Post by Ramon F Herrera Post by BT George Post by Ramon F Herrera Post by BT George
And actual live fire experiments have shown that passage through
ballistics gelatin simulating soft tissues *repeatedly* results in
I happen to know of really good deals in Mexico and Venezuela.
Have bridges, roads, etc. for sale at unbelievable prices.
So you bought them, found out they were worthless, and hope to find some
clown to unload them on. ...Keep looking!
Let's say I inherited them. Even better, let's agree will all the
readers who are saying: "That was a sarcastic comment", ok?
Now, in all the seriousness that this historic moment demands.
If you are so logical and concerned with the JFK case: Do you, BT George
support the project (*) to bring a top of the line film digitizer to the
and making copies with the most fidelity technically possible?
My support is irrelevant to your work. I think the SBT has already been
demonstrated by numerous other endeavors. The trajectory from the 6th
floor window works, and the evidence supports that was the shooter's
FWIW, I have always found it a bit suspicious that Myers has remained so
tight fisted with his work, even 15 years or so after doing it. But I do
not think it takes his efforts to demonstrate that Oswald as shooter
scenario works just fine.
In fact, your trajectory needs to take something else beside the tumbling
into possible account. Because even if the alignment between JFK's neck
wound and Connaly's back wound were to prove just a tad off from arrow
straight, I don't think that destroys the SBT. I say this, because a very
*slight* deflection to the right and/or up could have occurred in JFK's
neck. (If such bullets routinely tumble, a slight disturbance of
direction would hardly be surprising.) If so, Connally could have been
seated slightly differently than almost off the left edge of his jump seat
(as is sometimes depicted) and still have been wounded where is was.
Post by Ramon F Herrera
(a) For preservation purposes only?
(b) For further study by the world's best scientists?
Can you cite some of the best universities in the world, dedicated to
scientific, numerical matters? Do you trust them? Do you believe in
science and the power of numbers? What kind of petition would you
support, hoping to reach the most significant representation, by all
(1) The most important possession of a person or entity is their
reputation and credibility.
(2) Along the years, I have replied to every single question I have been
asked, in personal capacity and the people/groups behind JFK Numbers.
Let's do the honorable thing and respond accordingly.
(*) Funding announced by CAPA and other sources, and with the approval
by the National Archives, pending the Kennedy family.