Post by ajohnstonehttps://www.taxjustice.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/CORPOR1.pdf
No connection to hunger or famine in this study.
Post by ajohnstonehttps://www.oecd.org/dac/accountable-effective-institutions/49263997.pdf
No connection to hunger or famine here.
Post by ajohnstonehttps://waronwant.org/sites/default/files/WarOnWant_ZambiaTaxReport_web.pdf
Ditto.
Post by ajohnstonehttps://www.oxfam.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/endless-corporate-tax-scandals.pdf
Ditto.
Post by ajohnstoneetc. etc., ad nauseam
Google, Facebook and Microsoft should be paying more corporation tax in
developing nations, says ActionAid. The aid charity estimates that poorer
countries are missing out on up to $2.8bn
https://www.bbc.com/news/business-54691572
The articles are long on claims of tax avoidance schemes in Africa, and
nothing about how any tax avoidance schemes lead to hunger or famine, so
your claim can so far be dismissed. I think its up to the governments in
the countries cited to tax as they see fit, and an individual or
corporation is under no obligation to pay more than what the law states.
There is an easy "fix" regarding tax avoidance schemes, but as you're a
socialist, you'll dismiss the idea: A flat tax of some sort. No
deductions, no loopholes. No subsidies to build wind farms. No subsidies
to build or buy electric cars. No tax breaks for adopting a kid from
overseas. No tax breaks for starting a minority-owned business or digging
an oil well or any of a million other things the government tries to
encourage with tax policy. At the end of the year, company "X" adds up its
gross sales and pays a percentage to be determined. An individual is
exempt on the first "X" of their income and then pays a percentage of it
thereafter.