Post by Anthony Marsh Post by BOZ Post by Anthony Marsh Post by BOZ
One JFK researcher says that Oswald's curtain rods are in the National
Archives. Those are curtain rods from the House of Paine. When Oswald was
arrested in the theater the Paine curtain rods were still in the Paine's
garage. The argument that Oswald took curtain rods into the TSBD is
Which ones are they in the National Archives? 24 inch or 32-1/2 inch?
How could Micheal Paine remember the exact length down to the half-inch?
Did YOU, as an experienced researcher go to the National Archives and
measure them yourself to be sure? Do you even own a ruler? Do you even
know how to use a ruler?
All you can ever do is guess your way through life.
You don't understand SCIENCE.
Did Buell Frazier use a ruler when he measured Oswald's Carcano curtain
rods? Did Buell Frazier's sister use a ruler? I do own a ruler and know
how to use one. No, I have never been to the National Archives, but I have
been to Dealey Plaza several times. How did Buell Frazier come up with 24
plus give or take a few inches? Ruler or guess?
You make no sense. Frazieer noticed how long tha package was n the seat
and how Oswald carried it by his right palm on the stock and the muzzle
tucked into his armpit. Try it some time and post a photo.
Sorry, no. You make no sense.
You already claimed Frazier was an incompetent klutz here:
You also suggested he lied in the same post.
You can't rely on his estimate as accurate enough to eliminate the rifle
once you tried to remove the package from Oswald hand entirely by calling
Frazier a liar and an incompetent klutz.
It's as I pointed out earlier, conspiracy theorists flit from one theory
to the next never to alight on the most reasonable one. You go from
Frazier was incompetent or lying and Oswald had nothing that morning
except a small bag containing his lunch to Frazier was very accurate in
his estimate of the package length and that means the package Oswald had
couldn't be the rifle and could only be curtain rods.
You avoid the middle ground and the most reasonable explanation
entirely... Oswald had a long package that morning and that package was
long enough to contain the rifle that was later found in the building, but
Frazier's estimate was simply approximately a third too short.
And we shouldn't get all worked up over the estimate, because Frazier
never measured it, only estimated it. And Frazier on a multitude of
occasions said he was not paying attention to the package. And of course,
a long paper sack was found on the sixth floor next to the snipers nest
window that was long enough to contain Oswald's rifle. And that paper sack
had Oswald's print on it. So there's the evidence tying Oswald to the sack
Frazier saw and when measured, establishes Frazier estimated the sack as
shorter than it actually was.
But no, that's too reasonable. And points to Oswald. So that won't do.
It must be something like Frazier was an incompetent klutz, lied, and
Oswald only had his lunch and Frazier was also wholly accurate in his
estimates and trustworthy and Oswald only had curtain rods.
Good luck pushing that rock uphill.