would be available. They are far more
relevant than many of they photos they do have posted. And I'm not opposed
to irrelevant photos. Those are cool, too. But why not the more important
stuff?
Release the documents!
No. Steve Barber and Odellm have said they have the recording, but
apparently they'd rather not make it public. Marsh seems to be happy to
share what he has.
This person is being absurd, and not telling the truth. When I posted the
channel 2 video he immediately attacked me for withholding channel 2
recordings. The fact that I'd just posted one seemed to have gone over
his head.
I also never said I'd rather not make it public (like I just had). In
fact I said it was my intent to eventually post all of the recordings.
And he has no idea what I have or what Steve has.
But they are my copies, and it's my labor, and there are other things
going on. So it will be when I'm ready. Most people could understand
that. Some people just rant angrily for no good reason. There's probably
a good word for people like that.
Michael
You misrepresent our conflab. Perhaps it is brainflab. But it probably is
something else. May the sweat of of your brow eventually grow some fruit
on your barren YouTube channel.
No I didn't. You started off not making sense.
Michael
Fine. You have the right as a free capitalist to keep your recording to
yourself. Only a commie would want to publish such a thing, anyway, and
you're no Oswald. You are Michael. I hear you roar!
And you continue to not make sense. I've clearly said it is my intent to
publish them. You're only angry that I didn't comply with your wish in
advance. You were immediately angry that I hadn't already published them,
even before you expressed any desire to have them. Not very sensible.
Michael
I was never angry at you. That's all in your own head. I am amused at you.
With a tinge of disgust. But mostly I laugh.
And through all of that, you still make no sense.
Any sense you perceive is necessarily in your own head, so what you mean
is that you cannot make sense of what I say. You're simply not up to the
task.

Anthony Marsh
2020-10-10 00:26:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jason Burke
Post by 19efppp
Why isn't this stuff publicly available?
DPD Channel 2 recordings after 12:48 PM. I know of two "researchers"
who say they have such recordings, but they want to keep them to
themselves.
Would that be Tony and the mouse in his pocket?
MY MOUSE IS ok,but I NEED A NEW KEYBOARD.
Post by Jason Burke
Post by 19efppp
The Arch Kimbrough photos. Harold Weisberg said that Kimbrough took
"dozens" of photos, but the only one I've ever seen is a low quality crop
of Kimbrough 8.
The other Willis photos. Willis published 12, and they can be found
online. But Weisberg said he had 6 more, all in color. I've seen 1 of
those 6 in color, and another 1 in B&W that I'd like to see in color. With
all of the JFK fanatics out there, like DVP and Robin Unger and Prayer
Man, you'd think these things would be available. They are far more
relevant than many of they photos they do have posted. And I'm not opposed
to irrelevant photos. Those are cool, too. But why not the more important
stuff?
Release the documents!
Jason Burke
2020-10-10 01:11:54 UTC
Permalink
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by Jason Burke
Post by 19efppp
Why isn't this stuff publicly available?
DPD Channel 2 recordings after 12:48 PM. I know of two "researchers"
who say they have such recordings, but they want to keep them to
themselves.
Would that be Tony and the mouse in his pocket?
MY MOUSE IS ok,but I NEED A NEW KEYBOARD.
Preferably one with a `Caps Lock' key...
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by Jason Burke
Post by 19efppp
The Arch Kimbrough photos. Harold Weisberg said that Kimbrough took
"dozens" of photos, but the only one I've ever seen is a low quality crop
of Kimbrough 8.
The other Willis photos. Willis published 12, and they can be found
online. But Weisberg said he had 6 more, all in color. I've seen 1 of
those 6 in color, and another 1 in B&W that I'd like to see in color. With
all of the JFK fanatics out there, like DVP and Robin Unger and Prayer
Man, you'd think these things would be available. They are far more
relevant than many of they photos they do have posted. And I'm not opposed
to irrelevant photos. Those are cool, too. But why not the more important
stuff?
Release the documents!
Anthony Marsh
2020-10-11 03:35:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jason Burke
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by Jason Burke
Post by 19efppp
Why isn't this stuff publicly available?
DPD Channel 2 recordings after 12:48 PM. I know of two "researchers"
who say they have such recordings, but they want to keep them to
themselves.
Would that be Tony and the mouse in his pocket?
MY MOUSE IS ok,but I NEED A NEW KEYBOARD.
Preferably one with a `Caps Lock' key...
No, the problem I have is that I keep hitting Caps Lock when I try to
hold short.
And my L is worn off.
Post by Jason Burke
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by Jason Burke
Post by 19efppp
The Arch Kimbrough photos. Harold Weisberg said that Kimbrough took
"dozens" of photos, but the only one I've ever seen is a low quality crop
of Kimbrough 8.
The other Willis photos. Willis published 12, and they can be found
online. But Weisberg said he had 6 more, all in color. I've seen 1 of
those 6 in color, and another 1 in B&W that I'd like to see in color. With
all of the JFK fanatics out there, like DVP and Robin Unger and Prayer
Man, you'd think these things would be available. They are far more
relevant than many of they photos they do have posted. And I'm not opposed
to irrelevant photos. Those are cool, too. But why not the more important
stuff?
Release the documents!
John Corbett
2020-10-12 03:19:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by Jason Burke
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by Jason Burke
Post by 19efppp
Why isn't this stuff publicly available?
DPD Channel 2 recordings after 12:48 PM. I know of two "researchers"
who say they have such recordings, but they want to keep them to
themselves.
Would that be Tony and the mouse in his pocket?
MY MOUSE IS ok,but I NEED A NEW KEYBOARD.
Preferably one with a `Caps Lock' key...
No, the problem I have is that I keep hitting Caps Lock when I try to
hold short.
Rossley used to have the same problem.
John Corbett
2020-10-08 16:53:20 UTC
Permalink
Post by 19efppp
Why isn't this stuff publicly available?
DPD Channel 2 recordings after 12:48 PM. I know of two "researchers" who
say they have such recordings, but they want to keep them to themselves.
The Arch Kimbrough photos. Harold Weisberg said that Kimbrough took
"dozens" of photos, but the only one I've ever seen is a low quality crop
of Kimbrough 8.
The other Willis photos. Willis published 12, and they can be found
online. But Weisberg said he had 6 more, all in color. I've seen 1 of
those 6 in color, and another 1 in B&W that I'd like to see in color. With
all of the JFK fanatics out there, like DVP and Robin Unger and Prayer
Man, you'd think these things would be available. They are far more
relevant than many of they photos they do have posted. And I'm not opposed
to irrelevant photos. Those are cool, too. But why not the more important
stuff?
Release the documents!
People are free to do what they want with their private property. If law
enforcement thought they were evidence, they have the power to subpoena
them. Otherwise the owners are under no obligation to make them public to
satisfy your curiosity. Besides, for most CTs it's much more fun to
imagine what is in them. If they got released, they would probably find
out how mundane they are.
Anthony Marsh
2020-10-10 00:26:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by John Corbett
Post by 19efppp
Why isn't this stuff publicly available?
DPD Channel 2 recordings after 12:48 PM. I know of two "researchers" who
say they have such recordings, but they want to keep them to themselves.
The Arch Kimbrough photos. Harold Weisberg said that Kimbrough took
"dozens" of photos, but the only one I've ever seen is a low quality crop
of Kimbrough 8.
The other Willis photos. Willis published 12, and they can be found
online. But Weisberg said he had 6 more, all in color. I've seen 1 of
those 6 in color, and another 1 in B&W that I'd like to see in color. With
all of the JFK fanatics out there, like DVP and Robin Unger and Prayer
Man, you'd think these things would be available. They are far more
relevant than many of they photos they do have posted. And I'm not opposed
to irrelevant photos. Those are cool, too. But why not the more important
stuff?
Release the documents!
People are free to do what they want with their private property. If law
enforcement thought they were evidence, they have the power to subpoena
If it's evidence the government covers it up.
Post by John Corbett
them. Otherwise the owners are under no obligation to make them public to
satisfy your curiosity. Besides, for most CTs it's much more fun to
imagine what is in them. If they got released, they would probably find
out how mundane they are.
Please post whay you think yhr CTers are withholding.
Loading...