Discussion:
Conspiracy Theorists Hate Occam's Razor
Add Reply
David Von Pein
2018-07-02 17:39:54 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/25012-need-single-bullet-theory-diagram/?page=5&tab=comments#comment-381655

DAVID VON PEIN SAID:

Has any conspiracy theorist in history ever made this basic
observation?....

Boy, those assassins were sure a bunch of lucky sons of bitches when the
guy who shot JFK in the throat from the front managed to hit Kennedy in
exactly the right spot on his body so that (later on) the official
investigators could utilize that entry wound in the throat as the point of
exit for the SBT bullet. And then the multiple assassins got even luckier
when the upper-back bullet and the bullet that entered the throat both
decided not to exit the body and then both of those bullets vanished into
puffs of smoke before either of those bullets (which obviously were still
inside JFK's body when he was inside Trauma Room No. 1 at Parkland
Hospital) could be seen by any non-conspirator.

Can anyone truly believe that such incredible good fortune could possibly
have existed amongst the (alleged) multiple shooters who were (allegedly)
firing bullets at President Kennedy on 11/22/63?

(And yet CTers have the gall to tell me that **I** am the one who believes
in "Magic Bullets". Oy vey!)


DAVID VON PEIN LATER SAID:

Addendum....

My above comments reminded me of this great observation made by an LNer
named Bud at another forum....

"The retards [i.e., conspiracy theorists] hate Occam's Razor, because in
almost every case they opt for complex and fantastic explanations. Not
once or twice. Not even dozens of times. HUNDREDS of times. This is why
they won't put their ideas out there. Think I'm exaggerating? Just look at
one thing, the BY [backyard] photo. Two possibilities, fake or genuine.
They opt for the fantastic one. Now "faked" comes with a whole truckload
of fantastic subsets --- getting competent people on board, acquiring a
suitable "head" to use, etc. Now there are two possibilities why it was
among Oswald's possessions, a simple one, it was one of his possessions or
a fantastic one, it was planted. Again, the tards opt for the complex
fantastic one. Marina said she took a photo of Oswald holding the rifle.
The simple answer is that this is true, the complex and fantastic one is
that someone put her up to lying about this. Again the tards go for the
fantastic. Before they are done with this single issue they have posited
an impossibly fantastic scenario involving dozens of people." -- Bud; June
30, 2018
bigdog
2018-07-03 16:57:53 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by David Von Pein
http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/25012-need-single-bullet-theory-diagram/?page=5&tab=comments#comment-381655
Has any conspiracy theorist in history ever made this basic
observation?....
Boy, those assassins were sure a bunch of lucky sons of bitches when the
guy who shot JFK in the throat from the front managed to hit Kennedy in
exactly the right spot on his body so that (later on) the official
investigators could utilize that entry wound in the throat as the point of
exit for the SBT bullet. And then the multiple assassins got even luckier
when the upper-back bullet and the bullet that entered the throat both
decided not to exit the body and then both of those bullets vanished into
puffs of smoke before either of those bullets (which obviously were still
inside JFK's body when he was inside Trauma Room No. 1 at Parkland
Hospital) could be seen by any non-conspirator.
Can anyone truly believe that such incredible good fortune could possibly
have existed amongst the (alleged) multiple shooters who were (allegedly)
firing bullets at President Kennedy on 11/22/63?
(And yet CTers have the gall to tell me that **I** am the one who believes
in "Magic Bullets". Oy vey!)
Addendum....
My above comments reminded me of this great observation made by an LNer
named Bud at another forum....
"The retards [i.e., conspiracy theorists] hate Occam's Razor, because in
almost every case they opt for complex and fantastic explanations. Not
once or twice. Not even dozens of times. HUNDREDS of times. This is why
they won't put their ideas out there. Think I'm exaggerating? Just look at
one thing, the BY [backyard] photo. Two possibilities, fake or genuine.
They opt for the fantastic one. Now "faked" comes with a whole truckload
of fantastic subsets --- getting competent people on board, acquiring a
suitable "head" to use, etc. Now there are two possibilities why it was
among Oswald's possessions, a simple one, it was one of his possessions or
a fantastic one, it was planted. Again, the tards opt for the complex
fantastic one. Marina said she took a photo of Oswald holding the rifle.
The simple answer is that this is true, the complex and fantastic one is
that someone put her up to lying about this. Again the tards go for the
fantastic. Before they are done with this single issue they have posited
an impossibly fantastic scenario involving dozens of people." -- Bud; June
30, 2018
Isn't it amazing how quickly the DPD came up with a fake one to show
Oswald during his interrogation. It's almost as if they had it on file. Of
course the fantastic explanation is that they did.
bigdog
2018-07-03 16:58:33 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by David Von Pein
http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/25012-need-single-bullet-theory-diagram/?page=5&tab=comments#comment-381655
Has any conspiracy theorist in history ever made this basic
observation?....
Boy, those assassins were sure a bunch of lucky sons of bitches when the
guy who shot JFK in the throat from the front managed to hit Kennedy in
exactly the right spot on his body so that (later on) the official
investigators could utilize that entry wound in the throat as the point of
exit for the SBT bullet. And then the multiple assassins got even luckier
when the upper-back bullet and the bullet that entered the throat both
decided not to exit the body and then both of those bullets vanished into
puffs of smoke before either of those bullets (which obviously were still
inside JFK's body when he was inside Trauma Room No. 1 at Parkland
Hospital) could be seen by any non-conspirator.
Can anyone truly believe that such incredible good fortune could possibly
have existed amongst the (alleged) multiple shooters who were (allegedly)
firing bullets at President Kennedy on 11/22/63?
(And yet CTers have the gall to tell me that **I** am the one who believes
in "Magic Bullets". Oy vey!)
One thing I have learned about conspiracy hobbyists, they will believe
that whatever needed to have happened for their theories to hold water
must have happened because they KNOW their theories are valid. They start
with that assumption and then force fit the evidence to that predetermined
conclusion. This is why we get fantastic tales about planted bullets, body
snatching, body alterations, film alterations, photo alterations, phony
x-rays, witness tampering, etc., etc., etc.. The list goes on and on and
at times seems endless.
Post by David Von Pein
Addendum....
My above comments reminded me of this great observation made by an LNer
named Bud at another forum....
"The retards [i.e., conspiracy theorists] hate Occam's Razor, because in
almost every case they opt for complex and fantastic explanations. Not
once or twice. Not even dozens of times. HUNDREDS of times. This is why
they won't put their ideas out there. Think I'm exaggerating? Just look at
one thing, the BY [backyard] photo. Two possibilities, fake or genuine.
They opt for the fantastic one. Now "faked" comes with a whole truckload
of fantastic subsets --- getting competent people on board, acquiring a
suitable "head" to use, etc. Now there are two possibilities why it was
among Oswald's possessions, a simple one, it was one of his possessions or
a fantastic one, it was planted. Again, the tards opt for the complex
fantastic one. Marina said she took a photo of Oswald holding the rifle.
The simple answer is that this is true, the complex and fantastic one is
that someone put her up to lying about this. Again the tards go for the
fantastic. Before they are done with this single issue they have posited
an impossibly fantastic scenario involving dozens of people." -- Bud; June
30, 2018
mainframetech
2018-07-06 01:35:31 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by bigdog
Post by David Von Pein
http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/25012-need-single-bullet-theory-diagram/?page=5&tab=comments#comment-381655
Has any conspiracy theorist in history ever made this basic
observation?....
Boy, those assassins were sure a bunch of lucky sons of bitches when the
guy who shot JFK in the throat from the front managed to hit Kennedy in
exactly the right spot on his body so that (later on) the official
investigators could utilize that entry wound in the throat as the point of
exit for the SBT bullet. And then the multiple assassins got even luckier
when the upper-back bullet and the bullet that entered the throat both
decided not to exit the body and then both of those bullets vanished into
puffs of smoke before either of those bullets (which obviously were still
inside JFK's body when he was inside Trauma Room No. 1 at Parkland
Hospital) could be seen by any non-conspirator.
Can anyone truly believe that such incredible good fortune could possibly
have existed amongst the (alleged) multiple shooters who were (allegedly)
firing bullets at President Kennedy on 11/22/63?
(And yet CTers have the gall to tell me that **I** am the one who believes
in "Magic Bullets". Oy vey!)
One thing I have learned about conspiracy hobbyists, they will believe
that whatever needed to have happened for their theories to hold water
must have happened because they KNOW their theories are valid. They start
with that assumption and then force fit the evidence to that predetermined
conclusion. This is why we get fantastic tales about planted bullets, body
snatching, body alterations, film alterations, photo alterations, phony
x-rays, witness tampering, etc., etc., etc.. The list goes on and on and
at times seems endless.
Post by David Von Pein
Addendum....
My above comments reminded me of this great observation made by an LNer
named Bud at another forum....
"The retards [i.e., conspiracy theorists] hate Occam's Razor, because in
almost every case they opt for complex and fantastic explanations. Not
once or twice. Not even dozens of times. HUNDREDS of times. This is why
they won't put their ideas out there. Think I'm exaggerating? Just look at
one thing, the BY [backyard] photo. Two possibilities, fake or genuine.
They opt for the fantastic one. Now "faked" comes with a whole truckload
of fantastic subsets --- getting competent people on board, acquiring a
suitable "head" to use, etc. Now there are two possibilities why it was
among Oswald's possessions, a simple one, it was one of his possessions or
a fantastic one, it was planted. Again, the tards opt for the complex
fantastic one. Marina said she took a photo of Oswald holding the rifle.
The simple answer is that this is true, the complex and fantastic one is
that someone put her up to lying about this. Again the tards go for the
fantastic. Before they are done with this single issue they have posited
an impossibly fantastic scenario involving dozens of people." -- Bud; June
30, 2018
Sure sounds like the LNs are having a hard time trying to avoid all
the evidence that has been put in front of their faces, often refusing to
argue about it, and just going off into ridiculous tirades about CT
negatives and avoiding the subjects.

Chris
Jason Burke
2018-07-07 00:42:27 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by David Von Pein
http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/25012-need-single-bullet-theory-diagram/?page=5&tab=comments#comment-381655
Has any conspiracy theorist in history ever made this basic
observation?....
Boy, those assassins were sure a bunch of lucky sons of bitches when the
guy who shot JFK in the throat from the front managed to hit Kennedy in
exactly the right spot on his body so that (later on) the official
investigators could utilize that entry wound in the throat as the point of
exit for the SBT bullet. And then the multiple assassins got even luckier
when the upper-back bullet and the bullet that entered the throat both
decided not to exit the body and then both of those bullets vanished into
puffs of smoke before either of those bullets (which obviously were still
inside JFK's body when he was inside Trauma Room No. 1 at Parkland
Hospital) could be seen by any non-conspirator.
Can anyone truly believe that such incredible good fortune could possibly
have existed amongst the (alleged) multiple shooters who were (allegedly)
firing bullets at President Kennedy on 11/22/63?
(And yet CTers have the gall to tell me that **I** am the one who believes
in "Magic Bullets". Oy vey!)
One thing I have learned about conspiracy hobbyists, they will believe
that whatever needed to have happened for their theories to hold water
must have happened because they KNOW their theories are valid. They start
with that assumption and then force fit the evidence to that predetermined
conclusion. This is why we get fantastic tales about planted bullets, body
snatching, body alterations, film alterations, photo alterations, phony
x-rays, witness tampering, etc., etc., etc.. The list goes on and on and
at times seems endless.
Post by David Von Pein
Addendum....
My above comments reminded me of this great observation made by an LNer
named Bud at another forum....
"The retards [i.e., conspiracy theorists] hate Occam's Razor, because in
almost every case they opt for complex and fantastic explanations. Not
once or twice. Not even dozens of times. HUNDREDS of times. This is why
they won't put their ideas out there. Think I'm exaggerating? Just look at
one thing, the BY [backyard] photo. Two possibilities, fake or genuine.
They opt for the fantastic one. Now "faked" comes with a whole truckload
of fantastic subsets --- getting competent people on board, acquiring a
suitable "head" to use, etc. Now there are two possibilities why it was
among Oswald's possessions, a simple one, it was one of his possessions or
a fantastic one, it was planted. Again, the tards opt for the complex
fantastic one. Marina said she took a photo of Oswald holding the rifle.
The simple answer is that this is true, the complex and fantastic one is
that someone put her up to lying about this. Again the tards go for the
fantastic. Before they are done with this single issue they have posited
an impossibly fantastic scenario involving dozens of people." -- Bud; June
30, 2018
Sure sounds like the LNs are having a hard time trying to avoid all
the evidence that has been put in front of their faces, often refusing to
argue about it, and just going off into ridiculous tirades about CT
negatives and avoiding the subjects.
Chris
Are you *honestly* ANYWHERE near serious?
bigdog
2018-07-07 12:44:30 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by David Von Pein
http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/25012-need-single-bullet-theory-diagram/?page=5&tab=comments#comment-381655
Has any conspiracy theorist in history ever made this basic
observation?....
Boy, those assassins were sure a bunch of lucky sons of bitches when the
guy who shot JFK in the throat from the front managed to hit Kennedy in
exactly the right spot on his body so that (later on) the official
investigators could utilize that entry wound in the throat as the point of
exit for the SBT bullet. And then the multiple assassins got even luckier
when the upper-back bullet and the bullet that entered the throat both
decided not to exit the body and then both of those bullets vanished into
puffs of smoke before either of those bullets (which obviously were still
inside JFK's body when he was inside Trauma Room No. 1 at Parkland
Hospital) could be seen by any non-conspirator.
Can anyone truly believe that such incredible good fortune could possibly
have existed amongst the (alleged) multiple shooters who were (allegedly)
firing bullets at President Kennedy on 11/22/63?
(And yet CTers have the gall to tell me that **I** am the one who believes
in "Magic Bullets". Oy vey!)
One thing I have learned about conspiracy hobbyists, they will believe
that whatever needed to have happened for their theories to hold water
must have happened because they KNOW their theories are valid. They start
with that assumption and then force fit the evidence to that predetermined
conclusion. This is why we get fantastic tales about planted bullets, body
snatching, body alterations, film alterations, photo alterations, phony
x-rays, witness tampering, etc., etc., etc.. The list goes on and on and
at times seems endless.
Post by David Von Pein
Addendum....
My above comments reminded me of this great observation made by an LNer
named Bud at another forum....
"The retards [i.e., conspiracy theorists] hate Occam's Razor, because in
almost every case they opt for complex and fantastic explanations. Not
once or twice. Not even dozens of times. HUNDREDS of times. This is why
they won't put their ideas out there. Think I'm exaggerating? Just look at
one thing, the BY [backyard] photo. Two possibilities, fake or genuine.
They opt for the fantastic one. Now "faked" comes with a whole truckload
of fantastic subsets --- getting competent people on board, acquiring a
suitable "head" to use, etc. Now there are two possibilities why it was
among Oswald's possessions, a simple one, it was one of his possessions or
a fantastic one, it was planted. Again, the tards opt for the complex
fantastic one. Marina said she took a photo of Oswald holding the rifle.
The simple answer is that this is true, the complex and fantastic one is
that someone put her up to lying about this. Again the tards go for the
fantastic. Before they are done with this single issue they have posited
an impossibly fantastic scenario involving dozens of people." -- Bud; June
30, 2018
Sure sounds like the LNs are having a hard time trying to avoid all
the evidence that has been put in front of their faces, often refusing to
argue about it, and just going off into ridiculous tirades about CT
negatives and avoiding the subjects.
It's really funny that you think the nonsense you post here is evidence.
BOZ
2018-07-07 21:38:02 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by David Von Pein
http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/25012-need-single-bullet-theory-diagram/?page=5&tab=comments#comment-381655
Has any conspiracy theorist in history ever made this basic
observation?....
Boy, those assassins were sure a bunch of lucky sons of bitches when the
guy who shot JFK in the throat from the front managed to hit Kennedy in
exactly the right spot on his body so that (later on) the official
investigators could utilize that entry wound in the throat as the point of
exit for the SBT bullet. And then the multiple assassins got even luckier
when the upper-back bullet and the bullet that entered the throat both
decided not to exit the body and then both of those bullets vanished into
puffs of smoke before either of those bullets (which obviously were still
inside JFK's body when he was inside Trauma Room No. 1 at Parkland
Hospital) could be seen by any non-conspirator.
Can anyone truly believe that such incredible good fortune could possibly
have existed amongst the (alleged) multiple shooters who were (allegedly)
firing bullets at President Kennedy on 11/22/63?
(And yet CTers have the gall to tell me that **I** am the one who believes
in "Magic Bullets". Oy vey!)
One thing I have learned about conspiracy hobbyists, they will believe
that whatever needed to have happened for their theories to hold water
must have happened because they KNOW their theories are valid. They start
with that assumption and then force fit the evidence to that predetermined
conclusion. This is why we get fantastic tales about planted bullets, body
snatching, body alterations, film alterations, photo alterations, phony
x-rays, witness tampering, etc., etc., etc.. The list goes on and on and
at times seems endless.
Post by David Von Pein
Addendum....
My above comments reminded me of this great observation made by an LNer
named Bud at another forum....
"The retards [i.e., conspiracy theorists] hate Occam's Razor, because in
almost every case they opt for complex and fantastic explanations. Not
once or twice. Not even dozens of times. HUNDREDS of times. This is why
they won't put their ideas out there. Think I'm exaggerating? Just look at
one thing, the BY [backyard] photo. Two possibilities, fake or genuine.
They opt for the fantastic one. Now "faked" comes with a whole truckload
of fantastic subsets --- getting competent people on board, acquiring a
suitable "head" to use, etc. Now there are two possibilities why it was
among Oswald's possessions, a simple one, it was one of his possessions or
a fantastic one, it was planted. Again, the tards opt for the complex
fantastic one. Marina said she took a photo of Oswald holding the rifle.
The simple answer is that this is true, the complex and fantastic one is
that someone put her up to lying about this. Again the tards go for the
fantastic. Before they are done with this single issue they have posited
an impossibly fantastic scenario involving dozens of people." -- Bud; June
30, 2018
Sure sounds like the LNs are having a hard time trying to avoid all
the evidence that has been put in front of their faces, often refusing to
argue about it, and just going off into ridiculous tirades about CT
negatives and avoiding the subjects.
Chris
CHRIS YOUR THEORY THAT GERONIMO SHOT JFK DOESN'T MAKE SENSE. DO YOU THINK
GEORGE BUSH SKULL AND BONES AND JOHN KERRY SKULL AND BONES STOLE
GERONIMO'S SKULL?

Anthony Marsh
2018-07-03 16:58:54 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by David Von Pein
http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/25012-need-single-bullet-theory-diagram/?page=5&tab=comments#comment-381655
Has any conspiracy theorist in history ever made this basic
observation?....
Boy, those assassins were sure a bunch of lucky sons of bitches when the
guy who shot JFK in the throat from the front managed to hit Kennedy in
exactly the right spot on his body so that (later on) the official
investigators could utilize that entry wound in the throat as the point of
exit for the SBT bullet. And then the multiple assassins got even luckier
when the upper-back bullet and the bullet that entered the throat both
decided not to exit the body and then both of those bullets vanished into
puffs of smoke before either of those bullets (which obviously were still
inside JFK's body when he was inside Trauma Room No. 1 at Parkland
Hospital) could be seen by any non-conspirator.
Straw Man argument.
Remember it was Humes who said it might have been an ice bullet.
And you didn't complain about that.
Post by David Von Pein
Can anyone truly believe that such incredible good fortune could possibly
have existed amongst the (alleged) multiple shooters who were (allegedly)
firing bullets at President Kennedy on 11/22/63?
No one has to believe your straw man arguments anymore than the crazy
theories you are shooting down
Post by David Von Pein
(And yet CTers have the gall to tell me that **I** am the one who believes
in "Magic Bullets". Oy vey!)
Well, that's the SBT.
Post by David Von Pein
Addendum....
My above comments reminded me of this great observation made by an LNer
named Bud at another forum....
"The retards [i.e., conspiracy theorists] hate Occam's Razor, because in
almost every case they opt for complex and fantastic explanations. Not
once or twice. Not even dozens of times. HUNDREDS of times. This is why
they won't put their ideas out there. Think I'm exaggerating? Just look at
one thing, the BY [backyard] photo. Two possibilities, fake or genuine.
They opt for the fantastic one. Now "faked" comes with a whole truckload
of fantastic subsets --- getting competent people on board, acquiring a
suitable "head" to use, etc. Now there are two possibilities why it was
among Oswald's possessions, a simple one, it was one of his possessions or
a fantastic one, it was planted. Again, the tards opt for the complex
fantastic one. Marina said she took a photo of Oswald holding the rifle.
The simple answer is that this is true, the complex and fantastic one is
that someone put her up to lying about this. Again the tards go for the
fantastic. Before they are done with this single issue they have posited
an impossibly fantastic scenario involving dozens of people." -- Bud; June
30, 2018
It seems that Occam's Razor was invented by and used only by WC defenders.


Wow, Dozens of people? You mean like the CIA plots to kill Castro?
Why don't you call THEM retards?
Exploding sea shell?
Bud
2018-07-03 17:02:43 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by David Von Pein
http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/25012-need-single-bullet-theory-diagram/?page=5&tab=comments#comment-381655
Has any conspiracy theorist in history ever made this basic
observation?....
Boy, those assassins were sure a bunch of lucky sons of bitches when the
guy who shot JFK in the throat from the front managed to hit Kennedy in
exactly the right spot on his body so that (later on) the official
investigators could utilize that entry wound in the throat as the point of
exit for the SBT bullet. And then the multiple assassins got even luckier
when the upper-back bullet and the bullet that entered the throat both
decided not to exit the body and then both of those bullets vanished into
puffs of smoke before either of those bullets (which obviously were still
inside JFK's body when he was inside Trauma Room No. 1 at Parkland
Hospital) could be seen by any non-conspirator.
Can anyone truly believe that such incredible good fortune could possibly
have existed amongst the (alleged) multiple shooters who were (allegedly)
firing bullets at President Kennedy on 11/22/63?
(And yet CTers have the gall to tell me that **I** am the one who believes
in "Magic Bullets". Oy vey!)
Addendum....
My above comments reminded me of this great observation made by an LNer
named Bud at another forum....
"The retards [i.e., conspiracy theorists] hate Occam's Razor, because in
almost every case they opt for complex and fantastic explanations. Not
once or twice. Not even dozens of times. HUNDREDS of times. This is why
they won't put their ideas out there. Think I'm exaggerating? Just look at
one thing, the BY [backyard] photo. Two possibilities, fake or genuine.
They opt for the fantastic one. Now "faked" comes with a whole truckload
of fantastic subsets --- getting competent people on board, acquiring a
suitable "head" to use, etc. Now there are two possibilities why it was
among Oswald's possessions, a simple one, it was one of his possessions or
a fantastic one, it was planted. Again, the tards opt for the complex
fantastic one. Marina said she took a photo of Oswald holding the rifle.
The simple answer is that this is true, the complex and fantastic one is
that someone put her up to lying about this. Again the tards go for the
fantastic. Before they are done with this single issue they have posited
an impossibly fantastic scenario involving dozens of people." -- Bud; June
30, 2018
Hey David! I`m glad you felt what I wrote had some worth but if you
quote me here in the moderated group I would suggest you omit the
inflammatory rhetoric I use elsewhere. Makes .John`s job easier and stops
people from backdooring in insults when the precedence is made. In a case
like this feel free to omit the "r" word and just put [conspiracy
theorist] in its place. Other than that I think it was a solid
observation, one Ben had to totally remove and run from when he responded
to the version of this you posted over on the nuthouse.
Anthony Marsh
2018-07-04 01:39:45 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Bud
Post by David Von Pein
http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/25012-need-single-bullet-theory-diagram/?page=5&tab=comments#comment-381655
Has any conspiracy theorist in history ever made this basic
observation?....
Boy, those assassins were sure a bunch of lucky sons of bitches when the
guy who shot JFK in the throat from the front managed to hit Kennedy in
exactly the right spot on his body so that (later on) the official
investigators could utilize that entry wound in the throat as the point of
exit for the SBT bullet. And then the multiple assassins got even luckier
when the upper-back bullet and the bullet that entered the throat both
decided not to exit the body and then both of those bullets vanished into
puffs of smoke before either of those bullets (which obviously were still
inside JFK's body when he was inside Trauma Room No. 1 at Parkland
Hospital) could be seen by any non-conspirator.
Can anyone truly believe that such incredible good fortune could possibly
have existed amongst the (alleged) multiple shooters who were (allegedly)
firing bullets at President Kennedy on 11/22/63?
(And yet CTers have the gall to tell me that **I** am the one who believes
in "Magic Bullets". Oy vey!)
Addendum....
My above comments reminded me of this great observation made by an LNer
named Bud at another forum....
"The retards [i.e., conspiracy theorists] hate Occam's Razor, because in
almost every case they opt for complex and fantastic explanations. Not
once or twice. Not even dozens of times. HUNDREDS of times. This is why
they won't put their ideas out there. Think I'm exaggerating? Just look at
one thing, the BY [backyard] photo. Two possibilities, fake or genuine.
They opt for the fantastic one. Now "faked" comes with a whole truckload
of fantastic subsets --- getting competent people on board, acquiring a
suitable "head" to use, etc. Now there are two possibilities why it was
among Oswald's possessions, a simple one, it was one of his possessions or
a fantastic one, it was planted. Again, the tards opt for the complex
fantastic one. Marina said she took a photo of Oswald holding the rifle.
The simple answer is that this is true, the complex and fantastic one is
that someone put her up to lying about this. Again the tards go for the
fantastic. Before they are done with this single issue they have posited
an impossibly fantastic scenario involving dozens of people." -- Bud; June
30, 2018
Hey David! I`m glad you felt what I wrote had some worth but if you
quote me here in the moderated group I would suggest you omit the
inflammatory rhetoric I use elsewhere. Makes .John`s job easier and stops
people from backdooring in insults when the precedence is made. In a case
like this feel free to omit the "r" word and just put [conspiracy
theorist] in its place. Other than that I think it was a solid
observation, one Ben had to totally remove and run from when he responded
to the version of this you posted over on the nuthouse.
You're not supposed to tell him that. The minions are allowed to say
things that the conspiracy believers are not allowed to say.
David Von Pein
2018-07-04 01:48:04 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Bud
Post by David Von Pein
http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/25012-need-single-bullet-theory-diagram/?page=5&tab=comments#comment-381655
Has any conspiracy theorist in history ever made this basic
observation?....
Boy, those assassins were sure a bunch of lucky sons of bitches when the
guy who shot JFK in the throat from the front managed to hit Kennedy in
exactly the right spot on his body so that (later on) the official
investigators could utilize that entry wound in the throat as the point of
exit for the SBT bullet. And then the multiple assassins got even luckier
when the upper-back bullet and the bullet that entered the throat both
decided not to exit the body and then both of those bullets vanished into
puffs of smoke before either of those bullets (which obviously were still
inside JFK's body when he was inside Trauma Room No. 1 at Parkland
Hospital) could be seen by any non-conspirator.
Can anyone truly believe that such incredible good fortune could possibly
have existed amongst the (alleged) multiple shooters who were (allegedly)
firing bullets at President Kennedy on 11/22/63?
(And yet CTers have the gall to tell me that **I** am the one who believes
in "Magic Bullets". Oy vey!)
Addendum....
My above comments reminded me of this great observation made by an LNer
named Bud at another forum....
"The retards [i.e., conspiracy theorists] hate Occam's Razor, because in
almost every case they opt for complex and fantastic explanations. Not
once or twice. Not even dozens of times. HUNDREDS of times. This is why
they won't put their ideas out there. Think I'm exaggerating? Just look at
one thing, the BY [backyard] photo. Two possibilities, fake or genuine.
They opt for the fantastic one. Now "faked" comes with a whole truckload
of fantastic subsets --- getting competent people on board, acquiring a
suitable "head" to use, etc. Now there are two possibilities why it was
among Oswald's possessions, a simple one, it was one of his possessions or
a fantastic one, it was planted. Again, the tards opt for the complex
fantastic one. Marina said she took a photo of Oswald holding the rifle.
The simple answer is that this is true, the complex and fantastic one is
that someone put her up to lying about this. Again the tards go for the
fantastic. Before they are done with this single issue they have posited
an impossibly fantastic scenario involving dozens of people." -- Bud; June
30, 2018
Hey David! I`m glad you felt what I wrote had some worth but if you
quote me here in the moderated group I would suggest you omit the
inflammatory rhetoric I use elsewhere. Makes .John`s job easier and stops
people from backdooring in insults when the precedence is made. In a case
like this feel free to omit the "r" word and just put [conspiracy
theorist] in its place.
10-4. Will do (in the future).
Post by Bud
Other than that I think it was a solid
observation, one Ben had to totally remove and run from when he responded
to the version of this you posted over on the nuthouse.
BOZ
2018-07-03 17:13:42 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by David Von Pein
http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/25012-need-single-bullet-theory-diagram/?page=5&tab=comments#comment-381655
Has any conspiracy theorist in history ever made this basic
observation?....
Boy, those assassins were sure a bunch of lucky sons of bitches when the
guy who shot JFK in the throat from the front managed to hit Kennedy in
exactly the right spot on his body so that (later on) the official
investigators could utilize that entry wound in the throat as the point of
exit for the SBT bullet. And then the multiple assassins got even luckier
when the upper-back bullet and the bullet that entered the throat both
decided not to exit the body and then both of those bullets vanished into
puffs of smoke before either of those bullets (which obviously were still
inside JFK's body when he was inside Trauma Room No. 1 at Parkland
Hospital) could be seen by any non-conspirator.
Can anyone truly believe that such incredible good fortune could possibly
have existed amongst the (alleged) multiple shooters who were (allegedly)
firing bullets at President Kennedy on 11/22/63?
(And yet CTers have the gall to tell me that **I** am the one who believes
in "Magic Bullets". Oy vey!)
Addendum....
My above comments reminded me of this great observation made by an LNer
named Bud at another forum....
"The retards [i.e., conspiracy theorists] hate Occam's Razor, because in
almost every case they opt for complex and fantastic explanations. Not
once or twice. Not even dozens of times. HUNDREDS of times. This is why
they won't put their ideas out there. Think I'm exaggerating? Just look at
one thing, the BY [backyard] photo. Two possibilities, fake or genuine.
They opt for the fantastic one. Now "faked" comes with a whole truckload
of fantastic subsets --- getting competent people on board, acquiring a
suitable "head" to use, etc. Now there are two possibilities why it was
among Oswald's possessions, a simple one, it was one of his possessions or
a fantastic one, it was planted. Again, the tards opt for the complex
fantastic one. Marina said she took a photo of Oswald holding the rifle.
The simple answer is that this is true, the complex and fantastic one is
that someone put her up to lying about this. Again the tards go for the
fantastic. Before they are done with this single issue they have posited
an impossibly fantastic scenario involving dozens of people." -- Bud; June
30, 2018
CONSPIRACY THEORISTS THINK OCCAM'S RAZOR IS A CIA ELECTRIC TOOL USED IN
THE REMOVAL OF UNWANTED FACIAL HAIR.
Anthony Marsh
2018-07-04 01:34:31 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by BOZ
Post by David Von Pein
http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/25012-need-single-bullet-theory-diagram/?page=5&tab=comments#comment-381655
Has any conspiracy theorist in history ever made this basic
observation?....
Boy, those assassins were sure a bunch of lucky sons of bitches when the
guy who shot JFK in the throat from the front managed to hit Kennedy in
exactly the right spot on his body so that (later on) the official
investigators could utilize that entry wound in the throat as the point of
exit for the SBT bullet. And then the multiple assassins got even luckier
when the upper-back bullet and the bullet that entered the throat both
decided not to exit the body and then both of those bullets vanished into
puffs of smoke before either of those bullets (which obviously were still
inside JFK's body when he was inside Trauma Room No. 1 at Parkland
Hospital) could be seen by any non-conspirator.
Can anyone truly believe that such incredible good fortune could possibly
have existed amongst the (alleged) multiple shooters who were (allegedly)
firing bullets at President Kennedy on 11/22/63?
(And yet CTers have the gall to tell me that **I** am the one who believes
in "Magic Bullets". Oy vey!)
Addendum....
My above comments reminded me of this great observation made by an LNer
named Bud at another forum....
"The retards [i.e., conspiracy theorists] hate Occam's Razor, because in
almost every case they opt for complex and fantastic explanations. Not
once or twice. Not even dozens of times. HUNDREDS of times. This is why
they won't put their ideas out there. Think I'm exaggerating? Just look at
one thing, the BY [backyard] photo. Two possibilities, fake or genuine.
They opt for the fantastic one. Now "faked" comes with a whole truckload
of fantastic subsets --- getting competent people on board, acquiring a
suitable "head" to use, etc. Now there are two possibilities why it was
among Oswald's possessions, a simple one, it was one of his possessions or
a fantastic one, it was planted. Again, the tards opt for the complex
fantastic one. Marina said she took a photo of Oswald holding the rifle.
The simple answer is that this is true, the complex and fantastic one is
that someone put her up to lying about this. Again the tards go for the
fantastic. Before they are done with this single issue they have posited
an impossibly fantastic scenario involving dozens of people." -- Bud; June
30, 2018
CONSPIRACY THEORISTS THINK OCCAM'S RAZOR IS A CIA ELECTRIC TOOL USED IN
THE REMOVAL OF UNWANTED FACIAL HAIR.
Laugh it up wiseguy. We won, you lost. Don't be a sore loser.
Anthony Marsh
2018-07-04 01:34:40 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by BOZ
Post by David Von Pein
http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/25012-need-single-bullet-theory-diagram/?page=5&tab=comments#comment-381655
Has any conspiracy theorist in history ever made this basic
observation?....
Boy, those assassins were sure a bunch of lucky sons of bitches when the
guy who shot JFK in the throat from the front managed to hit Kennedy in
exactly the right spot on his body so that (later on) the official
investigators could utilize that entry wound in the throat as the point of
exit for the SBT bullet. And then the multiple assassins got even luckier
when the upper-back bullet and the bullet that entered the throat both
decided not to exit the body and then both of those bullets vanished into
puffs of smoke before either of those bullets (which obviously were still
inside JFK's body when he was inside Trauma Room No. 1 at Parkland
Hospital) could be seen by any non-conspirator.
Can anyone truly believe that such incredible good fortune could possibly
have existed amongst the (alleged) multiple shooters who were (allegedly)
firing bullets at President Kennedy on 11/22/63?
(And yet CTers have the gall to tell me that **I** am the one who believes
in "Magic Bullets". Oy vey!)
Addendum....
My above comments reminded me of this great observation made by an LNer
named Bud at another forum....
"The retards [i.e., conspiracy theorists] hate Occam's Razor, because in
almost every case they opt for complex and fantastic explanations. Not
once or twice. Not even dozens of times. HUNDREDS of times. This is why
they won't put their ideas out there. Think I'm exaggerating? Just look at
one thing, the BY [backyard] photo. Two possibilities, fake or genuine.
They opt for the fantastic one. Now "faked" comes with a whole truckload
of fantastic subsets --- getting competent people on board, acquiring a
suitable "head" to use, etc. Now there are two possibilities why it was
among Oswald's possessions, a simple one, it was one of his possessions or
a fantastic one, it was planted. Again, the tards opt for the complex
fantastic one. Marina said she took a photo of Oswald holding the rifle.
The simple answer is that this is true, the complex and fantastic one is
that someone put her up to lying about this. Again the tards go for the
fantastic. Before they are done with this single issue they have posited
an impossibly fantastic scenario involving dozens of people." -- Bud; June
30, 2018
CONSPIRACY THEORISTS THINK OCCAM'S RAZOR IS A CIA ELECTRIC TOOL USED IN
THE REMOVAL OF UNWANTED FACIAL HAIR.
We are not impressed by your Straw Man arguments. You need a weedwacker
to clean up your mess.
Ace Kefford
2018-07-04 01:27:51 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by David Von Pein
http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/25012-need-single-bullet-theory-diagram/?page=5&tab=comments#comment-381655
Has any conspiracy theorist in history ever made this basic
observation?....
Boy, those assassins were sure a bunch of lucky sons of bitches when the
guy who shot JFK in the throat from the front managed to hit Kennedy in
exactly the right spot on his body so that (later on) the official
investigators could utilize that entry wound in the throat as the point of
exit for the SBT bullet. And then the multiple assassins got even luckier
when the upper-back bullet and the bullet that entered the throat both
decided not to exit the body and then both of those bullets vanished into
puffs of smoke before either of those bullets (which obviously were still
inside JFK's body when he was inside Trauma Room No. 1 at Parkland
Hospital) could be seen by any non-conspirator.
Can anyone truly believe that such incredible good fortune could possibly
have existed amongst the (alleged) multiple shooters who were (allegedly)
firing bullets at President Kennedy on 11/22/63?
(And yet CTers have the gall to tell me that **I** am the one who believes
in "Magic Bullets". Oy vey!)
Addendum....
My above comments reminded me of this great observation made by an LNer
named Bud at another forum....
"The retards [i.e., conspiracy theorists] hate Occam's Razor, because in
almost every case they opt for complex and fantastic explanations. Not
once or twice. Not even dozens of times. HUNDREDS of times. This is why
they won't put their ideas out there. Think I'm exaggerating? Just look at
one thing, the BY [backyard] photo. Two possibilities, fake or genuine.
They opt for the fantastic one. Now "faked" comes with a whole truckload
of fantastic subsets --- getting competent people on board, acquiring a
suitable "head" to use, etc. Now there are two possibilities why it was
among Oswald's possessions, a simple one, it was one of his possessions or
a fantastic one, it was planted. Again, the tards opt for the complex
fantastic one. Marina said she took a photo of Oswald holding the rifle.
The simple answer is that this is true, the complex and fantastic one is
that someone put her up to lying about this. Again the tards go for the
fantastic. Before they are done with this single issue they have posited
an impossibly fantastic scenario involving dozens of people." -- Bud; June
30, 2018
Strange things and coincidences DO happen. But the buffs go to ridiculous
lengths to prop up their theories as the evidence falsifies their early
speculations. The ultimate end of this being the blanket
alteration/suppression/all powerful conspiracy argument which essentially
means we are not operating in an area where they can ever be wrong.

Bud in his genteel language hits the nail on the head. There is one
sensible explanation to a certain set of facts, but the buffs instead go
for an elaborate scenario that also happens to leave out a lot of
facts.

John Wayne said it best, "Ree-goddamn-diculous!"
mainframetech
2018-07-04 01:33:18 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by David Von Pein
http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/25012-need-single-bullet-theory-diagram/?page=5&tab=comments#comment-381655
Has any conspiracy theorist in history ever made this basic
observation?....
Boy, those assassins were sure a bunch of lucky sons of bitches when the
guy who shot JFK in the throat from the front managed to hit Kennedy in
exactly the right spot on his body so that (later on) the official
investigators could utilize that entry wound in the throat as the point of
exit for the SBT bullet. And then the multiple assassins got even luckier
when the upper-back bullet and the bullet that entered the throat both
decided not to exit the body and then both of those bullets vanished into
puffs of smoke before either of those bullets (which obviously were still
inside JFK's body when he was inside Trauma Room No. 1 at Parkland
Hospital) could be seen by any non-conspirator.
Can anyone truly believe that such incredible good fortune could possibly
have existed amongst the (alleged) multiple shooters who were (allegedly)
firing bullets at President Kennedy on 11/22/63?
(And yet CTers have the gall to tell me that **I** am the one who believes
in "Magic Bullets". Oy vey!)
It looks like DVP has gone off once again. With a lot of factoids
that don't make any sense.
Post by David Von Pein
Addendum....
My above comments reminded me of this great observation made by an LNer
named Bud at another forum....
"The retards [i.e., conspiracy theorists] hate Occam's Razor, because in
almost every case they opt for complex and fantastic explanations. Not
once or twice. Not even dozens of times. HUNDREDS of times. This is why
they won't put their ideas out there. Think I'm exaggerating? Just look at
one thing, the BY [backyard] photo. Two possibilities, fake or genuine.
They opt for the fantastic one. Now "faked" comes with a whole truckload
of fantastic subsets --- getting competent people on board, acquiring a
suitable "head" to use, etc.
As a proud CT, I agree that the BY photos were taken by Marina and they
were just what Oswald wanted. No trickery.

Chris
bigdog
2018-07-04 19:29:17 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by mainframetech
Post by David Von Pein
http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/25012-need-single-bullet-theory-diagram/?page=5&tab=comments#comment-381655
Has any conspiracy theorist in history ever made this basic
observation?....
Boy, those assassins were sure a bunch of lucky sons of bitches when the
guy who shot JFK in the throat from the front managed to hit Kennedy in
exactly the right spot on his body so that (later on) the official
investigators could utilize that entry wound in the throat as the point of
exit for the SBT bullet. And then the multiple assassins got even luckier
when the upper-back bullet and the bullet that entered the throat both
decided not to exit the body and then both of those bullets vanished into
puffs of smoke before either of those bullets (which obviously were still
inside JFK's body when he was inside Trauma Room No. 1 at Parkland
Hospital) could be seen by any non-conspirator.
Can anyone truly believe that such incredible good fortune could possibly
have existed amongst the (alleged) multiple shooters who were (allegedly)
firing bullets at President Kennedy on 11/22/63?
(And yet CTers have the gall to tell me that **I** am the one who believes
in "Magic Bullets". Oy vey!)
It looks like DVP has gone off once again. With a lot of factoids
that don't make any sense.
That would mean he has moved into your area of expertise.
Post by mainframetech
Post by David Von Pein
Addendum....
My above comments reminded me of this great observation made by an LNer
named Bud at another forum....
"The retards [i.e., conspiracy theorists] hate Occam's Razor, because in
almost every case they opt for complex and fantastic explanations. Not
once or twice. Not even dozens of times. HUNDREDS of times. This is why
they won't put their ideas out there. Think I'm exaggerating? Just look at
one thing, the BY [backyard] photo. Two possibilities, fake or genuine.
They opt for the fantastic one. Now "faked" comes with a whole truckload
of fantastic subsets --- getting competent people on board, acquiring a
suitable "head" to use, etc.
As a proud CT, I agree that the BY photos were taken by Marina and they
were just what Oswald wanted. No trickery.
He was photographed with the JFK and Tippit murder weapons and you don't
see anything suspicious about that.
mainframetech
2018-07-06 01:35:13 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by David Von Pein
http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/25012-need-single-bullet-theory-diagram/?page=5&tab=comments#comment-381655
Has any conspiracy theorist in history ever made this basic
observation?....
Boy, those assassins were sure a bunch of lucky sons of bitches when the
guy who shot JFK in the throat from the front managed to hit Kennedy in
exactly the right spot on his body so that (later on) the official
investigators could utilize that entry wound in the throat as the point of
exit for the SBT bullet. And then the multiple assassins got even luckier
when the upper-back bullet and the bullet that entered the throat both
decided not to exit the body and then both of those bullets vanished into
puffs of smoke before either of those bullets (which obviously were still
inside JFK's body when he was inside Trauma Room No. 1 at Parkland
Hospital) could be seen by any non-conspirator.
Can anyone truly believe that such incredible good fortune could possibly
have existed amongst the (alleged) multiple shooters who were (allegedly)
firing bullets at President Kennedy on 11/22/63?
(And yet CTers have the gall to tell me that **I** am the one who believes
in "Magic Bullets". Oy vey!)
It looks like DVP has gone off once again. With a lot of factoids
that don't make any sense.
That would mean he has moved into your area of expertise.
Post by mainframetech
Post by David Von Pein
Addendum....
My above comments reminded me of this great observation made by an LNer
named Bud at another forum....
"The retards [i.e., conspiracy theorists] hate Occam's Razor, because in
almost every case they opt for complex and fantastic explanations. Not
once or twice. Not even dozens of times. HUNDREDS of times. This is why
they won't put their ideas out there. Think I'm exaggerating? Just look at
one thing, the BY [backyard] photo. Two possibilities, fake or genuine.
They opt for the fantastic one. Now "faked" comes with a whole truckload
of fantastic subsets --- getting competent people on board, acquiring a
suitable "head" to use, etc.
As a proud CT, I agree that the BY photos were taken by Marina and they
were just what Oswald wanted. No trickery.
He was photographed with the JFK and Tippit murder weapons and you don't
see anything suspicious about that.
Well now, you see I'm more of an evidence guy and not a faith based
guesser like you. So I am not convinced that there is any proof anywhere
that the rifle and pistol on Oswald in his BY photo were responsible in
any way for the deaths of anyone.

Chris
bigdog
2018-07-07 12:44:06 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by David Von Pein
http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/25012-need-single-bullet-theory-diagram/?page=5&tab=comments#comment-381655
Has any conspiracy theorist in history ever made this basic
observation?....
Boy, those assassins were sure a bunch of lucky sons of bitches when the
guy who shot JFK in the throat from the front managed to hit Kennedy in
exactly the right spot on his body so that (later on) the official
investigators could utilize that entry wound in the throat as the point of
exit for the SBT bullet. And then the multiple assassins got even luckier
when the upper-back bullet and the bullet that entered the throat both
decided not to exit the body and then both of those bullets vanished into
puffs of smoke before either of those bullets (which obviously were still
inside JFK's body when he was inside Trauma Room No. 1 at Parkland
Hospital) could be seen by any non-conspirator.
Can anyone truly believe that such incredible good fortune could possibly
have existed amongst the (alleged) multiple shooters who were (allegedly)
firing bullets at President Kennedy on 11/22/63?
(And yet CTers have the gall to tell me that **I** am the one who believes
in "Magic Bullets". Oy vey!)
It looks like DVP has gone off once again. With a lot of factoids
that don't make any sense.
That would mean he has moved into your area of expertise.
Post by mainframetech
Post by David Von Pein
Addendum....
My above comments reminded me of this great observation made by an LNer
named Bud at another forum....
"The retards [i.e., conspiracy theorists] hate Occam's Razor, because in
almost every case they opt for complex and fantastic explanations. Not
once or twice. Not even dozens of times. HUNDREDS of times. This is why
they won't put their ideas out there. Think I'm exaggerating? Just look at
one thing, the BY [backyard] photo. Two possibilities, fake or genuine.
They opt for the fantastic one. Now "faked" comes with a whole truckload
of fantastic subsets --- getting competent people on board, acquiring a
suitable "head" to use, etc.
As a proud CT, I agree that the BY photos were taken by Marina and they
were just what Oswald wanted. No trickery.
He was photographed with the JFK and Tippit murder weapons and you don't
see anything suspicious about that.
Well now, you see I'm more of an evidence guy and not a faith based
guesser like you. So I am not convinced that there is any proof anywhere
that the rifle and pistol on Oswald in his BY photo were responsible in
any way for the deaths of anyone.
What you are convinced of and what the truth is took diverging paths a
long time ago.
David Von Pein
2018-07-04 01:49:51 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
http://quoting-common-sense.blogspot.com
Loading...