Discussion:
Were were all the other snipers?
(too old to reply)
claviger
2018-07-07 21:44:36 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Were were all the other snipers located? One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.

Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.

Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.

Where were the other 18 snipers located?

Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?
mainframetech
2018-07-10 03:36:15 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by claviger
Were were all the other snipers located? One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.
Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.
Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.
Where were the other 18 snipers located?
Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?
You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?

And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
over:

http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/

Chris
bigdog
2018-07-11 02:04:52 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Were were all the other snipers located? One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.
Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.
Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.
Where were the other 18 snipers located?
Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?
You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.

I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?
mainframetech
2018-07-12 02:40:33 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Were were all the other snipers located? One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.
Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.
Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.
Where were the other 18 snipers located?
Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?
You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?
I rather expected you to be confused. First shot struck through the
windshield and then into the throat of JFK. Second shot in the upper
back, and third shot struck the front of the head at the forehead/temple
area. When struck from outside, tempered glass will direct the shot
somewhat downward given that the windshield sloped downward, second shot
from the South Knoll was without windshield in the way. A straight shot
into the forehead.

Chris
bigdog
2018-07-12 20:27:39 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Were were all the other snipers located? One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.
Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.
Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.
Where were the other 18 snipers located?
Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?
You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?
I rather expected you to be confused. First shot struck through the
windshield and then into the throat of JFK. Second shot in the upper
back, and third shot struck the front of the head at the forehead/temple
area. When struck from outside, tempered glass will direct the shot
somewhat downward given that the windshield sloped downward, second shot
from the South Knoll was without windshield in the way. A straight shot
into the forehead.
Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.
mainframetech
2018-07-13 22:28:16 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Were were all the other snipers located? One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.
Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.
Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.
Where were the other 18 snipers located?
Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?
You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?
I rather expected you to be confused. First shot struck through the
windshield and then into the throat of JFK. Second shot in the upper
back, and third shot struck the front of the head at the forehead/temple
area. When struck from outside, tempered glass will direct the shot
somewhat downward given that the windshield sloped downward, second shot
from the South Knoll was without windshield in the way. A straight shot
into the forehead.
Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.
It's a dumb question. It's not known from the wounds if there were 3
shooters of 2 shooters that caused the 3 shots that struck JFK. The
throat and forehead shots might have ben the same person, or two people
near each other on the south knoll.

Chris
bigdog
2018-07-14 17:10:59 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Were were all the other snipers located? One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.
Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.
Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.
Where were the other 18 snipers located?
Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?
You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?
I rather expected you to be confused. First shot struck through the
windshield and then into the throat of JFK. Second shot in the upper
back, and third shot struck the front of the head at the forehead/temple
area. When struck from outside, tempered glass will direct the shot
somewhat downward given that the windshield sloped downward, second shot
from the South Knoll was without windshield in the way. A straight shot
into the forehead.
Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.
It's a dumb question. It's not known from the wounds if there were 3
shooters of 2 shooters that caused the 3 shots that struck JFK. The
throat and forehead shots might have ben the same person, or two people
near each other on the south knoll.
Can't wait to see where your shooters are next month.
mainframetech
2018-07-17 00:48:14 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Were were all the other snipers located? One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.
Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.
Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.
Where were the other 18 snipers located?
Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?
You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?
I rather expected you to be confused. First shot struck through the
windshield and then into the throat of JFK. Second shot in the upper
back, and third shot struck the front of the head at the forehead/temple
area. When struck from outside, tempered glass will direct the shot
somewhat downward given that the windshield sloped downward, second shot
from the South Knoll was without windshield in the way. A straight shot
into the forehead.
Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.
It's a dumb question. It's not known from the wounds if there were 3
shooters of 2 shooters that caused the 3 shots that struck JFK. The
throat and forehead shots might have ben the same person, or two people
near each other on the south knoll.
Can't wait to see where your shooters are next month.
As you've been told, it will depend on the evidence next month.

Chris
bigdog
2018-07-17 22:02:34 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Were were all the other snipers located? One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.
Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.
Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.
Where were the other 18 snipers located?
Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?
You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?
I rather expected you to be confused. First shot struck through the
windshield and then into the throat of JFK. Second shot in the upper
back, and third shot struck the front of the head at the forehead/temple
area. When struck from outside, tempered glass will direct the shot
somewhat downward given that the windshield sloped downward, second shot
from the South Knoll was without windshield in the way. A straight shot
into the forehead.
Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.
It's a dumb question. It's not known from the wounds if there were 3
shooters of 2 shooters that caused the 3 shots that struck JFK. The
throat and forehead shots might have ben the same person, or two people
near each other on the south knoll.
Can't wait to see where your shooters are next month.
As you've been told, it will depend on the evidence next month.
Do you really expect new evidence to show up next month. I think that is
known as incurable optimism. You think these websites you find with ever
more bizarre theories of what happened constitute evidence. You found a
guy with a new angle, placing a shooter on the SoGK and decided that
worked a lot better than the kooks you have put your faith in before.
There isn't a scrap of forensic evidence of any shooter anywhere except
the sniper's nest but that doesn't seem to trouble you in the least.
Anthony Marsh
2018-07-18 22:22:07 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Were were all the other snipers located? One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.
Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.
Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.
Where were the other 18 snipers located?
Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?
You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?
I rather expected you to be confused. First shot struck through the
windshield and then into the throat of JFK. Second shot in the upper
back, and third shot struck the front of the head at the forehead/temple
area. When struck from outside, tempered glass will direct the shot
somewhat downward given that the windshield sloped downward, second shot
from the South Knoll was without windshield in the way. A straight shot
into the forehead.
Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.
It's a dumb question. It's not known from the wounds if there were 3
shooters of 2 shooters that caused the 3 shots that struck JFK. The
throat and forehead shots might have ben the same person, or two people
near each other on the south knoll.
Can't wait to see where your shooters are next month.
As you've been told, it will depend on the evidence next month.
Do you really expect new evidence to show up next month. I think that is
known as incurable optimism. You think these websites you find with ever
more bizarre theories of what happened constitute evidence. You found a
guy with a new angle, placing a shooter on the SoGK and decided that
worked a lot better than the kooks you have put your faith in before.
There isn't a scrap of forensic evidence of any shooter anywhere except
the sniper's nest but that doesn't seem to trouble you in the least.
OK, so did YOU predict when Fox would leak the autopsy photos?
Jason Burke
2018-07-19 02:04:42 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Were were all the other snipers located? One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.
Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.
Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.
Where were the other 18 snipers located?
Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?
You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?
I rather expected you to be confused. First shot struck through the
windshield and then into the throat of JFK. Second shot in the upper
back, and third shot struck the front of the head at the forehead/temple
area. When struck from outside, tempered glass will direct the shot
somewhat downward given that the windshield sloped downward, second shot
from the South Knoll was without windshield in the way. A straight shot
into the forehead.
Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.
It's a dumb question. It's not known from the wounds if there were 3
shooters of 2 shooters that caused the 3 shots that struck JFK. The
throat and forehead shots might have ben the same person, or two people
near each other on the south knoll.
Can't wait to see where your shooters are next month.
As you've been told, it will depend on the evidence next month.
Do you really expect new evidence to show up next month. I think that is
known as incurable optimism. You think these websites you find with ever
more bizarre theories of what happened constitute evidence. You found a
guy with a new angle, placing a shooter on the SoGK and decided that
worked a lot better than the kooks you have put your faith in before.
There isn't a scrap of forensic evidence of any shooter anywhere except
the sniper's nest but that doesn't seem to trouble you in the least.
Creepy thing is that the CT crowd *does* think there's evidence "right
around the corner".

I guess they HAVE to. Being as they've failed outright for over half a
century.
Anthony Marsh
2018-07-19 21:46:27 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Jason Burke
Post by bigdog
Post by bigdog
Post by bigdog
Post by bigdog
Were were all the other snipers located?  One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.
Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.
Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.
Where were the other 18 snipers located?
Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?
      You were given an answer to those questions, but here you
are asking
the same ones over again.  If you weren't going to believe the
truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
    And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets.  Here's something
to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?
    I rather expected you to be confused.  First shot struck
through the
windshield and then into the throat of JFK.  Second shot in the
upper
back, and third shot struck the front of the head at the
forehead/temple
area.  When struck from outside, tempered glass will direct the shot
somewhat downward given that the windshield sloped downward, second shot
from the South Knoll was without windshield in the way.  A
straight shot
into the forehead.
Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.
     It's a dumb question.  It's not known from the wounds if there
were 3
shooters of 2 shooters that caused the 3 shots that struck JFK.  The
throat and forehead shots might have ben the same person, or two people
near each other on the south knoll.
Can't wait to see where your shooters are next month.
    As you've been told, it will depend on the evidence next month.
Do you really expect new evidence to show up next month. I think that is
known as incurable optimism. You think these websites you find with ever
more bizarre theories of what happened constitute evidence. You found a
guy with a new angle, placing a shooter on the SoGK and decided that
worked a lot better than the kooks you have put your faith in before.
There isn't a scrap of forensic evidence of any shooter anywhere except
the sniper's nest but that doesn't seem to trouble you in the least.
Creepy thing is that the CT crowd *does* think there's evidence "right
around the corner".
I guess they HAVE to. Being as they've failed outright for over half a
century.
1978
bigdog
2018-07-20 16:04:11 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Jason Burke
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Were were all the other snipers located? One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.
Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.
Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.
Where were the other 18 snipers located?
Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?
You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?
I rather expected you to be confused. First shot struck through the
windshield and then into the throat of JFK. Second shot in the upper
back, and third shot struck the front of the head at the forehead/temple
area. When struck from outside, tempered glass will direct the shot
somewhat downward given that the windshield sloped downward, second shot
from the South Knoll was without windshield in the way. A straight shot
into the forehead.
Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.
It's a dumb question. It's not known from the wounds if there were 3
shooters of 2 shooters that caused the 3 shots that struck JFK. The
throat and forehead shots might have ben the same person, or two people
near each other on the south knoll.
Can't wait to see where your shooters are next month.
As you've been told, it will depend on the evidence next month.
Do you really expect new evidence to show up next month. I think that is
known as incurable optimism. You think these websites you find with ever
more bizarre theories of what happened constitute evidence. You found a
guy with a new angle, placing a shooter on the SoGK and decided that
worked a lot better than the kooks you have put your faith in before.
There isn't a scrap of forensic evidence of any shooter anywhere except
the sniper's nest but that doesn't seem to trouble you in the least.
Creepy thing is that the CT crowd *does* think there's evidence "right
around the corner".
I guess they HAVE to. Being as they've failed outright for over half a
century.
They think the evidence is right around the corner. The trouble is they
are going around in circles.
mainframetech
2018-07-19 17:53:42 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Were were all the other snipers located? One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.
Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.
Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.
Where were the other 18 snipers located?
Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?
You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?
I rather expected you to be confused. First shot struck through the
windshield and then into the throat of JFK. Second shot in the upper
back, and third shot struck the front of the head at the forehead/temple
area. When struck from outside, tempered glass will direct the shot
somewhat downward given that the windshield sloped downward, second shot
from the South Knoll was without windshield in the way. A straight shot
into the forehead.
Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.
It's a dumb question. It's not known from the wounds if there were 3
shooters of 2 shooters that caused the 3 shots that struck JFK. The
throat and forehead shots might have ben the same person, or two people
near each other on the south knoll.
Can't wait to see where your shooters are next month.
As you've been told, it will depend on the evidence next month.
Do you really expect new evidence to show up next month. I think that is
known as incurable optimism. You think these websites you find with ever
more bizarre theories of what happened constitute evidence. You found a
guy with a new angle, placing a shooter on the SoGK and decided that
worked a lot better than the kooks you have put your faith in before.
There isn't a scrap of forensic evidence of any shooter anywhere except
the sniper's nest but that doesn't seem to trouble you in the least.
It was here that I found information about the ARRB work that was
done, and found that many things had been newly uncovered. In fact much
of the solution to the case is there, and don't bother me with it not
being recognized by others, since you've been unable to show their
surprise at finding nothing there.

Chris
bigdog
2018-07-20 16:21:33 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Were were all the other snipers located? One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.
Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.
Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.
Where were the other 18 snipers located?
Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?
You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?
I rather expected you to be confused. First shot struck through the
windshield and then into the throat of JFK. Second shot in the upper
back, and third shot struck the front of the head at the forehead/temple
area. When struck from outside, tempered glass will direct the shot
somewhat downward given that the windshield sloped downward, second shot
from the South Knoll was without windshield in the way. A straight shot
into the forehead.
Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.
It's a dumb question. It's not known from the wounds if there were 3
shooters of 2 shooters that caused the 3 shots that struck JFK. The
throat and forehead shots might have ben the same person, or two people
near each other on the south knoll.
Can't wait to see where your shooters are next month.
As you've been told, it will depend on the evidence next month.
Do you really expect new evidence to show up next month. I think that is
known as incurable optimism. You think these websites you find with ever
more bizarre theories of what happened constitute evidence. You found a
guy with a new angle, placing a shooter on the SoGK and decided that
worked a lot better than the kooks you have put your faith in before.
There isn't a scrap of forensic evidence of any shooter anywhere except
the sniper's nest but that doesn't seem to trouble you in the least.
It was here that I found information about the ARRB work that was
done, and found that many things had been newly uncovered.
What did you find in the ARRB that indicates there was a shooter on the
SoGK?
Post by mainframetech
In fact much
of the solution to the case is there, and don't bother me with it not
being recognized by others, since you've been unable to show their
surprise at finding nothing there.
You've been unable to show that the Lifton/Horne theory has gained
traction in the conspiracy community despite the ARRB files having been in
the public domain for over 20 years. Don't you think if there was wide
acceptance of the things you have been arguing for that there would be
more than a few kook websites trumpeting those findings?
Anthony Marsh
2018-07-21 00:11:31 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Were were all the other snipers located? One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.
Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.
Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.
Where were the other 18 snipers located?
Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?
You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?
I rather expected you to be confused. First shot struck through the
windshield and then into the throat of JFK. Second shot in the upper
back, and third shot struck the front of the head at the forehead/temple
area. When struck from outside, tempered glass will direct the shot
somewhat downward given that the windshield sloped downward, second shot
from the South Knoll was without windshield in the way. A straight shot
into the forehead.
Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.
It's a dumb question. It's not known from the wounds if there were 3
shooters of 2 shooters that caused the 3 shots that struck JFK. The
throat and forehead shots might have ben the same person, or two people
near each other on the south knoll.
Can't wait to see where your shooters are next month.
As you've been told, it will depend on the evidence next month.
Do you really expect new evidence to show up next month. I think that is
known as incurable optimism. You think these websites you find with ever
more bizarre theories of what happened constitute evidence. You found a
guy with a new angle, placing a shooter on the SoGK and decided that
worked a lot better than the kooks you have put your faith in before.
There isn't a scrap of forensic evidence of any shooter anywhere except
the sniper's nest but that doesn't seem to trouble you in the least.
It was here that I found information about the ARRB work that was
done, and found that many things had been newly uncovered.
What did you find in the ARRB that indicates there was a shooter on the
SoGK?
Post by mainframetech
In fact much
of the solution to the case is there, and don't bother me with it not
being recognized by others, since you've been unable to show their
surprise at finding nothing there.
You've been unable to show that the Lifton/Horne theory has gained
traction in the conspiracy community despite the ARRB files having been in
the public domain for over 20 years. Don't you think if there was wide
acceptance of the things you have been arguing for that there would be
more than a few kook websites trumpeting those findings?
It did gain traction for a few years.Best Evidence was a best seller. But
then people began to see holes in it. And the hard core of serious
researchers such as myself, Tink and Cyril rejected the idea of
alteration. Incompetence usually explains all the errors.
mainframetech
2018-07-23 01:33:57 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Were were all the other snipers located? One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.
Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.
Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.
Where were the other 18 snipers located?
Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?
You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?
I rather expected you to be confused. First shot struck through the
windshield and then into the throat of JFK. Second shot in the upper
back, and third shot struck the front of the head at the forehead/temple
area. When struck from outside, tempered glass will direct the shot
somewhat downward given that the windshield sloped downward, second shot
from the South Knoll was without windshield in the way. A straight shot
into the forehead.
Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.
It's a dumb question. It's not known from the wounds if there were 3
shooters of 2 shooters that caused the 3 shots that struck JFK. The
throat and forehead shots might have ben the same person, or two people
near each other on the south knoll.
Can't wait to see where your shooters are next month.
As you've been told, it will depend on the evidence next month.
Do you really expect new evidence to show up next month. I think that is
known as incurable optimism. You think these websites you find with ever
more bizarre theories of what happened constitute evidence. You found a
guy with a new angle, placing a shooter on the SoGK and decided that
worked a lot better than the kooks you have put your faith in before.
There isn't a scrap of forensic evidence of any shooter anywhere except
the sniper's nest but that doesn't seem to trouble you in the least.
It was here that I found information about the ARRB work that was
done, and found that many things had been newly uncovered.
What did you find in the ARRB that indicates there was a shooter on the
SoGK?
Nothing so far.
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
In fact much
of the solution to the case is there, and don't bother me with it not
being recognized by others, since you've been unable to show their
surprise at finding nothing there.
You've been unable to show that the Lifton/Horne theory has gained
traction in the conspiracy community despite the ARRB files having been in
the public domain for over 20 years. Don't you think if there was wide
acceptance of the things you have been arguing for that there would be
more than a few kook websites trumpeting those findings?
Well, there certainly are plenty of kook websites espousing the LN and
WCR view of things, or their theories anyway.

However, and example of the truth catching on can be found in the
article I've recently been pushing, which is here:

http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/

That article also is aware that there is a bullet hole in the
forehead/temple area.

Chris
bigdog
2018-07-23 21:10:35 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Were were all the other snipers located? One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.
Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.
Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.
Where were the other 18 snipers located?
Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?
You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?
I rather expected you to be confused. First shot struck through the
windshield and then into the throat of JFK. Second shot in the upper
back, and third shot struck the front of the head at the forehead/temple
area. When struck from outside, tempered glass will direct the shot
somewhat downward given that the windshield sloped downward, second shot
from the South Knoll was without windshield in the way. A straight shot
into the forehead.
Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.
It's a dumb question. It's not known from the wounds if there were 3
shooters of 2 shooters that caused the 3 shots that struck JFK. The
throat and forehead shots might have ben the same person, or two people
near each other on the south knoll.
Can't wait to see where your shooters are next month.
As you've been told, it will depend on the evidence next month.
Do you really expect new evidence to show up next month. I think that is
known as incurable optimism. You think these websites you find with ever
more bizarre theories of what happened constitute evidence. You found a
guy with a new angle, placing a shooter on the SoGK and decided that
worked a lot better than the kooks you have put your faith in before.
There isn't a scrap of forensic evidence of any shooter anywhere except
the sniper's nest but that doesn't seem to trouble you in the least.
It was here that I found information about the ARRB work that was
done, and found that many things had been newly uncovered.
What did you find in the ARRB that indicates there was a shooter on the
SoGK?
Nothing so far.
So if the ARRB had no evidence of a shooter on the SoGK, where did you
find evidence for that?
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
In fact much
of the solution to the case is there, and don't bother me with it not
being recognized by others, since you've been unable to show their
surprise at finding nothing there.
You've been unable to show that the Lifton/Horne theory has gained
traction in the conspiracy community despite the ARRB files having been in
the public domain for over 20 years. Don't you think if there was wide
acceptance of the things you have been arguing for that there would be
more than a few kook websites trumpeting those findings?
Well, there certainly are plenty of kook websites espousing the LN and
WCR view of things, or their theories anyway.
However, and example of the truth catching on can be found in the
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
An article for which you've offered no supporting evidence.
Post by mainframetech
That article also is aware that there is a bullet hole in the
forehead/temple area.
An article that shows the geometry for such a shot is impossible.
mainframetech
2018-07-25 01:32:36 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Were were all the other snipers located? One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.
Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.
Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.
Where were the other 18 snipers located?
Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?
You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?
I rather expected you to be confused. First shot struck through the
windshield and then into the throat of JFK. Second shot in the upper
back, and third shot struck the front of the head at the forehead/temple
area. When struck from outside, tempered glass will direct the shot
somewhat downward given that the windshield sloped downward, second shot
from the South Knoll was without windshield in the way. A straight shot
into the forehead.
Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.
It's a dumb question. It's not known from the wounds if there were 3
shooters of 2 shooters that caused the 3 shots that struck JFK. The
throat and forehead shots might have ben the same person, or two people
near each other on the south knoll.
Can't wait to see where your shooters are next month.
As you've been told, it will depend on the evidence next month.
Do you really expect new evidence to show up next month. I think that is
known as incurable optimism. You think these websites you find with ever
more bizarre theories of what happened constitute evidence. You found a
guy with a new angle, placing a shooter on the SoGK and decided that
worked a lot better than the kooks you have put your faith in before.
There isn't a scrap of forensic evidence of any shooter anywhere except
the sniper's nest but that doesn't seem to trouble you in the least.
It was here that I found information about the ARRB work that was
done, and found that many things had been newly uncovered.
What did you find in the ARRB that indicates there was a shooter on the
SoGK?
Nothing so far.
So if the ARRB had no evidence of a shooter on the SoGK, where did you
find evidence for that?
You were told the answer to that. Why do you like so much to see your
name up in the forum, repeating the same stuff over and over??
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
In fact much
of the solution to the case is there, and don't bother me with it not
being recognized by others, since you've been unable to show their
surprise at finding nothing there.
You've been unable to show that the Lifton/Horne theory has gained
traction in the conspiracy community despite the ARRB files having been in
the public domain for over 20 years. Don't you think if there was wide
acceptance of the things you have been arguing for that there would be
more than a few kook websites trumpeting those findings?
Well, there certainly are plenty of kook websites espousing the LN and
WCR view of things, or their theories anyway.
However, and example of the truth catching on can be found in the
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
An article for which you've offered no supporting evidence.
Post by mainframetech
That article also is aware that there is a bullet hole in the
forehead/temple area.
An article that shows the geometry for such a shot is impossible.
Nope, won't do. It shows the bullet paths very well. The problem has
to be where it often is, in your understanding.

Chris
bigdog
2018-07-26 02:23:09 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Were were all the other snipers located? One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.
Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.
Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.
Where were the other 18 snipers located?
Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?
You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?
I rather expected you to be confused. First shot struck through the
windshield and then into the throat of JFK. Second shot in the upper
back, and third shot struck the front of the head at the forehead/temple
area. When struck from outside, tempered glass will direct the shot
somewhat downward given that the windshield sloped downward, second shot
from the South Knoll was without windshield in the way. A straight shot
into the forehead.
Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.
It's a dumb question. It's not known from the wounds if there were 3
shooters of 2 shooters that caused the 3 shots that struck JFK. The
throat and forehead shots might have ben the same person, or two people
near each other on the south knoll.
Can't wait to see where your shooters are next month.
As you've been told, it will depend on the evidence next month.
Do you really expect new evidence to show up next month. I think that is
known as incurable optimism. You think these websites you find with ever
more bizarre theories of what happened constitute evidence. You found a
guy with a new angle, placing a shooter on the SoGK and decided that
worked a lot better than the kooks you have put your faith in before.
There isn't a scrap of forensic evidence of any shooter anywhere except
the sniper's nest but that doesn't seem to trouble you in the least.
It was here that I found information about the ARRB work that was
done, and found that many things had been newly uncovered.
What did you find in the ARRB that indicates there was a shooter on the
SoGK?
Nothing so far.
So if the ARRB had no evidence of a shooter on the SoGK, where did you
find evidence for that?
You were told the answer to that. Why do you like so much to see your
name up in the forum, repeating the same stuff over and over??
I guess this is your way of saying there is no such evidence.

Why is it when people like you and Marsh are asked a question for which
you have no answer you claim to have given the answer?
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
In fact much
of the solution to the case is there, and don't bother me with it not
being recognized by others, since you've been unable to show their
surprise at finding nothing there.
You've been unable to show that the Lifton/Horne theory has gained
traction in the conspiracy community despite the ARRB files having been in
the public domain for over 20 years. Don't you think if there was wide
acceptance of the things you have been arguing for that there would be
more than a few kook websites trumpeting those findings?
Well, there certainly are plenty of kook websites espousing the LN and
WCR view of things, or their theories anyway.
However, and example of the truth catching on can be found in the
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
An article for which you've offered no supporting evidence.
Post by mainframetech
That article also is aware that there is a bullet hole in the
forehead/temple area.
An article that shows the geometry for such a shot is impossible.
Nope, won't do. It shows the bullet paths very well. The problem has
to be where it often is, in your understanding.
It shows a bullet path going through the other occupants of the limo but
magically not hitting them. It shows that a if a bullet fired from the
SoGK had hit JFK in your forehead temple, it would not have exited the
BOH. It would have either been a grazing or trenching wound along the
right side of his head. That's why the geometry is impossible for you.
mainframetech
2018-07-27 00:50:35 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Were were all the other snipers located? One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.
Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.
Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.
Where were the other 18 snipers located?
Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?
You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?
I rather expected you to be confused. First shot struck through the
windshield and then into the throat of JFK. Second shot in the upper
back, and third shot struck the front of the head at the forehead/temple
area. When struck from outside, tempered glass will direct the shot
somewhat downward given that the windshield sloped downward, second shot
from the South Knoll was without windshield in the way. A straight shot
into the forehead.
Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.
It's a dumb question. It's not known from the wounds if there were 3
shooters of 2 shooters that caused the 3 shots that struck JFK. The
throat and forehead shots might have ben the same person, or two people
near each other on the south knoll.
Can't wait to see where your shooters are next month.
As you've been told, it will depend on the evidence next month.
Do you really expect new evidence to show up next month. I think that is
known as incurable optimism. You think these websites you find with ever
more bizarre theories of what happened constitute evidence. You found a
guy with a new angle, placing a shooter on the SoGK and decided that
worked a lot better than the kooks you have put your faith in before.
There isn't a scrap of forensic evidence of any shooter anywhere except
the sniper's nest but that doesn't seem to trouble you in the least.
It was here that I found information about the ARRB work that was
done, and found that many things had been newly uncovered.
What did you find in the ARRB that indicates there was a shooter on the
SoGK?
Nothing so far.
So if the ARRB had no evidence of a shooter on the SoGK, where did you
find evidence for that?
You were told the answer to that. Why do you like so much to see your
name up in the forum, repeating the same stuff over and over??
I guess this is your way of saying there is no such evidence.
Why is it when people like you and Marsh are asked a question for which
you have no answer you claim to have given the answer?
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
In fact much
of the solution to the case is there, and don't bother me with it not
being recognized by others, since you've been unable to show their
surprise at finding nothing there.
You've been unable to show that the Lifton/Horne theory has gained
traction in the conspiracy community despite the ARRB files having been in
the public domain for over 20 years. Don't you think if there was wide
acceptance of the things you have been arguing for that there would be
more than a few kook websites trumpeting those findings?
Well, there certainly are plenty of kook websites espousing the LN and
WCR view of things, or their theories anyway.
However, and example of the truth catching on can be found in the
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
An article for which you've offered no supporting evidence.
Post by mainframetech
That article also is aware that there is a bullet hole in the
forehead/temple area.
An article that shows the geometry for such a shot is impossible.
Nope, won't do. It shows the bullet paths very well. The problem has
to be where it often is, in your understanding.
It shows a bullet path going through the other occupants of the limo but
magically not hitting them. It shows that a if a bullet fired from the
SoGK had hit JFK in your forehead temple, it would not have exited the
BOH. It would have either been a grazing or trenching wound along the
right side of his head. That's why the geometry is impossible for you.
What's impossible is your figuring. The article makes it clear that
there was no "magic" which is LN type thinking. The line for the bullets
was clear and worked well for both the throat and forehead shots.

And I remind you again, the author takes into account the forehead
shot, and not any silly BOH shot that can't be proved.

Chris
bigdog
2018-07-28 03:54:53 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Were were all the other snipers located? One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.
Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.
Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.
Where were the other 18 snipers located?
Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?
You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?
I rather expected you to be confused. First shot struck through the
windshield and then into the throat of JFK. Second shot in the upper
back, and third shot struck the front of the head at the forehead/temple
area. When struck from outside, tempered glass will direct the shot
somewhat downward given that the windshield sloped downward, second shot
from the South Knoll was without windshield in the way. A straight shot
into the forehead.
Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.
It's a dumb question. It's not known from the wounds if there were 3
shooters of 2 shooters that caused the 3 shots that struck JFK. The
throat and forehead shots might have ben the same person, or two people
near each other on the south knoll.
Can't wait to see where your shooters are next month.
As you've been told, it will depend on the evidence next month.
Do you really expect new evidence to show up next month. I think that is
known as incurable optimism. You think these websites you find with ever
more bizarre theories of what happened constitute evidence. You found a
guy with a new angle, placing a shooter on the SoGK and decided that
worked a lot better than the kooks you have put your faith in before.
There isn't a scrap of forensic evidence of any shooter anywhere except
the sniper's nest but that doesn't seem to trouble you in the least.
It was here that I found information about the ARRB work that was
done, and found that many things had been newly uncovered.
What did you find in the ARRB that indicates there was a shooter on the
SoGK?
Nothing so far.
So if the ARRB had no evidence of a shooter on the SoGK, where did you
find evidence for that?
You were told the answer to that. Why do you like so much to see your
name up in the forum, repeating the same stuff over and over??
I guess this is your way of saying there is no such evidence.
Why is it when people like you and Marsh are asked a question for which
you have no answer you claim to have given the answer?
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
In fact much
of the solution to the case is there, and don't bother me with it not
being recognized by others, since you've been unable to show their
surprise at finding nothing there.
You've been unable to show that the Lifton/Horne theory has gained
traction in the conspiracy community despite the ARRB files having been in
the public domain for over 20 years. Don't you think if there was wide
acceptance of the things you have been arguing for that there would be
more than a few kook websites trumpeting those findings?
Well, there certainly are plenty of kook websites espousing the LN and
WCR view of things, or their theories anyway.
However, and example of the truth catching on can be found in the
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
An article for which you've offered no supporting evidence.
Post by mainframetech
That article also is aware that there is a bullet hole in the
forehead/temple area.
An article that shows the geometry for such a shot is impossible.
Nope, won't do. It shows the bullet paths very well. The problem has
to be where it often is, in your understanding.
It shows a bullet path going through the other occupants of the limo but
magically not hitting them. It shows that a if a bullet fired from the
SoGK had hit JFK in your forehead temple, it would not have exited the
BOH. It would have either been a grazing or trenching wound along the
right side of his head. That's why the geometry is impossible for you.
What's impossible is your figuring. The article makes it clear that
there was no "magic" which is LN type thinking. The line for the bullets
was clear and worked well for both the throat and forehead shots.
And I remind you again, the author takes into account the forehead
shot, and not any silly BOH shot that can't be proved.
Try drawing a straight line from your imaginary rear exit wound to your
equally imaginary forehead/temple entrance wound and see where that leads
you. Hint: nowhere near the SoGK.
Anthony Marsh
2018-07-29 18:23:03 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Were were all the other snipers located? One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.
Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.
Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.
Where were the other 18 snipers located?
Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?
You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?
I rather expected you to be confused. First shot struck through the
windshield and then into the throat of JFK. Second shot in the upper
back, and third shot struck the front of the head at the forehead/temple
area. When struck from outside, tempered glass will direct the shot
somewhat downward given that the windshield sloped downward, second shot
from the South Knoll was without windshield in the way. A straight shot
into the forehead.
Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.
It's a dumb question. It's not known from the wounds if there were 3
shooters of 2 shooters that caused the 3 shots that struck JFK. The
throat and forehead shots might have ben the same person, or two people
near each other on the south knoll.
Can't wait to see where your shooters are next month.
As you've been told, it will depend on the evidence next month.
Do you really expect new evidence to show up next month. I think that is
known as incurable optimism. You think these websites you find with ever
more bizarre theories of what happened constitute evidence. You found a
guy with a new angle, placing a shooter on the SoGK and decided that
worked a lot better than the kooks you have put your faith in before.
There isn't a scrap of forensic evidence of any shooter anywhere except
the sniper's nest but that doesn't seem to trouble you in the least.
It was here that I found information about the ARRB work that was
done, and found that many things had been newly uncovered.
What did you find in the ARRB that indicates there was a shooter on the
SoGK?
Nothing so far.
So if the ARRB had no evidence of a shooter on the SoGK, where did you
find evidence for that?
You were told the answer to that. Why do you like so much to see your
name up in the forum, repeating the same stuff over and over??
I guess this is your way of saying there is no such evidence.
Why is it when people like you and Marsh are asked a question for which
you have no answer you claim to have given the answer?
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
In fact much
of the solution to the case is there, and don't bother me with it not
being recognized by others, since you've been unable to show their
surprise at finding nothing there.
You've been unable to show that the Lifton/Horne theory has gained
traction in the conspiracy community despite the ARRB files having been in
the public domain for over 20 years. Don't you think if there was wide
acceptance of the things you have been arguing for that there would be
more than a few kook websites trumpeting those findings?
Well, there certainly are plenty of kook websites espousing the LN and
WCR view of things, or their theories anyway.
However, and example of the truth catching on can be found in the
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
An article for which you've offered no supporting evidence.
Post by mainframetech
That article also is aware that there is a bullet hole in the
forehead/temple area.
An article that shows the geometry for such a shot is impossible.
Nope, won't do. It shows the bullet paths very well. The problem has
to be where it often is, in your understanding.
It shows a bullet path going through the other occupants of the limo but
magically not hitting them. It shows that a if a bullet fired from the
SoGK had hit JFK in your forehead temple, it would not have exited the
BOH. It would have either been a grazing or trenching wound along the
right side of his head. That's why the geometry is impossible for you.
What's impossible is your figuring. The article makes it clear that
there was no "magic" which is LN type thinking. The line for the bullets
was clear and worked well for both the throat and forehead shots.
And I remind you again, the author takes into account the forehead
shot, and not any silly BOH shot that can't be proved.
Try drawing a straight line from your imaginary rear exit wound to your
equally imaginary forehead/temple entrance wound and see where that leads
you. Hint: nowhere near the SoGK.
You never show us your diagrams so you have no standing to order others to
do that.

WE both know it's impossible, but we don't need a drawing to know that.
Others have made ridiculous drawings. Do you know how to use a search
engine to see them?

I'd like to see you try ANY drawing using the original entrance hole in
the back of the head near the EOP. You demand it of others, but do YOU
have the skills to do it yourself? Do you even have Windows Ai now? Can
you print it out on your 3D printer?

https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwiC7IGcs8LcAhVCMd8KHeWMAQkQjRx6BAgBEAU&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pinterest.ca%2Fpin%2F14918242493977101%2F&psig=AOvVaw3SBcEva9efKY23T1Q3puKn&ust=1532887977560684
mainframetech
2018-07-30 01:57:19 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Were were all the other snipers located? One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.
Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.
Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.
Where were the other 18 snipers located?
Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?
You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?
I rather expected you to be confused. First shot struck through the
windshield and then into the throat of JFK. Second shot in the upper
back, and third shot struck the front of the head at the forehead/temple
area. When struck from outside, tempered glass will direct the shot
somewhat downward given that the windshield sloped downward, second shot
from the South Knoll was without windshield in the way. A straight shot
into the forehead.
Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.
It's a dumb question. It's not known from the wounds if there were 3
shooters of 2 shooters that caused the 3 shots that struck JFK. The
throat and forehead shots might have ben the same person, or two people
near each other on the south knoll.
Can't wait to see where your shooters are next month.
As you've been told, it will depend on the evidence next month.
Do you really expect new evidence to show up next month. I think that is
known as incurable optimism. You think these websites you find with ever
more bizarre theories of what happened constitute evidence. You found a
guy with a new angle, placing a shooter on the SoGK and decided that
worked a lot better than the kooks you have put your faith in before.
There isn't a scrap of forensic evidence of any shooter anywhere except
the sniper's nest but that doesn't seem to trouble you in the least.
It was here that I found information about the ARRB work that was
done, and found that many things had been newly uncovered.
What did you find in the ARRB that indicates there was a shooter on the
SoGK?
Nothing so far.
So if the ARRB had no evidence of a shooter on the SoGK, where did you
find evidence for that?
You were told the answer to that. Why do you like so much to see your
name up in the forum, repeating the same stuff over and over??
I guess this is your way of saying there is no such evidence.
Why is it when people like you and Marsh are asked a question for which
you have no answer you claim to have given the answer?
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
In fact much
of the solution to the case is there, and don't bother me with it not
being recognized by others, since you've been unable to show their
surprise at finding nothing there.
You've been unable to show that the Lifton/Horne theory has gained
traction in the conspiracy community despite the ARRB files having been in
the public domain for over 20 years. Don't you think if there was wide
acceptance of the things you have been arguing for that there would be
more than a few kook websites trumpeting those findings?
Well, there certainly are plenty of kook websites espousing the LN and
WCR view of things, or their theories anyway.
However, and example of the truth catching on can be found in the
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
An article for which you've offered no supporting evidence.
Post by mainframetech
That article also is aware that there is a bullet hole in the
forehead/temple area.
An article that shows the geometry for such a shot is impossible.
Nope, won't do. It shows the bullet paths very well. The problem has
to be where it often is, in your understanding.
It shows a bullet path going through the other occupants of the limo but
magically not hitting them. It shows that a if a bullet fired from the
SoGK had hit JFK in your forehead temple, it would not have exited the
BOH. It would have either been a grazing or trenching wound along the
right side of his head. That's why the geometry is impossible for you.
What's impossible is your figuring. The article makes it clear that
there was no "magic" which is LN type thinking. The line for the bullets
was clear and worked well for both the throat and forehead shots.
And I remind you again, the author takes into account the forehead
shot, and not any silly BOH shot that can't be proved.
Try drawing a straight line from your imaginary rear exit wound to your
equally imaginary forehead/temple entrance wound and see where that leads
you. Hint: nowhere near the SoGK.
Actually, that was done by the author of the article that describes the
South GK shots:

http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/

Chris
bigdog
2018-07-31 01:28:27 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Were were all the other snipers located? One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.
Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.
Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.
Where were the other 18 snipers located?
Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?
You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?
I rather expected you to be confused. First shot struck through the
windshield and then into the throat of JFK. Second shot in the upper
back, and third shot struck the front of the head at the forehead/temple
area. When struck from outside, tempered glass will direct the shot
somewhat downward given that the windshield sloped downward, second shot
from the South Knoll was without windshield in the way. A straight shot
into the forehead.
Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.
It's a dumb question. It's not known from the wounds if there were 3
shooters of 2 shooters that caused the 3 shots that struck JFK. The
throat and forehead shots might have ben the same person, or two people
near each other on the south knoll.
Can't wait to see where your shooters are next month.
As you've been told, it will depend on the evidence next month.
Do you really expect new evidence to show up next month. I think that is
known as incurable optimism. You think these websites you find with ever
more bizarre theories of what happened constitute evidence. You found a
guy with a new angle, placing a shooter on the SoGK and decided that
worked a lot better than the kooks you have put your faith in before.
There isn't a scrap of forensic evidence of any shooter anywhere except
the sniper's nest but that doesn't seem to trouble you in the least.
It was here that I found information about the ARRB work that was
done, and found that many things had been newly uncovered.
What did you find in the ARRB that indicates there was a shooter on the
SoGK?
Nothing so far.
So if the ARRB had no evidence of a shooter on the SoGK, where did you
find evidence for that?
You were told the answer to that. Why do you like so much to see your
name up in the forum, repeating the same stuff over and over??
I guess this is your way of saying there is no such evidence.
Why is it when people like you and Marsh are asked a question for which
you have no answer you claim to have given the answer?
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
In fact much
of the solution to the case is there, and don't bother me with it not
being recognized by others, since you've been unable to show their
surprise at finding nothing there.
You've been unable to show that the Lifton/Horne theory has gained
traction in the conspiracy community despite the ARRB files having been in
the public domain for over 20 years. Don't you think if there was wide
acceptance of the things you have been arguing for that there would be
more than a few kook websites trumpeting those findings?
Well, there certainly are plenty of kook websites espousing the LN and
WCR view of things, or their theories anyway.
However, and example of the truth catching on can be found in the
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
An article for which you've offered no supporting evidence.
Post by mainframetech
That article also is aware that there is a bullet hole in the
forehead/temple area.
An article that shows the geometry for such a shot is impossible.
Nope, won't do. It shows the bullet paths very well. The problem has
to be where it often is, in your understanding.
It shows a bullet path going through the other occupants of the limo but
magically not hitting them. It shows that a if a bullet fired from the
SoGK had hit JFK in your forehead temple, it would not have exited the
BOH. It would have either been a grazing or trenching wound along the
right side of his head. That's why the geometry is impossible for you.
What's impossible is your figuring. The article makes it clear that
there was no "magic" which is LN type thinking. The line for the bullets
was clear and worked well for both the throat and forehead shots.
And I remind you again, the author takes into account the forehead
shot, and not any silly BOH shot that can't be proved.
Try drawing a straight line from your imaginary rear exit wound to your
equally imaginary forehead/temple entrance wound and see where that leads
you. Hint: nowhere near the SoGK.
Actually, that was done by the author of the article that describes the
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Which image would that be?
mainframetech
2018-08-01 03:25:00 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Were were all the other snipers located? One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.
Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.
Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.
Where were the other 18 snipers located?
Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?
You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?
I rather expected you to be confused. First shot struck through the
windshield and then into the throat of JFK. Second shot in the upper
back, and third shot struck the front of the head at the forehead/temple
area. When struck from outside, tempered glass will direct the shot
somewhat downward given that the windshield sloped downward, second shot
from the South Knoll was without windshield in the way. A straight shot
into the forehead.
Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.
It's a dumb question. It's not known from the wounds if there were 3
shooters of 2 shooters that caused the 3 shots that struck JFK. The
throat and forehead shots might have ben the same person, or two people
near each other on the south knoll.
Can't wait to see where your shooters are next month.
As you've been told, it will depend on the evidence next month.
Do you really expect new evidence to show up next month. I think that is
known as incurable optimism. You think these websites you find with ever
more bizarre theories of what happened constitute evidence. You found a
guy with a new angle, placing a shooter on the SoGK and decided that
worked a lot better than the kooks you have put your faith in before.
There isn't a scrap of forensic evidence of any shooter anywhere except
the sniper's nest but that doesn't seem to trouble you in the least.
It was here that I found information about the ARRB work that was
done, and found that many things had been newly uncovered.
What did you find in the ARRB that indicates there was a shooter on the
SoGK?
Nothing so far.
So if the ARRB had no evidence of a shooter on the SoGK, where did you
find evidence for that?
You were told the answer to that. Why do you like so much to see your
name up in the forum, repeating the same stuff over and over??
I guess this is your way of saying there is no such evidence.
Why is it when people like you and Marsh are asked a question for which
you have no answer you claim to have given the answer?
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
In fact much
of the solution to the case is there, and don't bother me with it not
being recognized by others, since you've been unable to show their
surprise at finding nothing there.
You've been unable to show that the Lifton/Horne theory has gained
traction in the conspiracy community despite the ARRB files having been in
the public domain for over 20 years. Don't you think if there was wide
acceptance of the things you have been arguing for that there would be
more than a few kook websites trumpeting those findings?
Well, there certainly are plenty of kook websites espousing the LN and
WCR view of things, or their theories anyway.
However, and example of the truth catching on can be found in the
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
An article for which you've offered no supporting evidence.
Post by mainframetech
That article also is aware that there is a bullet hole in the
forehead/temple area.
An article that shows the geometry for such a shot is impossible.
Nope, won't do. It shows the bullet paths very well. The problem has
to be where it often is, in your understanding.
It shows a bullet path going through the other occupants of the limo but
magically not hitting them. It shows that a if a bullet fired from the
SoGK had hit JFK in your forehead temple, it would not have exited the
BOH. It would have either been a grazing or trenching wound along the
right side of his head. That's why the geometry is impossible for you.
What's impossible is your figuring. The article makes it clear that
there was no "magic" which is LN type thinking. The line for the bullets
was clear and worked well for both the throat and forehead shots.
And I remind you again, the author takes into account the forehead
shot, and not any silly BOH shot that can't be proved.
Try drawing a straight line from your imaginary rear exit wound to your
equally imaginary forehead/temple entrance wound and see where that leads
you. Hint: nowhere near the SoGK.
Actually, that was done by the author of the article that describes the
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Which image would that be?
Skip through them quickly and you'll see it.

Chris
bigdog
2018-08-02 16:29:31 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Try drawing a straight line from your imaginary rear exit wound to your
equally imaginary forehead/temple entrance wound and see where that leads
you. Hint: nowhere near the SoGK.
Actually, that was done by the author of the article that describes the
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Which image would that be?
Skip through them quickly and you'll see it.
So this is your way of sidestepping the inconvenient fact the images shown
aren't compatible with your silly forehead/temple entry. You can't point
to an image which shows that to be possible so you try to shift the burden
on me to find it.

All the images up through 020 are dealing with the throat shot. I don't
see an image 021. Image 022 is the one that shows the angle of the bullet
to the skull. While the skull is greatly oversized, that doesn't alter the
angle. As anyone can see, the only way to get that line to your BOH
blowout location is by having the entry go through the center of the
forehead. If you move that line to your imaginary forehead/temple entry
wound, you will see it doesn't exit at the BOH. In the past you have
denied that this diagram was intended to show the bullet path through the
head, only the angle of the shot. You just claimed the author showed an
image with a forehead/temple entry and a BOH exit. If it isn't image 022,
which one is it? Of are you going to continue to demand that I find the
image that supports your theory because you are unable to do it?
mainframetech
2018-08-04 03:58:27 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Try drawing a straight line from your imaginary rear exit wound to your
equally imaginary forehead/temple entrance wound and see where that leads
you. Hint: nowhere near the SoGK.
Actually, that was done by the author of the article that describes the
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Which image would that be?
Skip through them quickly and you'll see it.
So this is your way of sidestepping the inconvenient fact the images shown
aren't compatible with your silly forehead/temple entry. You can't point
to an image which shows that to be possible so you try to shift the burden
on me to find it.
WRONG! Your childish attempt to get me to do your work for you is
pathetic.
Post by bigdog
All the images up through 020 are dealing with the throat shot. I don't
see an image 021. Image 022 is the one that shows the angle of the bullet
to the skull. While the skull is greatly oversized, that doesn't alter the
angle. As anyone can see, the only way to get that line to your BOH
blowout location is by having the entry go through the center of the
forehead. If you move that line to your imaginary forehead/temple entry
wound, you will see it doesn't exit at the BOH. In the past you have
denied that this diagram was intended to show the bullet path through the
head, only the angle of the shot. You just claimed the author showed an
image with a forehead/temple entry and a BOH exit. If it isn't image 022,
which one is it? Of are you going to continue to demand that I find the
image that supports your theory because you are unable to do it?
No problem. Image 022 states "The line drawn from the skull is at 25
degrees to profile and represents the direction he was facing - not bullet
trajectory". That image shows the situation where the shooter will hit
the right side of the face in the forehead and that bullet will pass
through the skull and blow out the BOH. The line shown is NOT the
trajectory, as it says clearly. What's your problem?

Chris
bigdog
2018-08-05 03:58:09 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Try drawing a straight line from your imaginary rear exit wound to your
equally imaginary forehead/temple entrance wound and see where that leads
you. Hint: nowhere near the SoGK.
Actually, that was done by the author of the article that describes the
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Which image would that be?
Skip through them quickly and you'll see it.
So this is your way of sidestepping the inconvenient fact the images shown
aren't compatible with your silly forehead/temple entry. You can't point
to an image which shows that to be possible so you try to shift the burden
on me to find it.
WRONG! Your childish attempt to get me to do your work for you is
pathetic.
How did supplying evidence to support your theories become my work?
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
All the images up through 020 are dealing with the throat shot. I don't
see an image 021. Image 022 is the one that shows the angle of the bullet
to the skull. While the skull is greatly oversized, that doesn't alter the
angle. As anyone can see, the only way to get that line to your BOH
blowout location is by having the entry go through the center of the
forehead. If you move that line to your imaginary forehead/temple entry
wound, you will see it doesn't exit at the BOH. In the past you have
denied that this diagram was intended to show the bullet path through the
head, only the angle of the shot. You just claimed the author showed an
image with a forehead/temple entry and a BOH exit. If it isn't image 022,
which one is it? Of are you going to continue to demand that I find the
image that supports your theory because you are unable to do it?
No problem. Image 022 states "The line drawn from the skull is at 25
degrees to profile and represents the direction he was facing - not bullet
trajectory". That image shows the situation where the shooter will hit
the right side of the face in the forehead and that bullet will pass
through the skull and blow out the BOH. The line shown is NOT the
trajectory, as it says clearly. What's your problem?
When you move the line to where you claim the bullet entered, it doesn't
exit from the BOH. You know it. I know it. Anyone who reads this and lays
a straight edge from the origin of the shot to the point where you claim
the bullet entered the skull can see that.

If you go back through this thread you will see I challenged you to draw a
line through your alleged entry and exit wounds that would lead back to
your SoGK shooter. You offered this image instead but now tell us that
image wasn't intended to show the bullet trajectory. So you have not met
the challenge I made to you. You won't because you can't. The geometry
won't work and you know it.
mainframetech
2018-08-06 04:11:46 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Try drawing a straight line from your imaginary rear exit wound to your
equally imaginary forehead/temple entrance wound and see where that leads
you. Hint: nowhere near the SoGK.
Actually, that was done by the author of the article that describes the
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Which image would that be?
Skip through them quickly and you'll see it.
So this is your way of sidestepping the inconvenient fact the images shown
aren't compatible with your silly forehead/temple entry. You can't point
to an image which shows that to be possible so you try to shift the burden
on me to find it.
WRONG! Your childish attempt to get me to do your work for you is
pathetic.
How did supplying evidence to support your theories become my work?
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
All the images up through 020 are dealing with the throat shot. I don't
see an image 021. Image 022 is the one that shows the angle of the bullet
to the skull. While the skull is greatly oversized, that doesn't alter the
angle. As anyone can see, the only way to get that line to your BOH
blowout location is by having the entry go through the center of the
forehead. If you move that line to your imaginary forehead/temple entry
wound, you will see it doesn't exit at the BOH. In the past you have
denied that this diagram was intended to show the bullet path through the
head, only the angle of the shot. You just claimed the author showed an
image with a forehead/temple entry and a BOH exit. If it isn't image 022,
which one is it? Of are you going to continue to demand that I find the
image that supports your theory because you are unable to do it?
No problem. Image 022 states "The line drawn from the skull is at 25
degrees to profile and represents the direction he was facing - not bullet
trajectory". That image shows the situation where the shooter will hit
the right side of the face in the forehead and that bullet will pass
through the skull and blow out the BOH. The line shown is NOT the
trajectory, as it says clearly. What's your problem?
When you move the line to where you claim the bullet entered, it doesn't
exit from the BOH. You know it. I know it. Anyone who reads this and lays
a straight edge from the origin of the shot to the point where you claim
the bullet entered the skull can see that.
If you go back through this thread you will see I challenged you to draw a
line through your alleged entry and exit wounds that would lead back to
your SoGK shooter. You offered this image instead but now tell us that
image wasn't intended to show the bullet trajectory. So you have not met
the challenge I made to you. You won't because you can't. The geometry
won't work and you know it.
Goddamnit! Why can't you listen and follow simple instructions?
image 022 shows the direction that JFK was looking in when struck by the
bullet to the forehead. The line is not of trajectory at all, but where
JFK was looking. It's simple enough to see that there is an imaginary
line from the south parking lot to the head of JFK, and it will work
easily to cause the bullet hole in the forehead, and the blow out at the
BOH.

If this is going ot be another one of your pick, pick, pick things,
just because you don't have any serious evidence, give yourself a break
and don't bother.

Chris
bigdog
2018-08-07 04:40:36 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Try drawing a straight line from your imaginary rear exit wound to your
equally imaginary forehead/temple entrance wound and see where that leads
you. Hint: nowhere near the SoGK.
Actually, that was done by the author of the article that describes the
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Which image would that be?
Skip through them quickly and you'll see it.
So this is your way of sidestepping the inconvenient fact the images shown
aren't compatible with your silly forehead/temple entry. You can't point
to an image which shows that to be possible so you try to shift the burden
on me to find it.
WRONG! Your childish attempt to get me to do your work for you is
pathetic.
How did supplying evidence to support your theories become my work?
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
All the images up through 020 are dealing with the throat shot. I don't
see an image 021. Image 022 is the one that shows the angle of the bullet
to the skull. While the skull is greatly oversized, that doesn't alter the
angle. As anyone can see, the only way to get that line to your BOH
blowout location is by having the entry go through the center of the
forehead. If you move that line to your imaginary forehead/temple entry
wound, you will see it doesn't exit at the BOH. In the past you have
denied that this diagram was intended to show the bullet path through the
head, only the angle of the shot. You just claimed the author showed an
image with a forehead/temple entry and a BOH exit. If it isn't image 022,
which one is it? Of are you going to continue to demand that I find the
image that supports your theory because you are unable to do it?
No problem. Image 022 states "The line drawn from the skull is at 25
degrees to profile and represents the direction he was facing - not bullet
trajectory". That image shows the situation where the shooter will hit
the right side of the face in the forehead and that bullet will pass
through the skull and blow out the BOH. The line shown is NOT the
trajectory, as it says clearly. What's your problem?
When you move the line to where you claim the bullet entered, it doesn't
exit from the BOH. You know it. I know it. Anyone who reads this and lays
a straight edge from the origin of the shot to the point where you claim
the bullet entered the skull can see that.
If you go back through this thread you will see I challenged you to draw a
line through your alleged entry and exit wounds that would lead back to
your SoGK shooter. You offered this image instead but now tell us that
image wasn't intended to show the bullet trajectory. So you have not met
the challenge I made to you. You won't because you can't. The geometry
won't work and you know it.
Goddamnit! Why can't you listen and follow simple instructions?
image 022 shows the direction that JFK was looking in when struck by the
bullet to the forehead. The line is not of trajectory at all, but where
JFK was looking. It's simple enough to see that there is an imaginary
line from the south parking lot to the head of JFK, and it will work
easily to cause the bullet hole in the forehead, and the blow out at the
BOH.
I know it doesn't show the trajectory but when I challenged you to show
how a bullet fired from that location through your imaginary
forehead/temple entry wound could exit the BOH, you offered this kook's
work. If image 022 doesn't show that, than which of his images does. You
correctly pointed out that an imaginary line could show your trajectory
because if you drew a real line it would become obvious it doesn't work.
Such a shot would exit the side of the head. You know this which is why
you can't diagram such a shot or point to any image from this kook that
does show it.
Post by mainframetech
If this is going ot be another one of your pick, pick, pick things,
just because you don't have any serious evidence, give yourself a break
and don't bother.
So you think it is nitpicking to ask you to show how your imaginary shot
from the SoGK could actually enter and exit where you claim it did. It is
an impossibility and you know it yet you won't admit it.
Anthony Marsh
2018-08-07 15:34:36 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Try drawing a straight line from your imaginary rear exit wound to your
equally imaginary forehead/temple entrance wound and see where that leads
you. Hint: nowhere near the SoGK.
Actually, that was done by the author of the article that describes the
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Which image would that be?
Skip through them quickly and you'll see it.
So this is your way of sidestepping the inconvenient fact the images shown
aren't compatible with your silly forehead/temple entry. You can't point
to an image which shows that to be possible so you try to shift the burden
on me to find it.
WRONG! Your childish attempt to get me to do your work for you is
pathetic.
How did supplying evidence to support your theories become my work?
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
All the images up through 020 are dealing with the throat shot. I don't
see an image 021. Image 022 is the one that shows the angle of the bullet
to the skull. While the skull is greatly oversized, that doesn't alter the
angle. As anyone can see, the only way to get that line to your BOH
blowout location is by having the entry go through the center of the
forehead. If you move that line to your imaginary forehead/temple entry
wound, you will see it doesn't exit at the BOH. In the past you have
denied that this diagram was intended to show the bullet path through the
head, only the angle of the shot. You just claimed the author showed an
image with a forehead/temple entry and a BOH exit. If it isn't image 022,
which one is it? Of are you going to continue to demand that I find the
image that supports your theory because you are unable to do it?
No problem. Image 022 states "The line drawn from the skull is at 25
degrees to profile and represents the direction he was facing - not bullet
trajectory". That image shows the situation where the shooter will hit
the right side of the face in the forehead and that bullet will pass
through the skull and blow out the BOH. The line shown is NOT the
trajectory, as it says clearly. What's your problem?
When you move the line to where you claim the bullet entered, it doesn't
exit from the BOH. You know it. I know it. Anyone who reads this and lays
a straight edge from the origin of the shot to the point where you claim
the bullet entered the skull can see that.
If you go back through this thread you will see I challenged you to draw a
line through your alleged entry and exit wounds that would lead back to
your SoGK shooter. You offered this image instead but now tell us that
image wasn't intended to show the bullet trajectory. So you have not met
the challenge I made to you. You won't because you can't. The geometry
won't work and you know it.
You can issue all the challenges you want, but you can't accept them when
we present them. You are a hypocrite. Just to proved that you are a loyal
WC defender.

Anthony Marsh
2018-08-06 03:51:58 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Try drawing a straight line from your imaginary rear exit wound to your
equally imaginary forehead/temple entrance wound and see where that leads
you. Hint: nowhere near the SoGK.
Actually, that was done by the author of the article that describes the
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Which image would that be?
Skip through them quickly and you'll see it.
So this is your way of sidestepping the inconvenient fact the images shown
aren't compatible with your silly forehead/temple entry. You can't point
to an image which shows that to be possible so you try to shift the burden
on me to find it.
All the images up through 020 are dealing with the throat shot. I don't
see an image 021. Image 022 is the one that shows the angle of the bullet
to the skull. While the skull is greatly oversized, that doesn't alter the
angle. As anyone can see, the only way to get that line to your BOH
blowout location is by having the entry go through the center of the
forehead. If you move that line to your imaginary forehead/temple entry
wound, you will see it doesn't exit at the BOH. In the past you have
denied that this diagram was intended to show the bullet path through the
head, only the angle of the shot. You just claimed the author showed an
image with a forehead/temple entry and a BOH exit. If it isn't image 022,
which one is it? Of are you going to continue to demand that I find the
image that supports your theory because you are unable to do it?
How rude? Asking a kook to get specific and prove a point?
I wouldn't do that to you!
Anthony Marsh
2018-08-02 16:55:48 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Were were all the other snipers located? One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.
Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.
Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.
Where were the other 18 snipers located?
Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?
You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?
I rather expected you to be confused. First shot struck through the
windshield and then into the throat of JFK. Second shot in the upper
back, and third shot struck the front of the head at the forehead/temple
area. When struck from outside, tempered glass will direct the shot
somewhat downward given that the windshield sloped downward, second shot
from the South Knoll was without windshield in the way. A straight shot
into the forehead.
Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.
It's a dumb question. It's not known from the wounds if there were 3
shooters of 2 shooters that caused the 3 shots that struck JFK. The
throat and forehead shots might have ben the same person, or two people
near each other on the south knoll.
Can't wait to see where your shooters are next month.
As you've been told, it will depend on the evidence next month.
Do you really expect new evidence to show up next month. I think that is
known as incurable optimism. You think these websites you find with ever
more bizarre theories of what happened constitute evidence. You found a
guy with a new angle, placing a shooter on the SoGK and decided that
worked a lot better than the kooks you have put your faith in before.
There isn't a scrap of forensic evidence of any shooter anywhere except
the sniper's nest but that doesn't seem to trouble you in the least.
It was here that I found information about the ARRB work that was
done, and found that many things had been newly uncovered.
What did you find in the ARRB that indicates there was a shooter on the
SoGK?
Nothing so far.
So if the ARRB had no evidence of a shooter on the SoGK, where did you
find evidence for that?
You were told the answer to that. Why do you like so much to see your
name up in the forum, repeating the same stuff over and over??
I guess this is your way of saying there is no such evidence.
Why is it when people like you and Marsh are asked a question for which
you have no answer you claim to have given the answer?
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
In fact much
of the solution to the case is there, and don't bother me with it not
being recognized by others, since you've been unable to show their
surprise at finding nothing there.
You've been unable to show that the Lifton/Horne theory has gained
traction in the conspiracy community despite the ARRB files having been in
the public domain for over 20 years. Don't you think if there was wide
acceptance of the things you have been arguing for that there would be
more than a few kook websites trumpeting those findings?
Well, there certainly are plenty of kook websites espousing the LN and
WCR view of things, or their theories anyway.
However, and example of the truth catching on can be found in the
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
An article for which you've offered no supporting evidence.
Post by mainframetech
That article also is aware that there is a bullet hole in the
forehead/temple area.
An article that shows the geometry for such a shot is impossible.
Nope, won't do. It shows the bullet paths very well. The problem has
to be where it often is, in your understanding.
It shows a bullet path going through the other occupants of the limo but
magically not hitting them. It shows that a if a bullet fired from the
SoGK had hit JFK in your forehead temple, it would not have exited the
BOH. It would have either been a grazing or trenching wound along the
right side of his head. That's why the geometry is impossible for you.
What's impossible is your figuring. The article makes it clear that
there was no "magic" which is LN type thinking. The line for the bullets
was clear and worked well for both the throat and forehead shots.
And I remind you again, the author takes into account the forehead
shot, and not any silly BOH shot that can't be proved.
Try drawing a straight line from your imaginary rear exit wound to your
equally imaginary forehead/temple entrance wound and see where that leads
you. Hint: nowhere near the SoGK.
Actually, that was done by the author of the article that describes the
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Which image would that be?
Skip through them quickly and you'll see it.
Evasion. Link directly to the image you think proves your point.
Post by mainframetech
Chris
Anthony Marsh
2018-07-28 03:29:10 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Were were all the other snipers located? One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.
Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.
Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.
Where were the other 18 snipers located?
Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?
You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?
I rather expected you to be confused. First shot struck through the
windshield and then into the throat of JFK. Second shot in the upper
back, and third shot struck the front of the head at the forehead/temple
area. When struck from outside, tempered glass will direct the shot
somewhat downward given that the windshield sloped downward, second shot
from the South Knoll was without windshield in the way. A straight shot
into the forehead.
Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.
It's a dumb question. It's not known from the wounds if there were 3
shooters of 2 shooters that caused the 3 shots that struck JFK. The
throat and forehead shots might have ben the same person, or two people
near each other on the south knoll.
Can't wait to see where your shooters are next month.
As you've been told, it will depend on the evidence next month.
Do you really expect new evidence to show up next month. I think that is
known as incurable optimism. You think these websites you find with ever
more bizarre theories of what happened constitute evidence. You found a
guy with a new angle, placing a shooter on the SoGK and decided that
worked a lot better than the kooks you have put your faith in before.
There isn't a scrap of forensic evidence of any shooter anywhere except
the sniper's nest but that doesn't seem to trouble you in the least.
It was here that I found information about the ARRB work that was
done, and found that many things had been newly uncovered.
What did you find in the ARRB that indicates there was a shooter on the
SoGK?
Nothing so far.
So if the ARRB had no evidence of a shooter on the SoGK, where did you
find evidence for that?
You were told the answer to that. Why do you like so much to see your
name up in the forum, repeating the same stuff over and over??
I guess this is your way of saying there is no such evidence.
Why is it when people like you and Marsh are asked a question for which
you have no answer you claim to have given the answer?
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
In fact much
of the solution to the case is there, and don't bother me with it not
being recognized by others, since you've been unable to show their
surprise at finding nothing there.
You've been unable to show that the Lifton/Horne theory has gained
traction in the conspiracy community despite the ARRB files having been in
the public domain for over 20 years. Don't you think if there was wide
acceptance of the things you have been arguing for that there would be
more than a few kook websites trumpeting those findings?
Well, there certainly are plenty of kook websites espousing the LN and
WCR view of things, or their theories anyway.
However, and example of the truth catching on can be found in the
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
An article for which you've offered no supporting evidence.
Post by mainframetech
That article also is aware that there is a bullet hole in the
forehead/temple area.
An article that shows the geometry for such a shot is impossible.
Nope, won't do. It shows the bullet paths very well. The problem has
to be where it often is, in your understanding.
It shows a bullet path going through the other occupants of the limo but
magically not hitting them. It shows that a if a bullet fired from the
SoGK had hit JFK in your forehead temple, it would not have exited the
BOH. It would have either been a grazing or trenching wound along the
right side of his head. That's why the geometry is impossible for you.
How about Dale Myers and his diagrams showing the bullet go between
JFK's outstretched fingers and not hitting them? That's OK with you?

Loading Image...
Loading Image...

Gee, I wonder why Dale had to change his drawing about 20 times?


When did you ever see JFK in this postion in the Zapruder film?
Jason Burke
2018-07-18 00:14:09 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Were were all the other snipers located? One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.
Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.
Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.
Where were the other 18 snipers located?
Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?
You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?
I rather expected you to be confused. First shot struck through the
windshield and then into the throat of JFK. Second shot in the upper
back, and third shot struck the front of the head at the forehead/temple
area. When struck from outside, tempered glass will direct the shot
somewhat downward given that the windshield sloped downward, second shot
from the South Knoll was without windshield in the way. A straight shot
into the forehead.
Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.
It's a dumb question. It's not known from the wounds if there were 3
shooters of 2 shooters that caused the 3 shots that struck JFK. The
throat and forehead shots might have ben the same person, or two people
near each other on the south knoll.
Can't wait to see where your shooters are next month.
As you've been told, it will depend on the evidence next month.
Chris
Undoubtedly the same place your "evidence" has been the last 650+ months.

But keep fighting the silly fight!
Anthony Marsh
2018-07-18 22:23:14 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Jason Burke
Post by bigdog
Post by bigdog
Post by bigdog
Were were all the other snipers located?  One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.
Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.
Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.
Where were the other 18 snipers located?
Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?
      You were given an answer to those questions, but here you
are asking
the same ones over again.  If you weren't going to believe the
truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
    And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets.  Here's something to
chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?
    I rather expected you to be confused.  First shot struck
through the
windshield and then into the throat of JFK.  Second shot in the upper
back, and third shot struck the front of the head at the
forehead/temple
area.  When struck from outside, tempered glass will direct the shot
somewhat downward given that the windshield sloped downward, second shot
from the South Knoll was without windshield in the way.  A
straight shot
into the forehead.
Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.
     It's a dumb question.  It's not known from the wounds if there
were 3
shooters of 2 shooters that caused the 3 shots that struck JFK.  The
throat and forehead shots might have ben the same person, or two people
near each other on the south knoll.
Can't wait to see where your shooters are next month.
    As you've been told, it will depend on the evidence next month.
Chris
Undoubtedly the same place your "evidence" has been the last 650+ months.
But keep fighting the silly fight!
OK, so you are on the record as saying that to fight for Democracy is
silly. It that why you are a Trump supporter?
Jason Burke
2018-07-14 20:42:48 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Were were all the other snipers located? One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.
Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.
Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.
Where were the other 18 snipers located?
Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?
You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?
I rather expected you to be confused. First shot struck through the
windshield and then into the throat of JFK. Second shot in the upper
back, and third shot struck the front of the head at the forehead/temple
area. When struck from outside, tempered glass will direct the shot
somewhat downward given that the windshield sloped downward, second shot
from the South Knoll was without windshield in the way. A straight shot
into the forehead.
Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.
It's a dumb question. It's not known from the wounds if there were 3
shooters of 2 shooters that caused the 3 shots that struck JFK. The
That's actually technically true, Chris.
But what *is* known is that there was one shooter that caused the three
shots that struck JFK.
Post by mainframetech
throat and forehead shots might have ben the same person, or two people
near each other on the south knoll.
Chris
claviger
2018-07-15 21:43:18 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Jason Burke
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Were were all the other snipers located? One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.
Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.
Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.
Where were the other 18 snipers located?
Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?
You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?
I rather expected you to be confused. First shot struck through the
windshield and then into the throat of JFK. Second shot in the upper
back, and third shot struck the front of the head at the forehead/temple
area. When struck from outside, tempered glass will direct the shot
somewhat downward given that the windshield sloped downward, second shot
from the South Knoll was without windshield in the way. A straight shot
into the forehead.
Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.
It's a dumb question. It's not known from the wounds if there were 3
shooters of 2 shooters that caused the 3 shots that struck JFK. The
That's actually technically true, Chris.
But what *is* known is that there was one shooter that caused the three
shots that struck JFK.
Post by mainframetech
throat and forehead shots might have ben the same person, or two people
near each other on the south knoll.
Chris
MFT believes in a 20 snipers scenario. If true 18 were totally
incompetent.
Anthony Marsh
2018-07-16 11:58:50 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by claviger
Post by Jason Burke
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Were were all the other snipers located? One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.
Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.
Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.
Where were the other 18 snipers located?
Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?
You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?
I rather expected you to be confused. First shot struck through the
windshield and then into the throat of JFK. Second shot in the upper
back, and third shot struck the front of the head at the forehead/temple
area. When struck from outside, tempered glass will direct the shot
somewhat downward given that the windshield sloped downward, second shot
from the South Knoll was without windshield in the way. A straight shot
into the forehead.
Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.
It's a dumb question. It's not known from the wounds if there were 3
shooters of 2 shooters that caused the 3 shots that struck JFK. The
That's actually technically true, Chris.
But what *is* known is that there was one shooter that caused the three
shots that struck JFK.
Post by mainframetech
throat and forehead shots might have ben the same person, or two people
near each other on the south knoll.
Chris
MFT believes in a 20 snipers scenario. If true 18 were totally
incompetent.
Now wait a damn minute! You are stipulating that 2 snipers did not miss?
What are their names and where were they shooting from?

Don't pretend that you know the name of the CIA officer shooting from the
grassy knoll.
claviger
2018-07-17 17:23:05 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by claviger
MFT believes in a 20 snipers scenario. If true 18 were totally
incompetent.
Now wait a damn minute! You are stipulating that 2 snipers did
not miss?
I'm stipulating only one sniper fired at the Limousine from the 6th
floor of the TSBD.
Post by Anthony Marsh
What are their names and where were they shooting from?
His name was Lee Harvey Oswald and he was shooting from a
6th floor window in front of a sniper's nest he arranged with
malice of forethought.
Post by Anthony Marsh
Don't pretend that you know the name of the CIA officer shooting
from the grassy knoll.
There was no sniper on the grassy knoll and no creepy black dogman
with a rifle in the patio.
Anthony Marsh
2018-07-18 18:55:05 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by claviger
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by claviger
MFT believes in a 20 snipers scenario. If true 18 were totally
incompetent.
Now wait a damn minute! You are stipulating that 2 snipers did
not miss?
I'm stipulating only one sniper fired at the Limousine from the 6th
floor of the TSBD.
20-18=2, not 1.
Post by claviger
Post by Anthony Marsh
What are their names and where were they shooting from?
His name was Lee Harvey Oswald and he was shooting from a
6th floor window in front of a sniper's nest he arranged with
malice of forethought.
Post by Anthony Marsh
Don't pretend that you know the name of the CIA officer shooting
from the grassy knoll.
There was no sniper on the grassy knoll and no creepy black dogman
with a rifle in the patio.
Black Dog Man is what some conspiracy kooks made up to describe the man
in a black suit behind the retaining wall.
They think he is creepy. I don't.
You still can't admit that you worded it incorrectly and ended up with 2
shooters. Why not just call it a TYPO?
mainframetech
2018-07-17 00:48:05 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by claviger
Post by Jason Burke
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Were were all the other snipers located? One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.
Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.
Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.
Where were the other 18 snipers located?
Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?
You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?
I rather expected you to be confused. First shot struck through the
windshield and then into the throat of JFK. Second shot in the upper
back, and third shot struck the front of the head at the forehead/temple
area. When struck from outside, tempered glass will direct the shot
somewhat downward given that the windshield sloped downward, second shot
from the South Knoll was without windshield in the way. A straight shot
into the forehead.
Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.
It's a dumb question. It's not known from the wounds if there were 3
shooters of 2 shooters that caused the 3 shots that struck JFK. The
That's actually technically true, Chris.
But what *is* known is that there was one shooter that caused the three
shots that struck JFK.
Post by mainframetech
throat and forehead shots might have ben the same person, or two people
near each other on the south knoll.
Chris
MFT believes in a 20 snipers scenario. If true 18 were totally
incompetent.
I don't believe in any "snipers" as you well know. Our definitions of
shooters and snipers differ. Snipers to me are trained specialists like
the Marine scout/snipers. Shooters are just that. Not specially trained
for that particular task. To hit the target with shooters, you need many
more of them.

Chris
bigdog
2018-07-17 22:02:01 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Post by Jason Burke
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Were were all the other snipers located? One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.
Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.
Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.
Where were the other 18 snipers located?
Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?
You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?
I rather expected you to be confused. First shot struck through the
windshield and then into the throat of JFK. Second shot in the upper
back, and third shot struck the front of the head at the forehead/temple
area. When struck from outside, tempered glass will direct the shot
somewhat downward given that the windshield sloped downward, second shot
from the South Knoll was without windshield in the way. A straight shot
into the forehead.
Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.
It's a dumb question. It's not known from the wounds if there were 3
shooters of 2 shooters that caused the 3 shots that struck JFK. The
That's actually technically true, Chris.
But what *is* known is that there was one shooter that caused the three
shots that struck JFK.
Post by mainframetech
throat and forehead shots might have ben the same person, or two people
near each other on the south knoll.
Chris
MFT believes in a 20 snipers scenario. If true 18 were totally
incompetent.
I don't believe in any "snipers" as you well know. Our definitions of
shooters and snipers differ. Snipers to me are trained specialists like
the Marine scout/snipers. Shooters are just that. Not specially trained
for that particular task. To hit the target with shooters, you need many
more of them.
I suppose you could be more ridiculous but it is hard to imagine how. You
are proposing a sophisticated plot to assassinate the POTUS and rather
than hire one expert marksman to do the job, "they" seem to have entrusted
the job to a small army of klutzes and on top of that after firing all
that lead into DP "they" thought they could still frame one guy. I suppose
this all makes sense to you.
Jason Burke
2018-07-19 02:05:13 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Post by Jason Burke
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Were were all the other snipers located? One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.
Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.
Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.
Where were the other 18 snipers located?
Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?
You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?
I rather expected you to be confused. First shot struck through the
windshield and then into the throat of JFK. Second shot in the upper
back, and third shot struck the front of the head at the forehead/temple
area. When struck from outside, tempered glass will direct the shot
somewhat downward given that the windshield sloped downward, second shot
from the South Knoll was without windshield in the way. A straight shot
into the forehead.
Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.
It's a dumb question. It's not known from the wounds if there were 3
shooters of 2 shooters that caused the 3 shots that struck JFK. The
That's actually technically true, Chris.
But what *is* known is that there was one shooter that caused the three
shots that struck JFK.
Post by mainframetech
throat and forehead shots might have ben the same person, or two people
near each other on the south knoll.
Chris
MFT believes in a 20 snipers scenario. If true 18 were totally
incompetent.
I don't believe in any "snipers" as you well know. Our definitions of
shooters and snipers differ. Snipers to me are trained specialists like
the Marine scout/snipers. Shooters are just that. Not specially trained
for that particular task. To hit the target with shooters, you need many
more of them.
I suppose you could be more ridiculous but it is hard to imagine how. You
are proposing a sophisticated plot to assassinate the POTUS and rather
than hire one expert marksman to do the job, "they" seem to have entrusted
the job to a small army of klutzes and on top of that after firing all
that lead into DP "they" thought they could still frame one guy. I suppose
this all makes sense to you.
Sadly, it probably does.
mainframetech
2018-07-19 17:54:21 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Post by Jason Burke
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Were were all the other snipers located? One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.
Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.
Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.
Where were the other 18 snipers located?
Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?
You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?
I rather expected you to be confused. First shot struck through the
windshield and then into the throat of JFK. Second shot in the upper
back, and third shot struck the front of the head at the forehead/temple
area. When struck from outside, tempered glass will direct the shot
somewhat downward given that the windshield sloped downward, second shot
from the South Knoll was without windshield in the way. A straight shot
into the forehead.
Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.
It's a dumb question. It's not known from the wounds if there were 3
shooters of 2 shooters that caused the 3 shots that struck JFK. The
That's actually technically true, Chris.
But what *is* known is that there was one shooter that caused the three
shots that struck JFK.
Post by mainframetech
throat and forehead shots might have ben the same person, or two people
near each other on the south knoll.
Chris
MFT believes in a 20 snipers scenario. If true 18 were totally
incompetent.
I don't believe in any "snipers" as you well know. Our definitions of
shooters and snipers differ. Snipers to me are trained specialists like
the Marine scout/snipers. Shooters are just that. Not specially trained
for that particular task. To hit the target with shooters, you need many
more of them.
I suppose you could be more ridiculous but it is hard to imagine how. You
are proposing a sophisticated plot to assassinate the POTUS and rather
than hire one expert marksman to do the job, "they" seem to have entrusted
the job to a small army of klutzes and on top of that after firing all
that lead into DP "they" thought they could still frame one guy. I suppose
this all makes sense to you.
Well you see, you didn't notice, but it worked!

Chris
Jason Burke
2018-07-20 16:04:22 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Post by Jason Burke
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Were were all the other snipers located? One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.
Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.
Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.
Where were the other 18 snipers located?
Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?
You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?
I rather expected you to be confused. First shot struck through the
windshield and then into the throat of JFK. Second shot in the upper
back, and third shot struck the front of the head at the forehead/temple
area. When struck from outside, tempered glass will direct the shot
somewhat downward given that the windshield sloped downward, second shot
from the South Knoll was without windshield in the way. A straight shot
into the forehead.
Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.
It's a dumb question. It's not known from the wounds if there were 3
shooters of 2 shooters that caused the 3 shots that struck JFK. The
That's actually technically true, Chris.
But what *is* known is that there was one shooter that caused the three
shots that struck JFK.
Post by mainframetech
throat and forehead shots might have ben the same person, or two people
near each other on the south knoll.
Chris
MFT believes in a 20 snipers scenario. If true 18 were totally
incompetent.
I don't believe in any "snipers" as you well know. Our definitions of
shooters and snipers differ. Snipers to me are trained specialists like
the Marine scout/snipers. Shooters are just that. Not specially trained
for that particular task. To hit the target with shooters, you need many
more of them.
I suppose you could be more ridiculous but it is hard to imagine how. You
are proposing a sophisticated plot to assassinate the POTUS and rather
than hire one expert marksman to do the job, "they" seem to have entrusted
the job to a small army of klutzes and on top of that after firing all
that lead into DP "they" thought they could still frame one guy. I suppose
this all makes sense to you.
Well you see, you didn't notice, but it worked!
Chris
When you're totally making up cr*p, you can believe anything you want.
Steve M. Galbraith
2018-07-20 16:27:03 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Post by Jason Burke
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Were were all the other snipers located? One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.
Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.
Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.
Where were the other 18 snipers located?
Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?
You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?
I rather expected you to be confused. First shot struck through the
windshield and then into the throat of JFK. Second shot in the upper
back, and third shot struck the front of the head at the forehead/temple
area. When struck from outside, tempered glass will direct the shot
somewhat downward given that the windshield sloped downward, second shot
from the South Knoll was without windshield in the way. A straight shot
into the forehead.
Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.
It's a dumb question. It's not known from the wounds if there were 3
shooters of 2 shooters that caused the 3 shots that struck JFK. The
That's actually technically true, Chris.
But what *is* known is that there was one shooter that caused the three
shots that struck JFK.
Post by mainframetech
throat and forehead shots might have ben the same person, or two people
near each other on the south knoll.
Chris
MFT believes in a 20 snipers scenario. If true 18 were totally
incompetent.
I don't believe in any "snipers" as you well know. Our definitions of
shooters and snipers differ. Snipers to me are trained specialists like
the Marine scout/snipers. Shooters are just that. Not specially trained
for that particular task. To hit the target with shooters, you need many
more of them.
I suppose you could be more ridiculous but it is hard to imagine how. You
are proposing a sophisticated plot to assassinate the POTUS and rather
than hire one expert marksman to do the job, "they" seem to have entrusted
the job to a small army of klutzes and on top of that after firing all
that lead into DP "they" thought they could still frame one guy. I suppose
this all makes sense to you.
Fake films, fake autopsy, fake this and that. CIA, FBI, Justice
Department.

All of these powerful groups engaging in all of this detailed activity.

But they hired some clowns to do the actual shooting. Because, y'know, it
was hard to get quality snipers back then.
Anthony Marsh
2018-07-21 00:11:44 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Steve M. Galbraith
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Post by Jason Burke
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Were were all the other snipers located? One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.
Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.
Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.
Where were the other 18 snipers located?
Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?
You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?
I rather expected you to be confused. First shot struck through the
windshield and then into the throat of JFK. Second shot in the upper
back, and third shot struck the front of the head at the forehead/temple
area. When struck from outside, tempered glass will direct the shot
somewhat downward given that the windshield sloped downward, second shot
from the South Knoll was without windshield in the way. A straight shot
into the forehead.
Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.
It's a dumb question. It's not known from the wounds if there were 3
shooters of 2 shooters that caused the 3 shots that struck JFK. The
That's actually technically true, Chris.
But what *is* known is that there was one shooter that caused the three
shots that struck JFK.
Post by mainframetech
throat and forehead shots might have ben the same person, or two people
near each other on the south knoll.
Chris
MFT believes in a 20 snipers scenario. If true 18 were totally
incompetent.
I don't believe in any "snipers" as you well know. Our definitions of
shooters and snipers differ. Snipers to me are trained specialists like
the Marine scout/snipers. Shooters are just that. Not specially trained
for that particular task. To hit the target with shooters, you need many
more of them.
I suppose you could be more ridiculous but it is hard to imagine how. You
are proposing a sophisticated plot to assassinate the POTUS and rather
than hire one expert marksman to do the job, "they" seem to have entrusted
the job to a small army of klutzes and on top of that after firing all
that lead into DP "they" thought they could still frame one guy. I suppose
this all makes sense to you.
Fake films, fake autopsy, fake this and that. CIA, FBI, Justice
Department.
All of these powerful groups engaging in all of this detailed activity.
But they hired some clowns to do the actual shooting. Because, y'know, it
was hard to get quality snipers back then.
So you are saying it must be a CIA plot, given the high degree of
incompetence, just like the Castro plots. How many attempts, something
like 600 and they never could kill him. Your tax dollars at work.
bigdog
2018-07-21 00:12:08 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Steve M. Galbraith
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Post by Jason Burke
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Were were all the other snipers located? One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.
Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.
Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.
Where were the other 18 snipers located?
Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?
You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?
I rather expected you to be confused. First shot struck through the
windshield and then into the throat of JFK. Second shot in the upper
back, and third shot struck the front of the head at the forehead/temple
area. When struck from outside, tempered glass will direct the shot
somewhat downward given that the windshield sloped downward, second shot
from the South Knoll was without windshield in the way. A straight shot
into the forehead.
Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.
It's a dumb question. It's not known from the wounds if there were 3
shooters of 2 shooters that caused the 3 shots that struck JFK. The
That's actually technically true, Chris.
But what *is* known is that there was one shooter that caused the three
shots that struck JFK.
Post by mainframetech
throat and forehead shots might have ben the same person, or two people
near each other on the south knoll.
Chris
MFT believes in a 20 snipers scenario. If true 18 were totally
incompetent.
I don't believe in any "snipers" as you well know. Our definitions of
shooters and snipers differ. Snipers to me are trained specialists like
the Marine scout/snipers. Shooters are just that. Not specially trained
for that particular task. To hit the target with shooters, you need many
more of them.
I suppose you could be more ridiculous but it is hard to imagine how. You
are proposing a sophisticated plot to assassinate the POTUS and rather
than hire one expert marksman to do the job, "they" seem to have entrusted
the job to a small army of klutzes and on top of that after firing all
that lead into DP "they" thought they could still frame one guy. I suppose
this all makes sense to you.
Fake films, fake autopsy, fake this and that. CIA, FBI, Justice
Department.
All of these powerful groups engaging in all of this detailed activity.
But they hired some clowns to do the actual shooting. Because, y'know, it
was hard to get quality snipers back then.
The best part is Chris thinks they had the Mafia recruit the shooters and
of course they didn't know any good hit men.
Anthony Marsh
2018-07-24 05:14:39 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by bigdog
Post by Steve M. Galbraith
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Post by Jason Burke
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Were were all the other snipers located? One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.
Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.
Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.
Where were the other 18 snipers located?
Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?
You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?
I rather expected you to be confused. First shot struck through the
windshield and then into the throat of JFK. Second shot in the upper
back, and third shot struck the front of the head at the forehead/temple
area. When struck from outside, tempered glass will direct the shot
somewhat downward given that the windshield sloped downward, second shot
from the South Knoll was without windshield in the way. A straight shot
into the forehead.
Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.
It's a dumb question. It's not known from the wounds if there were 3
shooters of 2 shooters that caused the 3 shots that struck JFK. The
That's actually technically true, Chris.
But what *is* known is that there was one shooter that caused the three
shots that struck JFK.
Post by mainframetech
throat and forehead shots might have ben the same person, or two people
near each other on the south knoll.
Chris
MFT believes in a 20 snipers scenario. If true 18 were totally
incompetent.
I don't believe in any "snipers" as you well know. Our definitions of
shooters and snipers differ. Snipers to me are trained specialists like
the Marine scout/snipers. Shooters are just that. Not specially trained
for that particular task. To hit the target with shooters, you need many
more of them.
I suppose you could be more ridiculous but it is hard to imagine how. You
are proposing a sophisticated plot to assassinate the POTUS and rather
than hire one expert marksman to do the job, "they" seem to have entrusted
the job to a small army of klutzes and on top of that after firing all
that lead into DP "they" thought they could still frame one guy. I suppose
this all makes sense to you.
Fake films, fake autopsy, fake this and that. CIA, FBI, Justice
Department.
All of these powerful groups engaging in all of this detailed activity.
But they hired some clowns to do the actual shooting. Because, y'know, it
was hard to get quality snipers back then.
The best part is Chris thinks they had the Mafia recruit the shooters and
of course they didn't know any good hit men.
You are a little confused about how assassinations work. The CIA hires
the Mafia and then the Mafia subcontracts the shooters.
mainframetech
2018-07-23 01:33:22 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Steve M. Galbraith
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Post by Jason Burke
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Were were all the other snipers located? One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.
Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.
Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.
Where were the other 18 snipers located?
Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?
You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?
I rather expected you to be confused. First shot struck through the
windshield and then into the throat of JFK. Second shot in the upper
back, and third shot struck the front of the head at the forehead/temple
area. When struck from outside, tempered glass will direct the shot
somewhat downward given that the windshield sloped downward, second shot
from the South Knoll was without windshield in the way. A straight shot
into the forehead.
Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.
It's a dumb question. It's not known from the wounds if there were 3
shooters of 2 shooters that caused the 3 shots that struck JFK. The
That's actually technically true, Chris.
But what *is* known is that there was one shooter that caused the three
shots that struck JFK.
Post by mainframetech
throat and forehead shots might have ben the same person, or two people
near each other on the south knoll.
Chris
MFT believes in a 20 snipers scenario. If true 18 were totally
incompetent.
I don't believe in any "snipers" as you well know. Our definitions of
shooters and snipers differ. Snipers to me are trained specialists like
the Marine scout/snipers. Shooters are just that. Not specially trained
for that particular task. To hit the target with shooters, you need many
more of them.
I suppose you could be more ridiculous but it is hard to imagine how. You
are proposing a sophisticated plot to assassinate the POTUS and rather
than hire one expert marksman to do the job, "they" seem to have entrusted
the job to a small army of klutzes and on top of that after firing all
that lead into DP "they" thought they could still frame one guy. I suppose
this all makes sense to you.
Fake films, fake autopsy, fake this and that. CIA, FBI, Justice
Department.
All of these powerful groups engaging in all of this detailed activity.
Ridiculous! Nothing of the kind occurred! Individuals from various
groups were part of the planning, but not whole organizations! And a
certain amount of evidence was real and not faked.
Post by Steve M. Galbraith
But they hired some clowns to do the actual shooting. Because, y'know, it
was hard to get quality snipers back then.
The shooters were Mafia connected. In 1963 none of them would have
talked if caught, and they were readily available to the Mafia bosses who
were part o the plot planning. True that expert snipers didn't grow on
trees then either.


You have to think to make guesses in this case.

As to comments about how silly it all was, think back that it worked
for 40% of America.

Chris
bigdog
2018-07-23 13:57:28 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by mainframetech
Post by Steve M. Galbraith
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Post by Jason Burke
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Were were all the other snipers located? One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.
Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.
Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.
Where were the other 18 snipers located?
Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?
You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?
I rather expected you to be confused. First shot struck through the
windshield and then into the throat of JFK. Second shot in the upper
back, and third shot struck the front of the head at the forehead/temple
area. When struck from outside, tempered glass will direct the shot
somewhat downward given that the windshield sloped downward, second shot
from the South Knoll was without windshield in the way. A straight shot
into the forehead.
Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.
It's a dumb question. It's not known from the wounds if there were 3
shooters of 2 shooters that caused the 3 shots that struck JFK. The
That's actually technically true, Chris.
But what *is* known is that there was one shooter that caused the three
shots that struck JFK.
Post by mainframetech
throat and forehead shots might have ben the same person, or two people
near each other on the south knoll.
Chris
MFT believes in a 20 snipers scenario. If true 18 were totally
incompetent.
I don't believe in any "snipers" as you well know. Our definitions of
shooters and snipers differ. Snipers to me are trained specialists like
the Marine scout/snipers. Shooters are just that. Not specially trained
for that particular task. To hit the target with shooters, you need many
more of them.
I suppose you could be more ridiculous but it is hard to imagine how. You
are proposing a sophisticated plot to assassinate the POTUS and rather
than hire one expert marksman to do the job, "they" seem to have entrusted
the job to a small army of klutzes and on top of that after firing all
that lead into DP "they" thought they could still frame one guy. I suppose
this all makes sense to you.
Fake films, fake autopsy, fake this and that. CIA, FBI, Justice
Department.
All of these powerful groups engaging in all of this detailed activity.
Ridiculous! Nothing of the kind occurred! Individuals from various
groups were part of the planning, but not whole organizations! And a
certain amount of evidence was real and not faked.
Why does the real evidence and the faked evidence all point to Oswald?
Post by mainframetech
Post by Steve M. Galbraith
But they hired some clowns to do the actual shooting. Because, y'know, it
was hard to get quality snipers back then.
The shooters were Mafia connected. In 1963 none of them would have
talked if caught, and they were readily available to the Mafia bosses who
were part o the plot planning. True that expert snipers didn't grow on
trees then either.
How do you know the shooters were Mafia connected? Another of your silly
assumptions. Here's where you tell us it was obvious.
Post by mainframetech
You have to think to make guesses in this case.
Apparently you don't have to think much.
Post by mainframetech
As to comments about how silly it all was, think back that it worked
for 40% of America.
The 40% who base their beliefs on evidence and not assumptions.
Anthony Marsh
2018-07-24 05:14:48 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by Steve M. Galbraith
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Post by Jason Burke
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Were were all the other snipers located? One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.
Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.
Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.
Where were the other 18 snipers located?
Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?
You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?
I rather expected you to be confused. First shot struck through the
windshield and then into the throat of JFK. Second shot in the upper
back, and third shot struck the front of the head at the forehead/temple
area. When struck from outside, tempered glass will direct the shot
somewhat downward given that the windshield sloped downward, second shot
from the South Knoll was without windshield in the way. A straight shot
into the forehead.
Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.
It's a dumb question. It's not known from the wounds if there were 3
shooters of 2 shooters that caused the 3 shots that struck JFK. The
That's actually technically true, Chris.
But what *is* known is that there was one shooter that caused the three
shots that struck JFK.
Post by mainframetech
throat and forehead shots might have ben the same person, or two people
near each other on the south knoll.
Chris
MFT believes in a 20 snipers scenario. If true 18 were totally
incompetent.
I don't believe in any "snipers" as you well know. Our definitions of
shooters and snipers differ. Snipers to me are trained specialists like
the Marine scout/snipers. Shooters are just that. Not specially trained
for that particular task. To hit the target with shooters, you need many
more of them.
I suppose you could be more ridiculous but it is hard to imagine how. You
are proposing a sophisticated plot to assassinate the POTUS and rather
than hire one expert marksman to do the job, "they" seem to have entrusted
the job to a small army of klutzes and on top of that after firing all
that lead into DP "they" thought they could still frame one guy. I suppose
this all makes sense to you.
Fake films, fake autopsy, fake this and that. CIA, FBI, Justice
Department.
All of these powerful groups engaging in all of this detailed activity.
Ridiculous! Nothing of the kind occurred! Individuals from various
groups were part of the planning, but not whole organizations! And a
certain amount of evidence was real and not faked.
Why does the real evidence and the faked evidence all point to Oswald?
Post by mainframetech
Post by Steve M. Galbraith
But they hired some clowns to do the actual shooting. Because, y'know, it
was hard to get quality snipers back then.
The shooters were Mafia connected. In 1963 none of them would have
talked if caught, and they were readily available to the Mafia bosses who
were part o the plot planning. True that expert snipers didn't grow on
trees then either.
How do you know the shooters were Mafia connected? Another of your silly
assumptions. Here's where you tell us it was obvious.
Post by mainframetech
You have to think to make guesses in this case.
Apparently you don't have to think much.
Post by mainframetech
As to comments about how silly it all was, think back that it worked
for 40% of America.
The 40% who base their beliefs on evidence and not assumptions.
Is that the 40% who believe in UFOs?
mainframetech
2018-07-25 01:32:54 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by Steve M. Galbraith
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Post by Jason Burke
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Were were all the other snipers located? One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.
Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.
Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.
Where were the other 18 snipers located?
Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?
You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?
I rather expected you to be confused. First shot struck through the
windshield and then into the throat of JFK. Second shot in the upper
back, and third shot struck the front of the head at the forehead/temple
area. When struck from outside, tempered glass will direct the shot
somewhat downward given that the windshield sloped downward, second shot
from the South Knoll was without windshield in the way. A straight shot
into the forehead.
Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.
It's a dumb question. It's not known from the wounds if there were 3
shooters of 2 shooters that caused the 3 shots that struck JFK. The
That's actually technically true, Chris.
But what *is* known is that there was one shooter that caused the three
shots that struck JFK.
Post by mainframetech
throat and forehead shots might have ben the same person, or two people
near each other on the south knoll.
Chris
MFT believes in a 20 snipers scenario. If true 18 were totally
incompetent.
I don't believe in any "snipers" as you well know. Our definitions of
shooters and snipers differ. Snipers to me are trained specialists like
the Marine scout/snipers. Shooters are just that. Not specially trained
for that particular task. To hit the target with shooters, you need many
more of them.
I suppose you could be more ridiculous but it is hard to imagine how. You
are proposing a sophisticated plot to assassinate the POTUS and rather
than hire one expert marksman to do the job, "they" seem to have entrusted
the job to a small army of klutzes and on top of that after firing all
that lead into DP "they" thought they could still frame one guy. I suppose
this all makes sense to you.
Fake films, fake autopsy, fake this and that. CIA, FBI, Justice
Department.
All of these powerful groups engaging in all of this detailed activity.
Ridiculous! Nothing of the kind occurred! Individuals from various
groups were part of the planning, but not whole organizations! And a
certain amount of evidence was real and not faked.
Why does the real evidence and the faked evidence all point to Oswald?
Post by mainframetech
Post by Steve M. Galbraith
But they hired some clowns to do the actual shooting. Because, y'know, it
was hard to get quality snipers back then.
The shooters were Mafia connected. In 1963 none of them would have
talked if caught, and they were readily available to the Mafia bosses who
were part o the plot planning. True that expert snipers didn't grow on
trees then either.
How do you know the shooters were Mafia connected? Another of your silly
assumptions. Here's where you tell us it was obvious.
Post by mainframetech
You have to think to make guesses in this case.
Apparently you don't have to think much.
Post by mainframetech
As to comments about how silly it all was, think back that it worked
for 40% of America.
The 40% who base their beliefs on evidence and not assumptions.
Crap! I've seen your evidence and it's lacking anything useful.

Chris
bigdog
2018-07-26 02:23:33 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by Steve M. Galbraith
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Post by Jason Burke
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Were were all the other snipers located? One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.
Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.
Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.
Where were the other 18 snipers located?
Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?
You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?
I rather expected you to be confused. First shot struck through the
windshield and then into the throat of JFK. Second shot in the upper
back, and third shot struck the front of the head at the forehead/temple
area. When struck from outside, tempered glass will direct the shot
somewhat downward given that the windshield sloped downward, second shot
from the South Knoll was without windshield in the way. A straight shot
into the forehead.
Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.
It's a dumb question. It's not known from the wounds if there were 3
shooters of 2 shooters that caused the 3 shots that struck JFK. The
That's actually technically true, Chris.
But what *is* known is that there was one shooter that caused the three
shots that struck JFK.
Post by mainframetech
throat and forehead shots might have ben the same person, or two people
near each other on the south knoll.
Chris
MFT believes in a 20 snipers scenario. If true 18 were totally
incompetent.
I don't believe in any "snipers" as you well know. Our definitions of
shooters and snipers differ. Snipers to me are trained specialists like
the Marine scout/snipers. Shooters are just that. Not specially trained
for that particular task. To hit the target with shooters, you need many
more of them.
I suppose you could be more ridiculous but it is hard to imagine how. You
are proposing a sophisticated plot to assassinate the POTUS and rather
than hire one expert marksman to do the job, "they" seem to have entrusted
the job to a small army of klutzes and on top of that after firing all
that lead into DP "they" thought they could still frame one guy. I suppose
this all makes sense to you.
Fake films, fake autopsy, fake this and that. CIA, FBI, Justice
Department.
All of these powerful groups engaging in all of this detailed activity.
Ridiculous! Nothing of the kind occurred! Individuals from various
groups were part of the planning, but not whole organizations! And a
certain amount of evidence was real and not faked.
Why does the real evidence and the faked evidence all point to Oswald?
Post by mainframetech
Post by Steve M. Galbraith
But they hired some clowns to do the actual shooting. Because, y'know, it
was hard to get quality snipers back then.
The shooters were Mafia connected. In 1963 none of them would have
talked if caught, and they were readily available to the Mafia bosses who
were part o the plot planning. True that expert snipers didn't grow on
trees then either.
How do you know the shooters were Mafia connected? Another of your silly
assumptions. Here's where you tell us it was obvious.
Post by mainframetech
You have to think to make guesses in this case.
Apparently you don't have to think much.
Post by mainframetech
As to comments about how silly it all was, think back that it worked
for 40% of America.
The 40% who base their beliefs on evidence and not assumptions.
Crap! I've seen your evidence and it's lacking anything useful.
It's certainly not useful to you because you would rather believe things
that run contrary to the evidence.
mainframetech
2018-07-27 00:49:56 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by Steve M. Galbraith
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Post by Jason Burke
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Were were all the other snipers located? One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.
Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.
Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.
Where were the other 18 snipers located?
Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?
You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?
I rather expected you to be confused. First shot struck through the
windshield and then into the throat of JFK. Second shot in the upper
back, and third shot struck the front of the head at the forehead/temple
area. When struck from outside, tempered glass will direct the shot
somewhat downward given that the windshield sloped downward, second shot
from the South Knoll was without windshield in the way. A straight shot
into the forehead.
Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.
It's a dumb question. It's not known from the wounds if there were 3
shooters of 2 shooters that caused the 3 shots that struck JFK. The
That's actually technically true, Chris.
But what *is* known is that there was one shooter that caused the three
shots that struck JFK.
Post by mainframetech
throat and forehead shots might have ben the same person, or two people
near each other on the south knoll.
Chris
MFT believes in a 20 snipers scenario. If true 18 were totally
incompetent.
I don't believe in any "snipers" as you well know. Our definitions of
shooters and snipers differ. Snipers to me are trained specialists like
the Marine scout/snipers. Shooters are just that. Not specially trained
for that particular task. To hit the target with shooters, you need many
more of them.
I suppose you could be more ridiculous but it is hard to imagine how. You
are proposing a sophisticated plot to assassinate the POTUS and rather
than hire one expert marksman to do the job, "they" seem to have entrusted
the job to a small army of klutzes and on top of that after firing all
that lead into DP "they" thought they could still frame one guy. I suppose
this all makes sense to you.
Fake films, fake autopsy, fake this and that. CIA, FBI, Justice
Department.
All of these powerful groups engaging in all of this detailed activity.
Ridiculous! Nothing of the kind occurred! Individuals from various
groups were part of the planning, but not whole organizations! And a
certain amount of evidence was real and not faked.
Why does the real evidence and the faked evidence all point to Oswald?
Post by mainframetech
Post by Steve M. Galbraith
But they hired some clowns to do the actual shooting. Because, y'know, it
was hard to get quality snipers back then.
The shooters were Mafia connected. In 1963 none of them would have
talked if caught, and they were readily available to the Mafia bosses who
were part o the plot planning. True that expert snipers didn't grow on
trees then either.
How do you know the shooters were Mafia connected? Another of your silly
assumptions. Here's where you tell us it was obvious.
Post by mainframetech
You have to think to make guesses in this case.
Apparently you don't have to think much.
Post by mainframetech
As to comments about how silly it all was, think back that it worked
for 40% of America.
The 40% who base their beliefs on evidence and not assumptions.
Crap! I've seen your evidence and it's lacking anything useful.
It's certainly not useful to you because you would rather believe things
that run contrary to the evidence.
Nope, just contrary to your WCR.

Chris
Anthony Marsh
2018-07-28 03:29:21 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by Steve M. Galbraith
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Post by Jason Burke
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Were were all the other snipers located? One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.
Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.
Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.
Where were the other 18 snipers located?
Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?
You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?
I rather expected you to be confused. First shot struck through the
windshield and then into the throat of JFK. Second shot in the upper
back, and third shot struck the front of the head at the forehead/temple
area. When struck from outside, tempered glass will direct the shot
somewhat downward given that the windshield sloped downward, second shot
from the South Knoll was without windshield in the way. A straight shot
into the forehead.
Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.
It's a dumb question. It's not known from the wounds if there were 3
shooters of 2 shooters that caused the 3 shots that struck JFK. The
That's actually technically true, Chris.
But what *is* known is that there was one shooter that caused the three
shots that struck JFK.
Post by mainframetech
throat and forehead shots might have ben the same person, or two people
near each other on the south knoll.
Chris
MFT believes in a 20 snipers scenario. If true 18 were totally
incompetent.
I don't believe in any "snipers" as you well know. Our definitions of
shooters and snipers differ. Snipers to me are trained specialists like
the Marine scout/snipers. Shooters are just that. Not specially trained
for that particular task. To hit the target with shooters, you need many
more of them.
I suppose you could be more ridiculous but it is hard to imagine how. You
are proposing a sophisticated plot to assassinate the POTUS and rather
than hire one expert marksman to do the job, "they" seem to have entrusted
the job to a small army of klutzes and on top of that after firing all
that lead into DP "they" thought they could still frame one guy. I suppose
this all makes sense to you.
Fake films, fake autopsy, fake this and that. CIA, FBI, Justice
Department.
All of these powerful groups engaging in all of this detailed activity.
Ridiculous! Nothing of the kind occurred! Individuals from various
groups were part of the planning, but not whole organizations! And a
certain amount of evidence was real and not faked.
Why does the real evidence and the faked evidence all point to Oswald?
Post by mainframetech
Post by Steve M. Galbraith
But they hired some clowns to do the actual shooting. Because, y'know, it
was hard to get quality snipers back then.
The shooters were Mafia connected. In 1963 none of them would have
talked if caught, and they were readily available to the Mafia bosses who
were part o the plot planning. True that expert snipers didn't grow on
trees then either.
How do you know the shooters were Mafia connected? Another of your silly
assumptions. Here's where you tell us it was obvious.
Post by mainframetech
You have to think to make guesses in this case.
Apparently you don't have to think much.
Post by mainframetech
As to comments about how silly it all was, think back that it worked
for 40% of America.
The 40% who base their beliefs on evidence and not assumptions.
Crap! I've seen your evidence and it's lacking anything useful.
It's certainly not useful to you because you would rather believe things
that run contrary to the evidence.
Why did the fake evidence point to Alfred Dreyfus? Because it was planted.
Anthony Marsh
2018-07-15 21:56:04 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Jason Burke
Post by bigdog
Post by bigdog
Were were all the other snipers located?  One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.
Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.
Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.
Where were the other 18 snipers located?
Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?
      You were given an answer to those questions, but here you
are asking
the same ones over again.  If you weren't going to believe the
truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
    And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets.  Here's something to
chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?
    I rather expected you to be confused.  First shot struck through
the
windshield and then into the throat of JFK.  Second shot in the upper
back, and third shot struck the front of the head at the
forehead/temple
area.  When struck from outside, tempered glass will direct the shot
somewhat downward given that the windshield sloped downward, second shot
from the South Knoll was without windshield in the way.  A straight
shot
into the forehead.
Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.
     It's a dumb question.  It's not known from the wounds if there
were 3
shooters of 2 shooters that caused the 3 shots that struck JFK.  The
That's actually technically true, Chris.
But what *is* known is that there was one shooter that caused the three
shots that struck JFK.
Which 3 wounds? Show me. You say JFK was struck 3 times?
And that's only 3 wounds? All entrances and no exits? I never heard that
theory before. Tell me more.
Post by Jason Burke
throat and forehead shots might have ben the same person, or two people
near each other on the south knoll.
Chris
Anthony Marsh
2018-07-13 14:46:40 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Were were all the other snipers located? One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.
Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.
Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.
Where were the other 18 snipers located?
Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?
You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?
I rather expected you to be confused. First shot struck through the
windshield and then into the throat of JFK. Second shot in the upper
back, and third shot struck the front of the head at the forehead/temple
area. When struck from outside, tempered glass will direct the shot
somewhat downward given that the windshield sloped downward, second shot
You've tested this yourself with your Carcano? Which brand of ammo did
you use?
Post by mainframetech
from the South Knoll was without windshield in the way. A straight shot
into the forehead.
Chris
Ace Kefford
2018-07-12 02:46:18 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Were were all the other snipers located? One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.
Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.
Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.
Where were the other 18 snipers located?
Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?
You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?
Where WEREN'T they?! The buffs would have them shooting at each other!
Actually I recall that was part of the ridiculous Saul theory, where Saul
supposedly was going to shoot Oswald.
mainframetech
2018-07-13 00:57:43 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Ace Kefford
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Were were all the other snipers located? One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.
Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.
Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.
Where were the other 18 snipers located?
Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?
You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?
Where WEREN'T they?! The buffs would have them shooting at each other!
Actually I recall that was part of the ridiculous Saul theory, where Saul
supposedly was going to shoot Oswald.
Well can the LNs get it together and argue about the article put
forward, or are they going to splinter off and blat about anything that
hits them stream of conscious?

Don't let bd's confusion mess up your minds. 3 bullets hit JFK, and
they came from either 2 or 3 shooters.

http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/

Chris
bigdog
2018-07-13 18:36:56 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by mainframetech
Post by Ace Kefford
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Were were all the other snipers located? One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.
Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.
Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.
Where were the other 18 snipers located?
Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?
You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?
Where WEREN'T they?! The buffs would have them shooting at each other!
Actually I recall that was part of the ridiculous Saul theory, where Saul
supposedly was going to shoot Oswald.
Well can the LNs get it together and argue about the article put
forward, or are they going to splinter off and blat about anything that
hits them stream of conscious?
Don't let bd's confusion mess up your minds. 3 bullets hit JFK, and
they came from either 2 or 3 shooters.
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Oh, so now it's 2 or 3 shooters. That tells us you really don't know where
the shots came from. Not that we didn't already know that.
mainframetech
2018-07-17 00:48:31 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by Ace Kefford
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Were were all the other snipers located? One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.
Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.
Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.
Where were the other 18 snipers located?
Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?
You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?
Where WEREN'T they?! The buffs would have them shooting at each other!
Actually I recall that was part of the ridiculous Saul theory, where Saul
supposedly was going to shoot Oswald.
Well can the LNs get it together and argue about the article put
forward, or are they going to splinter off and blat about anything that
hits them stream of conscious?
Don't let bd's confusion mess up your minds. 3 bullets hit JFK, and
they came from either 2 or 3 shooters.
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Oh, so now it's 2 or 3 shooters. That tells us you really don't know where
the shots came from. Not that we didn't already know that.
It always was, but you didn't understand that 3 shooters hitting the
target could be any combination of 1 to 3 shooters.

Chris
Jason Burke
2018-07-17 22:00:16 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by Ace Kefford
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Were were all the other snipers located? One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.
Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.
Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.
Where were the other 18 snipers located?
Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?
You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?
Where WEREN'T they?! The buffs would have them shooting at each other!
Actually I recall that was part of the ridiculous Saul theory, where Saul
supposedly was going to shoot Oswald.
Well can the LNs get it together and argue about the article put
forward, or are they going to splinter off and blat about anything that
hits them stream of conscious?
Don't let bd's confusion mess up your minds. 3 bullets hit JFK, and
they came from either 2 or 3 shooters.
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Oh, so now it's 2 or 3 shooters. That tells us you really don't know where
the shots came from. Not that we didn't already know that.
It always was, but you didn't understand that 3 shooters hitting the
target could be any combination of 1 to 3 shooters.
Chris
I've been watching some Ron White videos lately. Pretty good for a
(redacted)...
bigdog
2018-07-17 22:03:01 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by Ace Kefford
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Were were all the other snipers located? One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.
Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.
Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.
Where were the other 18 snipers located?
Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?
You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?
Where WEREN'T they?! The buffs would have them shooting at each other!
Actually I recall that was part of the ridiculous Saul theory, where Saul
supposedly was going to shoot Oswald.
Well can the LNs get it together and argue about the article put
forward, or are they going to splinter off and blat about anything that
hits them stream of conscious?
Don't let bd's confusion mess up your minds. 3 bullets hit JFK, and
they came from either 2 or 3 shooters.
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Oh, so now it's 2 or 3 shooters. That tells us you really don't know where
the shots came from. Not that we didn't already know that.
It always was, but you didn't understand that 3 shooters hitting the
target could be any combination of 1 to 3 shooters.
One question. ARE YOU FREAKING SERIOUS??? 3 shooters hitting the target
requires 3 different shooters each hitting the target. That is the only
combination that works. If 2 shooters hit the target and one missed, then
you don't have 3 shooters hitting the target.
Anthony Marsh
2018-07-18 22:23:41 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by Ace Kefford
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Were were all the other snipers located? One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.
Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.
Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.
Where were the other 18 snipers located?
Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?
You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?
Where WEREN'T they?! The buffs would have them shooting at each other!
Actually I recall that was part of the ridiculous Saul theory, where Saul
supposedly was going to shoot Oswald.
Well can the LNs get it together and argue about the article put
forward, or are they going to splinter off and blat about anything that
hits them stream of conscious?
Don't let bd's confusion mess up your minds. 3 bullets hit JFK, and
they came from either 2 or 3 shooters.
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Oh, so now it's 2 or 3 shooters. That tells us you really don't know where
the shots came from. Not that we didn't already know that.
It always was, but you didn't understand that 3 shooters hitting the
target could be any combination of 1 to 3 shooters.
One question. ARE YOU FREAKING SERIOUS??? 3 shooters hitting the target
requires 3 different shooters each hitting the target. That is the only
combination that works. If 2 shooters hit the target and one missed, then
you don't have 3 shooters hitting the target.
So you say there were only 2 shooters thus only 2 shots?
Jason Burke
2018-07-19 02:03:53 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by Ace Kefford
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Were were all the other snipers located? One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.
Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.
Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.
Where were the other 18 snipers located?
Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?
You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?
Where WEREN'T they?! The buffs would have them shooting at each other!
Actually I recall that was part of the ridiculous Saul theory, where Saul
supposedly was going to shoot Oswald.
Well can the LNs get it together and argue about the article put
forward, or are they going to splinter off and blat about anything that
hits them stream of conscious?
Don't let bd's confusion mess up your minds. 3 bullets hit JFK, and
they came from either 2 or 3 shooters.
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Oh, so now it's 2 or 3 shooters. That tells us you really don't know where
the shots came from. Not that we didn't already know that.
It always was, but you didn't understand that 3 shooters hitting the
target could be any combination of 1 to 3 shooters.
One question. ARE YOU FREAKING SERIOUS??? 3 shooters hitting the target
requires 3 different shooters each hitting the target. That is the only
combination that works. If 2 shooters hit the target and one missed, then
you don't have 3 shooters hitting the target.
Damn logic.
mainframetech
2018-07-19 17:52:47 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by Ace Kefford
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Were were all the other snipers located? One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.
Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.
Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.
Where were the other 18 snipers located?
Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?
You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?
Where WEREN'T they?! The buffs would have them shooting at each other!
Actually I recall that was part of the ridiculous Saul theory, where Saul
supposedly was going to shoot Oswald.
Well can the LNs get it together and argue about the article put
forward, or are they going to splinter off and blat about anything that
hits them stream of conscious?
Don't let bd's confusion mess up your minds. 3 bullets hit JFK, and
they came from either 2 or 3 shooters.
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Oh, so now it's 2 or 3 shooters. That tells us you really don't know where
the shots came from. Not that we didn't already know that.
It always was, but you didn't understand that 3 shooters hitting the
target could be any combination of 1 to 3 shooters.
One question. ARE YOU FREAKING SERIOUS??? 3 shooters hitting the target
requires 3 different shooters each hitting the target. That is the only
combination that works. If 2 shooters hit the target and one missed, then
you don't have 3 shooters hitting the target.
Well, I'll give you my best guess, just to make you eat your words.
First, a shooter on the South GK fired a round through the limo windshield
into JFK's throat. Then a shooter from the Dal-Tex building fired a rifle
at JFK and hit him in the upper back, and in the meantime the first
shooter had reloaded, or had an automatic rifle and fired it at JFK
hitting him in the forehead/temple area and killing him. So you see, it
can be done. 3 hits 2 shooters. Simple.

Chris
bigdog
2018-07-20 16:20:40 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by Ace Kefford
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Were were all the other snipers located? One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.
Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.
Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.
Where were the other 18 snipers located?
Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?
You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?
Where WEREN'T they?! The buffs would have them shooting at each other!
Actually I recall that was part of the ridiculous Saul theory, where Saul
supposedly was going to shoot Oswald.
Well can the LNs get it together and argue about the article put
forward, or are they going to splinter off and blat about anything that
hits them stream of conscious?
Don't let bd's confusion mess up your minds. 3 bullets hit JFK, and
they came from either 2 or 3 shooters.
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Oh, so now it's 2 or 3 shooters. That tells us you really don't know where
the shots came from. Not that we didn't already know that.
It always was, but you didn't understand that 3 shooters hitting the
target could be any combination of 1 to 3 shooters.
One question. ARE YOU FREAKING SERIOUS??? 3 shooters hitting the target
requires 3 different shooters each hitting the target. That is the only
combination that works. If 2 shooters hit the target and one missed, then
you don't have 3 shooters hitting the target.
Well, I'll give you my best guess, just to make you eat your words.
Oh, this should be good.
Post by mainframetech
First, a shooter on the South GK fired a round through the limo windshield
into JFK's throat. Then a shooter from the Dal-Tex building fired a rifle
at JFK and hit him in the upper back, and in the meantime the first
shooter had reloaded, or had an automatic rifle and fired it at JFK
hitting him in the forehead/temple area and killing him. So you see, it
can be done. 3 hits 2 shooters. Simple.
You said three shooters hit the target. That's only two shooters hitting
the target. One of the two hit him twice.
mainframetech
2018-07-23 01:34:08 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by Ace Kefford
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Were were all the other snipers located? One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.
Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.
Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.
Where were the other 18 snipers located?
Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?
You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?
Where WEREN'T they?! The buffs would have them shooting at each other!
Actually I recall that was part of the ridiculous Saul theory, where Saul
supposedly was going to shoot Oswald.
Well can the LNs get it together and argue about the article put
forward, or are they going to splinter off and blat about anything that
hits them stream of conscious?
Don't let bd's confusion mess up your minds. 3 bullets hit JFK, and
they came from either 2 or 3 shooters.
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Oh, so now it's 2 or 3 shooters. That tells us you really don't know where
the shots came from. Not that we didn't already know that.
It always was, but you didn't understand that 3 shooters hitting the
target could be any combination of 1 to 3 shooters.
One question. ARE YOU FREAKING SERIOUS??? 3 shooters hitting the target
requires 3 different shooters each hitting the target. That is the only
combination that works. If 2 shooters hit the target and one missed, then
you don't have 3 shooters hitting the target.
Well, I'll give you my best guess, just to make you eat your words.
Oh, this should be good.
Post by mainframetech
First, a shooter on the South GK fired a round through the limo windshield
into JFK's throat. Then a shooter from the Dal-Tex building fired a rifle
at JFK and hit him in the upper back, and in the meantime the first
shooter had reloaded, or had an automatic rifle and fired it at JFK
hitting him in the forehead/temple area and killing him. So you see, it
can be done. 3 hits 2 shooters. Simple.
You said three shooters hit the target. That's only two shooters hitting
the target. One of the two hit him twice.
Try using your head for something other than a hammer.

Chris
Jason Burke
2018-07-23 13:54:10 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by Ace Kefford
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Were were all the other snipers located? One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.
Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.
Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.
Where were the other 18 snipers located?
Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?
You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?
Where WEREN'T they?! The buffs would have them shooting at each other!
Actually I recall that was part of the ridiculous Saul theory, where Saul
supposedly was going to shoot Oswald.
Well can the LNs get it together and argue about the article put
forward, or are they going to splinter off and blat about anything that
hits them stream of conscious?
Don't let bd's confusion mess up your minds. 3 bullets hit JFK, and
they came from either 2 or 3 shooters.
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Oh, so now it's 2 or 3 shooters. That tells us you really don't know where
the shots came from. Not that we didn't already know that.
It always was, but you didn't understand that 3 shooters hitting the
target could be any combination of 1 to 3 shooters.
One question. ARE YOU FREAKING SERIOUS??? 3 shooters hitting the target
requires 3 different shooters each hitting the target. That is the only
combination that works. If 2 shooters hit the target and one missed, then
you don't have 3 shooters hitting the target.
Well, I'll give you my best guess, just to make you eat your words.
Oh, this should be good.
Post by mainframetech
First, a shooter on the South GK fired a round through the limo windshield
into JFK's throat. Then a shooter from the Dal-Tex building fired a rifle
at JFK and hit him in the upper back, and in the meantime the first
shooter had reloaded, or had an automatic rifle and fired it at JFK
hitting him in the forehead/temple area and killing him. So you see, it
can be done. 3 hits 2 shooters. Simple.
You said three shooters hit the target. That's only two shooters hitting
the target. One of the two hit him twice.
Try using your head for something other than a hammer.
Chris
Once again...
Are you *honestly* this clueless, Chris?
claviger
2018-07-11 02:06:06 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by mainframetech
Where were all the other snipers located? One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.
Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.
Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.
Where were the other 18 snipers located?
Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?
You were given an answer to those questions, but
here you are asking the same ones over again.
The reason being you refuse to give answers to simple questions.
Post by mainframetech
If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
You support an author who claims 20 snipers were in place to
fire at the motorcade but you make no effort to locate any of
those positions for trajectory analysis.
Post by mainframetech
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Chris
Based on position of the President at the time of the head shot
to make an entrance wound in the forehead and exit wound out
the backside of the head, the sniper would need to be located
on the forward left side of the Limousine. What corroborating
proof do you have of a sniper on the south pergola? The sniper
would need to be in position somewhere close to where Tague
was standing.
mainframetech
2018-07-12 02:39:35 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by claviger
Post by mainframetech
Where were all the other snipers located? One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.
Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.
Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.
Where were the other 18 snipers located?
Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?
You were given an answer to those questions, but
here you are asking the same ones over again.
The reason being you refuse to give answers to simple questions.
Post by mainframetech
If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
You support an author who claims 20 snipers were in place to
fire at the motorcade but you make no effort to locate any of
those positions for trajectory analysis.
I have suggested that the scenario in that book is closer to the truth
than any other versions I've heard from the LNs, who seem to have no clue.
Post by claviger
Post by mainframetech
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Chris
Based on position of the President at the time of the head shot
to make an entrance wound in the forehead and exit wound out
the backside of the head, the sniper would need to be located
on the forward left side of the Limousine. What corroborating
proof do you have of a sniper on the south pergola? The sniper
would need to be in position somewhere close to where Tague
was standing.
Why do you persist in thinking only of a single shooter? There were
multiple bullet strikes in the plaza and they were from multiple weapons.

Tague was standing near the street at the underpass. The shooter was
up on the South knoll. Trajectory information is marked in the article I
linked you to.

Chris
claviger
2018-07-31 14:41:22 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Were were all the other snipers located? One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.
Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.
Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.
Where were the other 18 snipers located?
Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?
You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
I've asked this question numerous times, but never get an answer from you.
The reason being you don't have a clue, but keep repeating this faux fact
as a CT factoid. Not all CTs agree with that nonsense either.
Post by mainframetech
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Chris
I have already chewed on that, pointing out the position and posture of
the President at the time and where the sniper would need to be when the
shot was fired. You had no response to that info.
Anthony Marsh
2018-08-01 16:02:20 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by claviger
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Were were all the other snipers located? One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.
Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.
Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.
Where were the other 18 snipers located?
Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?
You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
I've asked this question numerous times, but never get an answer from you.
The reason being you don't have a clue, but keep repeating this faux fact
as a CT factoid. Not all CTs agree with that nonsense either.
Post by mainframetech
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Chris
I have already chewed on that, pointing out the position and posture of
the President at the time and where the sniper would need to be when the
shot was fired. You had no response to that info.
Can I guess? How about the SS car? There is still one kook who believes
that.
mainframetech
2018-08-02 02:56:53 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by claviger
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Were were all the other snipers located? One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.
Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.
Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.
Where were the other 18 snipers located?
Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?
You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
I've asked this question numerous times, but never get an answer from you.
The reason being you don't have a clue, but keep repeating this faux fact
as a CT factoid. Not all CTs agree with that nonsense either.
Post by mainframetech
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Chris
I have already chewed on that, pointing out the position and posture of
the President at the time and where the sniper would need to be when the
shot was fired. You had no response to that info.
Sorry, I don't remember you saying anything cogent on that. Try me
again. The article included sight lines and positions for the limo and
the South GK.

Chris
claviger
2018-08-02 23:33:31 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Were were all the other snipers located? One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.
Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.
Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.
Where were the other 18 snipers located?
Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?
You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
I've asked this question numerous times, but never get an answer from you.
The reason being you don't have a clue, but keep repeating this faux fact
as a CT factoid. Not all CTs agree with that nonsense either.
Post by mainframetech
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Chris
I have already chewed on that, pointing out the position and posture of
the President at the time and where the sniper would need to be when the
shot was fired. You had no response to that info.
Sorry, I don't remember you saying anything cogent on that. Try me
again. The article included sight lines and positions for the limo and
the South GK.
Chris
Did it include a trajectory analysis connecting to the head wound?
If not, then no proof of a head shot from the South Pergola.
mainframetech
2018-08-04 03:57:44 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by claviger
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Were were all the other snipers located? One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.
Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.
Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.
Where were the other 18 snipers located?
Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?
You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
I've asked this question numerous times, but never get an answer from you.
The reason being you don't have a clue, but keep repeating this faux fact
as a CT factoid. Not all CTs agree with that nonsense either.
Post by mainframetech
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Chris
I have already chewed on that, pointing out the position and posture of
the President at the time and where the sniper would need to be when the
shot was fired. You had no response to that info.
Sorry, I don't remember you saying anything cogent on that. Try me
again. The article included sight lines and positions for the limo and
the South GK.
Chris
Did it include a trajectory analysis connecting to the head wound?
If not, then no proof of a head shot from the South Pergola.
It happens to provide a sight line (image 022), which could be used as
a trajectory line. It does NOT define the shot through the skull though.
It shows the direction JFK was facing when he was hit in the
forehead/temple area.

Chris
bigdog
2018-08-05 03:54:44 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Were were all the other snipers located? One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.
Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.
Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.
Where were the other 18 snipers located?
Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?
You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
I've asked this question numerous times, but never get an answer from you.
The reason being you don't have a clue, but keep repeating this faux fact
as a CT factoid. Not all CTs agree with that nonsense either.
Post by mainframetech
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Chris
I have already chewed on that, pointing out the position and posture of
the President at the time and where the sniper would need to be when the
shot was fired. You had no response to that info.
Sorry, I don't remember you saying anything cogent on that. Try me
again. The article included sight lines and positions for the limo and
the South GK.
Chris
Did it include a trajectory analysis connecting to the head wound?
If not, then no proof of a head shot from the South Pergola.
It happens to provide a sight line (image 022), which could be used as
a trajectory line. It does NOT define the shot through the skull though.
It shows the direction JFK was facing when he was hit in the
forehead/temple area.
It doesn't take anything more than a straight edge to show that if you
move the line in image 022 from the center of the forehead to your
imaginary forehead/temple that the line would not continue out the BOH. Go
ahead and try it. Maybe you already have and see that it doesn't work for
you so you pretend that isn't a problem.
mainframetech
2018-08-06 04:12:08 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Were were all the other snipers located? One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.
Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.
Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.
Where were the other 18 snipers located?
Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?
You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
I've asked this question numerous times, but never get an answer from you.
The reason being you don't have a clue, but keep repeating this faux fact
as a CT factoid. Not all CTs agree with that nonsense either.
Post by mainframetech
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Chris
I have already chewed on that, pointing out the position and posture of
the President at the time and where the sniper would need to be when the
shot was fired. You had no response to that info.
Sorry, I don't remember you saying anything cogent on that. Try me
again. The article included sight lines and positions for the limo and
the South GK.
Chris
Did it include a trajectory analysis connecting to the head wound?
If not, then no proof of a head shot from the South Pergola.
It happens to provide a sight line (image 022), which could be used as
a trajectory line. It does NOT define the shot through the skull though.
It shows the direction JFK was facing when he was hit in the
forehead/temple area.
It doesn't take anything more than a straight edge to show that if you
move the line in image 022 from the center of the forehead to your
imaginary forehead/temple that the line would not continue out the BOH. Go
ahead and try it. Maybe you already have and see that it doesn't work for
you so you pretend that isn't a problem.
WRONG! You need to read the text with image 022. The line is NOT a
bullet path, it's the direction JFK was looking in when the shot was
fired.

Chris
Anthony Marsh
2018-08-06 03:52:10 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by claviger
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Were were all the other snipers located? One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.
Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.
Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.
Where were the other 18 snipers located?
Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?
You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
I've asked this question numerous times, but never get an answer from you.
The reason being you don't have a clue, but keep repeating this faux fact
as a CT factoid. Not all CTs agree with that nonsense either.
Post by mainframetech
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
Chris
I have already chewed on that, pointing out the position and posture of
the President at the time and where the sniper would need to be when the
shot was fired. You had no response to that info.
Sorry, I don't remember you saying anything cogent on that. Try me
again. The article included sight lines and positions for the limo and
the South GK.
Chris
Did it include a trajectory analysis connecting to the head wound?
If not, then no proof of a head shot from the South Pergola.
Ah, there is no proof of a head shot from the South Pegola.
There is no proof of a head shot from the SS car.
s***@aol.com
2018-07-23 13:49:50 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by claviger
Were were all the other snipers located? One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.
Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.
Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.
Where were the other 18 snipers located?
Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?
I can't give you a complete answer, but I can tell you what I know about
the shooters. My late wife was the shooter behind the picket fence. She
had been living in Dallas, and working covertly with some renegade CIA
persons. She had been trained as a commando by the Russians. Her
boyfriend, Fidel Castro sent her to Russia to provide greater training.
This is just about the only way an American can get into Russia for
militrary training. She was in Russia for two years, when she came back
in the Summer of '63. Hanging out in Dallas, she was kicking around
looking for work where she could try out her new skills. She was sent to
see someone at a house on Harlandale St. Dallas. She was told they might
need a marksman. This was the Alpha66 crew that was responsible for the
JFK assassination. After much training and practice, she was given the
job of shooter, behind the picket fence, in Dealey Plaza. The three
shooters acted as a team, directed by the wearing of radio receivers, and
being talked to by a man in the Plaza. This man was considered the Radio
Man. Prior to the big event. The team had practiced and practiced the
operation. My wife's assignment was practiced over and over. She walked
the route of her assignment over and over, with a stop watch, and counted
her steps to get from the parking lot to the spot behind the picket fence.
The timing had to be perfect. At the time of the event, she was waiting
in the parking lot for the right time. Her handlers alerted her when the
time was right. She walked from the parking lot to her position behind
the picket fence. A rifle had been hidden under a piece of butcher paper.
A man had been standing over the gun minutes prior to her time to take aim
and shoot. He walked away and left the rifle ready for her. The gun was
loaded with a round in the chamberl, safefy off. All she had to do was
pick up the rifle, aim, and shoot. As she walked to the fence, her
assignment was told to her through the radio receiver.
"Ready...Aim...Shoot!" She set the rifle down and walked back to the
parking lot where a cream-colored Rambler Stationwagon drove slowing
through the parking lot and pulled up behind her. She got in the car and
drove away. The Rambler drove her to Redbird Airport where she go onto a
small single plane and flew out of town. Two weeks later she was in
VietNam on another assignment.
Anthony Marsh
2018-07-24 05:15:23 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by s***@aol.com
Post by claviger
Were were all the other snipers located? One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.
Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.
Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.
Where were the other 18 snipers located?
Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?
I can't give you a complete answer, but I can tell you what I know about
the shooters. My late wife was the shooter behind the picket fence. She
had been living in Dallas, and working covertly with some renegade CIA
persons. She had been trained as a commando by the Russians. Her
boyfriend, Fidel Castro sent her to Russia to provide greater training.
This is just about the only way an American can get into Russia for
militrary training. She was in Russia for two years, when she came back
in the Summer of '63. Hanging out in Dallas, she was kicking around
looking for work where she could try out her new skills. She was sent to
see someone at a house on Harlandale St. Dallas. She was told they might
need a marksman. This was the Alpha66 crew that was responsible for the
JFK assassination. After much training and practice, she was given the
job of shooter, behind the picket fence, in Dealey Plaza. The three
shooters acted as a team, directed by the wearing of radio receivers, and
being talked to by a man in the Plaza. This man was considered the Radio
Man. Prior to the big event. The team had practiced and practiced the
operation. My wife's assignment was practiced over and over. She walked
the route of her assignment over and over, with a stop watch, and counted
her steps to get from the parking lot to the spot behind the picket fence.
The timing had to be perfect. At the time of the event, she was waiting
in the parking lot for the right time. Her handlers alerted her when the
time was right. She walked from the parking lot to her position behind
the picket fence. A rifle had been hidden under a piece of butcher paper.
A man had been standing over the gun minutes prior to her time to take aim
and shoot. He walked away and left the rifle ready for her. The gun was
loaded with a round in the chamberl, safefy off. All she had to do was
pick up the rifle, aim, and shoot. As she walked to the fence, her
assignment was told to her through the radio receiver.
"Ready...Aim...Shoot!" She set the rifle down and walked back to the
parking lot where a cream-colored Rambler Stationwagon drove slowing
through the parking lot and pulled up behind her. She got in the car and
drove away. The Rambler drove her to Redbird Airport where she go onto a
small single plane and flew out of town. Two weeks later she was in
VietNam on another assignment.
HOAX

I can't believe there were 65 other senjas.
Don't be an aol.
bigdog
2018-07-24 05:16:54 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by s***@aol.com
Post by claviger
Were were all the other snipers located? One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.
Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.
Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.
Where were the other 18 snipers located?
Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?
I can't give you a complete answer, but I can tell you what I know about
the shooters. My late wife was the shooter behind the picket fence. She
had been living in Dallas, and working covertly with some renegade CIA
persons. She had been trained as a commando by the Russians. Her
boyfriend, Fidel Castro sent her to Russia to provide greater training.
This is just about the only way an American can get into Russia for
militrary training. She was in Russia for two years, when she came back
in the Summer of '63. Hanging out in Dallas, she was kicking around
looking for work where she could try out her new skills. She was sent to
see someone at a house on Harlandale St. Dallas. She was told they might
need a marksman. This was the Alpha66 crew that was responsible for the
JFK assassination. After much training and practice, she was given the
job of shooter, behind the picket fence, in Dealey Plaza. The three
shooters acted as a team, directed by the wearing of radio receivers, and
being talked to by a man in the Plaza. This man was considered the Radio
Man. Prior to the big event. The team had practiced and practiced the
operation. My wife's assignment was practiced over and over. She walked
the route of her assignment over and over, with a stop watch, and counted
her steps to get from the parking lot to the spot behind the picket fence.
The timing had to be perfect. At the time of the event, she was waiting
in the parking lot for the right time. Her handlers alerted her when the
time was right. She walked from the parking lot to her position behind
the picket fence. A rifle had been hidden under a piece of butcher paper.
A man had been standing over the gun minutes prior to her time to take aim
and shoot. He walked away and left the rifle ready for her. The gun was
loaded with a round in the chamberl, safefy off. All she had to do was
pick up the rifle, aim, and shoot. As she walked to the fence, her
assignment was told to her through the radio receiver.
"Ready...Aim...Shoot!" She set the rifle down and walked back to the
parking lot where a cream-colored Rambler Stationwagon drove slowing
through the parking lot and pulled up behind her. She got in the car and
drove away. The Rambler drove her to Redbird Airport where she go onto a
small single plane and flew out of town. Two weeks later she was in
VietNam on another assignment.
I predict somebody is actually going to take this story seriously.
Jason Burke
2018-07-24 05:28:15 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by s***@aol.com
Post by claviger
Were were all the other snipers located? One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.
Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.
Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.
Where were the other 18 snipers located?
Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?
I can't give you a complete answer, but I can tell you what I know about
the shooters. My late wife was the shooter behind the picket fence. She
had been living in Dallas, and working covertly with some renegade CIA
persons. She had been trained as a commando by the Russians. Her
boyfriend, Fidel Castro sent her to Russia to provide greater training.
This is just about the only way an American can get into Russia for
militrary training. She was in Russia for two years, when she came back
in the Summer of '63. Hanging out in Dallas, she was kicking around
looking for work where she could try out her new skills. She was sent to
see someone at a house on Harlandale St. Dallas. She was told they might
need a marksman. This was the Alpha66 crew that was responsible for the
JFK assassination. After much training and practice, she was given the
job of shooter, behind the picket fence, in Dealey Plaza. The three
shooters acted as a team, directed by the wearing of radio receivers, and
being talked to by a man in the Plaza. This man was considered the Radio
Man. Prior to the big event. The team had practiced and practiced the
operation. My wife's assignment was practiced over and over. She walked
the route of her assignment over and over, with a stop watch, and counted
her steps to get from the parking lot to the spot behind the picket fence.
The timing had to be perfect. At the time of the event, she was waiting
in the parking lot for the right time. Her handlers alerted her when the
time was right. She walked from the parking lot to her position behind
the picket fence. A rifle had been hidden under a piece of butcher paper.
A man had been standing over the gun minutes prior to her time to take aim
and shoot. He walked away and left the rifle ready for her. The gun was
loaded with a round in the chamberl, safefy off. All she had to do was
pick up the rifle, aim, and shoot. As she walked to the fence, her
assignment was told to her through the radio receiver.
"Ready...Aim...Shoot!" She set the rifle down and walked back to the
parking lot where a cream-colored Rambler Stationwagon drove slowing
through the parking lot and pulled up behind her. She got in the car and
drove away. The Rambler drove her to Redbird Airport where she go onto a
small single plane and flew out of town. Two weeks later she was in
VietNam on another assignment.
Thank you for clearing that up and solving the case.
Your late wife sounds like a lovely lady.
Sorry for your loss.
Loading...