Discussion:
JFK was NOT killed by a 'grassy knoll' gunman
(too old to reply)
claviger
2018-06-03 22:38:49 UTC
Permalink
DailyMail.com

JFK was NOT killed by a 'grassy knoll' gunman:
New calculations confirm the fatal bullet was fired from behind
the president, suggesting Lee Harvey Oswald was the sole shooter
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-5657007/JFK-NOT-killed-grassy-knoll-gunman.html

Analyses just after JFK's death lined up with the arrest of Lee Harvey
Oswald But, conspiracy theory suggests there was another shooter standing
elsewhere 'Grassy knoll' theory says a shooter positioned to the northwest
fired the shot Footage of assassination showed JFK snapped back and to
left after he was hit New calculations suggest that backward movements
were due to a recoil effect Also showed an initial forward movement,
adding proof he was shot from behind By Cheyenne Macdonald For
Dailymail.com 25 April 2018
claviger
2018-06-12 21:45:06 UTC
Permalink
JFK was NOT killed by a 'grassy knoll' gunman:

New calculations confirm the fatal bullet was fired from behind
the president, suggesting Lee Harvey Oswald was the sole shooter.

Analyses just after JFK's death lined up with the arrest of Lee Harvey
Oswald.

But, conspiracy theory suggests there was another shooter standing
elsewhere.

'Grassy knoll' theory says a shooter positioned to the northwest
fired the shot.

Footage of assassination showed JFK snapped back and to
left after he was hit.

New calculations suggest that backward movements
were due to a recoil effect.

Also showed an initial forward movement,
adding proof he was shot from behind.

By Cheyenne Macdonald For
Dailymail.com 25 April 2018
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-5657007/JFK-NOT-killed-grassy-knoll-gunman.html
mainframetech
2018-06-13 14:54:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by claviger
New calculations confirm the fatal bullet was fired from behind
the president, suggesting Lee Harvey Oswald was the sole shooter.
Analyses just after JFK's death lined up with the arrest of Lee Harvey
Oswald.
But, conspiracy theory suggests there was another shooter standing
elsewhere.
'Grassy knoll' theory says a shooter positioned to the northwest
fired the shot.
Footage of assassination showed JFK snapped back and to
left after he was hit.
New calculations suggest that backward movements
were due to a recoil effect.
What new calculations, where are they? Nothing is supplied here.
Post by claviger
Also showed an initial forward movement,
adding proof he was shot from behind.
By Cheyenne Macdonald For
Dailymail.com 25 April 2018
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-5657007/JFK-NOT-killed-grassy-knoll-gunman.html
mainframetech
2018-06-13 14:55:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by claviger
DailyMail.com
New calculations confirm the fatal bullet was fired from behind
the president, suggesting Lee Harvey Oswald was the sole shooter
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-5657007/JFK-NOT-killed-grassy-knoll-gunman.html
That's false information. Because there is a bullet hole in the
forehead/temple area of JFK's head, which fits perfectly with the blowout
at the BOH, there is all the evidence you need for a frontal shot at JFK
which killed him. And remember, everyone with an honest mind can see the
bullet hole.
Post by claviger
Analyses just after JFK's death lined up with the arrest of Lee Harvey
Oswald But, conspiracy theory suggests there was another shooter standing
elsewhere 'Grassy knoll' theory says a shooter positioned to the northwest
fired the shot Footage of assassination showed JFK snapped back and to
left after he was hit New calculations suggest that backward movements
were due to a recoil effect Also showed an initial forward movement,
adding proof he was shot from behind By Cheyenne Macdonald For
Dailymail.com 25 April 2018
It could also come from the front, as per the bullet hole in the
forehead/temple area.


Movement of the head forward or back does NOT prove that a bullet could
ONLY come from behind. There are multiple reasons the head might spasm
backward, or forward, and also reasons from the impact of the bullet, and
other factors. See Vincent DiMaio.

Chris
Jason Burke
2018-06-14 14:50:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
DailyMail.com
New calculations confirm the fatal bullet was fired from behind
the president, suggesting Lee Harvey Oswald was the sole shooter
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-5657007/JFK-NOT-killed-grassy-knoll-gunman.html
That's false information. Because there is a bullet hole in the
forehead/temple area of JFK's head,
Nope.
Post by mainframetech
which fits perfectly with the blowout
at the BOH,
Nope.
Post by mainframetech
there is all the evidence you need for a frontal shot at JFK
which killed him. And remember, everyone with an honest mind can see the
bullet hole.
Nope.

Don't you get tired of having NO idea what you're talking about?
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Analyses just after JFK's death lined up with the arrest of Lee Harvey
Oswald But, conspiracy theory suggests there was another shooter standing
elsewhere 'Grassy knoll' theory says a shooter positioned to the northwest
fired the shot Footage of assassination showed JFK snapped back and to
left after he was hit New calculations suggest that backward movements
were due to a recoil effect Also showed an initial forward movement,
adding proof he was shot from behind By Cheyenne Macdonald For
Dailymail.com 25 April 2018
It could also come from the front, as per the bullet hole in the
forehead/temple area.
Ooooh. Too bad there isn't one.
Post by mainframetech
Movement of the head forward or back does NOT prove that a bullet could
ONLY come from behind.
Geez. You got something right. Even blind squirrel find nut sometime.
Post by mainframetech
There are multiple reasons the head might spasm
backward, or forward, and also reasons from the impact of the bullet, and
other factors. See Vincent DiMaio.
Chris
bigdog
2018-06-15 13:59:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
DailyMail.com
New calculations confirm the fatal bullet was fired from behind
the president, suggesting Lee Harvey Oswald was the sole shooter
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-5657007/JFK-NOT-killed-grassy-knoll-gunman.html
That's false information. Because there is a bullet hole in the
forehead/temple area of JFK's head,
Nope.
Are you paying attention, Chris. Contrary to what you have claimed, I am
NOT the only one who doesn't see your bullet hole in the forehead. In
fact, I am the rule, not the exception.
mainframetech
2018-06-18 14:20:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
DailyMail.com
New calculations confirm the fatal bullet was fired from behind
the president, suggesting Lee Harvey Oswald was the sole shooter
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-5657007/JFK-NOT-killed-grassy-knoll-gunman.html
That's false information. Because there is a bullet hole in the
forehead/temple area of JFK's head,
Nope.
Are you paying attention, Chris. Contrary to what you have claimed, I am
NOT the only one who doesn't see your bullet hole in the forehead. In
fact, I am the rule, not the exception.
Are you paying attention John? I have said that no one has said what
you have, that there is nothing there to see. However, some people have
said that what they see doesn't appear to be a bullet hole. So consider
yourself corrected. And the article above doesn't say anything about what
was the wound on the forehead. It's doubtful the author even knew there
was one.

The article is just one of Claviger's continuing copy of anything that
says JFK in it.

Chris
Anthony Marsh
2018-06-18 21:57:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
DailyMail.com
New calculations confirm the fatal bullet was fired from behind
the president, suggesting Lee Harvey Oswald was the sole shooter
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-5657007/JFK-NOT-killed-grassy-knoll-gunman.html
That's false information. Because there is a bullet hole in the
forehead/temple area of JFK's head,
Nope.
Are you paying attention, Chris. Contrary to what you have claimed, I am
NOT the only one who doesn't see your bullet hole in the forehead. In
fact, I am the rule, not the exception.
Are you paying attention John? I have said that no one has said what
you have, that there is nothing there to see. However, some people have
said that what they see doesn't appear to be a bullet hole. So consider
yourself corrected. And the article above doesn't say anything about what
was the wound on the forehead. It's doubtful the author even knew there
was one.
The article is just one of Claviger's continuing copy of anything that
says JFK in it.
I think the Trolls call it Swamp Posting. A way to clog up a newsgroup
so that no one wants to wade through all the junk.
Post by mainframetech
Chris
bigdog
2018-06-19 01:13:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
DailyMail.com
New calculations confirm the fatal bullet was fired from behind
the president, suggesting Lee Harvey Oswald was the sole shooter
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-5657007/JFK-NOT-killed-grassy-knoll-gunman.html
That's false information. Because there is a bullet hole in the
forehead/temple area of JFK's head,
Nope.
Are you paying attention, Chris. Contrary to what you have claimed, I am
NOT the only one who doesn't see your bullet hole in the forehead. In
fact, I am the rule, not the exception.
Are you paying attention John? I have said that no one has said what
you have, that there is nothing there to see. However, some people have
said that what they see doesn't appear to be a bullet hole. So consider
yourself corrected. And the article above doesn't say anything about what
was the wound on the forehead. It's doubtful the author even knew there
was one.
Of course he didn't because there wasn't one.
Post by mainframetech
The article is just one of Claviger's continuing copy of anything that
says JFK in it.
At least he seems to read the articles that he posts links to. You have
been known to post links to articles that completely contradict the point
you are trying to make.
claviger
2018-06-20 01:18:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
DailyMail.com
New calculations confirm the fatal bullet was fired from behind
the president, suggesting Lee Harvey Oswald was the sole shooter
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-5657007/JFK-NOT-killed-grassy-knoll-gunman.html
That's false information. Because there is a bullet hole in the
forehead/temple area of JFK's head,
Nope.
Are you paying attention, Chris. Contrary to what you have claimed, I am
NOT the only one who doesn't see your bullet hole in the forehead. In
fact, I am the rule, not the exception.
Are you paying attention John? I have said that no one has said what
you have, that there is nothing there to see. However, some people have
said that what they see doesn't appear to be a bullet hole. So consider
yourself corrected. And the article above doesn't say anything about what
was the wound on the forehead. It's doubtful the author even knew there
was one.
Of course he didn't because there wasn't one.
Post by mainframetech
The article is just one of Claviger's continuing copy of anything that
says JFK in it.
At least he seems to read the articles that he posts links to. You have
been known to post links to articles that completely contradict the point
you are trying to make.
Exactly what happened in the list of "39 Witnesses."
mainframetech
2018-06-25 02:55:51 UTC
Permalink
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
DailyMail.com
New calculations confirm the fatal bullet was fired from behind
the president, suggesting Lee Harvey Oswald was the sole shooter
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-5657007/JFK-NOT-killed-grassy-knoll-gunman.html
That's false information. Because there is a bullet hole in the
forehead/temple area of JFK's head,
Nope.
Are you paying attention, Chris. Contrary to what you have claimed, I am
NOT the only one who doesn't see your bullet hole in the forehead. In
fact, I am the rule, not the exception.
Are you paying attention John? I have said that no one has said what
you have, that there is nothing there to see. However, some people have
said that what they see doesn't appear to be a bullet hole. So consider
yourself corrected. And the article above doesn't say anything about what
was the wound on the forehead. It's doubtful the author even knew there
was one.
Of course he didn't because there wasn't one.
Post by mainframetech
The article is just one of Claviger's continuing copy of anything that
says JFK in it.
At least he seems to read the articles that he posts links to. You have
been known to post links to articles that completely contradict the point
you are trying to make.
LOL! In your opinion.

Chris

claviger
2018-06-14 19:27:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
DailyMail.com
New calculations confirm the fatal bullet was fired from behind
the president, suggesting Lee Harvey Oswald was the sole shooter
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-5657007/JFK-NOT-killed-grassy-knoll-gunman.html
That's false information. Because there is a bullet hole in the
forehead/temple area of JFK's head, which fits perfectly with the blowout
at the BOH, there is all the evidence you need for a frontal shot at JFK
which killed him. And remember, everyone with an honest mind can see the
bullet hole.
Post by claviger
Analyses just after JFK's death lined up with the arrest of Lee Harvey
Oswald But, conspiracy theory suggests there was another shooter standing
elsewhere 'Grassy knoll' theory says a shooter positioned to the northwest
fired the shot Footage of assassination showed JFK snapped back and to
left after he was hit New calculations suggest that backward movements
were due to a recoil effect Also showed an initial forward movement,
adding proof he was shot from behind By Cheyenne Macdonald For
Dailymail.com 25 April 2018
It could also come from the front, as per the bullet hole in the
forehead/temple area.
There was a fragmentation EXIT WOUND in the temple area.
No bullet entrance wound anywhere on the head except the
back of the skull, so please stop with these phony facts and
silly arguments. Your shtick was somewhat amusing the first
time around, but now its just boring.
Post by mainframetech
Movement of the head forward or back does NOT prove that a bullet could
ONLY come from behind. There are multiple reasons the head might spasm
backward, or forward, and also reasons from the impact of the bullet, and
other factors. See Vincent DiMaio.
Chris
Tell that to Oliver Stone who created the mindless mantra:

"Back and to the Left"
"Back and to the Left"
"Back and to the Left"
"Hare Hare, Krishna Krishna"

Even when his extreme close-up for shock effect clearly
showed the President's head tip forward before lurching
backward bouncing off the seat cushion, not Jackie.

It could not be more obvious to any normal human being with
a normal brain and normal eyesight the head shot came from
behind Limousine and knocked the President's head forward
before his body reacted with a strong reflex action straight
back into his seat cushion, not into the First Lady sitting so
close beside him.

It's on the Zapruder film. If you glibly claim alterations then
be prepared to explain exactly how they were done or don't
bother making that allegation. Other so-called experts have
tried and failed to make this dubious argument to convince
any serious researchers.
Anthony Marsh
2018-06-15 21:14:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by claviger
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
DailyMail.com
New calculations confirm the fatal bullet was fired from behind
the president, suggesting Lee Harvey Oswald was the sole shooter
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-5657007/JFK-NOT-killed-grassy-knoll-gunman.html
That's false information. Because there is a bullet hole in the
forehead/temple area of JFK's head, which fits perfectly with the blowout
at the BOH, there is all the evidence you need for a frontal shot at JFK
which killed him. And remember, everyone with an honest mind can see the
bullet hole.
Post by claviger
Analyses just after JFK's death lined up with the arrest of Lee Harvey
Oswald But, conspiracy theory suggests there was another shooter standing
elsewhere 'Grassy knoll' theory says a shooter positioned to the northwest
fired the shot Footage of assassination showed JFK snapped back and to
left after he was hit New calculations suggest that backward movements
were due to a recoil effect Also showed an initial forward movement,
adding proof he was shot from behind By Cheyenne Macdonald For
Dailymail.com 25 April 2018
It could also come from the front, as per the bullet hole in the
forehead/temple area.
There was a fragmentation EXIT WOUND in the temple area.
No bullet entrance wound anywhere on the head except the
back of the skull, so please stop with these phony facts and
silly arguments. Your shtick was somewhat amusing the first
time around, but now its just boring.
Post by mainframetech
Movement of the head forward or back does NOT prove that a bullet could
ONLY come from behind. There are multiple reasons the head might spasm
backward, or forward, and also reasons from the impact of the bullet, and
other factors. See Vincent DiMaio.
Chris
"Back and to the Left"
"Back and to the Left"
"Back and to the Left"
"Hare Hare, Krishna Krishna"
Even when his extreme close-up for shock effect clearly
showed the President's head tip forward before lurching
backward bouncing off the seat cushion, not Jackie.
It could not be more obvious to any normal human being with
a normal brain and normal eyesight the head shot came from
behind Limousine and knocked the President's head forward
before his body reacted with a strong reflex action straight
back into his seat cushion, not into the First Lady sitting so
close beside him.
It's on the Zapruder film. If you glibly claim alterations then
be prepared to explain exactly how they were done or don't
bother making that allegation. Other so-called experts have
tried and failed to make this dubious argument to convince
any serious researchers.
EVERYONE moved forward because the limo suddenly slowed down.
Or do you claim that they were ALL shot in the back of the head?
claviger
2018-06-16 21:03:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by claviger
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
DailyMail.com
New calculations confirm the fatal bullet was fired from behind
the president, suggesting Lee Harvey Oswald was the sole shooter
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-5657007/JFK-NOT-killed-grassy-knoll-gunman.html
That's false information. Because there is a bullet hole in the
forehead/temple area of JFK's head, which fits perfectly with the blowout
at the BOH, there is all the evidence you need for a frontal shot at JFK
which killed him. And remember, everyone with an honest mind can see the
bullet hole.
Post by claviger
Analyses just after JFK's death lined up with the arrest of Lee Harvey
Oswald But, conspiracy theory suggests there was another shooter standing
elsewhere 'Grassy knoll' theory says a shooter positioned to the northwest
fired the shot Footage of assassination showed JFK snapped back and to
left after he was hit New calculations suggest that backward movements
were due to a recoil effect Also showed an initial forward movement,
adding proof he was shot from behind By Cheyenne Macdonald For
Dailymail.com 25 April 2018
It could also come from the front, as per the bullet hole in the
forehead/temple area.
There was a fragmentation EXIT WOUND in the temple area.
No bullet entrance wound anywhere on the head except the
back of the skull, so please stop with these phony facts and
silly arguments. Your shtick was somewhat amusing the first
time around, but now its just boring.
Post by mainframetech
Movement of the head forward or back does NOT prove that a bullet could
ONLY come from behind. There are multiple reasons the head might spasm
backward, or forward, and also reasons from the impact of the bullet, and
other factors. See Vincent DiMaio.
Chris
"Back and to the Left"
"Back and to the Left"
"Back and to the Left"
"Hare Hare, Krishna Krishna"
Even when his extreme close-up for shock effect clearly
showed the President's head tip forward before lurching
backward bouncing off the seat cushion, not Jackie.
It could not be more obvious to any normal human being with
a normal brain and normal eyesight the head shot came from
behind Limousine and knocked the President's head forward
before his body reacted with a strong reflex action straight
back into his seat cushion, not into the First Lady sitting so
close beside him.
It's on the Zapruder film. If you glibly claim alterations then
be prepared to explain exactly how they were done or don't
bother making that allegation. Other so-called experts have
tried and failed to make this dubious argument to convince
any serious researchers.
EVERYONE moved forward because the limo suddenly slowed down.
Or do you claim that they were ALL shot in the back of the head?
You tried that excuse a long time ago. Nothing has changed.
It didn't work then and it doesn't work now.
mainframetech
2018-06-15 21:17:12 UTC
Permalink
Post by claviger
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
DailyMail.com
New calculations confirm the fatal bullet was fired from behind
the president, suggesting Lee Harvey Oswald was the sole shooter
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-5657007/JFK-NOT-killed-grassy-knoll-gunman.html
That's false information. Because there is a bullet hole in the
forehead/temple area of JFK's head, which fits perfectly with the blowout
at the BOH, there is all the evidence you need for a frontal shot at JFK
which killed him. And remember, everyone with an honest mind can see the
bullet hole.
Post by claviger
Analyses just after JFK's death lined up with the arrest of Lee Harvey
Oswald But, conspiracy theory suggests there was another shooter standing
elsewhere 'Grassy knoll' theory says a shooter positioned to the northwest
fired the shot Footage of assassination showed JFK snapped back and to
left after he was hit New calculations suggest that backward movements
were due to a recoil effect Also showed an initial forward movement,
adding proof he was shot from behind By Cheyenne Macdonald For
Dailymail.com 25 April 2018
It could also come from the front, as per the bullet hole in the
forehead/temple area.
There was a fragmentation EXIT WOUND in the temple area.
No bullet entrance wound anywhere on the head except the
back of the skull, so please stop with these phony facts and
silly arguments. Your shtick was somewhat amusing the first
time around, but now its just boring.
Sad. Now you've joined your compatriot bd in his blindness. Tell me
that you've actually looked for the bullet hole using the instructions.
Because if you haven't had the courage to look, then you can't speak of
something you know nothing about.
Post by claviger
Post by mainframetech
Movement of the head forward or back does NOT prove that a bullet could
ONLY come from behind. There are multiple reasons the head might spasm
backward, or forward, and also reasons from the impact of the bullet, and
other factors. See Vincent DiMaio.
"Back and to the Left"
"Back and to the Left"
"Back and to the Left"
"Hare Hare, Krishna Krishna"
Sorry, I don't know Stone, and doubt that we think alike about the
crime.
Post by claviger
Even when his extreme close-up for shock effect clearly
showed the President's head tip forward before lurching
backward bouncing off the seat cushion, not Jackie.
It could not be more obvious to any normal human being with
a normal brain and normal eyesight the head shot came from
behind Limousine and knocked the President's head forward
before his body reacted with a strong reflex action straight
back into his seat cushion, not into the First Lady sitting so
close beside him.
As per Vincent DiMaio, a knowledgeable person in the field, there can
be many reasons for the head to go back or forward first, and then second.
It's not a guarantee either way. So you're setting yourself up as a
better pathologist than him.
Post by claviger
It's on the Zapruder film. If you glibly claim alterations then
be prepared to explain exactly how they were done or don't
bother making that allegation. Other so-called experts have
tried and failed to make this dubious argument to convince
any serious researchers.
Ah, you feel you've done all the research about it that can be done.
But that's really not the case, since Douglas Horne has done over 2
hundred pages of research and report in his "Inside the ARRB" volume 4 of
5 volumes. He lists the equipment that was used in 1963, and names the
CIA witnesses to the work done to alter the Z-film and explains errors on
the part of Rollie Zavada in his work. You might find it quite
illuminating, but being a dyed in the wool LN, you won't have the nerve to
look it over. Here are the the reviews:

https://www.amazon.com/Inside-Assassination-Records-Review-Board/dp/0984314407/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1529017531&sr=8-1&keywords=arrb+horne#customerReviews

The detail you want is in there. But check the reviews before buying
a copy.

Chris
claviger
2018-06-16 16:29:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by claviger
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
DailyMail.com
New calculations confirm the fatal bullet was fired from behind
the president, suggesting Lee Harvey Oswald was the sole shooter
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-5657007/JFK-NOT-killed-grassy-knoll-gunman.html
That's false information. Because there is a bullet hole in the
forehead/temple area of JFK's head, which fits perfectly with the blowout
at the BOH, there is all the evidence you need for a frontal shot at JFK
which killed him. And remember, everyone with an honest mind can see the
bullet hole.
Post by claviger
Analyses just after JFK's death lined up with the arrest of Lee Harvey
Oswald But, conspiracy theory suggests there was another shooter standing
elsewhere 'Grassy knoll' theory says a shooter positioned to the northwest
fired the shot Footage of assassination showed JFK snapped back and to
left after he was hit New calculations suggest that backward movements
were due to a recoil effect Also showed an initial forward movement,
adding proof he was shot from behind By Cheyenne Macdonald For
Dailymail.com 25 April 2018
It could also come from the front, as per the bullet hole in the
forehead/temple area.
There was a fragmentation EXIT WOUND in the temple area.
No bullet entrance wound anywhere on the head except the
back of the skull, so please stop with these phony facts and
silly arguments. Your shtick was somewhat amusing the first
time around, but now its just boring.
Post by mainframetech
Movement of the head forward or back does NOT prove that a bullet could
ONLY come from behind. There are multiple reasons the head might spasm
backward, or forward, and also reasons from the impact of the bullet, and
other factors. See Vincent DiMaio.
Chris
Back and to the Left
Back and to the Left
Back and to the Left
Hare Hare, Krishna Krishna
Even when his extreme close-up for shock effect clearly
showed the President's head tip forward before lurching
backward bouncing off the seat cushion, not Jackie.
It could not be more obvious to any normal human being with
a normal brain and normal eyesight the head shot came from
behind Limousine and knocked the President's head forward
before his body reacted with a strong reflex action straight
back into his seat cushion, not into the First Lady sitting so
close beside him.
It's on the Zapruder film. If you glibly claim alterations then
be prepared to explain exactly how they were done or don't
bother making that allegation. Other so-called experts have
tried and failed to make this dubious argument to convince
any serious researchers.
Oliver Stone believes the Zapruder Film is legitimate and tried
to use it as proof of a shot from the front but overdid it proving
just the opposite!

Thank you Ollie for debunking your own Mega-Million Dollar CT
work of fiction. The biggest boo-boo in the history of Hollywood.
Anthony Marsh
2018-06-24 00:13:51 UTC
Permalink
Post by claviger
Post by claviger
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
DailyMail.com
New calculations confirm the fatal bullet was fired from behind
the president, suggesting Lee Harvey Oswald was the sole shooter
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-5657007/JFK-NOT-killed-grassy-knoll-gunman.html
That's false information. Because there is a bullet hole in the
forehead/temple area of JFK's head, which fits perfectly with the blowout
at the BOH, there is all the evidence you need for a frontal shot at JFK
which killed him. And remember, everyone with an honest mind can see the
bullet hole.
Post by claviger
Analyses just after JFK's death lined up with the arrest of Lee Harvey
Oswald But, conspiracy theory suggests there was another shooter standing
elsewhere 'Grassy knoll' theory says a shooter positioned to the northwest
fired the shot Footage of assassination showed JFK snapped back and to
left after he was hit New calculations suggest that backward movements
were due to a recoil effect Also showed an initial forward movement,
adding proof he was shot from behind By Cheyenne Macdonald For
Dailymail.com 25 April 2018
It could also come from the front, as per the bullet hole in the
forehead/temple area.
There was a fragmentation EXIT WOUND in the temple area.
No bullet entrance wound anywhere on the head except the
back of the skull, so please stop with these phony facts and
silly arguments. Your shtick was somewhat amusing the first
time around, but now its just boring.
Post by mainframetech
Movement of the head forward or back does NOT prove that a bullet could
ONLY come from behind. There are multiple reasons the head might spasm
backward, or forward, and also reasons from the impact of the bullet, and
other factors. See Vincent DiMaio.
Chris
Back and to the Left
Back and to the Left
Back and to the Left
Hare Hare, Krishna Krishna
Even when his extreme close-up for shock effect clearly
showed the President's head tip forward before lurching
backward bouncing off the seat cushion, not Jackie.
It could not be more obvious to any normal human being with
a normal brain and normal eyesight the head shot came from
behind Limousine and knocked the President's head forward
before his body reacted with a strong reflex action straight
back into his seat cushion, not into the First Lady sitting so
close beside him.
It's on the Zapruder film. If you glibly claim alterations then
be prepared to explain exactly how they were done or don't
bother making that allegation. Other so-called experts have
tried and failed to make this dubious argument to convince
any serious researchers.
Oliver Stone believes the Zapruder Film is legitimate and tried
to use it as proof of a shot from the front but overdid it proving
just the opposite!
Thank you Ollie for debunking your own Mega-Million Dollar CT
work of fiction. The biggest boo-boo in the history of Hollywood.
JFK was not killed by a Secret Service agent. Only kooks believe that.
Loading...