Discussion:
Everything you know about the sixth floor of the depository is a
Add Reply
donald willis
2017-07-30 21:55:41 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
6) Everything you know about the sixth floor of the depository is a
lie--the Henslee legacy

Like the Henslee transcription, it was the Dillards which were used by the
Commission, at the hearings. Were the Dillards, like the Henslee, pieces
of evidence crafted especially for the Commission? Were the Powell and
the Moorman withheld to avoid "confusion"? Brennan and the "second
window" witness suggest, Yes and Yes, though the Dillards aren't as
readily dismissed as the Henslee. If there was, in fact, nothing to be
dismissed in the photos, or about the photos, the DPD's Whitewash
Transcription Service still succeeds in casting a pall over just about
every other related piece of evidence.

The revealed work of Sgt. Henslee is like a cynic's guide to the Kennedy
assassination. As evidence, his dishonest transcription is unique here in
that it locates the dishonesty in other forms of evidence--witness,
forensic, possibly even photographic, in Dealey Plaza as well as Oak
Cliff. It's many-tentacled. Check any transcribed transmission where
Bowles had to correct Henslee. Red flags, red flags.... Inescapably, the
unintended legacy of his transcription runs something like this:

Everything you know about the gun and the bullets in Oak Cliff is a lie.
Everything you know about the Tippit witnesses is a lie. Everything you
know about the sixth floor of the depository is a lie. See the
discussions re the 12:37 transmission (part 3), the 1:13 transmission
(part 4), the 1:26 transmission (part 2), and the 1:41 transmission (part
1). What the left hand of the DPD covered up, the right hand uncovered.

dcw
Anthony Marsh
2017-08-01 00:17:48 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by donald willis
6) Everything you know about the sixth floor of the depository is a
lie--the Henslee legacy
Like the Henslee transcription, it was the Dillards which were used by the
Commission, at the hearings. Were the Dillards, like the Henslee, pieces
of evidence crafted especially for the Commission? Were the Powell and
the Moorman withheld to avoid "confusion"? Brennan and the "second
window" witness suggest, Yes and Yes, though the Dillards aren't as
readily dismissed as the Henslee. If there was, in fact, nothing to be
dismissed in the photos, or about the photos, the DPD's Whitewash
Transcription Service still succeeds in casting a pall over just about
every other related piece of evidence.
I don't think any of the DPD transcripts were written only for the WC.
The SS had a need. The FBI had a need. Even before the WC started its
investigation.
Post by donald willis
The revealed work of Sgt. Henslee is like a cynic's guide to the Kennedy
assassination. As evidence, his dishonest transcription is unique here in
that it locates the dishonesty in other forms of evidence--witness,
forensic, possibly even photographic, in Dealey Plaza as well as Oak
Cliff. It's many-tentacled. Check any transcribed transmission where
Bowles had to correct Henslee. Red flags, red flags.... Inescapably, the
Everything you know about the gun and the bullets in Oak Cliff is a lie.
Everything you know about the Tippit witnesses is a lie. Everything you
know about the sixth floor of the depository is a lie. See the
discussions re the 12:37 transmission (part 3), the 1:13 transmission
(part 4), the 1:26 transmission (part 2), and the 1:41 transmission (part
1). What the left hand of the DPD covered up, the right hand uncovered.
dcw
Those are not the only transcripts. If you don't like them, make your own.
donald willis
2017-08-01 18:51:54 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
6) Everything you know about the sixth floor of the depository is a
lie--the Henslee legacy
Like the Henslee transcription, it was the Dillards which were used by the
Commission, at the hearings. Were the Dillards, like the Henslee, pieces
of evidence crafted especially for the Commission? Were the Powell and
the Moorman withheld to avoid "confusion"? Brennan and the "second
window" witness suggest, Yes and Yes, though the Dillards aren't as
readily dismissed as the Henslee. If there was, in fact, nothing to be
dismissed in the photos, or about the photos, the DPD's Whitewash
Transcription Service still succeeds in casting a pall over just about
every other related piece of evidence.
I don't think any of the DPD transcripts were written only for the WC.
Then why was the Henslee transcription used when questioning DPD officers,
then scrapped? Or replaced, by the Bowles.... The Bowles was used only, I
believe, for Curry's questioning, which came much later than stints by
Haygood, Sawyer, Hill, et al.
Post by Anthony Marsh
The SS had a need. The FBI had a need.
Yeah--the FBI did its own transcription later because (a) the Henslee was
so bad, & (b) the Bowles did not attach names to the officer numbers,
although the transcription itself was fine....


Even before the WC started its
Post by Anthony Marsh
investigation.
Post by donald willis
The revealed work of Sgt. Henslee is like a cynic's guide to the Kennedy
assassination. As evidence, his dishonest transcription is unique here in
that it locates the dishonesty in other forms of evidence--witness,
forensic, possibly even photographic, in Dealey Plaza as well as Oak
Cliff. It's many-tentacled. Check any transcribed transmission where
Bowles had to correct Henslee. Red flags, red flags.... Inescapably, the
Everything you know about the gun and the bullets in Oak Cliff is a lie.
Everything you know about the Tippit witnesses is a lie. Everything you
know about the sixth floor of the depository is a lie. See the
discussions re the 12:37 transmission (part 3), the 1:13 transmission
(part 4), the 1:26 transmission (part 2), and the 1:41 transmission (part
1). What the left hand of the DPD covered up, the right hand uncovered.
dcw
Those are not the only transcripts. If you don't like them, make your own.
Actually, I have. But the Bowles is fine, and he made it even better--a
Bowles re-do was printed in "JFK First Day Evidence". And I must admit,
he caught some things I didn't catch....

dcw
Anthony Marsh
2017-08-02 13:45:11 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
6) Everything you know about the sixth floor of the depository is a
lie--the Henslee legacy
Like the Henslee transcription, it was the Dillards which were used by the
Commission, at the hearings. Were the Dillards, like the Henslee, pieces
of evidence crafted especially for the Commission? Were the Powell and
the Moorman withheld to avoid "confusion"? Brennan and the "second
window" witness suggest, Yes and Yes, though the Dillards aren't as
readily dismissed as the Henslee. If there was, in fact, nothing to be
dismissed in the photos, or about the photos, the DPD's Whitewash
Transcription Service still succeeds in casting a pall over just about
every other related piece of evidence.
I don't think any of the DPD transcripts were written only for the WC.
Then why was the Henslee transcription used when questioning DPD officers,
then scrapped? Or replaced, by the Bowles.... The Bowles was used only, I
believe, for Curry's questioning, which came much later than stints by
Haygood, Sawyer, Hill, et al.
Because even the DPD realized that it was defective.
SHow me how the Bowles transcript was used when.
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
The SS had a need. The FBI had a need.
Yeah--the FBI did its own transcription later because (a) the Henslee was
so bad, & (b) the Bowles did not attach names to the officer numbers,
although the transcription itself was fine....
Can't have everything.
Post by donald willis
Even before the WC started its
Post by Anthony Marsh
investigation.
Post by donald willis
The revealed work of Sgt. Henslee is like a cynic's guide to the Kennedy
assassination. As evidence, his dishonest transcription is unique here in
that it locates the dishonesty in other forms of evidence--witness,
forensic, possibly even photographic, in Dealey Plaza as well as Oak
Cliff. It's many-tentacled. Check any transcribed transmission where
Bowles had to correct Henslee. Red flags, red flags.... Inescapably, the
Everything you know about the gun and the bullets in Oak Cliff is a lie.
Everything you know about the Tippit witnesses is a lie. Everything you
know about the sixth floor of the depository is a lie. See the
discussions re the 12:37 transmission (part 3), the 1:13 transmission
(part 4), the 1:26 transmission (part 2), and the 1:41 transmission (part
1). What the left hand of the DPD covered up, the right hand uncovered.
dcw
Those are not the only transcripts. If you don't like them, make your own.
Actually, I have. But the Bowles is fine, and he made it even better--a
Bowles re-do was printed in "JFK First Day Evidence". And I must admit,
he caught some things I didn't catch....
dcw
donald willis
2017-08-03 02:46:42 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
6) Everything you know about the sixth floor of the depository is a
lie--the Henslee legacy
Like the Henslee transcription, it was the Dillards which were used by the
Commission, at the hearings. Were the Dillards, like the Henslee, pieces
of evidence crafted especially for the Commission? Were the Powell and
the Moorman withheld to avoid "confusion"? Brennan and the "second
window" witness suggest, Yes and Yes, though the Dillards aren't as
readily dismissed as the Henslee. If there was, in fact, nothing to be
dismissed in the photos, or about the photos, the DPD's Whitewash
Transcription Service still succeeds in casting a pall over just about
every other related piece of evidence.
I don't think any of the DPD transcripts were written only for the WC.
Then why was the Henslee transcription used when questioning DPD officers,
then scrapped? Or replaced, by the Bowles.... The Bowles was used only, I
believe, for Curry's questioning, which came much later than stints by
Haygood, Sawyer, Hill, et al.
Because even the DPD realized that it was defective.
No. Because it had done its job. Thanks to Henslee's work, Sgt. Hill was
able to get away with saying he did not send the "auto 38" transmission.
(See part I.) And he was able to say that he did not send the earlier "I
have an eyewitness with me" transmission (1:26. See Part II.) He was
able to testify, that is, that he didn't leave the Tippit/Texaco scene
until much later, thus oh no he could not have been on Beckley at 1:26,
which is where he radioed from at 1:26. Because Henslee put other
officers' number on the transmission. Guess he had a radioactive witness.
Or one which would have undermined the official Oak Cliff story....

Meanwhile, in Dealey, Henslee double-covered-up the "second window"
witness. He put Haygood's call number on Hill's transmission. Bowles
restored it to Hill, but of course could do nothing about IDing Hill's
witness.

Henslee also, cleverly, changed "third" to "fifth" on Sawyer's 1:13
message re the "third floor". Guess you didn't now that "fifth" was
always taken as an error for "sixth". Easily dismissed. Not so easily
dismissed: "third floor". Or at least not so easily translated to
"sixth".

Bowles could do nothing to correct the defective *testimony* engendered by
Henslee's mis-translations. Hill's lies, Sawyer's lie, Haygood's lies.
Guess the DPD didn't know their testimony was defective....

dcw
Anthony Marsh
2017-08-04 14:33:13 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
6) Everything you know about the sixth floor of the depository is a
lie--the Henslee legacy
Like the Henslee transcription, it was the Dillards which were used by the
Commission, at the hearings. Were the Dillards, like the Henslee, pieces
of evidence crafted especially for the Commission? Were the Powell and
the Moorman withheld to avoid "confusion"? Brennan and the "second
window" witness suggest, Yes and Yes, though the Dillards aren't as
readily dismissed as the Henslee. If there was, in fact, nothing to be
dismissed in the photos, or about the photos, the DPD's Whitewash
Transcription Service still succeeds in casting a pall over just about
every other related piece of evidence.
I don't think any of the DPD transcripts were written only for the WC.
Then why was the Henslee transcription used when questioning DPD officers,
then scrapped? Or replaced, by the Bowles.... The Bowles was used only, I
believe, for Curry's questioning, which came much later than stints by
Haygood, Sawyer, Hill, et al.
Because even the DPD realized that it was defective.
No. Because it had done its job. Thanks to Henslee's work, Sgt. Hill was
able to get away with saying he did not send the "auto 38" transmission.
The whole cover-up can't be just to protect the reputation of Hill.
Was there a massive cover-up to erase Weitzman's calling the rifle a
Mauser? No, he simply admitted that he made a mistake. And it's an easy
one to make. Stop beating up on him.
Post by donald willis
(See part I.) And he was able to say that he did not send the earlier "I
have an eyewitness with me" transmission (1:26. See Part II.) He was
able to testify, that is, that he didn't leave the Tippit/Texaco scene
until much later, thus oh no he could not have been on Beckley at 1:26,
which is where he radioed from at 1:26. Because Henslee put other
officers' number on the transmission. Guess he had a radioactive witness.
Or one which would have undermined the official Oak Cliff story....
Meanwhile, in Dealey, Henslee double-covered-up the "second window"
witness. He put Haygood's call number on Hill's transmission. Bowles
restored it to Hill, but of course could do nothing about IDing Hill's
witness.
Henslee also, cleverly, changed "third" to "fifth" on Sawyer's 1:13
message re the "third floor". Guess you didn't now that "fifth" was
always taken as an error for "sixth". Easily dismissed. Not so easily
dismissed: "third floor". Or at least not so easily translated to
"sixth".
Bowles could do nothing to correct the defective *testimony* engendered by
Henslee's mis-translations. Hill's lies, Sawyer's lie, Haygood's lies.
Guess the DPD didn't know their testimony was defective....
dcw
donald willis
2017-08-05 03:28:24 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
6) Everything you know about the sixth floor of the depository is a
lie--the Henslee legacy
Like the Henslee transcription, it was the Dillards which were used by the
Commission, at the hearings. Were the Dillards, like the Henslee, pieces
of evidence crafted especially for the Commission? Were the Powell and
the Moorman withheld to avoid "confusion"? Brennan and the "second
window" witness suggest, Yes and Yes, though the Dillards aren't as
readily dismissed as the Henslee. If there was, in fact, nothing to be
dismissed in the photos, or about the photos, the DPD's Whitewash
Transcription Service still succeeds in casting a pall over just about
every other related piece of evidence.
I don't think any of the DPD transcripts were written only for the WC.
Then why was the Henslee transcription used when questioning DPD officers,
then scrapped? Or replaced, by the Bowles.... The Bowles was used only, I
believe, for Curry's questioning, which came much later than stints by
Haygood, Sawyer, Hill, et al.
Because even the DPD realized that it was defective.
No. Because it had done its job. Thanks to Henslee's work, Sgt. Hill was
able to get away with saying he did not send the "auto 38" transmission.
The whole cover-up can't be just to protect the reputation of Hill.
Take off your blinders. His reputation does not seem to be involved at
all, though I know that's a pet theory of yours. The identities of two
witnesses were covered up. Or do you think you can tell me the names of
Hill's 1:26 witness-who-could-ID-Tippit's killer and Patrolman Hill's
12:37 witness who said he saw a shot or two from the "second window" on
the east end of the TSBD? I thought not....

dcw
Anthony Marsh
2017-08-06 12:44:40 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
6) Everything you know about the sixth floor of the depository is a
lie--the Henslee legacy
Like the Henslee transcription, it was the Dillards which were used by the
Commission, at the hearings. Were the Dillards, like the Henslee, pieces
of evidence crafted especially for the Commission? Were the Powell and
the Moorman withheld to avoid "confusion"? Brennan and the "second
window" witness suggest, Yes and Yes, though the Dillards aren't as
readily dismissed as the Henslee. If there was, in fact, nothing to be
dismissed in the photos, or about the photos, the DPD's Whitewash
Transcription Service still succeeds in casting a pall over just about
every other related piece of evidence.
I don't think any of the DPD transcripts were written only for the WC.
Then why was the Henslee transcription used when questioning DPD officers,
then scrapped? Or replaced, by the Bowles.... The Bowles was used only, I
believe, for Curry's questioning, which came much later than stints by
Haygood, Sawyer, Hill, et al.
Because even the DPD realized that it was defective.
No. Because it had done its job. Thanks to Henslee's work, Sgt. Hill was
able to get away with saying he did not send the "auto 38" transmission.
The whole cover-up can't be just to protect the reputation of Hill.
Take off your blinders. His reputation does not seem to be involved at
all, though I know that's a pet theory of yours. The identities of two
Not a theory. A fact. A criticism of YOUR theory. That nothing stupid
ever happens so EVRYTHING must be conspiracy.
Post by donald willis
witnesses were covered up. Or do you think you can tell me the names of
Hill's 1:26 witness-who-could-ID-Tippit's killer and Patrolman Hill's
12:37 witness who said he saw a shot or two from the "second window" on
the east end of the TSBD? I thought not....
Do you have the transcripts?
Upload the section you are talking about.
Stop asking vague questions.

Maybe he meant Markham. Maybe he meant Benevedides. Kinda hard to read
his mind now.
Post by donald willis
dcw
donald willis
2017-08-07 13:59:18 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
6) Everything you know about the sixth floor of the depository is a
lie--the Henslee legacy
Like the Henslee transcription, it was the Dillards which were used by the
Commission, at the hearings. Were the Dillards, like the Henslee, pieces
of evidence crafted especially for the Commission? Were the Powell and
the Moorman withheld to avoid "confusion"? Brennan and the "second
window" witness suggest, Yes and Yes, though the Dillards aren't as
readily dismissed as the Henslee. If there was, in fact, nothing to be
dismissed in the photos, or about the photos, the DPD's Whitewash
Transcription Service still succeeds in casting a pall over just about
every other related piece of evidence.
I don't think any of the DPD transcripts were written only for the WC.
Then why was the Henslee transcription used when questioning DPD officers,
then scrapped? Or replaced, by the Bowles.... The Bowles was used only, I
believe, for Curry's questioning, which came much later than stints by
Haygood, Sawyer, Hill, et al.
Because even the DPD realized that it was defective.
No. Because it had done its job. Thanks to Henslee's work, Sgt. Hill was
able to get away with saying he did not send the "auto 38" transmission.
The whole cover-up can't be just to protect the reputation of Hill.
Take off your blinders. His reputation does not seem to be involved at
all, though I know that's a pet theory of yours. The identities of two
Not a theory. A fact. A criticism of YOUR theory. That nothing stupid
ever happens so EVRYTHING must be conspiracy.
That's YOUR theory of my theory. I never, for instance, said that
Weitzman was a member of the cover-up. And I believe that Fritz DID make
a mistake when he testified that he heard that Baker saw Oswald in the
first-floor domino room, with other diners....

dcw
Anthony Marsh
2017-08-07 22:50:29 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
6) Everything you know about the sixth floor of the depository is a
lie--the Henslee legacy
Like the Henslee transcription, it was the Dillards which were used by the
Commission, at the hearings. Were the Dillards, like the Henslee, pieces
of evidence crafted especially for the Commission? Were the Powell and
the Moorman withheld to avoid "confusion"? Brennan and the "second
window" witness suggest, Yes and Yes, though the Dillards aren't as
readily dismissed as the Henslee. If there was, in fact, nothing to be
dismissed in the photos, or about the photos, the DPD's Whitewash
Transcription Service still succeeds in casting a pall over just about
every other related piece of evidence.
I don't think any of the DPD transcripts were written only for the WC.
Then why was the Henslee transcription used when questioning DPD officers,
then scrapped? Or replaced, by the Bowles.... The Bowles was used only, I
believe, for Curry's questioning, which came much later than stints by
Haygood, Sawyer, Hill, et al.
Because even the DPD realized that it was defective.
No. Because it had done its job. Thanks to Henslee's work, Sgt. Hill was
able to get away with saying he did not send the "auto 38" transmission.
The whole cover-up can't be just to protect the reputation of Hill.
Take off your blinders. His reputation does not seem to be involved at
all, though I know that's a pet theory of yours. The identities of two
Not a theory. A fact. A criticism of YOUR theory. That nothing stupid
ever happens so EVRYTHING must be conspiracy.
That's YOUR theory of my theory. I never, for instance, said that
Weitzman was a member of the cover-up. And I believe that Fritz DID make
Learn English. I did not say that.
I compared the Hill situation to the Weitzman situation. You need to
make Henslee part of the cover-up to turn a simple mistake into
something conspiratorial.
Post by donald willis
a mistake when he testified that he heard that Baker saw Oswald in the
first-floor domino room, with other diners....
Yes, how many times do I have to warn you to never rely on any witness?
Post by donald willis
dcw
donald willis
2017-08-08 20:35:15 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
6) Everything you know about the sixth floor of the depository is a
lie--the Henslee legacy
Like the Henslee transcription, it was the Dillards which were used by the
Commission, at the hearings. Were the Dillards, like the Henslee, pieces
of evidence crafted especially for the Commission? Were the Powell and
the Moorman withheld to avoid "confusion"? Brennan and the "second
window" witness suggest, Yes and Yes, though the Dillards aren't as
readily dismissed as the Henslee. If there was, in fact, nothing to be
dismissed in the photos, or about the photos, the DPD's Whitewash
Transcription Service still succeeds in casting a pall over just about
every other related piece of evidence.
I don't think any of the DPD transcripts were written only for the WC.
Then why was the Henslee transcription used when questioning DPD officers,
then scrapped? Or replaced, by the Bowles.... The Bowles was used only, I
believe, for Curry's questioning, which came much later than stints by
Haygood, Sawyer, Hill, et al.
Because even the DPD realized that it was defective.
No. Because it had done its job. Thanks to Henslee's work, Sgt. Hill was
able to get away with saying he did not send the "auto 38" transmission.
The whole cover-up can't be just to protect the reputation of Hill.
Take off your blinders. His reputation does not seem to be involved at
all, though I know that's a pet theory of yours. The identities of two
Not a theory. A fact. A criticism of YOUR theory. That nothing stupid
ever happens so EVRYTHING must be conspiracy.
That's YOUR theory of my theory. I never, for instance, said that
Weitzman was a member of the cover-up. And I believe that Fritz DID make
Learn English. I did not say that.
I compared the Hill situation to the Weitzman situation.
And I, correctly I think, noted that the situations were not resolved in
nearly the same way....

You need to
Post by Anthony Marsh
make Henslee part of the cover-up to turn a simple mistake into
something conspiratorial.
"a simple mistake" ... "Mistake"? Henslee appended two names and numbers
to a radio transmission which the two had nothing to do with. *Hill*, who
actually sent the 1:26 message, testified that he COULD NOT HAVE SENT it,
that he was nowhere near 12th & Beckley at 1:26, where & when the message
was sent.

Unlearn whatever it is that's clouding your mind to what was going on!

dcw
Anthony Marsh
2017-08-09 16:32:05 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
6) Everything you know about the sixth floor of the depository is a
lie--the Henslee legacy
Like the Henslee transcription, it was the Dillards which were used by the
Commission, at the hearings. Were the Dillards, like the Henslee, pieces
of evidence crafted especially for the Commission? Were the Powell and
the Moorman withheld to avoid "confusion"? Brennan and the "second
window" witness suggest, Yes and Yes, though the Dillards aren't as
readily dismissed as the Henslee. If there was, in fact, nothing to be
dismissed in the photos, or about the photos, the DPD's Whitewash
Transcription Service still succeeds in casting a pall over just about
every other related piece of evidence.
I don't think any of the DPD transcripts were written only for the WC.
Then why was the Henslee transcription used when questioning DPD officers,
then scrapped? Or replaced, by the Bowles.... The Bowles was used only, I
believe, for Curry's questioning, which came much later than stints by
Haygood, Sawyer, Hill, et al.
Because even the DPD realized that it was defective.
No. Because it had done its job. Thanks to Henslee's work, Sgt. Hill was
able to get away with saying he did not send the "auto 38" transmission.
The whole cover-up can't be just to protect the reputation of Hill.
Take off your blinders. His reputation does not seem to be involved at
all, though I know that's a pet theory of yours. The identities of two
Not a theory. A fact. A criticism of YOUR theory. That nothing stupid
ever happens so EVRYTHING must be conspiracy.
That's YOUR theory of my theory. I never, for instance, said that
Weitzman was a member of the cover-up. And I believe that Fritz DID make
Learn English. I did not say that.
I compared the Hill situation to the Weitzman situation.
And I, correctly I think, noted that the situations were not resolved in
nearly the same way....
You need to
Post by Anthony Marsh
make Henslee part of the cover-up to turn a simple mistake into
something conspiratorial.
"a simple mistake" ... "Mistake"? Henslee appended two names and numbers
to a radio transmission which the two had nothing to do with. *Hill*, who
actually sent the 1:26 message, testified that he COULD NOT HAVE SENT it,
that he was nowhere near 12th & Beckley at 1:26, where & when the message
was sent.
So what if he was not right there at the scene of the crime? He could be
radioing in after he left or basing it on what he had heard from someone
else.
Post by donald willis
Unlearn whatever it is that's clouding your mind to what was going on!
dcw
donald willis
2017-08-09 22:40:09 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
6) Everything you know about the sixth floor of the depository is a
lie--the Henslee legacy
Like the Henslee transcription, it was the Dillards which were used by the
Commission, at the hearings. Were the Dillards, like the Henslee, pieces
of evidence crafted especially for the Commission? Were the Powell and
the Moorman withheld to avoid "confusion"? Brennan and the "second
window" witness suggest, Yes and Yes, though the Dillards aren't as
readily dismissed as the Henslee. If there was, in fact, nothing to be
dismissed in the photos, or about the photos, the DPD's Whitewash
Transcription Service still succeeds in casting a pall over just about
every other related piece of evidence.
I don't think any of the DPD transcripts were written only for the WC.
Then why was the Henslee transcription used when questioning DPD officers,
then scrapped? Or replaced, by the Bowles.... The Bowles was used only, I
believe, for Curry's questioning, which came much later than stints by
Haygood, Sawyer, Hill, et al.
Because even the DPD realized that it was defective.
No. Because it had done its job. Thanks to Henslee's work, Sgt. Hill was
able to get away with saying he did not send the "auto 38" transmission.
The whole cover-up can't be just to protect the reputation of Hill.
Take off your blinders. His reputation does not seem to be involved at
all, though I know that's a pet theory of yours. The identities of two
Not a theory. A fact. A criticism of YOUR theory. That nothing stupid
ever happens so EVRYTHING must be conspiracy.
That's YOUR theory of my theory. I never, for instance, said that
Weitzman was a member of the cover-up. And I believe that Fritz DID make
Learn English. I did not say that.
I compared the Hill situation to the Weitzman situation.
And I, correctly I think, noted that the situations were not resolved in
nearly the same way....
You need to
Post by Anthony Marsh
make Henslee part of the cover-up to turn a simple mistake into
something conspiratorial.
"a simple mistake" ... "Mistake"? Henslee appended two names and numbers
to a radio transmission which the two had nothing to do with. *Hill*, who
actually sent the 1:26 message, testified that he COULD NOT HAVE SENT it,
that he was nowhere near 12th & Beckley at 1:26, where & when the message
was sent.
So what if he was not right there at the scene of the crime? He could be
radioing in after he left
That's exactly what happened. Why did he deny it? Why did he move heaven
and earth, or at least 12th & Beckley, to make it sound as if he couldn't
have sent the message? Why was he very (very) reluctant to say WHO his
witness was?

dcw
Anthony Marsh
2017-08-10 13:06:56 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
6) Everything you know about the sixth floor of the depository is a
lie--the Henslee legacy
Like the Henslee transcription, it was the Dillards which were used by the
Commission, at the hearings. Were the Dillards, like the Henslee, pieces
of evidence crafted especially for the Commission? Were the Powell and
the Moorman withheld to avoid "confusion"? Brennan and the "second
window" witness suggest, Yes and Yes, though the Dillards aren't as
readily dismissed as the Henslee. If there was, in fact, nothing to be
dismissed in the photos, or about the photos, the DPD's Whitewash
Transcription Service still succeeds in casting a pall over just about
every other related piece of evidence.
I don't think any of the DPD transcripts were written only for the WC.
Then why was the Henslee transcription used when questioning DPD officers,
then scrapped? Or replaced, by the Bowles.... The Bowles was used only, I
believe, for Curry's questioning, which came much later than stints by
Haygood, Sawyer, Hill, et al.
Because even the DPD realized that it was defective.
No. Because it had done its job. Thanks to Henslee's work, Sgt. Hill was
able to get away with saying he did not send the "auto 38" transmission.
The whole cover-up can't be just to protect the reputation of Hill.
Take off your blinders. His reputation does not seem to be involved at
all, though I know that's a pet theory of yours. The identities of two
Not a theory. A fact. A criticism of YOUR theory. That nothing stupid
ever happens so EVRYTHING must be conspiracy.
That's YOUR theory of my theory. I never, for instance, said that
Weitzman was a member of the cover-up. And I believe that Fritz DID make
Learn English. I did not say that.
I compared the Hill situation to the Weitzman situation.
And I, correctly I think, noted that the situations were not resolved in
nearly the same way....
You need to
Post by Anthony Marsh
make Henslee part of the cover-up to turn a simple mistake into
something conspiratorial.
"a simple mistake" ... "Mistake"? Henslee appended two names and numbers
to a radio transmission which the two had nothing to do with. *Hill*, who
actually sent the 1:26 message, testified that he COULD NOT HAVE SENT it,
that he was nowhere near 12th & Beckley at 1:26, where & when the message
was sent.
So what if he was not right there at the scene of the crime? He could be
radioing in after he left
That's exactly what happened. Why did he deny it? Why did he move heaven
and earth, or at least 12th & Beckley, to make it sound as if he couldn't
have sent the message? Why was he very (very) reluctant to say WHO his
witness was?
Because he couldn't admit his incompetence. It's called CYA.
Post by donald willis
dcw
donald willis
2017-08-10 22:01:48 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
6) Everything you know about the sixth floor of the depository is a
lie--the Henslee legacy
Like the Henslee transcription, it was the Dillards which were used by the
Commission, at the hearings. Were the Dillards, like the Henslee, pieces
of evidence crafted especially for the Commission? Were the Powell and
the Moorman withheld to avoid "confusion"? Brennan and the "second
window" witness suggest, Yes and Yes, though the Dillards aren't as
readily dismissed as the Henslee. If there was, in fact, nothing to be
dismissed in the photos, or about the photos, the DPD's Whitewash
Transcription Service still succeeds in casting a pall over just about
every other related piece of evidence.
I don't think any of the DPD transcripts were written only for the WC.
Then why was the Henslee transcription used when questioning DPD officers,
then scrapped? Or replaced, by the Bowles.... The Bowles was used only, I
believe, for Curry's questioning, which came much later than stints by
Haygood, Sawyer, Hill, et al.
Because even the DPD realized that it was defective.
No. Because it had done its job. Thanks to Henslee's work, Sgt. Hill was
able to get away with saying he did not send the "auto 38" transmission.
The whole cover-up can't be just to protect the reputation of Hill.
Take off your blinders. His reputation does not seem to be involved at
all, though I know that's a pet theory of yours. The identities of two
Not a theory. A fact. A criticism of YOUR theory. That nothing stupid
ever happens so EVRYTHING must be conspiracy.
That's YOUR theory of my theory. I never, for instance, said that
Weitzman was a member of the cover-up. And I believe that Fritz DID make
Learn English. I did not say that.
I compared the Hill situation to the Weitzman situation.
And I, correctly I think, noted that the situations were not resolved in
nearly the same way....
You need to
Post by Anthony Marsh
make Henslee part of the cover-up to turn a simple mistake into
something conspiratorial.
"a simple mistake" ... "Mistake"? Henslee appended two names and numbers
to a radio transmission which the two had nothing to do with. *Hill*, who
actually sent the 1:26 message, testified that he COULD NOT HAVE SENT it,
that he was nowhere near 12th & Beckley at 1:26, where & when the message
was sent.
So what if he was not right there at the scene of the crime? He could be
radioing in after he left
That's exactly what happened. Why did he deny it? Why did he move heaven
and earth, or at least 12th & Beckley, to make it sound as if he couldn't
have sent the message? Why was he very (very) reluctant to say WHO his
witness was?
Because he couldn't admit his incompetence. It's called CYA.
You sound like a broken record--though I guess that analogy (!) will fade
into obscurity.... What "incompetence"? Hill radioed that he had a
witness in his car. That part seems pretty cut and dried....

dcw
Anthony Marsh
2017-08-11 13:58:46 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
6) Everything you know about the sixth floor of the depository is a
lie--the Henslee legacy
Like the Henslee transcription, it was the Dillards which were used by the
Commission, at the hearings. Were the Dillards, like the Henslee, pieces
of evidence crafted especially for the Commission? Were the Powell and
the Moorman withheld to avoid "confusion"? Brennan and the "second
window" witness suggest, Yes and Yes, though the Dillards aren't as
readily dismissed as the Henslee. If there was, in fact, nothing to be
dismissed in the photos, or about the photos, the DPD's Whitewash
Transcription Service still succeeds in casting a pall over just about
every other related piece of evidence.
I don't think any of the DPD transcripts were written only for the WC.
Then why was the Henslee transcription used when questioning DPD officers,
then scrapped? Or replaced, by the Bowles.... The Bowles was used only, I
believe, for Curry's questioning, which came much later than stints by
Haygood, Sawyer, Hill, et al.
Because even the DPD realized that it was defective.
No. Because it had done its job. Thanks to Henslee's work, Sgt. Hill was
able to get away with saying he did not send the "auto 38" transmission.
The whole cover-up can't be just to protect the reputation of Hill.
Take off your blinders. His reputation does not seem to be involved at
all, though I know that's a pet theory of yours. The identities of two
Not a theory. A fact. A criticism of YOUR theory. That nothing stupid
ever happens so EVRYTHING must be conspiracy.
That's YOUR theory of my theory. I never, for instance, said that
Weitzman was a member of the cover-up. And I believe that Fritz DID make
Learn English. I did not say that.
I compared the Hill situation to the Weitzman situation.
And I, correctly I think, noted that the situations were not resolved in
nearly the same way....
You need to
Post by Anthony Marsh
make Henslee part of the cover-up to turn a simple mistake into
something conspiratorial.
"a simple mistake" ... "Mistake"? Henslee appended two names and numbers
to a radio transmission which the two had nothing to do with. *Hill*, who
actually sent the 1:26 message, testified that he COULD NOT HAVE SENT it,
that he was nowhere near 12th & Beckley at 1:26, where & when the message
was sent.
So what if he was not right there at the scene of the crime? He could be
radioing in after he left
That's exactly what happened. Why did he deny it? Why did he move heaven
and earth, or at least 12th & Beckley, to make it sound as if he couldn't
have sent the message? Why was he very (very) reluctant to say WHO his
witness was?
Because he couldn't admit his incompetence. It's called CYA.
You sound like a broken record--though I guess that analogy (!) will fade
into obscurity.... What "incompetence"? Hill radioed that he had a
witness in his car. That part seems pretty cut and dried....
No. The DPD authorities made lots of little mistakes and tried to cover
them up to hide their incompetence. Again, incompetence explains a lot
more than a monumental conspiracy over trivial matters.
Post by donald willis
dcw
donald willis
2017-08-12 00:37:23 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
6) Everything you know about the sixth floor of the depository is a
lie--the Henslee legacy
Like the Henslee transcription, it was the Dillards which were used by the
Commission, at the hearings. Were the Dillards, like the Henslee, pieces
of evidence crafted especially for the Commission? Were the Powell and
the Moorman withheld to avoid "confusion"? Brennan and the "second
window" witness suggest, Yes and Yes, though the Dillards aren't as
readily dismissed as the Henslee. If there was, in fact, nothing to be
dismissed in the photos, or about the photos, the DPD's Whitewash
Transcription Service still succeeds in casting a pall over just about
every other related piece of evidence.
I don't think any of the DPD transcripts were written only for the WC.
Then why was the Henslee transcription used when questioning DPD officers,
then scrapped? Or replaced, by the Bowles.... The Bowles was used only, I
believe, for Curry's questioning, which came much later than stints by
Haygood, Sawyer, Hill, et al.
Because even the DPD realized that it was defective.
No. Because it had done its job. Thanks to Henslee's work, Sgt. Hill was
able to get away with saying he did not send the "auto 38" transmission.
The whole cover-up can't be just to protect the reputation of Hill.
Take off your blinders. His reputation does not seem to be involved at
all, though I know that's a pet theory of yours. The identities of two
Not a theory. A fact. A criticism of YOUR theory. That nothing stupid
ever happens so EVRYTHING must be conspiracy.
That's YOUR theory of my theory. I never, for instance, said that
Weitzman was a member of the cover-up. And I believe that Fritz DID make
Learn English. I did not say that.
I compared the Hill situation to the Weitzman situation.
And I, correctly I think, noted that the situations were not resolved in
nearly the same way....
You need to
Post by Anthony Marsh
make Henslee part of the cover-up to turn a simple mistake into
something conspiratorial.
"a simple mistake" ... "Mistake"? Henslee appended two names and numbers
to a radio transmission which the two had nothing to do with. *Hill*, who
actually sent the 1:26 message, testified that he COULD NOT HAVE SENT it,
that he was nowhere near 12th & Beckley at 1:26, where & when the message
was sent.
So what if he was not right there at the scene of the crime? He could be
radioing in after he left
That's exactly what happened. Why did he deny it? Why did he move heaven
and earth, or at least 12th & Beckley, to make it sound as if he couldn't
have sent the message? Why was he very (very) reluctant to say WHO his
witness was?
Because he couldn't admit his incompetence. It's called CYA.
You sound like a broken record--though I guess that analogy (!) will fade
into obscurity.... What "incompetence"? Hill radioed that he had a
witness in his car. That part seems pretty cut and dried....
No. The DPD authorities made lots of little mistakes and tried to cover
them up to hide their incompetence. Again, incompetence explains a lot
more than a monumental conspiracy over trivial matters.
Post by donald willis
dcw
Again, it hardly explains Hill helping Henslee (or vice versa) cover-up
the ID of a witness. That doesn't fit YOUR pet theory....

dcw
Anthony Marsh
2017-08-13 03:08:51 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
6) Everything you know about the sixth floor of the depository is a
lie--the Henslee legacy
Like the Henslee transcription, it was the Dillards which were used by the
Commission, at the hearings. Were the Dillards, like the Henslee, pieces
of evidence crafted especially for the Commission? Were the Powell and
the Moorman withheld to avoid "confusion"? Brennan and the "second
window" witness suggest, Yes and Yes, though the Dillards aren't as
readily dismissed as the Henslee. If there was, in fact, nothing to be
dismissed in the photos, or about the photos, the DPD's Whitewash
Transcription Service still succeeds in casting a pall over just about
every other related piece of evidence.
I don't think any of the DPD transcripts were written only for the WC.
Then why was the Henslee transcription used when questioning DPD officers,
then scrapped? Or replaced, by the Bowles.... The Bowles was used only, I
believe, for Curry's questioning, which came much later than stints by
Haygood, Sawyer, Hill, et al.
Because even the DPD realized that it was defective.
No. Because it had done its job. Thanks to Henslee's work, Sgt. Hill was
able to get away with saying he did not send the "auto 38" transmission.
The whole cover-up can't be just to protect the reputation of Hill.
Take off your blinders. His reputation does not seem to be involved at
all, though I know that's a pet theory of yours. The identities of two
Not a theory. A fact. A criticism of YOUR theory. That nothing stupid
ever happens so EVRYTHING must be conspiracy.
That's YOUR theory of my theory. I never, for instance, said that
Weitzman was a member of the cover-up. And I believe that Fritz DID make
Learn English. I did not say that.
I compared the Hill situation to the Weitzman situation.
And I, correctly I think, noted that the situations were not resolved in
nearly the same way....
You need to
Post by Anthony Marsh
make Henslee part of the cover-up to turn a simple mistake into
something conspiratorial.
"a simple mistake" ... "Mistake"? Henslee appended two names and numbers
to a radio transmission which the two had nothing to do with. *Hill*, who
actually sent the 1:26 message, testified that he COULD NOT HAVE SENT it,
that he was nowhere near 12th & Beckley at 1:26, where & when the message
was sent.
So what if he was not right there at the scene of the crime? He could be
radioing in after he left
That's exactly what happened. Why did he deny it? Why did he move heaven
and earth, or at least 12th & Beckley, to make it sound as if he couldn't
have sent the message? Why was he very (very) reluctant to say WHO his
witness was?
Because he couldn't admit his incompetence. It's called CYA.
You sound like a broken record--though I guess that analogy (!) will fade
into obscurity.... What "incompetence"? Hill radioed that he had a
witness in his car. That part seems pretty cut and dried....
No. The DPD authorities made lots of little mistakes and tried to cover
them up to hide their incompetence. Again, incompetence explains a lot
more than a monumental conspiracy over trivial matters.
Post by donald willis
dcw
Again, it hardly explains Hill helping Henslee (or vice versa) cover-up
the ID of a witness. That doesn't fit YOUR pet theory....
It does. He screwed up wanted to cover up his mistake. Explain my pet
theory.
Post by donald willis
dcw
donald willis
2017-08-13 22:21:21 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
6) Everything you know about the sixth floor of the depository is a
lie--the Henslee legacy
Like the Henslee transcription, it was the Dillards which were used by the
Commission, at the hearings. Were the Dillards, like the Henslee, pieces
of evidence crafted especially for the Commission? Were the Powell and
the Moorman withheld to avoid "confusion"? Brennan and the "second
window" witness suggest, Yes and Yes, though the Dillards aren't as
readily dismissed as the Henslee. If there was, in fact, nothing to be
dismissed in the photos, or about the photos, the DPD's Whitewash
Transcription Service still succeeds in casting a pall over just about
every other related piece of evidence.
I don't think any of the DPD transcripts were written only for the WC.
Then why was the Henslee transcription used when questioning DPD officers,
then scrapped? Or replaced, by the Bowles.... The Bowles was used only, I
believe, for Curry's questioning, which came much later than stints by
Haygood, Sawyer, Hill, et al.
Because even the DPD realized that it was defective.
No. Because it had done its job. Thanks to Henslee's work, Sgt. Hill was
able to get away with saying he did not send the "auto 38" transmission.
The whole cover-up can't be just to protect the reputation of Hill.
Take off your blinders. His reputation does not seem to be involved at
all, though I know that's a pet theory of yours. The identities of two
Not a theory. A fact. A criticism of YOUR theory. That nothing stupid
ever happens so EVRYTHING must be conspiracy.
That's YOUR theory of my theory. I never, for instance, said that
Weitzman was a member of the cover-up. And I believe that Fritz DID make
Learn English. I did not say that.
I compared the Hill situation to the Weitzman situation.
And I, correctly I think, noted that the situations were not resolved in
nearly the same way....
You need to
Post by Anthony Marsh
make Henslee part of the cover-up to turn a simple mistake into
something conspiratorial.
"a simple mistake" ... "Mistake"? Henslee appended two names and numbers
to a radio transmission which the two had nothing to do with. *Hill*, who
actually sent the 1:26 message, testified that he COULD NOT HAVE SENT it,
that he was nowhere near 12th & Beckley at 1:26, where & when the message
was sent.
So what if he was not right there at the scene of the crime? He could be
radioing in after he left
That's exactly what happened. Why did he deny it? Why did he move heaven
and earth, or at least 12th & Beckley, to make it sound as if he couldn't
have sent the message? Why was he very (very) reluctant to say WHO his
witness was?
Because he couldn't admit his incompetence. It's called CYA.
You sound like a broken record--though I guess that analogy (!) will fade
into obscurity.... What "incompetence"? Hill radioed that he had a
witness in his car. That part seems pretty cut and dried....
No. The DPD authorities made lots of little mistakes and tried to cover
them up to hide their incompetence. Again, incompetence explains a lot
more than a monumental conspiracy over trivial matters.
Post by donald willis
dcw
Again, it hardly explains Hill helping Henslee (or vice versa) cover-up
the ID of a witness. That doesn't fit YOUR pet theory....
It does. He screwed up wanted to cover up his mistake.
Again, just how did Hill "screw up" his 1:26 transmission re a witness who
could ID the perp??? You have information which no one else has???


Explain my pet
Post by Anthony Marsh
theory.
Post by donald willis
dcw
donald willis
2017-08-07 20:17:02 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
6) Everything you know about the sixth floor of the depository is a
lie--the Henslee legacy
Like the Henslee transcription, it was the Dillards which were used by the
Commission, at the hearings. Were the Dillards, like the Henslee, pieces
of evidence crafted especially for the Commission? Were the Powell and
the Moorman withheld to avoid "confusion"? Brennan and the "second
window" witness suggest, Yes and Yes, though the Dillards aren't as
readily dismissed as the Henslee. If there was, in fact, nothing to be
dismissed in the photos, or about the photos, the DPD's Whitewash
Transcription Service still succeeds in casting a pall over just about
every other related piece of evidence.
I don't think any of the DPD transcripts were written only for the WC.
Then why was the Henslee transcription used when questioning DPD officers,
then scrapped? Or replaced, by the Bowles.... The Bowles was used only, I
believe, for Curry's questioning, which came much later than stints by
Haygood, Sawyer, Hill, et al.
Because even the DPD realized that it was defective.
No. Because it had done its job. Thanks to Henslee's work, Sgt. Hill was
able to get away with saying he did not send the "auto 38" transmission.
The whole cover-up can't be just to protect the reputation of Hill.
Take off your blinders. His reputation does not seem to be involved at
all, though I know that's a pet theory of yours. The identities of two
Not a theory. A fact. A criticism of YOUR theory. That nothing stupid
ever happens so EVRYTHING must be conspiracy.
Post by donald willis
witnesses were covered up. Or do you think you can tell me the names of
Hill's 1:26 witness-who-could-ID-Tippit's killer and Patrolman Hill's
12:37 witness who said he saw a shot or two from the "second window" on
the east end of the TSBD? I thought not....
Do you have the transcripts?
Upload the section you are talking about.
It's all in the 2nd & 3rd posts in this series.

"I'm at 12th & Beckley now, have a man in the car that can identify the
suspect if anybody gets him." Sawyer Exhibit A, v21p396, of the volumes.
Henslee the transcriber of this 1:26pm DPD transmission incorrectly notes
Westbrook-Bachelor/550-2 as the sender.

"Get men to cover this building TSBD, believe the shots came from there,
facing it on Elm St. looking at the building it will be the second window
from the end in the upper right hand corner." This 12:37 DPD transmission
is attributed, incorrectly, in Sawyer Exh. A to "Haygood/142".
Post by Anthony Marsh
Stop asking vague questions.
Maybe he meant Markham. Maybe he meant Benevedides. Kinda hard to read
his mind now.
Benavides is an excellent guess. But he testified that he left the Tippit
scene without telling the cops much of anything and without leaving with
them. I used to think that it was Benavides or Scoggins.

As noted in my second post in the series, Hill's witness might be either
Scoggins or Harold Russell. They were the only two witnesses that I know
of who said, at one time or another, that they left the scene to go with
the cops.

dcw
donald willis
2017-08-05 03:28:48 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
6) Everything you know about the sixth floor of the depository is a
lie--the Henslee legacy
Like the Henslee transcription, it was the Dillards which were used by the
Commission, at the hearings. Were the Dillards, like the Henslee, pieces
of evidence crafted especially for the Commission? Were the Powell and
the Moorman withheld to avoid "confusion"? Brennan and the "second
window" witness suggest, Yes and Yes, though the Dillards aren't as
readily dismissed as the Henslee. If there was, in fact, nothing to be
dismissed in the photos, or about the photos, the DPD's Whitewash
Transcription Service still succeeds in casting a pall over just about
every other related piece of evidence.
I don't think any of the DPD transcripts were written only for the WC.
Then why was the Henslee transcription used when questioning DPD officers,
then scrapped? Or replaced, by the Bowles.... The Bowles was used only, I
believe, for Curry's questioning, which came much later than stints by
Haygood, Sawyer, Hill, et al.
Because even the DPD realized that it was defective.
No. Because it had done its job. Thanks to Henslee's work, Sgt. Hill was
able to get away with saying he did not send the "auto 38" transmission.
The whole cover-up can't be just to protect the reputation of Hill.
Was there a massive cover-up to erase Weitzman's calling the rifle a
Mauser? No, he simply admitted that he made a mistake. And it's an easy
one to make. Stop beating up on him.
I don't think I've ever touched Weitzman
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
(See part I.) And he was able to say that he did not send the earlier "I
have an eyewitness with me" transmission (1:26. See Part II.) He was
able to testify, that is, that he didn't leave the Tippit/Texaco scene
until much later, thus oh no he could not have been on Beckley at 1:26,
which is where he radioed from at 1:26. Because Henslee put other
officers' number on the transmission. Guess he had a radioactive witness.
Or one which would have undermined the official Oak Cliff story....
Meanwhile, in Dealey, Henslee double-covered-up the "second window"
witness. He put Haygood's call number on Hill's transmission. Bowles
restored it to Hill, but of course could do nothing about IDing Hill's
witness.
Henslee also, cleverly, changed "third" to "fifth" on Sawyer's 1:13
message re the "third floor". Guess you didn't now that "fifth" was
always taken as an error for "sixth". Easily dismissed. Not so easily
dismissed: "third floor". Or at least not so easily translated to
"sixth".
Bowles could do nothing to correct the defective *testimony* engendered by
Henslee's mis-translations. Hill's lies, Sawyer's lie, Haygood's lies.
Guess the DPD didn't know their testimony was defective....
dcw
Anthony Marsh
2017-08-06 12:43:56 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
6) Everything you know about the sixth floor of the depository is a
lie--the Henslee legacy
Like the Henslee transcription, it was the Dillards which were used by the
Commission, at the hearings. Were the Dillards, like the Henslee, pieces
of evidence crafted especially for the Commission? Were the Powell and
the Moorman withheld to avoid "confusion"? Brennan and the "second
window" witness suggest, Yes and Yes, though the Dillards aren't as
readily dismissed as the Henslee. If there was, in fact, nothing to be
dismissed in the photos, or about the photos, the DPD's Whitewash
Transcription Service still succeeds in casting a pall over just about
every other related piece of evidence.
I don't think any of the DPD transcripts were written only for the WC.
Then why was the Henslee transcription used when questioning DPD officers,
then scrapped? Or replaced, by the Bowles.... The Bowles was used only, I
believe, for Curry's questioning, which came much later than stints by
Haygood, Sawyer, Hill, et al.
Because even the DPD realized that it was defective.
No. Because it had done its job. Thanks to Henslee's work, Sgt. Hill was
able to get away with saying he did not send the "auto 38" transmission.
The whole cover-up can't be just to protect the reputation of Hill.
Was there a massive cover-up to erase Weitzman's calling the rifle a
Mauser? No, he simply admitted that he made a mistake. And it's an easy
one to make. Stop beating up on him.
I don't think I've ever touched Weitzman
So you don't understand the analogy.
When it comes to the DPD incompetence explains a lot more than conspiracy.
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
(See part I.) And he was able to say that he did not send the earlier "I
have an eyewitness with me" transmission (1:26. See Part II.) He was
able to testify, that is, that he didn't leave the Tippit/Texaco scene
until much later, thus oh no he could not have been on Beckley at 1:26,
which is where he radioed from at 1:26. Because Henslee put other
officers' number on the transmission. Guess he had a radioactive witness.
Or one which would have undermined the official Oak Cliff story....
Meanwhile, in Dealey, Henslee double-covered-up the "second window"
witness. He put Haygood's call number on Hill's transmission. Bowles
restored it to Hill, but of course could do nothing about IDing Hill's
witness.
Henslee also, cleverly, changed "third" to "fifth" on Sawyer's 1:13
message re the "third floor". Guess you didn't now that "fifth" was
always taken as an error for "sixth". Easily dismissed. Not so easily
dismissed: "third floor". Or at least not so easily translated to
"sixth".
Bowles could do nothing to correct the defective *testimony* engendered by
Henslee's mis-translations. Hill's lies, Sawyer's lie, Haygood's lies.
Guess the DPD didn't know their testimony was defective....
dcw
donald willis
2017-08-07 13:58:53 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
6) Everything you know about the sixth floor of the depository is a
lie--the Henslee legacy
Like the Henslee transcription, it was the Dillards which were used by the
Commission, at the hearings. Were the Dillards, like the Henslee, pieces
of evidence crafted especially for the Commission? Were the Powell and
the Moorman withheld to avoid "confusion"? Brennan and the "second
window" witness suggest, Yes and Yes, though the Dillards aren't as
readily dismissed as the Henslee. If there was, in fact, nothing to be
dismissed in the photos, or about the photos, the DPD's Whitewash
Transcription Service still succeeds in casting a pall over just about
every other related piece of evidence.
I don't think any of the DPD transcripts were written only for the WC.
Then why was the Henslee transcription used when questioning DPD officers,
then scrapped? Or replaced, by the Bowles.... The Bowles was used only, I
believe, for Curry's questioning, which came much later than stints by
Haygood, Sawyer, Hill, et al.
Because even the DPD realized that it was defective.
No. Because it had done its job. Thanks to Henslee's work, Sgt. Hill was
able to get away with saying he did not send the "auto 38" transmission.
The whole cover-up can't be just to protect the reputation of Hill.
Was there a massive cover-up to erase Weitzman's calling the rifle a
Mauser? No, he simply admitted that he made a mistake. And it's an easy
one to make. Stop beating up on him.
I don't think I've ever touched Weitzman
So you don't understand the analogy.
I don't accept the analogy. Very different cases. Sgt. Hill did NOT
admit a "mistake". It WAS covered up.
Post by Anthony Marsh
When it comes to the DPD incompetence explains a lot more than conspiracy.
Let's say that there was a mixture of the two. Which means that, say,
Fritz's picking up the hulls in the TSBD could go either way.... But that
too WAS covered up, by his Homicide lieutenants, and by Fritz himself.
He never admitted picking up the hulls. It was exposed by the sheriff's
deputies, Faulkner that very weekend, Mooney at the hearings. And of
course, much later, by Alyea. So, at first, Faulkner was a lone voice,
drowned out by Homicide voices....

dcw
Anthony Marsh
2017-08-07 22:53:30 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
6) Everything you know about the sixth floor of the depository is a
lie--the Henslee legacy
Like the Henslee transcription, it was the Dillards which were used by the
Commission, at the hearings. Were the Dillards, like the Henslee, pieces
of evidence crafted especially for the Commission? Were the Powell and
the Moorman withheld to avoid "confusion"? Brennan and the "second
window" witness suggest, Yes and Yes, though the Dillards aren't as
readily dismissed as the Henslee. If there was, in fact, nothing to be
dismissed in the photos, or about the photos, the DPD's Whitewash
Transcription Service still succeeds in casting a pall over just about
every other related piece of evidence.
I don't think any of the DPD transcripts were written only for the WC.
Then why was the Henslee transcription used when questioning DPD officers,
then scrapped? Or replaced, by the Bowles.... The Bowles was used only, I
believe, for Curry's questioning, which came much later than stints by
Haygood, Sawyer, Hill, et al.
Because even the DPD realized that it was defective.
No. Because it had done its job. Thanks to Henslee's work, Sgt. Hill was
able to get away with saying he did not send the "auto 38" transmission.
The whole cover-up can't be just to protect the reputation of Hill.
Was there a massive cover-up to erase Weitzman's calling the rifle a
Mauser? No, he simply admitted that he made a mistake. And it's an easy
one to make. Stop beating up on him.
I don't think I've ever touched Weitzman
So you don't understand the analogy.
I don't accept the analogy. Very different cases. Sgt. Hill did NOT
admit a "mistake". It WAS covered up.
Yeah, that's what an analogy is. If they were exactly the same case it
wouldn't be an analogy. You just confirmed that you don't know what an
analogy is.
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
When it comes to the DPD incompetence explains a lot more than conspiracy.
Let's say that there was a mixture of the two. Which means that, say,
Fritz's picking up the hulls in the TSBD could go either way.... But that
too WAS covered up, by his Homicide lieutenants, and by Fritz himself.
He never admitted picking up the hulls. It was exposed by the sheriff's
deputies, Faulkner that very weekend, Mooney at the hearings. And of
course, much later, by Alyea. So, at first, Faulkner was a lone voice,
drowned out by Homicide voices....
Yes, it's called CYA to cover up mistakes or incompetence.
Doesn't prove that he was part of the planning to assassinate the President.
Post by donald willis
dcw
donald willis
2017-08-08 20:36:05 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
6) Everything you know about the sixth floor of the depository is a
lie--the Henslee legacy
Like the Henslee transcription, it was the Dillards which were used by the
Commission, at the hearings. Were the Dillards, like the Henslee, pieces
of evidence crafted especially for the Commission? Were the Powell and
the Moorman withheld to avoid "confusion"? Brennan and the "second
window" witness suggest, Yes and Yes, though the Dillards aren't as
readily dismissed as the Henslee. If there was, in fact, nothing to be
dismissed in the photos, or about the photos, the DPD's Whitewash
Transcription Service still succeeds in casting a pall over just about
every other related piece of evidence.
I don't think any of the DPD transcripts were written only for the WC.
Then why was the Henslee transcription used when questioning DPD officers,
then scrapped? Or replaced, by the Bowles.... The Bowles was used only, I
believe, for Curry's questioning, which came much later than stints by
Haygood, Sawyer, Hill, et al.
Because even the DPD realized that it was defective.
No. Because it had done its job. Thanks to Henslee's work, Sgt. Hill was
able to get away with saying he did not send the "auto 38" transmission.
The whole cover-up can't be just to protect the reputation of Hill.
Was there a massive cover-up to erase Weitzman's calling the rifle a
Mauser? No, he simply admitted that he made a mistake. And it's an easy
one to make. Stop beating up on him.
I don't think I've ever touched Weitzman
So you don't understand the analogy.
I don't accept the analogy. Very different cases. Sgt. Hill did NOT
admit a "mistake". It WAS covered up.
Yeah, that's what an analogy is. If they were exactly the same case it
wouldn't be an analogy. You just confirmed that you don't know what an
analogy is.
Know-it-all professors like you and King can be infuriating....
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
When it comes to the DPD incompetence explains a lot more than conspiracy.
Let's say that there was a mixture of the two. Which means that, say,
Fritz's picking up the hulls in the TSBD could go either way.... But that
too WAS covered up, by his Homicide lieutenants, and by Fritz himself.
He never admitted picking up the hulls. It was exposed by the sheriff's
deputies, Faulkner that very weekend, Mooney at the hearings. And of
course, much later, by Alyea. So, at first, Faulkner was a lone voice,
drowned out by Homicide voices....
Yes, it's called CYA to cover up mistakes or incompetence.
Doesn't prove that he was part of the planning to assassinate the President.
Yes, yes, the DPD, the CIA, the FBI & co. were just Keystone Kops, or
Keystone Agents, and a stray bullet or two from their clowning around
happened to hit Kennedy. The Marsh Theory of Accidental Assassinations.
And that's what they're teaching in our colleges now....

dcw
Anthony Marsh
2017-08-09 16:31:30 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
6) Everything you know about the sixth floor of the depository is a
lie--the Henslee legacy
Like the Henslee transcription, it was the Dillards which were used by the
Commission, at the hearings. Were the Dillards, like the Henslee, pieces
of evidence crafted especially for the Commission? Were the Powell and
the Moorman withheld to avoid "confusion"? Brennan and the "second
window" witness suggest, Yes and Yes, though the Dillards aren't as
readily dismissed as the Henslee. If there was, in fact, nothing to be
dismissed in the photos, or about the photos, the DPD's Whitewash
Transcription Service still succeeds in casting a pall over just about
every other related piece of evidence.
I don't think any of the DPD transcripts were written only for the WC.
Then why was the Henslee transcription used when questioning DPD officers,
then scrapped? Or replaced, by the Bowles.... The Bowles was used only, I
believe, for Curry's questioning, which came much later than stints by
Haygood, Sawyer, Hill, et al.
Because even the DPD realized that it was defective.
No. Because it had done its job. Thanks to Henslee's work, Sgt. Hill was
able to get away with saying he did not send the "auto 38" transmission.
The whole cover-up can't be just to protect the reputation of Hill.
Was there a massive cover-up to erase Weitzman's calling the rifle a
Mauser? No, he simply admitted that he made a mistake. And it's an easy
one to make. Stop beating up on him.
I don't think I've ever touched Weitzman
So you don't understand the analogy.
I don't accept the analogy. Very different cases. Sgt. Hill did NOT
admit a "mistake". It WAS covered up.
Yeah, that's what an analogy is. If they were exactly the same case it
wouldn't be an analogy. You just confirmed that you don't know what an
analogy is.
Know-it-all professors like you and King can be infuriating....
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
When it comes to the DPD incompetence explains a lot more than conspiracy.
Let's say that there was a mixture of the two. Which means that, say,
Fritz's picking up the hulls in the TSBD could go either way.... But that
too WAS covered up, by his Homicide lieutenants, and by Fritz himself.
He never admitted picking up the hulls. It was exposed by the sheriff's
deputies, Faulkner that very weekend, Mooney at the hearings. And of
course, much later, by Alyea. So, at first, Faulkner was a lone voice,
drowned out by Homicide voices....
Yes, it's called CYA to cover up mistakes or incompetence.
Doesn't prove that he was part of the planning to assassinate the President.
Yes, yes, the DPD, the CIA, the FBI & co. were just Keystone Kops, or
Keystone Agents, and a stray bullet or two from their clowning around
happened to hit Kennedy. The Marsh Theory of Accidental Assassinations.
And that's what they're teaching in our colleges now....
dcw
No one said that. Focus on each element on its own.
Loading...