Ramon F Herrera
2019-05-12 21:59:00 UTC
If you have been watching, you have surely noticed that our censor,
professor McAdams has grown very uncomfortable with the material that
Yours Truly has brought to this forum in the last few months.
In all these years, nobody had presented a real opposition in the form of
irrefutable challenges, all of numerical nature. In order to bring a
widely accepted resolution to the case that has promoted division and
confusion into our country and others, Authoritative Entities have been
summoned. All this is unprecedented and this forum should be making some
sort of history.
Meanwhile, suddenly and coincidentally "John Deagle" has not only
reappeared but been given Letter of Marque to regale our distinguished
audience with his production, proper of a poor soul afflicted with the
most severe case of tropical disease.
I posted a reply to Steve Galbraith, which the Harvard educated
academician deemed as not suitable for your eyes. I asked "which line
constitutes a personal attack?" and he decided to ignore my question.
What I am attacking is the way of doing "business as usual" so prevalent
that has become characteristic of this group. I am concerned about our
reputation, not that of a single participant.
Let's see then which line(s) pass his Draconian muster.
[Steve Galbraith wrote:] There isn't a shred of evidence that
"Joannide's agents" acted on instructions of him or the CIA.
My Reply Line No. 1: The destroyers of evidence demand to see evidence.