BOZ
2018-05-10 01:04:27 UTC
An assumption is something that you assume to be the case, even without
proof.
For example, the conspiracy zealot assumes that a stranger came into the
TSBD with Oswald's rifle and shot JFK. Without proof. No witness saw a
stranger come in before the assassination. No stranger was seen leaving.
The conspiracy zealot assumes without proof that an assassin was firing
from the grassy knoll. No credible witness saw an assassin there. No
rifle was found. No shells were found. He has no proof. He says never rely
on witnesses yet he relies on earwitnesses to argue that Frank Bender was
firing from the knoll. No proof. Just an assumption.
proof.
For example, the conspiracy zealot assumes that a stranger came into the
TSBD with Oswald's rifle and shot JFK. Without proof. No witness saw a
stranger come in before the assassination. No stranger was seen leaving.
The conspiracy zealot assumes without proof that an assassin was firing
from the grassy knoll. No credible witness saw an assassin there. No
rifle was found. No shells were found. He has no proof. He says never rely
on witnesses yet he relies on earwitnesses to argue that Frank Bender was
firing from the knoll. No proof. Just an assumption.