Post by Ralph Cinque
I told you, Haydon, I mean Sparta, the cops were all in on it. Just today,
I listened to Elmer Boyd's interview in which he said he was eating lunch
at his mother-in-law's house that Sunday morning, and he watched it on
television, and he instantly recognized Jack Ruby. Instantly! THAT IS
IMPOSSIBLE BECAUSE YOU NEVER SEE THE MAN'S FACE! All he saw was exactly
what we saw, and you know how poor the footage is. So, he's sitting back
eating a steak at his mother-in-law's table, and he sees the NBC footage
(that's the only live one) and there is no way anyone can claim there is
enough exposure of the shooter to identify him as Jack Ruby. Watch it
yourself, and you'll realize how preposterous it is to claim that Ruby can
Based on what? And you're wrong about the reporters. Hugh Aynesworth knew
Jack Ruby and interacted with him 3x that weekend, yet he didn't recognize
him and didn't find out that he was Ruby until the police announced it
later. Then the other was Ike Pappas who also interacted with Ruby that
weekend and took a business card from him, and he didn't realize he was
Ruby until he was told so by Police. And Pappas seemed to have a good
vantage point. Just look at the Beers photo.
So, it was just the lying cops who said they recognized Ruby in the
garage; no one else. And Boyd claimed to do it from his mother-in-law's
table, no less.
And they were very careful not to let the face of the shooter be exposed.
Why don't you reverse that question and ask yourself why, when there were
cameras pointed at him from multiple directions, that none captured his
face? Just worked out that way, eh? The reason why the shooter (Bookhout)
dove into the waiting arms of the cops is because they were his screen.
They were his blanket. They were NEVER fighting. "Ruby", as people
mistakenly call him, never did anything aggressive. Show me the frame in
which he is punching, kicking, flailing, spitting or doing anything
combative. He never resisted. There was NO REASON why that "fight" should
not have come to an end in that garage. The idea that it dragged on into
the jail office is absolutely preposterous. You hear me, Haydon? I mean
Yes, I have a photo of the back of James Bookhout's neck which compares
favorably with that of the Garage Shooter, unlike Jack Ruby. Click on the
link at the bottom.
And Shoter is a typo. I was typing fast, and the second o just didn't
land. What you did is mistake two completely different words: "brakes" and
"breaks". And I had never seen it before.
Now, you are completely losing it. There is no evidence that Pierce used
siren and flashing lights to run any lights to get to the front of the
building, and he never claimed that he did that. So, how dare you proffer
And the delays you mentioned had the opposite effect. They delayed the
transfer, and if Pierce didn't know about them, then he would have
expected Oswald to appear even earlier, so he should have left even
earlier. You're just making excuses, and they're not even good ones.
The people on Commerce Street were gathered to watch Oswald being driven
away. They knew that he would be coming out there. But the Main Street
ramp was incoming. So, who were they waiting to see driving in? Now, if
you can't understand that difference, Haydon, I mean Sparta, I can't dumb
it down any more.
Ruby knew that Pierce left the garage 1 minute before HIS EVENT, a separate
Jack Ruby was not at the televised garage shooting.
Jack Ruby was not at the televised garage shooting.
Jack Ruby was not at the televised garage shooting.
He was sequestered up on the 5th floor already at the time of the televised
The WU paperwork is bogus, and they made the mistake of time-stamping the
receipt before they time-stamped the money transfer. Again, like getting
the cart before the horse.
Jack Ruby had no memory of shooting Oswald. All he remembered was going
down to the ramp, reaching the bottom, and then being pounced upon by
police. He said that all the rest was a "blur." And the fact is: it was
even so much as a blur. He had no memory of shooting Oswald, period. And
why don't you think about what his lawyer plead: that he had psychomotor
epilepsy and went through the action of shooting Oswald unconsciously,
like he was sleepwalking. It's ridiculous, but why would he claim such a
thing? It was because Ruby must have told him that he had absolutely no
memory of doing it.
I have already delineated the things in the Jackson photo that are false,
impossibly false, and it's more scientific than anything you have ever
done in your life. And nobody has ever addressed these findings with any
explanations or excuses whatsoever I'll give you an example: Oswald's left
hand slapped to his chest is un-anatomical, meaning that it is not
consistent in form with a human hand. It is also much too big to be
Oswald's hand. We have images of his hands, and they weren't that big. In
the Jackson photo, Oswald's hand is a monstrosity.
Now, let's see you find an Anatomist who disagrees with that. I dare you,
and I dare him.
Please? When have I ever said please to anybody on this forum? You've got
some nerve depicting me that way, Haydon. I mean Sparta.
I had to Google Haydon and Uppercut to see just exactly who you were
accusing me of being, and I'm still not sure just who Haydon is.
So, in the 50+ years since the events took place, not a single Dallas
Police officer or detective has ever stepped forward and said that Oswald
was shot by FBI Agent James Bookhout, and that the whole Ruby shot Oswald
was a ruse. This would include the 20-25 reserve Dallas police officers
that were in and around city hall the entire morning that Oswald was
killed. Not a single person has come forward.
In the 50+ years since the events took place, not a single member of the
dozens of reporters that were in the basement that morning has ever come
forward and said that Ruby was not the man that shot Oswald. This despite
Ruby having briefly stood amongst them prior to the shooting. Not a single
member of the press, even those that were non-US citizens. And, OBTW, CBS
reporter Ike Pappas got down into the garage about 15 seconds prior to the
shooting. He was there even less than Ruby himself, so it's not surprising
if he didn't realize or recognize Ruby in the flash that Ruby darted out
and shot Oswald. Do you have any idea how many different people Ike Pappas
had met on that weekend?
The reason none of the cameras got a good image of Ruby was because they
were all positioned to get photos of Oswald being led to the car. When
Ruby darted out, his back was to all of the still photographers because
they were interested in getting photos of Oswald.
You continually state the DPD in attendance that morning were lying, yet
all of the corroborating evidence support their telling the truth. Case in
point, your jumping to the conclusion that Detective Dhority lied to the
WC when he said he was "backing" the car into place when the shooting took
place. As has been proven on this site, Dhority was telling the truth, and
your accusation that the car was moving forward has proven to be far from
the truth. So, who's really lying? It's you. And, once your lie is exposed
you try and cover it up by deleting posts on this site and entries on your
You still have not given an explanation as to how Ruby could have known,
minutes after the shooting took place, that Pierce had exited the garage
one minute before the shooting. DPD Sgt. Patrick Dean, who knew Ruby,
testified that Ruby told him that he entered the garage shortly before he
shot Oswald from the Main Street ramp when the officer guarding the
entrance was distracted by Lieutenant Pierce's departure through that
entrance. You've failed to provide a single piece of evidence that Pierce
left any earlier than 11:20 and that Ruby entered any earlier than that.
Not a single piece of evidence.
You've failed to provide a single piece of evidence that proves or
indicates the Western Union receipt found on Ruby's possession was forged.
Phone records showed that Karen Carlin made the call to Ruby requesting
the money order around 10:00 to 10:15 that morning, to his apartment in
Oak Cliff, and he told her it would take awhile to get dressed and drive
downtown. This was the time frame that you say that Ruby was already
downtown, or heading in that direction. He couldn't have been driving
downtown, or already at city hall and also be talking to Carlin on the
phone from his apartment. The 11:17 time stamp corroborates not only
Ruby's testimony as to when he entered the garage, but also the testimony
and phone records of Carlin.
I don't for a minute believe that Ruby had no recollection of shooting
Oswald. The whole epileptic seizure story was merely a legal ploy made by
Melvin Belli to try and get his client acquitted in a first degree
homicide case. That doesn't really make Ruby a liar.
With regards to the Bob Jackson photo of Ruby shooting Oswald, you
interpretation and opinion of whether or not the image was faked is
inconsequential. You're not an expert on photographic analysis, and you've
already proven yourself to not being very adept and determining the front
end of a vehicle from the rear end when viewing video images. Nor were you
very adept and determining that an individual seen in the videotaped
footage was not actually CBS correspondent Dan Rather (it wasn't). What
really matters is what experts in photographic analysis say about Bob
Jackson't photo. I asked you to provide any studies performed by
photographic experts that have come to conclusion that any of the photos
or film taken in the garage that morning were forged, and you've failed to
provide any such proof. Your opinion on the photos doesn't really count
for anything, because 1) you're not an expert, and 2) you're opinion is
slanted by your own bias.
As for the image of what you say is the back of Agent Bookhout's neck.
There's no proof that the photo is of Bookhout at all. Are we to take your
word for it that it really is Bookhout? Based on your recently deleted
posts and blog entries this past week, I'd say your word really can't be
Bottom line; you can make all the claims you wish about Bookhout shooting
Oswald, and Ruby being in custody an hour before the shooting took place,
even without having any solid evidence or eyewitness testimony to back it
up, nor any corroboration that any of it ever took place. Go ahead and
make those outrageous claims. But please don't cry or complain when people
on this site make fun of you for it. You reap what you sew. And when you
sew crap, people are going to give you crap.