Discussion:
JFK A LOCKED ROOM MYSTERY
(too old to reply)
BOZ
2018-05-27 18:37:20 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh22/pdf/WH22_CE_1381.pdf

SINCE NO STRANGER ENTERED THE BUILDING WE MUST CONCLUDE THAT THE SHOOTER
ON THE 6TH FLOOR WAS A TSBD EMPLOYEE. DANNY ARCE SAW A STRANGER ENTER AND
LEAVE BEFORE 12 PM, SO WE KNOW BEYOND ALL DOUBT THAT THE SHOOTER WAS A
TSBD EMPLOYEE.

WE KNOW FOR A FACT THAT GEORGE D WAS NOT IN THE USA ON NOVEMBER 22 1963
AND WE KNOW THAT NO STRANGER ENTERED THE PAINE GARAGE THE NIGHT BEFORE.

WE ALSO KNOW THAT AN EMPLOYEE OF THE TSBD STOLE PAPER TO WRAP UP THE JFK
MURDER WEAPON.

THESE ARE THE FACTS OF THIS CASE.
Anthony Marsh
2018-05-28 14:24:32 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by BOZ
https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh22/pdf/WH22_CE_1381.pdf
SINCE NO STRANGER ENTERED THE BUILDING WE MUST CONCLUDE THAT THE SHOOTER
ON THE 6TH FLOOR WAS A TSBD EMPLOYEE. DANNY ARCE SAW A STRANGER ENTER AND
LEAVE BEFORE 12 PM, SO WE KNOW BEYOND ALL DOUBT THAT THE SHOOTER WAS A
TSBD EMPLOYEE.
WE KNOW FOR A FACT THAT GEORGE D WAS NOT IN THE USA ON NOVEMBER 22 1963
AND WE KNOW THAT NO STRANGER ENTERED THE PAINE GARAGE THE NIGHT BEFORE.
WE ALSO KNOW THAT AN EMPLOYEE OF THE TSBD STOLE PAPER TO WRAP UP THE JFK
MURDER WEAPON.
THESE ARE THE FACTS OF THIS CASE.
No. You don't know ANY facts, All you do is make assumptions.
BOZ
2018-05-29 00:46:21 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by BOZ
https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh22/pdf/WH22_CE_1381.pdf
SINCE NO STRANGER ENTERED THE BUILDING WE MUST CONCLUDE THAT THE SHOOTER
ON THE 6TH FLOOR WAS A TSBD EMPLOYEE. DANNY ARCE SAW A STRANGER ENTER AND
LEAVE BEFORE 12 PM, SO WE KNOW BEYOND ALL DOUBT THAT THE SHOOTER WAS A
TSBD EMPLOYEE.
WE KNOW FOR A FACT THAT GEORGE D WAS NOT IN THE USA ON NOVEMBER 22 1963
AND WE KNOW THAT NO STRANGER ENTERED THE PAINE GARAGE THE NIGHT BEFORE.
WE ALSO KNOW THAT AN EMPLOYEE OF THE TSBD STOLE PAPER TO WRAP UP THE JFK
MURDER WEAPON.
THESE ARE THE FACTS OF THIS CASE.
No. You don't know ANY facts, All you do is make assumptions.
NO NO. AN ASSUMPTION IS ASSUMING THERE WAS MORE THAN ONE ASSASSIN IN
DEALEY PLAZA. MARSH ARE YOU STILL BLAMING THE ROGUE CIA FOR THE MUTINY ON
THE BOUNTY?
Anthony Marsh
2018-05-30 02:40:02 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by BOZ
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by BOZ
https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh22/pdf/WH22_CE_1381.pdf
SINCE NO STRANGER ENTERED THE BUILDING WE MUST CONCLUDE THAT THE SHOOTER
ON THE 6TH FLOOR WAS A TSBD EMPLOYEE. DANNY ARCE SAW A STRANGER ENTER AND
LEAVE BEFORE 12 PM, SO WE KNOW BEYOND ALL DOUBT THAT THE SHOOTER WAS A
TSBD EMPLOYEE.
WE KNOW FOR A FACT THAT GEORGE D WAS NOT IN THE USA ON NOVEMBER 22 1963
AND WE KNOW THAT NO STRANGER ENTERED THE PAINE GARAGE THE NIGHT BEFORE.
WE ALSO KNOW THAT AN EMPLOYEE OF THE TSBD STOLE PAPER TO WRAP UP THE JFK
MURDER WEAPON.
THESE ARE THE FACTS OF THIS CASE.
No. You don't know ANY facts, All you do is make assumptions.
NO NO. AN ASSUMPTION IS ASSUMING THERE WAS MORE THAN ONE ASSASSIN IN
DEALEY PLAZA. MARSH ARE YOU STILL BLAMING THE ROGUE CIA FOR THE MUTINY ON
THE BOUNTY?
You mean for the horrible remake? Yes.
BOZ
2018-05-31 02:54:12 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by BOZ
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by BOZ
https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh22/pdf/WH22_CE_1381.pdf
SINCE NO STRANGER ENTERED THE BUILDING WE MUST CONCLUDE THAT THE SHOOTER
ON THE 6TH FLOOR WAS A TSBD EMPLOYEE. DANNY ARCE SAW A STRANGER ENTER AND
LEAVE BEFORE 12 PM, SO WE KNOW BEYOND ALL DOUBT THAT THE SHOOTER WAS A
TSBD EMPLOYEE.
WE KNOW FOR A FACT THAT GEORGE D WAS NOT IN THE USA ON NOVEMBER 22 1963
AND WE KNOW THAT NO STRANGER ENTERED THE PAINE GARAGE THE NIGHT BEFORE.
WE ALSO KNOW THAT AN EMPLOYEE OF THE TSBD STOLE PAPER TO WRAP UP THE JFK
MURDER WEAPON.
THESE ARE THE FACTS OF THIS CASE.
No. You don't know ANY facts, All you do is make assumptions.
NO NO. AN ASSUMPTION IS ASSUMING THERE WAS MORE THAN ONE ASSASSIN IN
DEALEY PLAZA. MARSH ARE YOU STILL BLAMING THE ROGUE CIA FOR THE MUTINY ON
THE BOUNTY?
You mean for the horrible remake? Yes.
ANTHONY HOPKINS WAS THE GREATEST WILLIAM BLIGH OF ALL TIME. THE BRANDO
REMAKE WAS NOT SO GOOD.
Anthony Marsh
2018-06-01 13:55:36 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by BOZ
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by BOZ
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by BOZ
https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh22/pdf/WH22_CE_1381.pdf
SINCE NO STRANGER ENTERED THE BUILDING WE MUST CONCLUDE THAT THE SHOOTER
ON THE 6TH FLOOR WAS A TSBD EMPLOYEE. DANNY ARCE SAW A STRANGER ENTER AND
LEAVE BEFORE 12 PM, SO WE KNOW BEYOND ALL DOUBT THAT THE SHOOTER WAS A
TSBD EMPLOYEE.
WE KNOW FOR A FACT THAT GEORGE D WAS NOT IN THE USA ON NOVEMBER 22 1963
AND WE KNOW THAT NO STRANGER ENTERED THE PAINE GARAGE THE NIGHT BEFORE.
WE ALSO KNOW THAT AN EMPLOYEE OF THE TSBD STOLE PAPER TO WRAP UP THE JFK
MURDER WEAPON.
THESE ARE THE FACTS OF THIS CASE.
No. You don't know ANY facts, All you do is make assumptions.
NO NO. AN ASSUMPTION IS ASSUMING THERE WAS MORE THAN ONE ASSASSIN IN
DEALEY PLAZA. MARSH ARE YOU STILL BLAMING THE ROGUE CIA FOR THE MUTINY ON
THE BOUNTY?
You mean for the horrible remake? Yes.
ANTHONY HOPKINS WAS THE GREATEST WILLIAM BLIGH OF ALL TIME. THE BRANDO
REMAKE WAS NOT SO GOOD.
Agreed, but why Mel Gibson?
I hate when the make horrible movies just to feature the star of the week.
BOZ
2018-06-02 17:21:52 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by BOZ
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by BOZ
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by BOZ
https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh22/pdf/WH22_CE_1381.pdf
SINCE NO STRANGER ENTERED THE BUILDING WE MUST CONCLUDE THAT THE SHOOTER
ON THE 6TH FLOOR WAS A TSBD EMPLOYEE. DANNY ARCE SAW A STRANGER ENTER AND
LEAVE BEFORE 12 PM, SO WE KNOW BEYOND ALL DOUBT THAT THE SHOOTER WAS A
TSBD EMPLOYEE.
WE KNOW FOR A FACT THAT GEORGE D WAS NOT IN THE USA ON NOVEMBER 22 1963
AND WE KNOW THAT NO STRANGER ENTERED THE PAINE GARAGE THE NIGHT BEFORE.
WE ALSO KNOW THAT AN EMPLOYEE OF THE TSBD STOLE PAPER TO WRAP UP THE JFK
MURDER WEAPON.
THESE ARE THE FACTS OF THIS CASE.
No. You don't know ANY facts, All you do is make assumptions.
NO NO. AN ASSUMPTION IS ASSUMING THERE WAS MORE THAN ONE ASSASSIN IN
DEALEY PLAZA. MARSH ARE YOU STILL BLAMING THE ROGUE CIA FOR THE MUTINY ON
THE BOUNTY?
You mean for the horrible remake? Yes.
ANTHONY HOPKINS WAS THE GREATEST WILLIAM BLIGH OF ALL TIME. THE BRANDO
REMAKE WAS NOT SO GOOD.
Agreed, but why Mel Gibson?
I hate when the make horrible movies just to feature the star of the week.
MEL GIBSON BECAME A STAR AS A RESULT OF THE FIRST TWO MAD MAX FILMS. I
WOULD HAVE CAST DANIEL DAY LEWIS AS FLETCHER CHRISTIAN.
Steve BH
2018-06-05 22:17:37 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by BOZ
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by BOZ
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by BOZ
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by BOZ
https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh22/pdf/WH22_CE_1381.pdf
SINCE NO STRANGER ENTERED THE BUILDING WE MUST CONCLUDE THAT THE SHOOTER
ON THE 6TH FLOOR WAS A TSBD EMPLOYEE. DANNY ARCE SAW A STRANGER ENTER AND
LEAVE BEFORE 12 PM, SO WE KNOW BEYOND ALL DOUBT THAT THE SHOOTER WAS A
TSBD EMPLOYEE.
WE KNOW FOR A FACT THAT GEORGE D WAS NOT IN THE USA ON NOVEMBER 22 1963
AND WE KNOW THAT NO STRANGER ENTERED THE PAINE GARAGE THE NIGHT BEFORE.
WE ALSO KNOW THAT AN EMPLOYEE OF THE TSBD STOLE PAPER TO WRAP UP THE JFK
MURDER WEAPON.
THESE ARE THE FACTS OF THIS CASE.
No. You don't know ANY facts, All you do is make assumptions.
NO NO. AN ASSUMPTION IS ASSUMING THERE WAS MORE THAN ONE ASSASSIN IN
DEALEY PLAZA. MARSH ARE YOU STILL BLAMING THE ROGUE CIA FOR THE MUTINY ON
THE BOUNTY?
You mean for the horrible remake? Yes.
ANTHONY HOPKINS WAS THE GREATEST WILLIAM BLIGH OF ALL TIME. THE BRANDO
REMAKE WAS NOT SO GOOD.
Agreed, but why Mel Gibson?
I hate when the make horrible movies just to feature the star of the week.
MEL GIBSON BECAME A STAR AS A RESULT OF THE FIRST TWO MAD MAX FILMS. I
WOULD HAVE CAST DANIEL DAY LEWIS AS FLETCHER CHRISTIAN.
Charlie Sheen. Maybe the present Johnny Depp. Christian was that kind of
guy.
mainframetech
2018-05-31 03:01:20 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by BOZ
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by BOZ
https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh22/pdf/WH22_CE_1381.pdf
SINCE NO STRANGER ENTERED THE BUILDING WE MUST CONCLUDE THAT THE SHOOTER
ON THE 6TH FLOOR WAS A TSBD EMPLOYEE. DANNY ARCE SAW A STRANGER ENTER AND
LEAVE BEFORE 12 PM, SO WE KNOW BEYOND ALL DOUBT THAT THE SHOOTER WAS A
TSBD EMPLOYEE.
WE KNOW FOR A FACT THAT GEORGE D WAS NOT IN THE USA ON NOVEMBER 22 1963
AND WE KNOW THAT NO STRANGER ENTERED THE PAINE GARAGE THE NIGHT BEFORE.
WE ALSO KNOW THAT AN EMPLOYEE OF THE TSBD STOLE PAPER TO WRAP UP THE JFK
MURDER WEAPON.
THESE ARE THE FACTS OF THIS CASE.
No. You don't know ANY facts, All you do is make assumptions.
NO NO. AN ASSUMPTION IS ASSUMING THERE WAS MORE THAN ONE ASSASSIN IN
DEALEY PLAZA. MARSH ARE YOU STILL BLAMING THE ROGUE CIA FOR THE MUTINY ON
THE BOUNTY?
Try counting the bullet strikes in Dealey Plaza and see how many
shooters that suggests.

Chris
Anthony Marsh
2018-06-01 13:55:03 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by mainframetech
Post by BOZ
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by BOZ
https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh22/pdf/WH22_CE_1381.pdf
SINCE NO STRANGER ENTERED THE BUILDING WE MUST CONCLUDE THAT THE SHOOTER
ON THE 6TH FLOOR WAS A TSBD EMPLOYEE. DANNY ARCE SAW A STRANGER ENTER AND
LEAVE BEFORE 12 PM, SO WE KNOW BEYOND ALL DOUBT THAT THE SHOOTER WAS A
TSBD EMPLOYEE.
WE KNOW FOR A FACT THAT GEORGE D WAS NOT IN THE USA ON NOVEMBER 22 1963
AND WE KNOW THAT NO STRANGER ENTERED THE PAINE GARAGE THE NIGHT BEFORE.
WE ALSO KNOW THAT AN EMPLOYEE OF THE TSBD STOLE PAPER TO WRAP UP THE JFK
MURDER WEAPON.
THESE ARE THE FACTS OF THIS CASE.
No. You don't know ANY facts, All you do is make assumptions.
NO NO. AN ASSUMPTION IS ASSUMING THERE WAS MORE THAN ONE ASSASSIN IN
DEALEY PLAZA. MARSH ARE YOU STILL BLAMING THE ROGUE CIA FOR THE MUTINY ON
THE BOUNTY?
Try counting the bullet strikes in Dealey Plaza and see how many
shooters that suggests.
And you're not going to count the wounds?
And then you overlook the strikes I pointed out?
You're trimming the evidence to fit YOUR pet theory.
Post by mainframetech
Chris
bigdog
2018-06-03 18:39:55 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by mainframetech
Post by BOZ
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by BOZ
https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh22/pdf/WH22_CE_1381.pdf
SINCE NO STRANGER ENTERED THE BUILDING WE MUST CONCLUDE THAT THE SHOOTER
ON THE 6TH FLOOR WAS A TSBD EMPLOYEE. DANNY ARCE SAW A STRANGER ENTER AND
LEAVE BEFORE 12 PM, SO WE KNOW BEYOND ALL DOUBT THAT THE SHOOTER WAS A
TSBD EMPLOYEE.
WE KNOW FOR A FACT THAT GEORGE D WAS NOT IN THE USA ON NOVEMBER 22 1963
AND WE KNOW THAT NO STRANGER ENTERED THE PAINE GARAGE THE NIGHT BEFORE.
WE ALSO KNOW THAT AN EMPLOYEE OF THE TSBD STOLE PAPER TO WRAP UP THE JFK
MURDER WEAPON.
THESE ARE THE FACTS OF THIS CASE.
No. You don't know ANY facts, All you do is make assumptions.
NO NO. AN ASSUMPTION IS ASSUMING THERE WAS MORE THAN ONE ASSASSIN IN
DEALEY PLAZA. MARSH ARE YOU STILL BLAMING THE ROGUE CIA FOR THE MUTINY ON
THE BOUNTY?
Try counting the bullet strikes in Dealey Plaza and see how many
shooters that suggests.
ONE
Anthony Marsh
2018-06-04 19:29:20 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by mainframetech
Post by BOZ
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by BOZ
https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh22/pdf/WH22_CE_1381.pdf
SINCE NO STRANGER ENTERED THE BUILDING WE MUST CONCLUDE THAT THE SHOOTER
ON THE 6TH FLOOR WAS A TSBD EMPLOYEE. DANNY ARCE SAW A STRANGER ENTER AND
LEAVE BEFORE 12 PM, SO WE KNOW BEYOND ALL DOUBT THAT THE SHOOTER WAS A
TSBD EMPLOYEE.
WE KNOW FOR A FACT THAT GEORGE D WAS NOT IN THE USA ON NOVEMBER 22 1963
AND WE KNOW THAT NO STRANGER ENTERED THE PAINE GARAGE THE NIGHT BEFORE.
WE ALSO KNOW THAT AN EMPLOYEE OF THE TSBD STOLE PAPER TO WRAP UP THE JFK
MURDER WEAPON.
THESE ARE THE FACTS OF THIS CASE.
No. You don't know ANY facts, All you do is make assumptions.
NO NO. AN ASSUMPTION IS ASSUMING THERE WAS MORE THAN ONE ASSASSIN IN
DEALEY PLAZA. MARSH ARE YOU STILL BLAMING THE ROGUE CIA FOR THE MUTINY ON
THE BOUNTY?
Try counting the bullet strikes in Dealey Plaza and see how many
shooters that suggests.
ONE
Try diagramming your bullet paths to cause all the damage to the
limousine. You TALK big, but you can't back it up.
Jason Burke
2018-06-04 23:49:16 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by BOZ
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by BOZ
https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh22/pdf/WH22_CE_1381.pdf
SINCE NO STRANGER ENTERED THE BUILDING WE MUST CONCLUDE THAT THE SHOOTER
ON THE 6TH FLOOR WAS A TSBD EMPLOYEE. DANNY ARCE SAW A STRANGER ENTER AND
LEAVE BEFORE 12 PM, SO WE KNOW BEYOND ALL DOUBT THAT THE SHOOTER WAS A
TSBD EMPLOYEE.
WE KNOW FOR A FACT THAT GEORGE D WAS NOT IN THE USA ON NOVEMBER 22 1963
AND WE KNOW THAT NO STRANGER ENTERED THE PAINE GARAGE THE NIGHT BEFORE.
WE ALSO KNOW THAT AN EMPLOYEE OF THE TSBD STOLE PAPER TO WRAP UP THE JFK
MURDER WEAPON.
THESE ARE THE FACTS OF THIS CASE.
No. You don't know ANY facts, All you do is make assumptions.
NO NO. AN ASSUMPTION IS ASSUMING THERE WAS MORE THAN ONE ASSASSIN IN
DEALEY PLAZA. MARSH ARE YOU STILL BLAMING THE ROGUE CIA FOR THE MUTINY ON
THE BOUNTY?
     Try counting the bullet strikes in Dealey Plaza and see how many
shooters that suggests.
ONE
Try diagramming your bullet paths to cause all the damage to the
limousine. You TALK big, but you can't back it up.
I don't think that's BDs job.
bigdog
2018-06-06 01:06:17 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Jason Burke
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by BOZ
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by BOZ
https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh22/pdf/WH22_CE_1381.pdf
SINCE NO STRANGER ENTERED THE BUILDING WE MUST CONCLUDE THAT THE SHOOTER
ON THE 6TH FLOOR WAS A TSBD EMPLOYEE. DANNY ARCE SAW A STRANGER ENTER AND
LEAVE BEFORE 12 PM, SO WE KNOW BEYOND ALL DOUBT THAT THE SHOOTER WAS A
TSBD EMPLOYEE.
WE KNOW FOR A FACT THAT GEORGE D WAS NOT IN THE USA ON NOVEMBER 22 1963
AND WE KNOW THAT NO STRANGER ENTERED THE PAINE GARAGE THE NIGHT BEFORE.
WE ALSO KNOW THAT AN EMPLOYEE OF THE TSBD STOLE PAPER TO WRAP UP THE JFK
MURDER WEAPON.
THESE ARE THE FACTS OF THIS CASE.
No. You don't know ANY facts, All you do is make assumptions.
NO NO. AN ASSUMPTION IS ASSUMING THERE WAS MORE THAN ONE ASSASSIN IN
DEALEY PLAZA. MARSH ARE YOU STILL BLAMING THE ROGUE CIA FOR THE MUTINY ON
THE BOUNTY?
     Try counting the bullet strikes in Dealey Plaza and see how many
shooters that suggests.
ONE
Try diagramming your bullet paths to cause all the damage to the
limousine. You TALK big, but you can't back it up.
I don't think that's BDs job.
Even if it was, it would be a waste of time showing it to Marsh.
Anthony Marsh
2018-06-07 13:43:43 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by bigdog
Post by Jason Burke
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by BOZ
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by BOZ
https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh22/pdf/WH22_CE_1381.pdf
SINCE NO STRANGER ENTERED THE BUILDING WE MUST CONCLUDE THAT THE SHOOTER
ON THE 6TH FLOOR WAS A TSBD EMPLOYEE. DANNY ARCE SAW A STRANGER ENTER AND
LEAVE BEFORE 12 PM, SO WE KNOW BEYOND ALL DOUBT THAT THE SHOOTER WAS A
TSBD EMPLOYEE.
WE KNOW FOR A FACT THAT GEORGE D WAS NOT IN THE USA ON NOVEMBER 22 1963
AND WE KNOW THAT NO STRANGER ENTERED THE PAINE GARAGE THE NIGHT BEFORE.
WE ALSO KNOW THAT AN EMPLOYEE OF THE TSBD STOLE PAPER TO WRAP UP THE JFK
MURDER WEAPON.
THESE ARE THE FACTS OF THIS CASE.
No. You don't know ANY facts, All you do is make assumptions.
NO NO. AN ASSUMPTION IS ASSUMING THERE WAS MORE THAN ONE ASSASSIN IN
DEALEY PLAZA. MARSH ARE YOU STILL BLAMING THE ROGUE CIA FOR THE MUTINY ON
THE BOUNTY?
     Try counting the bullet strikes in Dealey Plaza and see how many
shooters that suggests.
ONE
Try diagramming your bullet paths to cause all the damage to the
limousine. You TALK big, but you can't back it up.
I don't think that's BDs job.
Even if it was, it would be a waste of time showing it to Marsh.
I knew you'd chicken out. You talk big, but you can never back it up.
OHLeeRedux
2018-06-08 21:43:38 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by bigdog
Post by Jason Burke
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by BOZ
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by BOZ
https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh22/pdf/WH22_CE_1381.pdf
SINCE NO STRANGER ENTERED THE BUILDING WE MUST CONCLUDE THAT THE SHOOTER
ON THE 6TH FLOOR WAS A TSBD EMPLOYEE. DANNY ARCE SAW A STRANGER ENTER AND
LEAVE BEFORE 12 PM, SO WE KNOW BEYOND ALL DOUBT THAT THE SHOOTER WAS A
TSBD EMPLOYEE.
WE KNOW FOR A FACT THAT GEORGE D WAS NOT IN THE USA ON NOVEMBER 22 1963
AND WE KNOW THAT NO STRANGER ENTERED THE PAINE GARAGE THE NIGHT BEFORE.
WE ALSO KNOW THAT AN EMPLOYEE OF THE TSBD STOLE PAPER TO WRAP UP THE JFK
MURDER WEAPON.
THESE ARE THE FACTS OF THIS CASE.
No. You don't know ANY facts, All you do is make assumptions.
NO NO. AN ASSUMPTION IS ASSUMING THERE WAS MORE THAN ONE ASSASSIN IN
DEALEY PLAZA. MARSH ARE YOU STILL BLAMING THE ROGUE CIA FOR THE MUTINY ON
THE BOUNTY?
     Try counting the bullet strikes in Dealey Plaza and see how many
shooters that suggests.
ONE
Try diagramming your bullet paths to cause all the damage to the
limousine. You TALK big, but you can't back it up.
I don't think that's BDs job.
Even if it was, it would be a waste of time showing it to Marsh.
I knew you'd chicken out. You talk big, but you can never back it up.
Oh for Christ's sake. I haven't heard that talk since I was in the fifth
grade -- and it was a third grader who said it.

This is the mentality we're dealing with here, folks.
bigdog
2018-06-10 17:53:53 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by OHLeeRedux
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by bigdog
Post by Jason Burke
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by BOZ
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by BOZ
https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh22/pdf/WH22_CE_1381.pdf
SINCE NO STRANGER ENTERED THE BUILDING WE MUST CONCLUDE THAT THE
SHOOTER
ON THE 6TH FLOOR WAS A TSBD EMPLOYEE. DANNY ARCE SAW A STRANGER
ENTER AND
LEAVE BEFORE 12 PM, SO WE KNOW BEYOND ALL DOUBT THAT THE SHOOTER
WAS A
TSBD EMPLOYEE.
WE KNOW FOR A FACT THAT GEORGE D WAS NOT IN THE USA ON NOVEMBER 22
1963
AND WE KNOW THAT NO STRANGER ENTERED THE PAINE GARAGE THE NIGHT
BEFORE.
WE ALSO KNOW THAT AN EMPLOYEE OF THE TSBD STOLE PAPER TO WRAP UP
THE JFK
MURDER WEAPON.
THESE ARE THE FACTS OF THIS CASE.
No. You don't know ANY facts, All you do is make assumptions.
NO NO. AN ASSUMPTION IS ASSUMING THERE WAS MORE THAN ONE ASSASSIN IN
DEALEY PLAZA. MARSH ARE YOU STILL BLAMING THE ROGUE CIA FOR THE MUTINY ON
THE BOUNTY?
     Try counting the bullet strikes in Dealey Plaza and see how many
shooters that suggests.
ONE
Try diagramming your bullet paths to cause all the damage to the
limousine. You TALK big, but you can't back it up.
I don't think that's BDs job.
Even if it was, it would be a waste of time showing it to Marsh.
I knew you'd chicken out. You talk big, but you can never back it up.
Oh for Christ's sake. I haven't heard that talk since I was in the fifth
grade -- and it was a third grader who said it.
This is the mentality we're dealing with here, folks.
This is one of the many reasons I no longer respond directly to Marsh.
It's impossible to have an intelligent dialog with him. He never seems to
respond to what you actually write but to what he imagines you have
written, probably a result of just skimming through the posts he replies
to. It's much easier for him to knockdown his own strawmen than to counter
what someone else has actually said.

OHLeeRedux
2018-05-29 20:49:13 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Anthony Marsh
Post by BOZ
https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh22/pdf/WH22_CE_1381.pdf
SINCE NO STRANGER ENTERED THE BUILDING WE MUST CONCLUDE THAT THE SHOOTER
ON THE 6TH FLOOR WAS A TSBD EMPLOYEE. DANNY ARCE SAW A STRANGER ENTER AND
LEAVE BEFORE 12 PM, SO WE KNOW BEYOND ALL DOUBT THAT THE SHOOTER WAS A
TSBD EMPLOYEE.
WE KNOW FOR A FACT THAT GEORGE D WAS NOT IN THE USA ON NOVEMBER 22 1963
AND WE KNOW THAT NO STRANGER ENTERED THE PAINE GARAGE THE NIGHT BEFORE.
WE ALSO KNOW THAT AN EMPLOYEE OF THE TSBD STOLE PAPER TO WRAP UP THE JFK
MURDER WEAPON.
THESE ARE THE FACTS OF THIS CASE.
No. You don't know ANY facts, All you do is make assumptions.
Pot, meet kettle.
mainframetech
2018-05-31 03:04:48 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by BOZ
https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh22/pdf/WH22_CE_1381.pdf
SINCE NO STRANGER ENTERED THE BUILDING WE MUST CONCLUDE THAT THE SHOOTER
ON THE 6TH FLOOR WAS A TSBD EMPLOYEE. DANNY ARCE SAW A STRANGER ENTER AND
LEAVE BEFORE 12 PM, SO WE KNOW BEYOND ALL DOUBT THAT THE SHOOTER WAS A
TSBD EMPLOYEE.
You know nothing of the kind. If no one admitted to seeing a stranger
enter the building, that does NOT mean that no stranger entered the
building. Simple logic tells you that.
Post by BOZ
WE KNOW FOR A FACT THAT GEORGE D WAS NOT IN THE USA ON NOVEMBER 22 1963
AND WE KNOW THAT NO STRANGER ENTERED THE PAINE GARAGE THE NIGHT BEFORE.
So what? His MC rifle was brought in by Oswald.
Post by BOZ
WE ALSO KNOW THAT AN EMPLOYEE OF THE TSBD STOLE PAPER TO WRAP UP THE JFK
MURDER WEAPON.
Actually, as with the stranger entering, you really DON'T know if a
stranger stole paper to wrap a rifle in. But the sake of argument, I'm
willing to accept that Oswald stole the paper to get the rifle into the
TSBD. You still haven't put the gun in the hands of LHO and put him in
the window firing at the motorcade.
Post by BOZ
THESE ARE THE FACTS OF THIS CASE.
Not really.

Chris
Anthony Marsh
2018-06-01 13:54:48 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by mainframetech
Post by BOZ
https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh22/pdf/WH22_CE_1381.pdf
SINCE NO STRANGER ENTERED THE BUILDING WE MUST CONCLUDE THAT THE SHOOTER
ON THE 6TH FLOOR WAS A TSBD EMPLOYEE. DANNY ARCE SAW A STRANGER ENTER AND
LEAVE BEFORE 12 PM, SO WE KNOW BEYOND ALL DOUBT THAT THE SHOOTER WAS A
TSBD EMPLOYEE.
You know nothing of the kind. If no one admitted to seeing a stranger
enter the building, that does NOT mean that no stranger entered the
building. Simple logic tells you that.
Post by BOZ
WE KNOW FOR A FACT THAT GEORGE D WAS NOT IN THE USA ON NOVEMBER 22 1963
AND WE KNOW THAT NO STRANGER ENTERED THE PAINE GARAGE THE NIGHT BEFORE.
So what? His MC rifle was brought in by Oswald.
Just because he gave money to Lee does not make it HIS rifle.
Post by mainframetech
Post by BOZ
WE ALSO KNOW THAT AN EMPLOYEE OF THE TSBD STOLE PAPER TO WRAP UP THE JFK
MURDER WEAPON.
Actually, as with the stranger entering, you really DON'T know if a
stranger stole paper to wrap a rifle in. But the sake of argument, I'm
willing to accept that Oswald stole the paper to get the rifle into the
TSBD. You still haven't put the gun in the hands of LHO and put him in
the window firing at the motorcade.
Stop stipulating to their lies.
Post by mainframetech
Post by BOZ
THESE ARE THE FACTS OF THIS CASE.
Not really.
Chris
Loading...