Discussion:
JFK commenting on coup against Diem
(too old to reply)
John Corbett
2021-01-05 04:58:24 UTC
Permalink


He was speaking into a dictaphone about the coup and assassination of Diem
on 11/4/63. In it he indicates there was division within the
administration as to whether or not Diem should have been removed and
seemed to be appalled at that he was assassinated. In the middle of the
dictation John Jr. comes in and they have a short conversation before he
resumes the dictation.
Steve M. Galbraith
2021-01-06 20:15:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by John Corbett
http://youtu.be/mQX4cBV5Kfw
He was speaking into a dictaphone about the coup and assassination of Diem
on 11/4/63. In it he indicates there was division within the
administration as to whether or not Diem should have been removed and
seemed to be appalled at that he was assassinated. In the middle of the
dictation John Jr. comes in and they have a short conversation before he
resumes the dictation.
JFK would have been quite naive to think that Diem could be overthrown and
then the coup makers would let him (and his powerful brother) live. They'd
be inviting a civil war one - retaliation by Diem's supporters - that they
couldn't be sure of defeating.

From my reading, the administration was hesitant to support a coup because
they were worried that it would fail not because it would succeed or that
things would be made worse if it worked. If it failed - and the US was
seen as complicit by Diem and his supporters - then the whole situation
would blow up.
John Corbett
2021-01-07 05:59:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by Steve M. Galbraith
Post by John Corbett
http://youtu.be/mQX4cBV5Kfw
He was speaking into a dictaphone about the coup and assassination of Diem
on 11/4/63. In it he indicates there was division within the
administration as to whether or not Diem should have been removed and
seemed to be appalled at that he was assassinated. In the middle of the
dictation John Jr. comes in and they have a short conversation before he
resumes the dictation.
JFK would have been quite naive to think that Diem could be overthrown and
then the coup makers would let him (and his powerful brother) live. They'd
be inviting a civil war one - retaliation by Diem's supporters - that they
couldn't be sure of defeating.
From my reading, the administration was hesitant to support a coup because
they were worried that it would fail not because it would succeed or that
things would be made worse if it worked. If it failed - and the US was
seen as complicit by Diem and his supporters - then the whole situation
would blow up.
I don't disagree with any of that. They had to choose between the lesser
of two evils. I'm not sure they picked the right one.

Loading...