Post by Ralph Cinque
No, Marsh. What's silly is saying that Oswald didn't kill Kennedy but did
Whether or not a map got published on Friday, November 22 or even the
evening of Thursday, November 21 is irrelevant because there is no chance
that it had any bearing on Oswald's actions.
This isn't the Debate Club at school where we are debating just for
practice. We're trying to determine how Oswald might have learned that the
motorcade was going to pass the building, such that the idea of shooting
him would have started in his mind. Since those maps could have played no
such role, they are irrelevant, and the fact that McAdams obscures that
fact is reprehensible. The only date he posts is November 19.
Garrison lied about the map, Cinque. He said it covered five sixths of the
front page of the DMN. That is the point of the article.
A description of the motorcade route was published on 19 November, Cinque.
That is PLENTY of time for Oswald to learn it before going home on the
evening of 21 November to retrieve his rifle.
And then there is Russo's witness who said Oswald saw it on TV, Cinque.
The President of the United States is coming to Dallas and you DON'T think
they would have been broadcasting details of it beforehand?
It was a different world then, Cinque, before your mate Oswald did what he
did, so despicably.
Fancy forming an organization trying to exonerate the little Marxist
Fancy making up some fairytale like Baker that you had an affair with him!
It is to laugh, as they say.
*...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.
And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head...
X marks the spot where Mark Lane lied!