Post by GKnoll Post by Michael O'Dell Post by Anthony Marsh Post by firstname.lastname@example.org Post by Anthony Marsh Post by GKnoll Post by email@example.com Post by Anthony Marsh Post by GKnoll Post by GKnoll
The two cross talk fragments, "in an effort" and "try to determine"
prove that there were several skips on the Dictabelt.
The following image shows where the fragment "try to
located relative to the beginning of the "hold" crosstalk. It
the "try to determine" fragment is followed immediately by the
everything secure" crosstalk.
There is about 2.3 seconds of missing section where the "loud click" is
Is that 2.3 seconds the gap time for repeats?
Post by GKnoll
Following is the complete section of speech broadcast on Channel 2 that
starts at "in an effort". I have put asterisks around the missing
?? ??"in an effort to try to determine, *if what and when
there and* hold everything secure until homicide and other investigators
can get there".
The segment "if what and when happened down there and" is missing. The
"loud click" is a back skip of the recorder and it happened during this
episode of cross talk.
Is 2.3 seconds the regular back skip timing?
I think it might be. I think there was 2.3 seconds recording time per
track. So 2.3 seconds would be a back skip of 1 track. This would imply
that there would be 23 minutes of recording time for an entire
Post by Anthony Marsh Post by GKnoll
here is the link...
You do notice that Steve Barber and Michael O'Dell are no where to be
Those two guys have some explaining to do.
Hiding under the bed.
Breaking new ground is always difficult. Having said that, I do believe
that both Steve Barber and Michael ODell have a responsibility to address
these issues in the public domain. Members of this forum should ask them
to address it.
Nobody has a responsibility to respond to your random thoughts.
That's just nutty.
Actually, you do.
No, I don't. I have no obligation to ever mention this subject again.
And most of the time I don't.
More specifically, nobody works for you. I have no obligation to
respond to your claims even if they were actual thought-out arguments.
Do I have to keep reminding you that not too long ago you told Steve
that he was wrong about the location of the "men available" fragment.
There's a million cranks on the internet that all think they have the
answer to something. One I knew thought he could prove Einstein was
wrong. They are all totally convinced and think they have the
"evidence" to prove it. Nobody has an obligation to disprove these
people. Although I admit doing so once in a while for entertainment.
Well, now its your turn. Now I am going to teach you something.
We all have something to learn. The reason I know what I do know about
this case is because I was willing to take risk, to ask questions, to
not be afraid to be wrong.
Post by GKnoll
The question I asked Steve is not just a random thought. I asked
him(and you) where exactly he hears the words "to determine". He has
refused to do that.
You actually should be telling Steve to tell the newsgroup where
exactly he hears those words and not trying to fault me because I am
asking him to do it.
I don't tell Steve what to do.
Actually, you did. Again, you told him he was wrong about the "men
available" location. And if you were completely honest with yourself and
others you would tell him about a few other things that have been
discussed in this newsgroup.
Post by GKnoll Post by Michael O'Dell Post by Anthony Marsh
Well, we have, thousands of times, but they refuse to answer because
they are part of the cover-up and KNOW it was a conspiracy.
Tony likes to throw these absurd statement based on nothing. I don't
know why, they don't make him look any better. But they can be
humorous, in a certain kind of way.
From what I have learned about you and Steve, I do not think that
Marsh's statement is absurd at all. I think that Marsh is right.
Well, that says something about you.
After dealing with you and Steve, we both came to the same conclusion.