I provide evidence: Jack Ruby. Jack Ruby said that he saw Pierce driving
out when he was there, and since I have established that Jack Ruby was
there earlier, then it follows from that that Pierce must have been there
earlier. That's Logic, something that you know little or nothing about.
And who says that the reason Pierce drove out at 10:15 was anything other
than baiting Ruby? I'm not saying that Pierce was actually going anywhere.
It was all about snaring Jack Ruby and providing a pretext for him getting
in. So, that's the reason he drove out at 10:15 (approximately): to bait
Ruby. No other reason; just that.
And what you call his "reason" for driving out at 11:15, it was really
just his false alibi for driving out then. Provide a police escort car to
the county jail? There was the Brinks truck which, reportedly, was going
to be driven empty. Then, Oswald was going to be in Fritz' car with
Dhority driving and carrying Leavelle and Graves and Oswald. And you're
saying that Pierce had to drive around to get in position? Well, the
Brinks truck was backed up into the Commerce Street ramp, so obviously it
was going to pull out that way, on Commerce. And Dhority was pulling in
with Fritz' car right when the shooting happened, and it was heading
towards Main Street. But, presumably, after Oswald and the others got in,
it was going to be turned around to follow the Brinks truck. That was the
plan, right? It wasn't going to drive out Main Street, was it? So, why
couldn't Pierce go out the same way? It's just a phony alibi. You have a
tendency to swallow bull chit whole.
You are practicing insanity, Sparta. That's because the photographic
evidence clearly and definitively shows that the Garage Shooter was NOT
Jack Ruby. And yet, you continue to say that he was in defiance of that
photographic evidence. And that is plucking insane.