Discussion:
Why no evidence?
(too old to reply)
claviger
2018-07-01 22:40:15 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Why is it after 50 years not one CT on this newsgroup can
position all the snipers claimed to be in Dealey Plaza and
explain all those trajectories and prove the directions by
terminal ballistics?

Not one legitimate witness saw anyone behind the fence
or walking away from the parking lot with a rifle. It is an
absurdity to make claims with no evidence to back it up.
Anthony Marsh
2018-07-02 17:33:42 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by claviger
Why is it after 50 years not one CT on this newsgroup can
position all the snipers claimed to be in Dealey Plaza and
explain all those trajectories and prove the directions by
terminal ballistics?
Not one legitimate witness saw anyone behind the fence
or walking away from the parking lot with a rifle. It is an
absurdity to make claims with no evidence to back it up.
So what. Snipers are often not seen. They don't want to be seen.
You make up ridiculous objections to facts.
I never said he walked away with a rifle.
claviger
2018-07-03 17:10:54 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by claviger
Why is it after 50 years not one CT on this newsgroup can
position all the snipers claimed to be in Dealey Plaza and
explain all those trajectories and prove the directions by
terminal ballistics?
Not one legitimate witness saw anyone behind the fence
or walking away from the parking lot with a rifle. It is an
absurdity to make claims with no evidence to back it up.
So what. Snipers are often not seen.
They don't want to be seen.
Correct. So how did your snipers move in and out of the
TSBD without being noticed as strangers, and carrying a
weapon?
Post by Anthony Marsh
You make up ridiculous objections to facts.
I like facts. I waaant facts. I neeeed facts. OK, I admit
I'm a fact junky addicted to facts and can't help myself.
I suffer from a longstanding and ongoing factaddiction.
Can you say the last word 3 times real fast?

Please bring me some facts soon. If I don't get some on
regular basis I get withdrawal symptoms: shaky shakes,
and tremors, and the sudden urge to do breakdancing in
public places like Wally World where I get applause from
people waiting in line.
Post by Anthony Marsh
I never said he walked away with a rifle.
You say all snipers used 6.5 Carcano rifles to frame LHO,
who fired his own rifle not knowing he was being framed.
Was he told they would be firing blanks as a joke on both
a President and Governor? Did all snipers bring rifles in a
paper bag too? Did they all take the effort to disassemble
them to carry off in one heavy paper bag, or two smaller
bags? Were the other snipers employees or strangers, or
both? If strangers, what excuse did they use for being on
the inside of the TSBD when numerous shots were fired?
Did any of them screw up and bring a 7.35 mm Carcano?
Anthony Marsh
2018-07-04 01:36:32 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by claviger
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by claviger
Why is it after 50 years not one CT on this newsgroup can
position all the snipers claimed to be in Dealey Plaza and
explain all those trajectories and prove the directions by
terminal ballistics?
Not one legitimate witness saw anyone behind the fence
or walking away from the parking lot with a rifle. It is an
absurdity to make claims with no evidence to back it up.
So what. Snipers are often not seen.
They don't want to be seen.
Correct. So how did your snipers move in and out of the
TSBD without being noticed as strangers, and carrying a
weapon?
Post by Anthony Marsh
You make up ridiculous objections to facts.
I like facts. I waaant facts. I neeeed facts. OK, I admit
I'm a fact junky addicted to facts and can't help myself.
I suffer from a longstanding and ongoing factaddiction.
Can you say the last word 3 times real fast?
false. You accept the Hickey theory without ANY facts whatsoever.
You are a hypocrite.
Post by claviger
Please bring me some facts soon. If I don't get some on
regular basis I get withdrawal symptoms: shaky shakes,
and tremors, and the sudden urge to do breakdancing in
public places like Wally World where I get applause from
people waiting in line.
That's what you get when you read the WC. Luckily you don't do that often.
Post by claviger
Post by Anthony Marsh
I never said he walked away with a rifle.
You say all snipers used 6.5 Carcano rifles to frame LHO,
Not exactly. Using other carcanos does from frame Oswald, it just keeps
the fragments consistent with Oswald's weapon. I realize that the DPD was
too stupid to identify an Oswald bullet such as the one he fired at
Walker. But what if they asked they asked the FBI for help, like with the
NAA which they could not do?

And the FBI finding 30 fragments with an antimony level of 1000 PPM, but 5
fragments with an antimony level of 20,000 PPM? The DPD would not be smart
enough to figure out that they came from the same weapon, but maybe
Frazier would be. Game Over.

WHat did happen when the FBI did find a fragment that did not match the
Oswald fragments. They pacicked and covered it up, because they KNEW what
that would mean. WWIII.
Post by claviger
who fired his own rifle not knowing he was being framed.
Sometimes people will steal a gun to use in a crime or some kid will
steal his mother's rifle for a mass shooting.
Post by claviger
Was he told they would be firing blanks as a joke on both
Geez, now you're really testing my memory. Was that fromk Judyth?
Post by claviger
a President and Governor? Did all snipers bring rifles in a
paper bag too? Did they all take the effort to disassemble
No, one was in a workman's tool box.
Post by claviger
them to carry off in one heavy paper bag, or two smaller
bags? Were the other snipers employees or strangers, or
I don't think any other employee was involved. That was Fritz's theory.
Post by claviger
both? If strangers, what excuse did they use for being on
the inside of the TSBD when numerous shots were fired?
Why would they need an excuse? Just flash their genuine SS identification.
Or reporter's badge.
Post by claviger
Did any of them screw up and bring a 7.35 mm Carcano?
Yes, and he was told to go home.
claviger
2018-07-03 20:28:32 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by claviger
Why is it after 50 years not one CT on this newsgroup can
position all the snipers claimed to be in Dealey Plaza and
explain all those trajectories and prove the directions by
terminal ballistics?
Not one legitimate witness saw anyone behind the fence
or walking away from the parking lot with a rifle. It is an
absurdity to make claims with no evidence to back it up.
So what. Snipers are often not seen.
Not if they want to survive to snipe another day.
Post by Anthony Marsh
They don't want to be seen.
Don't need an audience for their occupation.
Post by Anthony Marsh
You make up ridiculous objections to facts.
What facts?!!
Post by Anthony Marsh
I never said he walked away with a rifle.
He who?
Anthony Marsh
2018-07-04 13:45:05 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by claviger
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by claviger
Why is it after 50 years not one CT on this newsgroup can
position all the snipers claimed to be in Dealey Plaza and
explain all those trajectories and prove the directions by
terminal ballistics?
Not one legitimate witness saw anyone behind the fence
or walking away from the parking lot with a rifle. It is an
absurdity to make claims with no evidence to back it up.
So what. Snipers are often not seen.
Not if they want to survive to snipe another day.
Post by Anthony Marsh
They don't want to be seen.
Don't need an audience for their occupation.
Post by Anthony Marsh
You make up ridiculous objections to facts.
What facts?!!
Post by Anthony Marsh
I never said he walked away with a rifle.
He who?
The grassy knoll shooter.
claviger
2018-07-05 23:08:28 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by claviger
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by claviger
Why is it after 50 years not one CT on this newsgroup can
position all the snipers claimed to be in Dealey Plaza and
explain all those trajectories and prove the directions by
terminal ballistics?
Not one legitimate witness saw anyone behind the fence
or walking away from the parking lot with a rifle. It is an
absurdity to make claims with no evidence to back it up.
So what. Snipers are often not seen.
Not if they want to survive to snipe another day.
Post by Anthony Marsh
They don't want to be seen.
Don't need an audience for their occupation.
Post by Anthony Marsh
You make up ridiculous objections to facts.
What facts?!!
Post by Anthony Marsh
I never said he walked away with a rifle.
He who?
The grassy knoll shooter.
So what happened to the rifle? Is it buried somewhere on the GK?
Anthony Marsh
2018-07-07 12:43:48 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by claviger
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by claviger
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by claviger
Why is it after 50 years not one CT on this newsgroup can
position all the snipers claimed to be in Dealey Plaza and
explain all those trajectories and prove the directions by
terminal ballistics?
Not one legitimate witness saw anyone behind the fence
or walking away from the parking lot with a rifle. It is an
absurdity to make claims with no evidence to back it up.
So what. Snipers are often not seen.
Not if they want to survive to snipe another day.
Post by Anthony Marsh
They don't want to be seen.
Don't need an audience for their occupation.
Post by Anthony Marsh
You make up ridiculous objections to facts.
What facts?!!
Post by Anthony Marsh
I never said he walked away with a rifle.
He who?
The grassy knoll shooter.
So what happened to the rifle? Is it buried somewhere on the GK?
You're thinking of another movie, Winter Kills, where they hide the
rifle in a pipe. There is something pathological abut your thinking
where you think everyone MUST agree with you.
donald willis
2018-07-04 01:47:18 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by claviger
Why is it after 50 years not one CT on this newsgroup can
position all the snipers claimed to be in Dealey Plaza and
explain all those trajectories and prove the directions by
terminal ballistics?
Not one legitimate witness saw anyone behind the fence
or walking away from the parking lot with a rifle. It is an
absurdity to make claims with no evidence to back it up.
So what. Snipers are often not seen. They don't want to be seen.
The suspect on an upper floor of the depository wanted to be seen, or at
least did not mind at all being seen. Brennan said the guy sat sideways
on the sill; Fischer could see both his shirt & slacks (!); Mrs. Walther
said he was hanging out the window. Why did THIS sniper want to be
seen???

dcw
Anthony Marsh
2018-07-05 23:15:23 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by donald willis
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by claviger
Why is it after 50 years not one CT on this newsgroup can
position all the snipers claimed to be in Dealey Plaza and
explain all those trajectories and prove the directions by
terminal ballistics?
Not one legitimate witness saw anyone behind the fence
or walking away from the parking lot with a rifle. It is an
absurdity to make claims with no evidence to back it up.
So what. Snipers are often not seen. They don't want to be seen.
The suspect on an upper floor of the depository wanted to be seen, or at
least did not mind at all being seen. Brennan said the guy sat sideways
on the sill; Fischer could see both his shirt & slacks (!); Mrs. Walther
said he was hanging out the window. Why did THIS sniper want to be
seen???
Hey, maybe he was just a decoy.
Post by donald willis
dcw
mainframetech
2018-07-03 04:22:37 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by claviger
Why is it after 50 years not one CT on this newsgroup can
position all the snipers claimed to be in Dealey Plaza and
explain all those trajectories and prove the directions by
terminal ballistics?
Not one legitimate witness saw anyone behind the fence
or walking away from the parking lot with a rifle. It is an
absurdity to make claims with no evidence to back it up.
It's absurd to make statements that make no sense and give false
information.

Chris
claviger
2018-07-03 21:09:42 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Why is it after 50 years not one CT on this newsgroup can
position all the snipers claimed to be in Dealey Plaza and
explain all those trajectories and prove the directions by
terminal ballistics?
Not one legitimate witness saw anyone behind the fence
or walking away from the parking lot with a rifle. It is an
absurdity to make claims with no evidence to back it up.
It's absurd to make statements that make no sense and
give false information.
Chris
For once we agree on something.
claviger
2018-07-04 01:33:42 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Why is it after 50 years not one CT on this newsgroup can
position all the snipers claimed to be in Dealey Plaza and
explain all those trajectories and prove the directions by
terminal ballistics?
Not one legitimate witness saw anyone behind the fence
or walking away from the parking lot with a rifle. It is an
absurdity to make claims with no evidence to back it up.
It's absurd to make statements that make no sense and
give false information.
Chris
I could not agree more, so I'm counting on you to correct this
appalling situation by answering the questions above so you
can prove to the world CTs are not like the Scarecrow in the
Wizard of Oz and you really do have a brain! It's very simple
just tell us how many snipers, where they were located, and
what kind of weapons they used. And while your at it, tell us
how many genuine witnesses saw a person on the GK with a
rifle firing shots at the motorcade.
mainframetech
2018-07-05 02:25:19 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by claviger
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Why is it after 50 years not one CT on this newsgroup can
position all the snipers claimed to be in Dealey Plaza and
explain all those trajectories and prove the directions by
terminal ballistics?
Not one legitimate witness saw anyone behind the fence
or walking away from the parking lot with a rifle. It is an
absurdity to make claims with no evidence to back it up.
It's absurd to make statements that make no sense and
give false information.
Chris
I could not agree more, so I'm counting on you to correct this
appalling situation by answering the questions above so you
can prove to the world CTs are not like the Scarecrow in the
Wizard of Oz and you really do have a brain! It's very simple
just tell us how many snipers, where they were located, and
what kind of weapons they used. And while your at it, tell us
how many genuine witnesses saw a person on the GK with a
rifle firing shots at the motorcade.
Yep, my concerns about your sanity are getting a backing now. How
does one identify the type of rifle used by a shooter when he wasn't seen
by anyone now alive? Who they were and their locations are listed in the
book "The Men that Don't Fit in" by Roderick Mackenzie III. A few are
also in the book "The Men on the Sixth Floor" by Collum and Sample which
corroborate some of the info in the first book.

I won't answer your question about eyewitnesses on the GK, since you
will take it as an opportunity to try to dismiss them, as if you were the
emperor of Dealey Plaza and had such rights, which you don't.

Now that I've proven I have a brain, what will you do to prove the
same?

Perhaps do what sensible people do when faced by evidence, they change
using the new evidence.

Chris
bigdog
2018-07-06 01:27:30 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Why is it after 50 years not one CT on this newsgroup can
position all the snipers claimed to be in Dealey Plaza and
explain all those trajectories and prove the directions by
terminal ballistics?
Not one legitimate witness saw anyone behind the fence
or walking away from the parking lot with a rifle. It is an
absurdity to make claims with no evidence to back it up.
It's absurd to make statements that make no sense and
give false information.
Chris
I could not agree more, so I'm counting on you to correct this
appalling situation by answering the questions above so you
can prove to the world CTs are not like the Scarecrow in the
Wizard of Oz and you really do have a brain! It's very simple
just tell us how many snipers, where they were located, and
what kind of weapons they used. And while your at it, tell us
how many genuine witnesses saw a person on the GK with a
rifle firing shots at the motorcade.
Yep, my concerns about your sanity are getting a backing now. How
does one identify the type of rifle used by a shooter when he wasn't seen
by anyone now alive? Who they were and their locations are listed in the
book "The Men that Don't Fit in" by Roderick Mackenzie III. A few are
also in the book "The Men on the Sixth Floor" by Collum and Sample which
corroborate some of the info in the first book.
Two people telling the same baseless story is not corroboration.
Post by mainframetech
I won't answer your question about eyewitnesses on the GK, since you
will take it as an opportunity to try to dismiss them, as if you were the
emperor of Dealey Plaza and had such rights, which you don't.
Now that I've proven I have a brain, what will you do to prove the
same?
I won't say it. It's too easy and would probably get rejected.
Post by mainframetech
Perhaps do what sensible people do when faced by evidence, they change
using the new evidence.
Or they could do like you do and force fit the evidence to their beliefs.
mainframetech
2018-07-07 12:56:33 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Why is it after 50 years not one CT on this newsgroup can
position all the snipers claimed to be in Dealey Plaza and
explain all those trajectories and prove the directions by
terminal ballistics?
Not one legitimate witness saw anyone behind the fence
or walking away from the parking lot with a rifle. It is an
absurdity to make claims with no evidence to back it up.
It's absurd to make statements that make no sense and
give false information.
Chris
I could not agree more, so I'm counting on you to correct this
appalling situation by answering the questions above so you
can prove to the world CTs are not like the Scarecrow in the
Wizard of Oz and you really do have a brain! It's very simple
just tell us how many snipers, where they were located, and
what kind of weapons they used. And while your at it, tell us
how many genuine witnesses saw a person on the GK with a
rifle firing shots at the motorcade.
Yep, my concerns about your sanity are getting a backing now. How
does one identify the type of rifle used by a shooter when he wasn't seen
by anyone now alive? Who they were and their locations are listed in the
book "The Men that Don't Fit in" by Roderick Mackenzie III. A few are
also in the book "The Men on the Sixth Floor" by Collum and Sample which
corroborate some of the info in the first book.
Two people telling the same baseless story is not corroboration.
LOL! Ah, they all lied!
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
I won't answer your question about eyewitnesses on the GK, since you
will take it as an opportunity to try to dismiss them, as if you were the
emperor of Dealey Plaza and had such rights, which you don't.
Now that I've proven I have a brain, what will you do to prove the
same?
I won't say it. It's too easy and would probably get rejected.
Post by mainframetech
Perhaps do what sensible people do when faced by evidence, they change
using the new evidence.
Or they could do like you do and force fit the evidence to their beliefs.
Or make opinions to support their own wacky ideas.

Chris
bigdog
2018-07-07 22:20:14 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Why is it after 50 years not one CT on this newsgroup can
position all the snipers claimed to be in Dealey Plaza and
explain all those trajectories and prove the directions by
terminal ballistics?
Not one legitimate witness saw anyone behind the fence
or walking away from the parking lot with a rifle. It is an
absurdity to make claims with no evidence to back it up.
It's absurd to make statements that make no sense and
give false information.
Chris
I could not agree more, so I'm counting on you to correct this
appalling situation by answering the questions above so you
can prove to the world CTs are not like the Scarecrow in the
Wizard of Oz and you really do have a brain! It's very simple
just tell us how many snipers, where they were located, and
what kind of weapons they used. And while your at it, tell us
how many genuine witnesses saw a person on the GK with a
rifle firing shots at the motorcade.
Yep, my concerns about your sanity are getting a backing now. How
does one identify the type of rifle used by a shooter when he wasn't seen
by anyone now alive? Who they were and their locations are listed in the
book "The Men that Don't Fit in" by Roderick Mackenzie III. A few are
also in the book "The Men on the Sixth Floor" by Collum and Sample which
corroborate some of the info in the first book.
Two people telling the same baseless story is not corroboration.
LOL! Ah, they all lied!
I have no problem saying that about these kook authors.
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
I won't answer your question about eyewitnesses on the GK, since you
will take it as an opportunity to try to dismiss them, as if you were the
emperor of Dealey Plaza and had such rights, which you don't.
Now that I've proven I have a brain, what will you do to prove the
same?
I won't say it. It's too easy and would probably get rejected.
Post by mainframetech
Perhaps do what sensible people do when faced by evidence, they change
using the new evidence.
Or they could do like you do and force fit the evidence to their beliefs.
Or make opinions to support their own wacky ideas.
Yes, you do that too.
Anthony Marsh
2018-07-08 12:53:20 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Why is it after 50 years not one CT on this newsgroup can
position all the snipers claimed to be in Dealey Plaza and
explain all those trajectories and prove the directions by
terminal ballistics?
Not one legitimate witness saw anyone behind the fence
or walking away from the parking lot with a rifle. It is an
absurdity to make claims with no evidence to back it up.
It's absurd to make statements that make no sense and
give false information.
Chris
I could not agree more, so I'm counting on you to correct this
appalling situation by answering the questions above so you
can prove to the world CTs are not like the Scarecrow in the
Wizard of Oz and you really do have a brain! It's very simple
just tell us how many snipers, where they were located, and
what kind of weapons they used. And while your at it, tell us
how many genuine witnesses saw a person on the GK with a
rifle firing shots at the motorcade.
Yep, my concerns about your sanity are getting a backing now. How
does one identify the type of rifle used by a shooter when he wasn't seen
by anyone now alive? Who they were and their locations are listed in the
book "The Men that Don't Fit in" by Roderick Mackenzie III. A few are
also in the book "The Men on the Sixth Floor" by Collum and Sample which
corroborate some of the info in the first book.
Two people telling the same baseless story is not corroboration.
LOL! Ah, they all lied!
Well, there's a silver lining there. With a habitual liar you know that he
is always lying so the opposite must be the truth.

Like when Trump says that he is not firing someone and the next day he's
gone. It's like getting the kiss from the Godfather.
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
I won't answer your question about eyewitnesses on the GK, since you
will take it as an opportunity to try to dismiss them, as if you were the
emperor of Dealey Plaza and had such rights, which you don't.
Now that I've proven I have a brain, what will you do to prove the
same?
I won't say it. It's too easy and would probably get rejected.
Post by mainframetech
Perhaps do what sensible people do when faced by evidence, they change
using the new evidence.
Or they could do like you do and force fit the evidence to their beliefs.
Or make opinions to support their own wacky ideas.
Chris
Anthony Marsh
2018-07-05 23:17:11 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by claviger
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Why is it after 50 years not one CT on this newsgroup can
position all the snipers claimed to be in Dealey Plaza and
explain all those trajectories and prove the directions by
terminal ballistics?
Not one legitimate witness saw anyone behind the fence
or walking away from the parking lot with a rifle. It is an
absurdity to make claims with no evidence to back it up.
It's absurd to make statements that make no sense and
give false information.
Chris
I could not agree more, so I'm counting on you to correct this
appalling situation by answering the questions above so you
can prove to the world CTs are not like the Scarecrow in the
Wizard of Oz and you really do have a brain! It's very simple
just tell us how many snipers, where they were located, and
what kind of weapons they used. And while your at it, tell us
how many genuine witnesses saw a person on the GK with a
rifle firing shots at the motorcade.
No one had to. How many people saw the shooter shooting at MLK?
How many people saw the shooter shooting at President Chen?
You make up ludicrous objections.
claviger
2018-07-07 12:50:56 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by claviger
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Why is it after 50 years not one CT on this newsgroup can
position all the snipers claimed to be in Dealey Plaza and
explain all those trajectories and prove the directions by
terminal ballistics?
Not one legitimate witness saw anyone behind the fence
or walking away from the parking lot with a rifle. It is an
absurdity to make claims with no evidence to back it up.
It's absurd to make statements that make no sense and
give false information.
Chris
I could not agree more, so I'm counting on you to correct this
appalling situation by answering the questions above so you
can prove to the world CTs are not like the Scarecrow in the
Wizard of Oz and you really do have a brain! It's very simple
just tell us how many snipers, where they were located, and
what kind of weapons they used. And while your at it, tell us
how many genuine witnesses saw a person on the GK with a
rifle firing shots at the motorcade.
No one had to. How many people saw the shooter shooting at
MLK?
Was he on a grassy hill in a wide open parking lot surrounded by
witnesses?
Post by Anthony Marsh
How many people saw the shooter shooting at President Chen?
You make up ludicrous objections.
I learned that technique from you.
Anthony Marsh
2018-07-08 12:54:14 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by claviger
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by claviger
Post by mainframetech
Post by claviger
Why is it after 50 years not one CT on this newsgroup can
position all the snipers claimed to be in Dealey Plaza and
explain all those trajectories and prove the directions by
terminal ballistics?
Not one legitimate witness saw anyone behind the fence
or walking away from the parking lot with a rifle. It is an
absurdity to make claims with no evidence to back it up.
It's absurd to make statements that make no sense and
give false information.
Chris
I could not agree more, so I'm counting on you to correct this
appalling situation by answering the questions above so you
can prove to the world CTs are not like the Scarecrow in the
Wizard of Oz and you really do have a brain! It's very simple
just tell us how many snipers, where they were located, and
what kind of weapons they used. And while your at it, tell us
how many genuine witnesses saw a person on the GK with a
rifle firing shots at the motorcade.
No one had to. How many people saw the shooter shooting at
MLK?
Was he on a grassy hill in a wide open parking lot surrounded by
witnesses?
Post by Anthony Marsh
How many people saw the shooter shooting at President Chen?
You make up ludicrous objections.
I learned that technique from you.
All you ever do is make insults to avoid answering my questions.
Because you are not smart enough or you realize that an honest answer
would destroy your silly argument.
bigdog
2018-07-03 17:00:17 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by claviger
Why is it after 50 years not one CT on this newsgroup can
position all the snipers claimed to be in Dealey Plaza and
explain all those trajectories and prove the directions by
terminal ballistics?
Not one legitimate witness saw anyone behind the fence
or walking away from the parking lot with a rifle. It is an
absurdity to make claims with no evidence to back it up.
Chris keeps moving him around. First he was on the grassy knoll. Then the
storm drain. Now it's the south knoll parking lot. I can't wait to see
where he puts him next month. Maybe a hot dog stand at the corner of
Houston and Elm.
Anthony Marsh
2018-07-04 01:42:53 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by bigdog
Post by claviger
Why is it after 50 years not one CT on this newsgroup can
position all the snipers claimed to be in Dealey Plaza and
explain all those trajectories and prove the directions by
terminal ballistics?
Not one legitimate witness saw anyone behind the fence
or walking away from the parking lot with a rifle. It is an
absurdity to make claims with no evidence to back it up.
Chris keeps moving him around. First he was on the grassy knoll. Then the
storm drain. Now it's the south knoll parking lot. I can't wait to see
where he puts him next month. Maybe a hot dog stand at the corner of
Houston and Elm.
How about the laundry truck?
mainframetech
2018-07-05 02:25:51 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by bigdog
Post by claviger
Why is it after 50 years not one CT on this newsgroup can
position all the snipers claimed to be in Dealey Plaza and
explain all those trajectories and prove the directions by
terminal ballistics?
Why can't you do the same for the TSBD 6th floor?
Post by bigdog
Post by claviger
Not one legitimate witness saw anyone behind the fence
or walking away from the parking lot with a rifle. It is an
absurdity to make claims with no evidence to back it up.
Ah, "legitimate witness" to be decided by you, of course...:)
Post by bigdog
Chris keeps moving him around. First he was on the grassy knoll. Then the
storm drain. Now it's the south knoll parking lot. I can't wait to see
where he puts him next month. Maybe a hot dog stand at the corner of
Houston and Elm.
WRONG! As any amateur detective (which you are not) might do, I look
for the scenario that makes the most sense. The more recent information
that showed how the bullet striking the front of the head and throat was
the best fit made sense. A person would be a fool to lock in to a
particular scenario when a better more sensible one presented itself.
That is more the problem of the WCR lovers.

For those that don't know what we're talking about, here's the
article and photos:

http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/

Chris
bigdog
2018-07-06 01:28:08 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by claviger
Why is it after 50 years not one CT on this newsgroup can
position all the snipers claimed to be in Dealey Plaza and
explain all those trajectories and prove the directions by
terminal ballistics?
Why can't you do the same for the TSBD 6th floor?
The WC did that 54 years ago. Sorry you never got to see it.
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by claviger
Not one legitimate witness saw anyone behind the fence
or walking away from the parking lot with a rifle. It is an
absurdity to make claims with no evidence to back it up.
Ah, "legitimate witness" to be decided by you, of course...:)
You don't have any witnesses, legitimate or otherwise.
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Chris keeps moving him around. First he was on the grassy knoll. Then the
storm drain. Now it's the south knoll parking lot. I can't wait to see
where he puts him next month. Maybe a hot dog stand at the corner of
Houston and Elm.
WRONG! As any amateur detective (which you are not)
And you are? <chuckle>
Post by mainframetech
might do, I look for the scenario that makes the most sense.
You keep rejecting the scenario that makes the most sense. The one that is
the most straight forward explanation of the evidence and doesn't require
one to believe so much of the evidence was tampered with.
Post by mainframetech
The more recent information
that showed how the bullet striking the front of the head and throat was
the best fit made sense.
Some klutz creating a website and showing theoretical bullet trajectories
with no evidence to support it is not evidence, especially when those
trajectories are absurd.
Post by mainframetech
A person would be a fool to lock in to a
particular scenario when a better more sensible one presented itself.
That is more the problem of the WCR lovers.
That's like saying a person would be a fool to believe that 2 + 2 = 4 when
there is a website that tells us 2 + 2 = 5.8934.
Post by mainframetech
For those that don't know what we're talking about, here's the
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
I hope the other members of this newsgroup get as big a chuckle out of
this as I did.
Jason Burke
2018-07-07 00:42:38 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by claviger
Why is it after 50 years not one CT on this newsgroup can
position all the snipers claimed to be in Dealey Plaza and
explain all those trajectories and prove the directions by
terminal ballistics?
Why can't you do the same for the TSBD 6th floor?
The WC did that 54 years ago. Sorry you never got to see it.
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by claviger
Not one legitimate witness saw anyone behind the fence
or walking away from the parking lot with a rifle. It is an
absurdity to make claims with no evidence to back it up.
Ah, "legitimate witness" to be decided by you, of course...:)
You don't have any witnesses, legitimate or otherwise.
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Chris keeps moving him around. First he was on the grassy knoll. Then the
storm drain. Now it's the south knoll parking lot. I can't wait to see
where he puts him next month. Maybe a hot dog stand at the corner of
Houston and Elm.
WRONG! As any amateur detective (which you are not)
And you are? <chuckle>
Post by mainframetech
might do, I look for the scenario that makes the most sense.
You keep rejecting the scenario that makes the most sense. The one that is
the most straight forward explanation of the evidence and doesn't require
one to believe so much of the evidence was tampered with.
Post by mainframetech
The more recent information
that showed how the bullet striking the front of the head and throat was
the best fit made sense.
Some klutz creating a website and showing theoretical bullet trajectories
with no evidence to support it is not evidence, especially when those
trajectories are absurd.
Post by mainframetech
A person would be a fool to lock in to a
particular scenario when a better more sensible one presented itself.
That is more the problem of the WCR lovers.
That's like saying a person would be a fool to believe that 2 + 2 = 4 when
there is a website that tells us 2 + 2 = 5.8934.
"If it's on the internet, it must be true"

-- A Lincoln, 1864.
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
For those that don't know what we're talking about, here's the
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
I hope the other members of this newsgroup get as big a chuckle out of
this as I did.
Anthony Marsh
2018-07-07 00:45:22 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by claviger
Why is it after 50 years not one CT on this newsgroup can
position all the snipers claimed to be in Dealey Plaza and
explain all those trajectories and prove the directions by
terminal ballistics?
Why can't you do the same for the TSBD 6th floor?
The WC did that 54 years ago. Sorry you never got to see it.
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by claviger
Not one legitimate witness saw anyone behind the fence
or walking away from the parking lot with a rifle. It is an
absurdity to make claims with no evidence to back it up.
Ah, "legitimate witness" to be decided by you, of course...:)
You don't have any witnesses, legitimate or otherwise.
That's not a nice way to talk about the WC.
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Chris keeps moving him around. First he was on the grassy knoll. Then the
storm drain. Now it's the south knoll parking lot. I can't wait to see
where he puts him next month. Maybe a hot dog stand at the corner of
Houston and Elm.
WRONG! As any amateur detective (which you are not)
And you are? <chuckle>
Post by mainframetech
might do, I look for the scenario that makes the most sense.
You keep rejecting the scenario that makes the most sense. The one that is
the most straight forward explanation of the evidence and doesn't require
one to believe so much of the evidence was tampered with.
Post by mainframetech
The more recent information
that showed how the bullet striking the front of the head and throat was
the best fit made sense.
Some klutz creating a website and showing theoretical bullet trajectories
with no evidence to support it is not evidence, especially when those
trajectories are absurd.
Post by mainframetech
A person would be a fool to lock in to a
particular scenario when a better more sensible one presented itself.
That is more the problem of the WCR lovers.
That's like saying a person would be a fool to believe that 2 + 2 = 4 when
there is a website that tells us 2 + 2 = 5.8934.
Post by mainframetech
For those that don't know what we're talking about, here's the
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
I hope the other members of this newsgroup get as big a chuckle out of
this as I did.
mainframetech
2018-07-07 12:56:24 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by claviger
Why is it after 50 years not one CT on this newsgroup can
position all the snipers claimed to be in Dealey Plaza and
explain all those trajectories and prove the directions by
terminal ballistics?
Why can't you do the same for the TSBD 6th floor?
The WC did that 54 years ago. Sorry you never got to see it.
So if its already been done that should be easy for you to copy it out.
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by claviger
Not one legitimate witness saw anyone behind the fence
or walking away from the parking lot with a rifle. It is an
absurdity to make claims with no evidence to back it up.
Ah, "legitimate witness" to be decided by you, of course...:)
You don't have any witnesses, legitimate or otherwise.
Well of course I do. But you will pretend you can dismiss any
evidence or witnesses, so why bother?
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Chris keeps moving him around. First he was on the grassy knoll. Then the
storm drain. Now it's the south knoll parking lot. I can't wait to see
where he puts him next month. Maybe a hot dog stand at the corner of
Houston and Elm.
WRONG! As any amateur detective (which you are not)
And you are? <chuckle>
Post by mainframetech
might do, I look for the scenario that makes the most sense.
You keep rejecting the scenario that makes the most sense. The one that is
the most straight forward explanation of the evidence and doesn't require
one to believe so much of the evidence was tampered with.
Post by mainframetech
The more recent information
that showed how the bullet striking the front of the head and throat was
the best fit made sense.
Some klutz creating a website and showing theoretical bullet trajectories
with no evidence to support it is not evidence, especially when those
trajectories are absurd.
LOL! Now the person is a "klutz"! All these people that disagree
with you are all these terrible names you keep calling them. Maybe in
hopes that your insults will make it so they won't be believed! In
actuality, the guy has a great deal of support if you knew anything about
the case and didn't just sit back and potshot everything.
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
A person would be a fool to lock in to a
particular scenario when a better more sensible one presented itself.
That is more the problem of the WCR lovers.
That's like saying a person would be a fool to believe that 2 + 2 = 4 when
there is a website that tells us 2 + 2 = 5.8934.
No, now you're bringing the WCR into the argument, which means you
lost right away.
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
For those that don't know what we're talking about, here's the
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
I hope the other members of this newsgroup get as big a chuckle out of
this as I did.
Nope, that won't get you anywhere. It's really akin to sour grapes!

Chris
bigdog
2018-07-07 22:21:09 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by claviger
Why is it after 50 years not one CT on this newsgroup can
position all the snipers claimed to be in Dealey Plaza and
explain all those trajectories and prove the directions by
terminal ballistics?
Why can't you do the same for the TSBD 6th floor?
The WC did that 54 years ago. Sorry you never got to see it.
So if its already been done that should be easy for you to copy it out.
The entire WCR is available online in addition to the 26 volumes of raw
data. It's all there for you. All you need is the will to take a look at
it.
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by claviger
Not one legitimate witness saw anyone behind the fence
or walking away from the parking lot with a rifle. It is an
absurdity to make claims with no evidence to back it up.
Ah, "legitimate witness" to be decided by you, of course...:)
You don't have any witnesses, legitimate or otherwise.
Well of course I do. But you will pretend you can dismiss any
evidence or witnesses, so why bother?
The witnesses you cite don't support your goofy narrative unless you
"correct" what they actually said.
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Chris keeps moving him around. First he was on the grassy knoll. Then the
storm drain. Now it's the south knoll parking lot. I can't wait to see
where he puts him next month. Maybe a hot dog stand at the corner of
Houston and Elm.
WRONG! As any amateur detective (which you are not)
And you are? <chuckle>
Post by mainframetech
might do, I look for the scenario that makes the most sense.
You keep rejecting the scenario that makes the most sense. The one that is
the most straight forward explanation of the evidence and doesn't require
one to believe so much of the evidence was tampered with.
Post by mainframetech
The more recent information
that showed how the bullet striking the front of the head and throat was
the best fit made sense.
Some klutz creating a website and showing theoretical bullet trajectories
with no evidence to support it is not evidence, especially when those
trajectories are absurd.
LOL! Now the person is a "klutz"!
Pretty much.
Post by mainframetech
All these people that disagree
with you are all these terrible names you keep calling them.
Klutz isn't so terrible. I could think of a lot worse but that would be
mean spirited.
Post by mainframetech
Maybe in hopes that your insults will make it so they won't be believed!
I don't think there is much of a possibility of that with a few exceptions.
Post by mainframetech
In actuality, the guy has a great deal of support if you knew anything about
the case and didn't just sit back and potshot everything.
There isn't a shred of evidence that any shots were fired from the south
knoll.
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
A person would be a fool to lock in to a
particular scenario when a better more sensible one presented itself.
That is more the problem of the WCR lovers.
That's like saying a person would be a fool to believe that 2 + 2 = 4 when
there is a website that tells us 2 + 2 = 5.8934.
No, now you're bringing the WCR into the argument, which means you
lost right away.
Only if you get to be the arbiter of who wins and loses.
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
For those that don't know what we're talking about, here's the
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
I hope the other members of this newsgroup get as big a chuckle out of
this as I did.
Nope, that won't get you anywhere. It's really akin to sour grapes!
I hope everyone here goes to look at that website. They will see for
themselves the kind of nonsense you are willing to buy into.
Anthony Marsh
2018-07-09 19:41:10 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by claviger
Why is it after 50 years not one CT on this newsgroup can
position all the snipers claimed to be in Dealey Plaza and
explain all those trajectories and prove the directions by
terminal ballistics?
Why can't you do the same for the TSBD 6th floor?
The WC did that 54 years ago. Sorry you never got to see it.
So if its already been done that should be easy for you to copy it out.
The entire WCR is available online in addition to the 26 volumes of raw
data. It's all there for you. All you need is the will to take a look at
it.
But you have never read the documents which the WC did not publish.
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by claviger
Not one legitimate witness saw anyone behind the fence
or walking away from the parking lot with a rifle. It is an
absurdity to make claims with no evidence to back it up.
Ah, "legitimate witness" to be decided by you, of course...:)
You don't have any witnesses, legitimate or otherwise.
Well of course I do. But you will pretend you can dismiss any
evidence or witnesses, so why bother?
The witnesses you cite don't support your goofy narrative unless you
"correct" what they actually said.
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Chris keeps moving him around. First he was on the grassy knoll. Then the
storm drain. Now it's the south knoll parking lot. I can't wait to see
where he puts him next month. Maybe a hot dog stand at the corner of
Houston and Elm.
WRONG! As any amateur detective (which you are not)
And you are? <chuckle>
Post by mainframetech
might do, I look for the scenario that makes the most sense.
You keep rejecting the scenario that makes the most sense. The one that is
the most straight forward explanation of the evidence and doesn't require
one to believe so much of the evidence was tampered with.
Post by mainframetech
The more recent information
that showed how the bullet striking the front of the head and throat was
the best fit made sense.
Some klutz creating a website and showing theoretical bullet trajectories
with no evidence to support it is not evidence, especially when those
trajectories are absurd.
LOL! Now the person is a "klutz"!
Pretty much.
Post by mainframetech
All these people that disagree
with you are all these terrible names you keep calling them.
Klutz isn't so terrible. I could think of a lot worse but that would be
mean spirited.
Post by mainframetech
Maybe in hopes that your insults will make it so they won't be believed!
I don't think there is much of a possibility of that with a few exceptions.
Post by mainframetech
In actuality, the guy has a great deal of support if you knew anything about
the case and didn't just sit back and potshot everything.
There isn't a shred of evidence that any shots were fired from the south
knoll.
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
A person would be a fool to lock in to a
particular scenario when a better more sensible one presented itself.
That is more the problem of the WCR lovers.
That's like saying a person would be a fool to believe that 2 + 2 = 4 when
there is a website that tells us 2 + 2 = 5.8934.
No, now you're bringing the WCR into the argument, which means you
lost right away.
Only if you get to be the arbiter of who wins and loses.
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
For those that don't know what we're talking about, here's the
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
I hope the other members of this newsgroup get as big a chuckle out of
this as I did.
Nope, that won't get you anywhere. It's really akin to sour grapes!
I hope everyone here goes to look at that website. They will see for
themselves the kind of nonsense you are willing to buy into.
Anthony Marsh
2018-07-08 12:53:46 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by claviger
Why is it after 50 years not one CT on this newsgroup can
position all the snipers claimed to be in Dealey Plaza and
explain all those trajectories and prove the directions by
terminal ballistics?
Why can't you do the same for the TSBD 6th floor?
The WC did that 54 years ago. Sorry you never got to see it.
So if its already been done that should be easy for you to copy it out.
Copy? WTF are you mumbling about? Copy what? They don't have the WC
documents. That would be dangerously like research. All they have are the
lies they've heard from other WC defenders. And they don't have a copier.
If you mean copy and paste they don't know how to do that. Only post links
to millions of irrelevant URLs. Someone here asked for a document and I
was the ONLY one who had it so I emailed it to him. That is called OPEN
RESEARCH.

In our apartment complex we have a Community Room and in it there is a
Community table so if you have something you don't want you put it on the
table and anyone can take it for free. My rule is that I take something
and then I put something on the table that i don't need. Just yesterday I
got some new stuff and put the old stuff on the table and my worst enemies
took it off the table.
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by claviger
Not one legitimate witness saw anyone behind the fence
or walking away from the parking lot with a rifle. It is an
absurdity to make claims with no evidence to back it up.
Ah, "legitimate witness" to be decided by you, of course...:)
You don't have any witnesses, legitimate or otherwise.
Well of course I do. But you will pretend you can dismiss any
evidence or witnesses, so why bother?
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Chris keeps moving him around. First he was on the grassy knoll. Then the
storm drain. Now it's the south knoll parking lot. I can't wait to see
where he puts him next month. Maybe a hot dog stand at the corner of
Houston and Elm.
WRONG! As any amateur detective (which you are not)
And you are? <chuckle>
Post by mainframetech
might do, I look for the scenario that makes the most sense.
You keep rejecting the scenario that makes the most sense. The one that is
the most straight forward explanation of the evidence and doesn't require
one to believe so much of the evidence was tampered with.
Post by mainframetech
The more recent information
that showed how the bullet striking the front of the head and throat was
the best fit made sense.
Some klutz creating a website and showing theoretical bullet trajectories
with no evidence to support it is not evidence, especially when those
trajectories are absurd.
LOL! Now the person is a "klutz"! All these people that disagree
with you are all these terrible names you keep calling them. Maybe in
hopes that your insults will make it so they won't be believed! In
actuality, the guy has a great deal of support if you knew anything about
the case and didn't just sit back and potshot everything.
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
A person would be a fool to lock in to a
particular scenario when a better more sensible one presented itself.
That is more the problem of the WCR lovers.
That's like saying a person would be a fool to believe that 2 + 2 = 4 when
there is a website that tells us 2 + 2 = 5.8934.
No, now you're bringing the WCR into the argument, which means you
lost right away.
But the WCR is useful because it tells you what they covered up and what
they lied about. Once you know that they lied the opposite must be the
TRUTH.
Post by mainframetech
Post by bigdog
Post by mainframetech
For those that don't know what we're talking about, here's the
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/
I hope the other members of this newsgroup get as big a chuckle out of
this as I did.
Nope, that won't get you anywhere. It's really akin to sour grapes!
Chris
bigdog
2018-07-03 17:00:52 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
EUREKA!!! I finally figured it out. The sniper behind the fence on the GK
was camouflaged as a parked car.
Anthony Marsh
2018-07-04 01:42:07 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by bigdog
EUREKA!!! I finally figured it out. The sniper behind the fence on the GK
was camouflaged as a parked car.
Don't you remember the Classic Shooter controversy?
Loading...