Discussion:
Here is the Problem for CTs
(too old to reply)
claviger
2018-07-13 14:47:38 UTC
Permalink
Two shots from behind the Limousine make perfect sense.
This explanation fits the examination by pathology doctors
at the autopsy.

Shots from the wooden fence or anywhere else around the
Plaza make no sense and have no scientific support.

It's that simple. CTs are on a rampage to contradict science
and logic. Their explanations are devoid of factual evidence.
donald willis
2018-07-14 03:45:11 UTC
Permalink
Post by claviger
Two shots from behind the Limousine make perfect sense.
Are we now, then, back to the original number? Or maybe c. is implying
that the third shot didn't make perfect sense.... ???
Post by claviger
This explanation fits the examination by pathology doctors
at the autopsy.
Shots from the wooden fence or anywhere else around the
Plaza make no sense and have no scientific support.
It's that simple. CTs are on a rampage to contradict science
and logic. Their explanations are devoid of factual evidence.
Anthony Marsh
2018-07-14 23:47:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by donald willis
Post by claviger
Two shots from behind the Limousine make perfect sense.
Are we now, then, back to the original number? Or maybe c. is implying
that the third shot didn't make perfect sense.... ???
Who originally said only two shots? I forget his name.
Why don't you be generous and say he made a typo.
Maybe he hit the 2 instead of the 3? Ya, that would work.
OOPs, he actually spelled it out.
Maybe he's secretly signalling us that he's changing sides and now
believes in a shot from the front, just not any of the locations we've
pointed out.
Post by donald willis
Post by claviger
This explanation fits the examination by pathology doctors
at the autopsy.
Shots from the wooden fence or anywhere else around the
Plaza make no sense and have no scientific support.
It's that simple. CTs are on a rampage to contradict science
and logic. Their explanations are devoid of factual evidence.
donald willis
2018-07-15 23:35:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by claviger
Two shots from behind the Limousine make perfect sense.
Are we now, then, back to the original number? Or maybe c. is implying
that the third shot didn't make perfect sense.... ???
Who originally said only two shots? I forget his name.
Why don't you be generous and say he made a typo.
Maybe he hit the 2 instead of the 3? Ya, that would work.
OOPs, he actually spelled it out.
Maybe he's secretly signalling us that he's changing sides and now
believes in a shot from the front, just not any of the locations we've
pointed out.
Not bloody likely!
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by claviger
This explanation fits the examination by pathology doctors
at the autopsy.
Shots from the wooden fence or anywhere else around the
Plaza make no sense and have no scientific support.
It's that simple. CTs are on a rampage to contradict science
and logic. Their explanations are devoid of factual evidence.
Anthony Marsh
2018-07-17 21:11:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by claviger
Two shots from behind the Limousine make perfect sense.
Are we now, then, back to the original number? Or maybe c. is implying
that the third shot didn't make perfect sense.... ???
Who originally said only two shots? I forget his name.
Why don't you be generous and say he made a typo.
Maybe he hit the 2 instead of the 3? Ya, that would work.
OOPs, he actually spelled it out.
Maybe he's secretly signalling us that he's changing sides and now
believes in a shot from the front, just not any of the locations we've
pointed out.
Not bloody likely!
You have to do the decent thing and give these guys a way out. You can't
just call them liars thousands of times each day. Sometimes they make
mistakes or are just incompetent.
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by claviger
This explanation fits the examination by pathology doctors
at the autopsy.
Shots from the wooden fence or anywhere else around the
Plaza make no sense and have no scientific support.
It's that simple. CTs are on a rampage to contradict science
and logic. Their explanations are devoid of factual evidence.
Anthony Marsh
2018-07-14 17:07:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by claviger
Two shots from behind the Limousine make perfect sense.
This explanation fits the examination by pathology doctors
at the autopsy.
Yes, there were 2 shots from behind, from the sniper's nest.
But why did you forget the THIRD shot from the sniper's nest? Because
you think the third shot came from the SS car? What about the three
empty shells found on the 6th floor?
Post by claviger
Shots from the wooden fence or anywhere else around the
Plaza make no sense and have no scientific support.
You know that's not true. Don't even mention the word SCIENCE when you
don't believe in it. The acoustics evidence is SCIENCE and you can't
refute it. It proves your 3 shots from behind and also proves a shot
from the grassy knoll.
Post by claviger
It's that simple. CTs are on a rampage to contradict science
and logic. Their explanations are devoid of factual evidence.
You are devoid of reason. AR-15?
That's crazy.
mainframetech
2018-07-17 17:03:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by claviger
Two shots from behind the Limousine make perfect sense.
This explanation fits the examination by pathology doctors
at the autopsy.
Shots from the wooden fence or anywhere else around the
Plaza make no sense and have no scientific support.
It's that simple. CTs are on a rampage to contradict science
and logic. Their explanations are devoid of factual evidence.
Sounds like a lot of opinions. Which aren't science.

Chris
bigdog
2018-07-18 04:52:32 UTC
Permalink
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Two shots from behind the Limousine make perfect sense.
This explanation fits the examination by pathology doctors
at the autopsy.
Shots from the wooden fence or anywhere else around the
Plaza make no sense and have no scientific support.
It's that simple. CTs are on a rampage to contradict science
and logic. Their explanations are devoid of factual evidence.
Sounds like a lot of opinions. Which aren't science.
When did you start caring about science?
Anthony Marsh
2018-07-19 21:46:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Two shots from behind the Limousine make perfect sense.
This explanation fits the examination by pathology doctors
at the autopsy.
Shots from the wooden fence or anywhere else around the
Plaza make no sense and have no scientific support.
It's that simple. CTs are on a rampage to contradict science
and logic. Their explanations are devoid of factual evidence.
Sounds like a lot of opinions. Which aren't science.
When did you start caring about science?
1947. My father was a scientist.
claviger
2018-07-18 00:16:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by claviger
Two shots from behind the Limousine make perfect sense.
This explanation fits the examination by pathology doctors
at the autopsy.
Shots from the wooden fence or anywhere else around the
Plaza make no sense and have no scientific support.
It's that simple. CTs are on a rampage to contradict science
and logic. Their explanations are devoid of factual evidence.
CT WAGs are self defeating. A firing squad of 20 snipers sneak into Dealey
Plaza to blast away at the motorcade but the only sniper to hit the target
is the poor little pathetic patsy. After this incredibly incompetent
performance they vanish from sight and skulk away. So they were very good
at coming in and going out but not so good with rifles. Without a doubt
the most ridiculous theory yet by the CT guessologistz.
bigdog
2018-07-18 22:20:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by claviger
Post by claviger
Two shots from behind the Limousine make perfect sense.
This explanation fits the examination by pathology doctors
at the autopsy.
Shots from the wooden fence or anywhere else around the
Plaza make no sense and have no scientific support.
It's that simple. CTs are on a rampage to contradict science
and logic. Their explanations are devoid of factual evidence.
CT WAGs are self defeating. A firing squad of 20 snipers sneak into Dealey
Plaza to blast away at the motorcade but the only sniper to hit the target
is the poor little pathetic patsy. After this incredibly incompetent
performance they vanish from sight and skulk away. So they were very good
at coming in and going out but not so good with rifles. Without a doubt
the most ridiculous theory yet by the CT guessologistz.
The conspiracy theories are getting so wacky that they are becoming
parodies of themselves.
claviger
2018-07-19 18:13:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by bigdog
Post by claviger
Post by claviger
Two shots from behind the Limousine make perfect sense.
This explanation fits the examination by pathology doctors
at the autopsy.
Shots from the wooden fence or anywhere else around the
Plaza make no sense and have no scientific support.
It's that simple. CTs are on a rampage to contradict science
and logic. Their explanations are devoid of factual evidence.
CT WAGs are self defeating. A firing squad of 20 snipers sneak into Dealey
Plaza to blast away at the motorcade but the only sniper to hit the target
is the poor little pathetic patsy. After this incredibly incompetent
performance they vanish from sight and skulk away. So they were very good
at coming in and going out but not so good with rifles. Without a doubt
the most ridiculous theory yet by the CT guessologistz.
The conspiracy theories are getting so wacky that they are becoming
parodies of themselves.
Brilliant observation !
Anthony Marsh
2018-07-19 21:46:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by bigdog
Post by claviger
Post by claviger
Two shots from behind the Limousine make perfect sense.
This explanation fits the examination by pathology doctors
at the autopsy.
Shots from the wooden fence or anywhere else around the
Plaza make no sense and have no scientific support.
It's that simple. CTs are on a rampage to contradict science
and logic. Their explanations are devoid of factual evidence.
CT WAGs are self defeating. A firing squad of 20 snipers sneak into Dealey
Plaza to blast away at the motorcade but the only sniper to hit the target
is the poor little pathetic patsy. After this incredibly incompetent
performance they vanish from sight and skulk away. So they were very good
at coming in and going out but not so good with rifles. Without a doubt
the most ridiculous theory yet by the CT guessologistz.
The conspiracy theories are getting so wacky that they are becoming
parodies of themselves.
Hubris is not evidence.
mainframetech
2018-07-21 00:06:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by bigdog
Post by claviger
Post by claviger
Two shots from behind the Limousine make perfect sense.
This explanation fits the examination by pathology doctors
at the autopsy.
Shots from the wooden fence or anywhere else around the
Plaza make no sense and have no scientific support.
It's that simple. CTs are on a rampage to contradict science
and logic. Their explanations are devoid of factual evidence.
CT WAGs are self defeating. A firing squad of 20 snipers sneak into Dealey
Plaza to blast away at the motorcade but the only sniper to hit the target
is the poor little pathetic patsy. After this incredibly incompetent
performance they vanish from sight and skulk away. So they were very good
at coming in and going out but not so good with rifles. Without a doubt
the most ridiculous theory yet by the CT guessologistz.
The conspiracy theories are getting so wacky that they are becoming
parodies of themselves.
Oops! The LNs are feeding each other again! One concocts phony
conspiracy theories, and the other one lambasts them! Team work! The
description of theories has been answered in the post above this one.

Chris
Jason Burke
2018-07-22 01:49:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by claviger
Post by claviger
Two shots from behind the Limousine make perfect sense.
This explanation fits the examination by pathology doctors
at the autopsy.
Shots from the wooden fence or anywhere else around the
Plaza make no sense and have no scientific support.
It's that simple. CTs are on a rampage to contradict science
and logic. Their explanations are devoid of factual evidence.
CT WAGs are self defeating. A firing squad of 20 snipers sneak into Dealey
Plaza to blast away at the motorcade but the only sniper to hit the target
is the poor little pathetic patsy. After this incredibly incompetent
performance they vanish from sight and skulk away. So they were very good
at coming in and going out but not so good with rifles. Without a doubt
the most ridiculous theory yet by the CT guessologistz.
The conspiracy theories are getting so wacky that they are becoming
parodies of themselves.
Oops! The LNs are feeding each other again! One concocts phony
conspiracy theories, and the other one lambasts them! Team work! The
description of theories has been answered in the post above this one.
Chris
I did enjoy a couple of LSD experiences when I was younger. But I
eventually came to realize what I was thinking Just. Wasn't. Reality.
Jason Burke
2018-07-19 02:00:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by claviger
Post by claviger
Two shots from behind the Limousine make perfect sense.
This explanation fits the examination by pathology doctors
at the autopsy.
Shots from the wooden fence or anywhere else around the
Plaza make no sense and have no scientific support.
It's that simple. CTs are on a rampage to contradict science
and logic. Their explanations are devoid of factual evidence.
CT WAGs are self defeating. A firing squad of 20 snipers sneak into Dealey
Plaza to blast away at the motorcade but the only sniper to hit the target
is the poor little pathetic patsy. After this incredibly incompetent
performance they vanish from sight and skulk away. So they were very good
at coming in and going out but not so good with rifles. Without a doubt
the most ridiculous theory yet by the CT guessologistz.
Sadly, it's got some *serious* competition.
Anthony Marsh
2018-07-19 02:02:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by claviger
Post by claviger
Two shots from behind the Limousine make perfect sense.
This explanation fits the examination by pathology doctors
at the autopsy.
Shots from the wooden fence or anywhere else around the
Plaza make no sense and have no scientific support.
It's that simple. CTs are on a rampage to contradict science
and logic. Their explanations are devoid of factual evidence.
CT WAGs are self defeating. A firing squad of 20 snipers sneak into Dealey
Plaza to blast away at the motorcade but the only sniper to hit the target
is the poor little pathetic patsy. After this incredibly incompetent
performance they vanish from sight and skulk away. So they were very good
at coming in and going out but not so good with rifles. Without a doubt
the most ridiculous theory yet by the CT guessologistz.
So now you're reduced to writing straw man arguments to yourself?
Or did you forget which alias to use?
mainframetech
2018-07-21 00:07:48 UTC
Permalink
Post by claviger
Post by claviger
Two shots from behind the Limousine make perfect sense.
This explanation fits the examination by pathology doctors
at the autopsy.
Shots from the wooden fence or anywhere else around the
Plaza make no sense and have no scientific support.
It's that simple. CTs are on a rampage to contradict science
and logic. Their explanations are devoid of factual evidence.
CT WAGs are self defeating. A firing squad of 20 snipers sneak into Dealey
Plaza to blast away at the motorcade but the only sniper to hit the target
is the poor little pathetic patsy. After this incredibly incompetent
performance they vanish from sight and skulk away. So they were very good
at coming in and going out but not so good with rifles. Without a doubt
the most ridiculous theory yet by the CT guessologistz.
Talk about foolish guesses! There were not 20 shooters firing into
Dealey Plaza that day. A typical LN silliness. Probably about 6 would be
the scenario that had the most possibility of being true. As to who hit
the target, there were 3 shots that connected with the target, and they
were the shot to the throat, to the upper back, and to the forehead. No
other strikes, though there were many in the plaza that missed the target.
None of the shots that hit the target were from the TSBD 6th floor.

And of course, like good little shooters, they policed their brass and
took their rifles with them when they left.

Chris
bigdog
2018-07-22 01:46:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Post by claviger
Two shots from behind the Limousine make perfect sense.
This explanation fits the examination by pathology doctors
at the autopsy.
Shots from the wooden fence or anywhere else around the
Plaza make no sense and have no scientific support.
It's that simple. CTs are on a rampage to contradict science
and logic. Their explanations are devoid of factual evidence.
CT WAGs are self defeating. A firing squad of 20 snipers sneak into Dealey
Plaza to blast away at the motorcade but the only sniper to hit the target
is the poor little pathetic patsy. After this incredibly incompetent
performance they vanish from sight and skulk away. So they were very good
at coming in and going out but not so good with rifles. Without a doubt
the most ridiculous theory yet by the CT guessologistz.
Talk about foolish guesses! There were not 20 shooters firing into
Dealey Plaza that day. A typical LN silliness. Probably about 6 would be
the scenario that had the most possibility of being true. As to who hit
the target, there were 3 shots that connected with the target, and they
were the shot to the throat, to the upper back, and to the forehead. No
other strikes, though there were many in the plaza that missed the target.
None of the shots that hit the target were from the TSBD 6th floor.
And of course, like good little shooters, they policed their brass and
took their rifles with them when they left.
They must not have been good little shooters if most of their shots missed
at such close range.
Anthony Marsh
2018-07-25 01:17:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Post by claviger
Two shots from behind the Limousine make perfect sense.
This explanation fits the examination by pathology doctors
at the autopsy.
Shots from the wooden fence or anywhere else around the
Plaza make no sense and have no scientific support.
It's that simple. CTs are on a rampage to contradict science
and logic. Their explanations are devoid of factual evidence.
CT WAGs are self defeating. A firing squad of 20 snipers sneak into Dealey
Plaza to blast away at the motorcade but the only sniper to hit the target
is the poor little pathetic patsy. After this incredibly incompetent
performance they vanish from sight and skulk away. So they were very good
at coming in and going out but not so good with rifles. Without a doubt
the most ridiculous theory yet by the CT guessologistz.
Talk about foolish guesses! There were not 20 shooters firing into
Dealey Plaza that day. A typical LN silliness. Probably about 6 would be
the scenario that had the most possibility of being true. As to who hit
the target, there were 3 shots that connected with the target, and they
were the shot to the throat, to the upper back, and to the forehead. No
other strikes, though there were many in the plaza that missed the target.
None of the shots that hit the target were from the TSBD 6th floor.
And of course, like good little shooters, they policed their brass and
took their rifles with them when they left.
They must not have been good little shooters if most of their shots missed
at such close range.
Oswald missed a seat Walker at 120 feet.
claviger
2018-07-26 13:26:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by bigdog
They must not have been good little shooters if most of their
shots missed at such close range.
Oswald missed a seated Walker at 120 feet.
Barely missed. Walker said the closed window saved his life.
When LHO fired shots from an open window he made 2 hits
on second human target.
Anthony Marsh
2018-07-28 03:41:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by claviger
Post by bigdog
They must not have been good little shooters if most of their
shots missed at such close range.
Oswald missed a seated Walker at 120 feet.
Barely missed. Walker said the closed window saved his life.
When LHO fired shots from an open window he made 2 hits
on second human target.
You seem confused by windows. You are comparing apples and oranges. Oswald
did not shoot from behind a window at Walker.

Whether the window was open or not is immeaterial. His bullet hit the
meeting rails.

How about if you try missuing using the Walker shooting to say that if
they had used the bubbletop on the limo the sniper would have missed
because it would have deflected the bullet?
claviger
2018-07-29 22:28:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by claviger
Post by bigdog
They must not have been good little shooters if most of their
shots missed at such close range.
Oswald missed a seated Walker at 120 feet.
Barely missed. Walker said the closed window saved his life.
When LHO fired shots from an open window he made 2 hits
on second human target.
You seem confused by windows. You are comparing apples and
oranges. Oswald did not shoot from behind a window at Walker.
Good point. He shot at General Walker sitting behind a window.
You have a remarkable innate talent for stating the obvious.
Post by Anthony Marsh
Whether the window was open or not is immeaterial. His bullet hit the
meeting rails.
How about if you try missuing using the Walker shooting to say that if
they had used the bubbletop on the limo the sniper would have missed
because it would have deflected the bullet?
It would have provided enhanced protection to possibly deflect
and destabilize bullets fired at the President.

Jason Burke
2018-07-22 01:48:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Post by claviger
Two shots from behind the Limousine make perfect sense.
This explanation fits the examination by pathology doctors
at the autopsy.
Shots from the wooden fence or anywhere else around the
Plaza make no sense and have no scientific support.
It's that simple. CTs are on a rampage to contradict science
and logic. Their explanations are devoid of factual evidence.
CT WAGs are self defeating. A firing squad of 20 snipers sneak into Dealey
Plaza to blast away at the motorcade but the only sniper to hit the target
is the poor little pathetic patsy. After this incredibly incompetent
performance they vanish from sight and skulk away. So they were very good
at coming in and going out but not so good with rifles. Without a doubt
the most ridiculous theory yet by the CT guessologistz.
Talk about foolish guesses! There were not 20 shooters firing into
Dealey Plaza that day. A typical LN silliness. Probably about 6 would be
Oooh. Only "about" five too high.
But keep going with the fantasy, Chris!
Why rely on evidence when you can just make sh*t up?
Post by mainframetech
the scenario that had the most possibility of being true. As to who hit
the target, there were 3 shots that connected with the target, and they
were the shot to the throat, to the upper back, and to the forehead. No
other strikes, though there were many in the plaza that missed the target.
None of the shots that hit the target were from the TSBD 6th floor.
And of course, like good little shooters, they policed their brass and
took their rifles with them when they left.
Chris
Loading...