Discussion:
JFK wasn't the real target
Add Reply
claviger
2017-05-20 18:47:08 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Los Angeles Times


Lee Harvey Oswald’s little green book shows JFK wasn't the real target
http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-reston-jfk-assassination-target-20161122-story.html
Anthony Marsh
2017-05-21 22:32:13 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by claviger
Los Angeles Times
Lee Harvey Oswald’s little green book shows JFK wasn't the real target
http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-reston-jfk-assassination-target-20161122-story.html
Discredited theory.
OHLeeRedux
2017-05-22 20:20:38 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by claviger
Los Angeles Times
Lee Harvey Oswald’s little green book shows JFK wasn't the real target
http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-reston-jfk-assassination-target-20161122-story.html
Discredited theory.
Just like you.
Ace Kefford
2017-05-23 01:22:08 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by claviger
Los Angeles Times
Lee Harvey Oswald’s little green book shows JFK wasn't the real target
http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-reston-jfk-assassination-target-20161122-story.html
Little GREEN book? Aren't those things usually little black books? Did
he keep the numbers of space aliens in it? Then again, the band Love had
a semi-hit with "Little Red Book."
Jonny Mayer
2017-05-23 22:43:01 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
You posted about 8 months ago Claviger.
claviger
2017-05-29 02:06:10 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by claviger
Los Angeles Times
Lee Harvey Oswald’s little green book shows JFK wasn't the real target
http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-reston-jfk-assassination-target-20161122-story.html
If true LHO used the open sight not the scope and in his hurry to fire at
JBC over did it on dropping the bead (top of post) to bottom of the V the
shots would be at a steeper angle hitting behind the intended target,
which would explain why LHO shot the guy he liked in the backseat instead
of the guy he despised in the middle seat. In his mind LHO would be a
hero to spare JFK and punish JBC. After the ambush he would arrogantly
tell JFK "you owe me for sparing your life". The problem with this plan
he was an inexperienced sniper and screwed up both shots. If LHO was the
incompetent shooter CTs insist he was this scenario becomes a real
possibility why he shot the wrong target twice in his attempt to hit the
man who refused his honorable discharge.
Anthony Marsh
2017-05-29 23:27:36 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by claviger
Post by claviger
Los Angeles Times
Lee Harvey Oswald???s little green book shows JFK wasn't the real target
http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-reston-jfk-assassination-target-20161122-story.html
If true LHO used the open sight not the scope and in his hurry to fire at
JBC over did it on dropping the bead (top of post) to bottom of the V the
shots would be at a steeper angle hitting behind the intended target,
which would explain why LHO shot the guy he liked in the backseat instead
of the guy he despised in the middle seat. In his mind LHO would be a
hero to spare JFK and punish JBC. After the ambush he would arrogantly
tell JFK "you owe me for sparing your life". The problem with this plan
he was an inexperienced sniper and screwed up both shots. If LHO was the
incompetent shooter CTs insist he was this scenario becomes a real
possibility why he shot the wrong target twice in his attempt to hit the
man who refused his honorable discharge.
That story is a red herring. If the shooter was not even Oswald why would
he have a grudge against Connally. The President was the only target. Just
for fun why don't you make up a bogus theory that Jackie was the real
target. Maybe some type of dispute about her clothes.
claviger
2017-05-30 19:13:15 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by claviger
Post by claviger
Los Angeles Times
Lee Harvey Oswald???s little green book shows JFK wasn't the real target
http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-reston-jfk-assassination-target-20161122-story.html
If true LHO used the open sight not the scope and in his hurry to fire at
JBC over did it on dropping the bead (top of post) to bottom of the V the
shots would be at a steeper angle hitting behind the intended target,
which would explain why LHO shot the guy he liked in the backseat instead
of the guy he despised in the middle seat. In his mind LHO would be a
hero to spare JFK and punish JBC. After the ambush he would arrogantly
tell JFK "you owe me for sparing your life". The problem with this plan
he was an inexperienced sniper and screwed up both shots. If LHO was the
incompetent shooter CTs insist he was this scenario becomes a real
possibility why he shot the wrong target twice in his attempt to hit the
man who refused his honorable discharge.
That story is a red herring. If the shooter was not even Oswald why would
he have a grudge against Connally. The President was the only target. Just
for fun why don't you make up a bogus theory that Jackie was the real
target. Maybe some type of dispute about her clothes.
CTs never tire of claiming LHO was a boot camp bonehead who could barely
pass quals. Then you perpetuate the assumption he was incapable of
improving with practice. He was a born loser who couldn't even learn to
drive a car. If all this CT propaganda is true the scenario I just
presented fits in with the image of LHO as a pathetic loser. When he
found out Carcano open sights were opposite M-1 open sights but had no way
to practice at a firing range, then it is entirely possible based on the
CT image of him as a perpetual numskull, that he would find a way to screw
up his carefully planned ambush on Governor Connally. All I've done is
present a scenario consistent with CT mentality about the low tech image
of LHO in the 6th floor window firing his unfamiliar weapon at the
motorcade.
Anthony Marsh
2017-05-31 14:28:10 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by claviger
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by claviger
Post by claviger
Los Angeles Times
Lee Harvey Oswald???s little green book shows JFK wasn't the real target
http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-reston-jfk-assassination-target-20161122-story.html
If true LHO used the open sight not the scope and in his hurry to fire at
JBC over did it on dropping the bead (top of post) to bottom of the V the
shots would be at a steeper angle hitting behind the intended target,
which would explain why LHO shot the guy he liked in the backseat instead
of the guy he despised in the middle seat. In his mind LHO would be a
hero to spare JFK and punish JBC. After the ambush he would arrogantly
tell JFK "you owe me for sparing your life". The problem with this plan
he was an inexperienced sniper and screwed up both shots. If LHO was the
incompetent shooter CTs insist he was this scenario becomes a real
possibility why he shot the wrong target twice in his attempt to hit the
man who refused his honorable discharge.
That story is a red herring. If the shooter was not even Oswald why would
he have a grudge against Connally. The President was the only target. Just
for fun why don't you make up a bogus theory that Jackie was the real
target. Maybe some type of dispute about her clothes.
CTs never tire of claiming LHO was a boot camp bonehead who could barely
pass quals. Then you perpetuate the assumption he was incapable of
Not true. He did just barely qualify, but the Carcano is a different
type of rifle with its own problems. He did not know how to overcome them.
Post by claviger
improving with practice. He was a born loser who couldn't even learn to
drive a car. If all this CT propaganda is true the scenario I just
Not true. He was learning how to drive a car and wanted to take the test
to get his driver's license. I have gone years without needing to drive
a car. But I always have my license.
Post by claviger
presented fits in with the image of LHO as a pathetic loser. When he
Yes, he was a pathetic loser. Just because YOU are a pathetic loser does
not make YOU an assassin.
Post by claviger
found out Carcano open sights were opposite M-1 open sights but had no way
to practice at a firing range, then it is entirely possible based on the
He does need to practice at a rifle range. That story was a hoax.
Post by claviger
CT image of him as a perpetual numskull, that he would find a way to screw
up his carefully planned ambush on Governor Connally. All I've done is
He did not want to kill Connally.
Post by claviger
present a scenario consistent with CT mentality about the low tech image
of LHO in the 6th floor window firing his unfamiliar weapon at the
motorcade.
His piece of junk. Not even the FBI experts could get it to fire
accurately.
claviger
2017-06-04 01:11:23 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by claviger
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by claviger
Post by claviger
Los Angeles Times
Lee Harvey Oswald???s little green book shows JFK wasn't the real target
http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-reston-jfk-assassination-target-20161122-story.html
If true LHO used the open sight not the scope and in his hurry to fire at
JBC over did it on dropping the bead (top of post) to bottom of the V the
shots would be at a steeper angle hitting behind the intended target,
which would explain why LHO shot the guy he liked in the backseat instead
of the guy he despised in the middle seat. In his mind LHO would be a
hero to spare JFK and punish JBC. After the ambush he would arrogantly
tell JFK "you owe me for sparing your life". The problem with this plan
he was an inexperienced sniper and screwed up both shots. If LHO was the
incompetent shooter CTs insist he was this scenario becomes a real
possibility why he shot the wrong target twice in his attempt to hit the
man who refused his honorable discharge.
That story is a red herring. If the shooter was not even Oswald why would
he have a grudge against Connally. The President was the only target. Just
for fun why don't you make up a bogus theory that Jackie was the real
target. Maybe some type of dispute about her clothes.
CTs never tire of claiming LHO was a boot camp bonehead who could barely
pass quals. Then you perpetuate the assumption he was incapable of
Not true. He did just barely qualify, but the Carcano is a different
type of rifle with its own problems. He did not know how to overcome them.
Thanks for proving my point.
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by claviger
improving with practice. He was a born loser who couldn't even learn to
drive a car. If all this CT propaganda is true the scenario I just
Not true. He was learning how to drive a car and wanted to take the test
to get his driver's license. I have gone years without needing to drive
a car. But I always have my license.
CTs ignore what you just said.
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by claviger
presented fits in with the image of LHO as a pathetic loser. When he
Yes, he was a pathetic loser. Just because YOU are a pathetic loser does
not make YOU an assassin.
If he shot the wrong guy he was a pathetic loser as an assassin. If he
hit the target he was aiming at he was a good shot.
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by claviger
found out Carcano open sights were opposite M-1 open sights but had no way
to practice at a firing range, then it is entirely possible based on the
He does need to practice at a rifle range. That story was a hoax.
Several witnesses saw him at the practice range. One employee adjusted
his scope. Another witness gave him a ride home. They both said it was
LHO.
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by claviger
CT image of him as a perpetual numskull, that he would find a way to screw
up his carefully planned ambush on Governor Connally. All I've done is
He did not want to kill Connally.
He liked JFK and disliked JBC.
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by claviger
present a scenario consistent with CT mentality about the low tech image
of LHO in the 6th floor window firing his unfamiliar weapon at the
motorcade.
His piece of junk. Not even the FBI experts could get it to fire
accurately.
Thanks for proving my theory.
Anthony Marsh
2017-06-05 14:05:32 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by claviger
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by claviger
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by claviger
Post by claviger
Los Angeles Times
Lee Harvey Oswald???s little green book shows JFK wasn't the real target
http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-reston-jfk-assassination-target-20161122-story.html
If true LHO used the open sight not the scope and in his hurry to fire at
JBC over did it on dropping the bead (top of post) to bottom of the V the
shots would be at a steeper angle hitting behind the intended target,
which would explain why LHO shot the guy he liked in the backseat instead
of the guy he despised in the middle seat. In his mind LHO would be a
hero to spare JFK and punish JBC. After the ambush he would arrogantly
tell JFK "you owe me for sparing your life". The problem with this plan
he was an inexperienced sniper and screwed up both shots. If LHO was the
incompetent shooter CTs insist he was this scenario becomes a real
possibility why he shot the wrong target twice in his attempt to hit the
man who refused his honorable discharge.
That story is a red herring. If the shooter was not even Oswald why would
he have a grudge against Connally. The President was the only target. Just
for fun why don't you make up a bogus theory that Jackie was the real
target. Maybe some type of dispute about her clothes.
CTs never tire of claiming LHO was a boot camp bonehead who could barely
pass quals. Then you perpetuate the assumption he was incapable of
Not true. He did just barely qualify, but the Carcano is a different
type of rifle with its own problems. He did not know how to overcome them.
Thanks for proving my point.
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by claviger
improving with practice. He was a born loser who couldn't even learn to
drive a car. If all this CT propaganda is true the scenario I just
Not true. He was learning how to drive a car and wanted to take the test
to get his driver's license. I have gone years without needing to drive
a car. But I always have my license.
CTs ignore what you just said.
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by claviger
presented fits in with the image of LHO as a pathetic loser. When he
Yes, he was a pathetic loser. Just because YOU are a pathetic loser does
not make YOU an assassin.
If he shot the wrong guy he was a pathetic loser as an assassin. If he
hit the target he was aiming at he was a good shot.
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by claviger
found out Carcano open sights were opposite M-1 open sights but had no way
to practice at a firing range, then it is entirely possible based on the
He does need to practice at a rifle range. That story was a hoax.
Several witnesses saw him at the practice range. One employee adjusted
his scope. Another witness gave him a ride home. They both said it was
LHO.
False. Hoax.
Post by claviger
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by claviger
CT image of him as a perpetual numskull, that he would find a way to screw
up his carefully planned ambush on Governor Connally. All I've done is
He did not want to kill Connally.
He liked JFK and disliked JBC.
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by claviger
present a scenario consistent with CT mentality about the low tech image
of LHO in the 6th floor window firing his unfamiliar weapon at the
motorcade.
His piece of junk. Not even the FBI experts could get it to fire
accurately.
Thanks for proving my theory.
claviger
2017-06-06 03:35:04 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by claviger
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by claviger
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by claviger
Post by claviger
Los Angeles Times
Lee Harvey Oswald???s little green book shows JFK wasn't the real target
http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-reston-jfk-assassination-target-20161122-story.html
If true LHO used the open sight not the scope and in his hurry to fire at
JBC over did it on dropping the bead (top of post) to bottom of the V the
shots would be at a steeper angle hitting behind the intended target,
which would explain why LHO shot the guy he liked in the backseat instead
of the guy he despised in the middle seat. In his mind LHO would be a
hero to spare JFK and punish JBC. After the ambush he would arrogantly
tell JFK "you owe me for sparing your life". The problem with this plan
he was an inexperienced sniper and screwed up both shots. If LHO was the
incompetent shooter CTs insist he was this scenario becomes a real
possibility why he shot the wrong target twice in his attempt to hit the
man who refused his honorable discharge.
That story is a red herring. If the shooter was not even Oswald why would
he have a grudge against Connally. The President was the only target. Just
for fun why don't you make up a bogus theory that Jackie was the real
target. Maybe some type of dispute about her clothes.
CTs never tire of claiming LHO was a boot camp bonehead who could barely
pass quals. Then you perpetuate the assumption he was incapable of
Not true. He did just barely qualify, but the Carcano is a different
type of rifle with its own problems. He did not know how to overcome them.
Thanks for proving my point.
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by claviger
improving with practice. He was a born loser who couldn't even learn to
drive a car. If all this CT propaganda is true the scenario I just
Not true. He was learning how to drive a car and wanted to take the test
to get his driver's license. I have gone years without needing to drive
a car. But I always have my license.
CTs ignore what you just said.
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by claviger
presented fits in with the image of LHO as a pathetic loser. When he
Yes, he was a pathetic loser. Just because YOU are a pathetic loser does
not make YOU an assassin.
If he shot the wrong guy he was a pathetic loser as an assassin. If he
hit the target he was aiming at he was a good shot.
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by claviger
found out Carcano open sights were opposite M-1 open sights but had no way
to practice at a firing range, then it is entirely possible based on the
He does need to practice at a rifle range. That story was a hoax.
Several witnesses saw him at the practice range. One employee adjusted
his scope. Another witness gave him a ride home. They both said it was
LHO.
False. Hoax.
None of those witnesses tried to get any publicity from sharing those
observations with police investigating this case. In fact just the
opposite. All they did is notify police that a person who looked just
like LHO was at a public shooting range 3 weeks in a row before the
assassination and never showed up again afterward. The FBI and DPD
decided it didn't matter anyway since they had LHO's homemade paper bag,
rifle, pistol, and empty shells from both crime scenes. They also had a
suspect who told several lies during interrogation.
Anthony Marsh
2017-06-07 18:59:12 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by claviger
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by claviger
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by claviger
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by claviger
Post by claviger
Los Angeles Times
Lee Harvey Oswald???s little green book shows JFK wasn't the real target
http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-reston-jfk-assassination-target-20161122-story.html
If true LHO used the open sight not the scope and in his hurry to fire at
JBC over did it on dropping the bead (top of post) to bottom of the V the
shots would be at a steeper angle hitting behind the intended target,
which would explain why LHO shot the guy he liked in the backseat instead
of the guy he despised in the middle seat. In his mind LHO would be a
hero to spare JFK and punish JBC. After the ambush he would arrogantly
tell JFK "you owe me for sparing your life". The problem with this plan
he was an inexperienced sniper and screwed up both shots. If LHO was the
incompetent shooter CTs insist he was this scenario becomes a real
possibility why he shot the wrong target twice in his attempt to hit the
man who refused his honorable discharge.
That story is a red herring. If the shooter was not even Oswald why would
he have a grudge against Connally. The President was the only target. Just
for fun why don't you make up a bogus theory that Jackie was the real
target. Maybe some type of dispute about her clothes.
CTs never tire of claiming LHO was a boot camp bonehead who could barely
pass quals. Then you perpetuate the assumption he was incapable of
Not true. He did just barely qualify, but the Carcano is a different
type of rifle with its own problems. He did not know how to overcome them.
Thanks for proving my point.
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by claviger
improving with practice. He was a born loser who couldn't even learn to
drive a car. If all this CT propaganda is true the scenario I just
Not true. He was learning how to drive a car and wanted to take the test
to get his driver's license. I have gone years without needing to drive
a car. But I always have my license.
CTs ignore what you just said.
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by claviger
presented fits in with the image of LHO as a pathetic loser. When he
Yes, he was a pathetic loser. Just because YOU are a pathetic loser does
not make YOU an assassin.
If he shot the wrong guy he was a pathetic loser as an assassin. If he
hit the target he was aiming at he was a good shot.
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by claviger
found out Carcano open sights were opposite M-1 open sights but had no way
to practice at a firing range, then it is entirely possible based on the
He does need to practice at a rifle range. That story was a hoax.
Several witnesses saw him at the practice range. One employee adjusted
his scope. Another witness gave him a ride home. They both said it was
LHO.
False. Hoax.
None of those witnesses tried to get any publicity from sharing those
observations with police investigating this case. In fact just the
It's still a hoax whether they got anything out of it or not.
JUst like Gordon Arnold. He didn't get a book out of it.
Post by claviger
opposite. All they did is notify police that a person who looked just
like LHO was at a public shooting range 3 weeks in a row before the
assassination and never showed up again afterward. The FBI and DPD
decided it didn't matter anyway since they had LHO's homemade paper bag,
rifle, pistol, and empty shells from both crime scenes. They also had a
suspect who told several lies during interrogation.
claviger
2017-06-09 00:44:08 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by claviger
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by claviger
If he shot the wrong guy he was a pathetic loser as an assassin. If he
hit the target he was aiming at he was a good shot.
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by claviger
found out Carcano open sights were opposite M-1 open sights but had no way
to practice at a firing range, then it is entirely possible based on the
He does need to practice at a rifle range. That story was a hoax.
Several witnesses saw him at the practice range. One employee adjusted
his scope. Another witness gave him a ride home. They both said it was
LHO.
False. Hoax.
None of those witnesses tried to get any publicity from sharing those
observations with police investigating this case. In fact just the
It's still a hoax whether they got anything out of it or not.
JUst like Gordon Arnold. He didn't get a book out of it.
GArnold was featured in the international TV documentary series The Men
Who Killed Kennedy.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Men_Who_Killed_Kennedy
claviger
2017-05-30 23:33:06 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by claviger
Los Angeles Times
Lee Harvey Oswald’s little green book shows JFK wasn't the real target
http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-reston-jfk-assassination-target-20161122-story.html
Rare interview with Malcolm Kilduff - YouTube

claviger
2017-06-14 19:13:12 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by claviger
Los Angeles Times
Lee Harvey Oswald’s little green book shows JFK wasn't the real target
http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-reston-jfk-assassination-target-20161122-story.html
The New York Times

John Connally of Texas, a Power In 2 Political Parties, Dies at 76
By Richard Severo
Published: June 16, 1993

"Mr. Connally said he thought the attack on the President was meant for
him. His belief was based on a letter written to him when he was Secretary
of the Navy by Lee Harvey Oswald, who requested that his undesirable
discharge from the Marines be upgraded. The request was not acted upon."

(Associated Press)

Loading...