James K. Olmstead
2007-04-21 21:07:57 UTC
As almost an annual event a few posts show demands for documentation of a
"False Defector Program".
In the past the program involving Oswald's defection were labeled as part
of a "False Defector Program" with no support what-so-ever beyond the
concerns that Lee's defection some how related to the Power's U-2 problem
and was covered up because of the relationship. Prior research work has
failed many trying to present a conspiratorial view of Oswald's trip to
the USSR. They always looked at the wrong sources for information.
This year Synder's role was added to a series of posts...with still no
documentation that he would be involved.
Let me end the debate once and for all dealing with Synder. The USDS
operational order DCID 4/2, dated 26 June 1959 establishes beyond doubt
Synder's role.
The full title to the program is:
DCID 4/2 THE DEFECTOR PROGRAM ABROAD.....dated 26 June, 1959 and revised 6
May, 1960.
To find DCID 4/2 one had to look "outside" the box, in fact one had to go
to Bogota, Columbia.
The first consideration is that Synder's connection to the CIA in 1959, as
a "asset" is immaterial. The nature of his Embassy employment puts him
directly involved with "Defectors". Each US Embassy had established in
1959 a committee known as a "local Defector Committee". This local
committee was composed of the following:
Security Officer.......note the Chief of Security was arrested outside
train station day Oswald arrived. Administrative Officer CAS Service
Attaches (this includes CIA/FBI/ONI/CID agents assigned cover tasks or
jobs) Counsellor of Embassy (this links the AG's office......see LHO's
return and RFK)
Synder is directly involved and a great deal of his actions concerning
Oswald's defection and return are suspect. His assignment placed him
directly involved in this "local Defector Committee" who he "reported to
is immaterial since all "intelligence reps" were part of this "joint"
operation. The only information NOT shared would be individual counter
intelligence operations in effect conducted by committee members higher
parent organization.....unless there was a general "need to know" basis.
The primary goal of DCID 4/2 deals with esablishing proceedures for
defector's coming over to "our side". It would also handle incidents of
defectors going over to the "dark side". In Oswald's case it can be
established that his "return" would be addressed by this local Defector
Committee. Showing his role during his 1959 actions is much harder, but
it can be seen.
To fully understand the actions of Synder that are suspect, one most
evaluate the proceedures outlined in DCID 4/2. Not one published work on
Oswald deals with DCID 4/2. No WC supporter can counter the
considerations of this established USG program and Oswald's defection.
Did Synder do anything criminal.......IMO no.....but his actions remain
suspect since basic considerations were "not followed" directed and
outlined by DCID 4/2. Cover up of actions also fall within protection
considerations of National Security programs in effect between 1959 and
1980.
DCID 4/2 establishes most of the USDS "foundation" for my research behind
"The Marxist Marine" which deals with Oswald's defection. I consider "The
Marxist Marine" ready for production and will market the material for TV
next year.....no book is planned for release prior to marketing of
program.
jko
"False Defector Program".
In the past the program involving Oswald's defection were labeled as part
of a "False Defector Program" with no support what-so-ever beyond the
concerns that Lee's defection some how related to the Power's U-2 problem
and was covered up because of the relationship. Prior research work has
failed many trying to present a conspiratorial view of Oswald's trip to
the USSR. They always looked at the wrong sources for information.
This year Synder's role was added to a series of posts...with still no
documentation that he would be involved.
Let me end the debate once and for all dealing with Synder. The USDS
operational order DCID 4/2, dated 26 June 1959 establishes beyond doubt
Synder's role.
The full title to the program is:
DCID 4/2 THE DEFECTOR PROGRAM ABROAD.....dated 26 June, 1959 and revised 6
May, 1960.
To find DCID 4/2 one had to look "outside" the box, in fact one had to go
to Bogota, Columbia.
The first consideration is that Synder's connection to the CIA in 1959, as
a "asset" is immaterial. The nature of his Embassy employment puts him
directly involved with "Defectors". Each US Embassy had established in
1959 a committee known as a "local Defector Committee". This local
committee was composed of the following:
Security Officer.......note the Chief of Security was arrested outside
train station day Oswald arrived. Administrative Officer CAS Service
Attaches (this includes CIA/FBI/ONI/CID agents assigned cover tasks or
jobs) Counsellor of Embassy (this links the AG's office......see LHO's
return and RFK)
Synder is directly involved and a great deal of his actions concerning
Oswald's defection and return are suspect. His assignment placed him
directly involved in this "local Defector Committee" who he "reported to
is immaterial since all "intelligence reps" were part of this "joint"
operation. The only information NOT shared would be individual counter
intelligence operations in effect conducted by committee members higher
parent organization.....unless there was a general "need to know" basis.
The primary goal of DCID 4/2 deals with esablishing proceedures for
defector's coming over to "our side". It would also handle incidents of
defectors going over to the "dark side". In Oswald's case it can be
established that his "return" would be addressed by this local Defector
Committee. Showing his role during his 1959 actions is much harder, but
it can be seen.
To fully understand the actions of Synder that are suspect, one most
evaluate the proceedures outlined in DCID 4/2. Not one published work on
Oswald deals with DCID 4/2. No WC supporter can counter the
considerations of this established USG program and Oswald's defection.
Did Synder do anything criminal.......IMO no.....but his actions remain
suspect since basic considerations were "not followed" directed and
outlined by DCID 4/2. Cover up of actions also fall within protection
considerations of National Security programs in effect between 1959 and
1980.
DCID 4/2 establishes most of the USDS "foundation" for my research behind
"The Marxist Marine" which deals with Oswald's defection. I consider "The
Marxist Marine" ready for production and will market the material for TV
next year.....no book is planned for release prior to marketing of
program.
jko