One Ballpark, Two Aspects, Three Stages

[[e-mail]]

The JFK Numbers initiative can be succinctly described as "Donations of 3D
Models of Craniums and Plazas to the National Archives". That is an
oversimplification but for now it will do.

It has two aspects:

- Architectural Aspect (SBT/MBT)

http://www.dealey-plaza.org/this-government-as-promised/SBT-MBT-Tools/RMT-for-Dummies

- Forensic Aspect (Fatal Shot)

Each is comprised of 3-stages but I will only mention the Architectural
Aspect.

(1) We do all we can, given very limited resources (funds, hardware &
software, experience and -specially- brain power)

(2) The following people and institutions are invited:

- Dale Myers and the others precursors

- Top science schools and leading centers of 3D design (including Myers'
Alma Mater, peers and professors)

- Z Axis Corporation

- The Koch Fund for Science

- The PBS NOVA Science Trust

- Lone Wolf Media

- The CIA (this was Tony Marsh's great suggestion)

- Suggestions? The more, the merrier.

They will consider, inspect, evaluate, criticize and IMPROVE our work.

In order to be accepted by the National Archives, the models cannot
possibly include any conclusion. We leave that to people who actually know
what they are doing. Read about "The Baseball Field".

(3) Next, to co-sign the offering of the work to the National Archives
(*). Finally, a formal donation is executed.

That is the plan, anyway. Time will tell how much is actually achieved.

-Ramon
JFK Numbers

(*) Already accorded between JFK Numbers and the National Archives, check
with my liaison, Mr. Eugene Morris

[[e-mail]]

- Determine whether X-rays are authentic.

Really? What would these people be called?

Engineers, Physicists, Mathematicians. Heavy knowledge of DSP (Digital
Signal Processing) is a requirement.

They are the ones who design CT equipment for companies like GE, Siemens,
Zeiss, Philips, Toshiba. Check the terms "CT" and "reconstruction". They
convert flat (Marsh map style) images into 3D models, which are at the
core of all CT equipment.

https://tinyurl.com/ukhvvr2

There is plenty of literature about the typical thickness and density of
human craniums. See some here:

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0BydXldbRY__vRUtNWTNTQTZSQzg

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.assassination.jfk/c/J43pcGp8i80/m/m6hFFhWuBwAJ

Those studies (and only those studies) are able to indicate whether
Mantik/Chesser or Robertson/Reilly were correct in their preliminary
assessments.

Do they work for universities?

Some do. I am most familiar with this group:

http://www.zib.de/projects/3d-reconstruction-anatomical-structures-2d-x-ray-images

Most specifically, with Hans-Cristian Hege, head of the group and Stefan
Zachow. Stefan asked me the parameters (focal length, angular field of
view, etc.) of the X-ray machine used in Bethesda, otherwise they will
have to use generic parameters. So far, all I have is: General Electric,
portable. I joined a group of former/current GE employees. No luck so far.
The National Archives were of no help, either, they suggested the US Navy
Museum.

How often would they be called upon to determine that?

As with most computer processes, every time a radiograph is examined, it
is essential to determine the validity of the input data.

Who would call upon them?

I did, about 5 years ago, after the Archives gave me their preliminary
authorization. In Berlin they are patiently waiting for the 3 DICOM files.

Preliminary step No. 1 should be obvious: to determine the authenticity of
the cranial regions. Doctor David Mantik (the top critic) says that a
small region is not genuine.

There is plenty of literature about typical thickness and density of an
adult's cranium. They can determine that in their lunch break, I figure.

My idea was "is there some sort of digital signature in the cranium
regions?" in one of my first transatlantic calls. Hans-Christian replied:
"Of course there is" and provided some literature.

Doctoral dissertations are considered as we speak. All based on my seminal
idea.

You are welcome, everyone!

-Ramon
JFK Numbers

ps: The meeting in Berlin is the product of my febrile imagination. The
reactions below are all real. Can you please add yours?

Let me repeat that:

Hank Sienzant/Joe Zircon:

THE REACTIONS BELOW ARE ALL REAL. CAN YOU PLEASE ADD YOURS?

================================

Let's say that the world top scientists in their field, those at the ZIB
institute in Berlin, creators of the most advanced CT equipment for the
likes of GE, Toshiba, Siemens, those brilliant researchers who -I hope &
dream- will be in charge of the "Ich Bin Ein Berliner" Project, the brain
(intended) child of JFK Numbers.

http://www.jfknumbers.org/ich-bin-ein-berliner/

We congregate the scientists and [the rest has been censored due to its
satirical content]

Every response given in the imaginary meeting at ZIB Berlin is real. I can
provide them in quotes, with dates.

This is the meeting that took place in my febrile imagination:

"Science vs. Fanaticism: The Power of Numbers vs. Ignorance (actual or
pretend)"
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.assassination.jfk/_S3BiI3ilEc/diL-3HllBwAJ

The are many more in the archives, these two have the addition of Mark
Norton:

"Breaking: DNA evidence to determine Jefferson, Sally Hemings succession
must be canceled"
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.assassination.jfk/g8n0a1zxz1s/QaJadwGwAgAJ

"Do the autopsy X-rays clearly indicate the bullet's trajectory?"
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.assassination.jfk/R3Xry-QWA00/7fSsYmZIAQAJ