John McAdams
2017-06-09 03:06:59 UTC
When Judyth Baker began to be discussed on this newsgroup circa 2000,
a lot of people were skeptical of her claims, and said so.
But Pamela Brown would have none of that. She claimed she was engaged
in a "process" and nobody was supposed to criticize Judyth until she
completed her "process."
She scolded, bitched and whined when anybody did.
Pamela is still here, whining about how I refused to "acknowledge her
position."
She can't use honest language. By "acknowledge" she means "accept
what I have to say, and shut up about Judyth until I say you can
discuss her."
Like some snowflake on a college campus, she claims to have been
victimizes simply because people disagree with her!
She's back on the newsgroup, bitching and whining, and it's not going
to do her any good. She made a fool of herself by defending Judyth
when everybody else could see Judyth was a fraud.
.John
-----------------------
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm
a lot of people were skeptical of her claims, and said so.
But Pamela Brown would have none of that. She claimed she was engaged
in a "process" and nobody was supposed to criticize Judyth until she
completed her "process."
She scolded, bitched and whined when anybody did.
Pamela is still here, whining about how I refused to "acknowledge her
position."
She can't use honest language. By "acknowledge" she means "accept
what I have to say, and shut up about Judyth until I say you can
discuss her."
Like some snowflake on a college campus, she claims to have been
victimizes simply because people disagree with her!
She's back on the newsgroup, bitching and whining, and it's not going
to do her any good. She made a fool of herself by defending Judyth
when everybody else could see Judyth was a fraud.
.John
-----------------------
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm